One thing that really made me take the gloves off in reply to those AMPW remarks was their calling me a Hannity. I am not referring to the Royal Prosecutor, who was comparing my criticism of double standards to Hannity, but other writers who just said I was Hannity and/or O’Reilly.
They do not consider that there is any difference between me and these pretentious dorks. They talk about the white race and both of them agree that anyone who opposes interracial marriage is, literally, a Nazi.
Anyone who reads any of my stuff, which these AMPWs clearly don’t, would know that, to me, Hannity is one of those insults which is really filthy.
I would find it funny if someone said I was an Al Franken. He is an outright enemy and makes no bones about it. But the concept of Honor runs deep in us Southerners. It causes all too many of us to be out at dawn looking down a gun barrel.
Franken is a loud-mouthed anti-white Jew. He is openly offensive.
But Hannity is something altogether different. He is a filthy little sneak, like all respectable conservatives.
My mentality on this is Southern because it is very, very Western. The predilections others despise in Southerners are seen as throwbacks, which, I say proudly, they are. To many AMPWs the only concern is that JEWS be exposed and punished.
For me, the enemy that makes my teeth grind and irrationality threaten is the anti-white WHITE. And IS a throwback. I keep pointing out that when Western values were routine, Dante reserved the worst part of Hell, the freezing part, to TRAITORS.
In addition, my compulsively honest soul shudders at being compared to what even O’Reilly refers to as “Baby Jesus.” Hannity is the psychopathic, smiling, righteous betrayer for whom an Eleventh Circle should have been invented.
What I am trying to say in my roundabout, subtle way is that I don’t LIKE Hannity.
Calling me a Hannity was a hideous and very personal insult.
#1 by Epiphany on 04/05/2012 - 6:27 am
“Liberals” only pretend to be against Islamophobia. That way, the “Neo Conservatives”– who support Israel, can pretend to give the Americans permission to hate Muslims. And, in this way, said “Neo Conservatives” can portray and depict themselves as brave rebels against Political Correctness. They are not! Neo Conservatives are only Liberals with a liking for the State of Israel.
Besides, the Feminists only wish for WHITE men to feel bad about being men. They no longer care, if they ever did, about how the Third World peoples routinely mistreat their womenfolk. If they did, they would come into conflict with the Multiculturalists. So, the poor Feminists have to stop short of that.
By doing so, they reveal themselves to be charletons and hypocrites!
#2 by BGLass on 04/05/2012 - 6:39 am
I’m of two minds.
One problem is when the pendulum swings and a major sycophant like Hannity hears he is loathed, he runs right out, trying to be a t.v. racist, (doing everything he can to enact the t.v. images that were his only personality, anyway).
Met a sellout salesman like this in the “New South.” He even looked like Hannity. He was selling wares on a job— and because he was talking to white Southerners, he kept going on like he was a slave master in a t.v. show., sharing how he bossed around his mexicans, like ‘yeah, I’m in Mandingo, too!”
It was like those Russian dolls— a sellout inside a sellout inside a sellout….
It’s one thing to be a Slickster. But just don’t lie about it.
Lying is when they really go wrong. It makes it doubly worse.
#3 by Epiphany on 04/05/2012 - 6:40 am
I think I am having more Epiphanies all the time.
#4 by BGLass on 04/05/2012 - 6:50 am
Neo-cons don’t just support israel.
That’s a catch-all word, imo, that clearly includes a genuinely fascist strain (in the sense of Militarist-Corporatist-Medicalist) inside the republican party. This ideological stance, represented by candidates, is totally incompatible with the Constitution, although Great Patriot Pundits on t.v., like on Fox, keep trying to synthesize Mussilini and Thomas Jefferson (lmao).
Thomas Jefferson and Mussilini are real-real different, yet some keep hammering at this synthesis, daily. Our founders this, our founders that, says the hannities
So many seem unclear on who they really belong to, nowadays.
#5 by Epiphany on 04/05/2012 - 6:53 am
The Neo Conservatives started out as Marxists! In this respect, they are much like the Fascists.
#6 by Epiphany on 04/05/2012 - 6:51 am
One should usually say what one really thinks. Most of the Politically Correct euphemisms really clog up the mind with nonsense. And, I finally became disillusioned with Feminism altogether!
#7 by Epiphany on 04/05/2012 - 6:54 am
America was founded on Deism, not Christianity! Learn about Deism and why the Founders rejected any and all forms of revealed scriptural religions. It is really interesting!
