Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!


Posted by Bob on April 12th, 2012 under Coaching Session

When Jefferson heard about the application of Missouri for statehood sparking a debate over slavery in 1819, the old prophet wrote, “It was like a fire bell in the night.”

This old Prophet hears those bells regularly.

For example, we had agreed that the WAY TO KEEP WHITE GENOCIDE IN PEOPLE’S MINDS if we should gain power was to have paid informers to nail their ancestors’ crimes on all heirs , and to beggar those who are still alive.

After going over this, or two full times, I reminded you again.

And two commentators said this was not Justice.

Back to Stormfront.

We are not trying to sell Nazism, Libertarianism, Identity Christianity or Vegetarianism. Or Justicism. We are here to save our race.

We are not trying to sell Nazism, Libertarianism, Identity Christianity or Vegetarianism or Justicism. We are here to save our race.

We are not trying to sell Nazism, Libertarianism, Identity Christianity or Vegetarianism or Justicism. We are here to save our race.

We are not trying to sell Nazism, Libertarianism, Identity Christianity or Vegetarianism or Justicism. We are here to save our race.

And KEEP it saved.

Justice in this form has never crushed anybody. Plenty of Communists and fascists were shot. The last I looked the long-persecuted Christians were still flowing over with money. Tribunals may give you a thrill, but I know an informer system LASTS.

But what bothers me most is that these otherwise good two commentators used the WORD Justice as their ENTIRE justification.

That is an AWFUL regression.

I explained why I kept demanding the FULL Mantra. I keep running into these sieves in your memory.

In that discussion there was a round on why we use genocide instead of population shift.

It’s CONSISTENT, dumbos! I have also written my fingers to the bone about respectability. Population shift obviously comes from people who are more worried about sounding reasonable!

Where the HELL have our hundreds of agreements on avoiding Wordist crap like Justice by adopting new words to make some TOO commenters feel better.

These are DUMB. You will be ready to translate the Mantra, and go across the street by yourself, when you stop having these blackouts

  1. #1 by Jason Here on 04/12/2012 - 6:47 am

    I heard Horus discuss the informant system idea, brilliant. On population shift vs genocide, if someone can provide the posts on that discussion I would appreciate. I understand now much more about distinction and why genocide is the more accurate and preferred term, but would like to see that discussion.

  2. #2 by Jason Here on 04/