#8 by Jason Here on 04/05/2012 - 6:57 am
I feel your pain. All I can say is, I have been called a Jew, a Hasbara agent, an agent for that NorthWest Pacific guy, and that just is off the top of my head. These were not passing remarks, but sustained attacks by many because I was always trying to take the discussion from preoccupation with conspiracy theories or the use of ethnic slurs which I thought helped our enemies, to a more effective approach. When I said I wouldn’t sacrifice every last White on earth just to get back at Israel, that seemed to set some supposedly pro-White people off.
But I didn’t have a program for going forward. I am delighted to have found this site and approach, as well as Horus’s great show. You will never know how much it means to us out here.
So, apparently this vicious name-calling is par for the course inside the WN community. Looks like we are on a more productive path now.
#9 by BGLass on 04/05/2012 - 7:09 am
Personally, am not a big fan of the Militarist-Corporatist-Medicalist Empirist Empire deal, the Welfare Statist “right wingist” ethnic-conflict-model scarcity-worshipping pundit-experts deal— but EVEN WORSE is that thingy latched onto the leftist-think-tanked socialization programs of the anti-white multi-cult.
It’s like the worst of all possible worlds— and contradictory systems that will never ever synthesize, not really.
Lord have mercy.
#10 by BGLass on 04/05/2012 - 7:47 am
Here’s what gets me: According to PTB—- a “Natonalist” IS a fascist. That’s hard for many Americans to understand, as their own sense of “nationalism” was something entirely different from economic fascism.
T.V. tries to make “fascism” mean racism (just like everything else means “racism”. Eg: wwii is “racism.” Civil war is “racism.” South is “racism.” Appalachia is “racism.” Flyover country is “racism…”
So you can see a pattern there, right?
This ‘training of the gaze’ means that no one discusses the roots of ‘fascism’ in the “left” (like with Mussilini) too long. Or the ECONOMIC question of it. It is not about economy EVER, just “racism” (of Germans only, only hitler, never mussilini, tito, franco, etc).
“Leftism” is supposedly ECONOMY, (redistribution). But “rightism” is about colors, (lol). Now, how can this even be a comparison?
And even if you think beyond there, you’re still stuck in a silly ‘either-or,’ left v right, which is useless.
If one THINKS for just one second, everything falls apart.
In many ways, the u.s. had already synthesized and transcended what Euro immigrants on t.v. seem to be grappling with now, so the remnant of the constitutional republic has has been taken many steps backward, the gains of 400 years seemingly lost, quite often
#11 by Epiphany on 04/05/2012 - 10:14 am
It would seem that they wish that they could gloss over and forget SOVIET sins. After all, the activities of the Soviet Union are so much like those of the Third Reich, that this destroys all the claims that the War was clear cut Good against Evil. None deny the Holocaust happened, except for a few.
They, of course, would love to forget about SOVIET sins. And, in a weird form of projection assume that many of the rest of us would like to white wash the Holocaust out of history. Make no mistake, the Communists’ sole desire was to destroy Christianity. I doubt the Communists ever cared about the Workers or the Peasants of the World.
You said it quite well, BGlass. Once one knows wha the Communists did, how much it resembled what the Nazis did, one realizes that the whole Right–Left paradign is nonsense. The Political Spectrum is a fairy tale! Indeed, how come no matter what horrid things African Americans say about Whites, or even Jews, African Americans are never called Rightists?
Besides, Italian Fascist warcrimes are buried; German Nazi warcrimes are smeared into the public’s collective faces all the time. One really has to wonder what that is all about?
Colleges and Universities are intellectually and morally bankrupt, with their absurd excuses as to why no matter what the Communists do, the Communists must never be quite as vilified and condemned as their National Socialist counterparts. So, the Communists let Yellow people join their movement. So what?
This only makes it appear that the Communists are not as racist as the Nazis. In reality, the Communists– the East Asian Communists– are every bit as racist as any, though racism against Whites is not called such. Neither Red Chinese racism against Americans nor Red Chinese racism against Russians is called racism. Even though it is.
I have my own ideas about what the true nature of Communism really is!
#12 by Gavin on 04/05/2012 - 10:38 am
lol
The dimwitted anti-White clowns scream DATS FASCIST RAWR!!!! at anything their masters tell them not to like.
#13 by Simmons on 04/05/2012 - 10:18 am
I hate captcha, type a decent readable post and one key stroke error in that stupid box erases everything.
Basically the FOXnewscons, talk radio cons and N&J obsessives do not help whites deal with the psychopathic sadist anti-whites. BUGsers do help whites (albeit in a small way for now).
We are at an inflection point in history, those who help whites (BUGs) and those who harm whites (about everyone else) are the players.
#14 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/05/2012 - 9:11 pm
(Just about captcha)
“I hate captcha, type a decent readable post and one key stroke error in that stupid box erases everything.”
When that happens, just go back one page and your post will still be there in the box with a new captcha for you to try. (BUT: if you were replying to someone, you will have to reset that feature).
I rarely use the captcha that is first offered…I click on the little “circle arrows” until I get a captcha I think my old eyes can handle (and there does seem to be a tendency for second and third choices to be a little more legible). Usually that way I get about 3 out of 4 on the first try.
I hope that helps!
#15 by neoswabian on 04/05/2012 - 12:24 pm
And anti-white WHITES deserve our especial ire in the Dantean sense that in the Inferno treacheries against those who had reason to trust the traitor (i.e. family members) are far more vile and deserve far harsher punishment than treacheries against a mere stranger who had no reason to trust in the first place.
#16 by Genseric on 04/05/2012 - 4:22 pm
This hits home for me. Talk about the ultimate betrayal.
#17 by Frank on 04/05/2012 - 1:04 pm
Epiphany, please tell us WHERE you have posted the Mantra today. OK?
#18 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/05/2012 - 9:16 pm
He’s probably one fellow it’s better to have inside the tent pissing IN!
#19 by Frank on 04/05/2012 - 1:11 pm
I am seeing the word “mantra” seep into discourse over at
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/04/enter-the-splc-and-csulb-thought-police/?show=comments
Both in Kevin MacDonald’s article and the comments.
No, they aren’t referreing to OUR Mantra, but there is a shift toward seeing the discourses called “the news” as basically a pile of anti-White mantras.
There is also more and more usage of “anti-White” throughout this space. Is something “rubbing off” on them?
Is this a good thing? Will it lead them to fight fire with fire rather than discussing?
#20 by Dick_Whitman on 04/05/2012 - 8:32 pm
The idea that Bob is no different than Hannity or O’Reily is so laughable and absurd that it’s not even worth the time to address it.
If pro-Whites/White Nationalists disagree with BUGS’ tactics and strategy then that’s OK. We can agree to disagree. The thing to watch for are “pro-Whites” who try to defame or disrupt what we’re doing.
This will start to happen as BUGS and FTWR grow in influence. Most of the opposition to BUGS/FTWR (from pro-Whites/WN) will be from lack of understanding, or jealousy that it’s not them who’s growing in influence. But eventually the anti-Whites will have no choice but to attack BUGS and the White Rabbit. As of now they’re to scared to publicly acknowledge the existence of BUGS/FTWR.
I wish to point out to the AMPWs that the organized forces of anti-Whiteness ($PLC, ADL, etc) spend millions of dollars for “spreading awareness” of WNs who “name the Jew” 24/7 and for those WNs who advocate the big “race war.” But they don’t spend a penny “spreading awareness” of the existence of BUGS or FTWR? I wonder why? How come they publicly list “hate groups” with 3 people but don’t say a word about an internet radio show with thousands of listeners (FTWR)?
I also ask the AMPWs to think about the operating procedures of COINTELLPRO operatives. COINTELLPRO agents generally advocate violence, Nazi street marches, racial epithets, and anti-Jew tirades. But one thing these agents never do is advocate a consistent message. If a consistent message is so ineffective, you would think that these agents would have pro-Whites wasting there time with them? But they don’t?
#21 by Frank on 04/05/2012 - 10:19 pm
*** NOTICE ***
Tomorrow night (Friday 4/6) at 9:00pm Eastern, there will be a radio show at VoR and Horus will be the featured guest. Perhaps another BUGSer as well. The topics will include THE VIDEO.
To listen, go to: http://reasonradionetwork.com/ and on the upper right of the page are all the links for accessing the show.
If you’d like to join the Skype chat that accompanies the show, scroll down to “The Friday Show” on the right, and you’ll see a small blue “Skype” icon. Click that, and you’re “in” (if you have Skype, that is)
See you there!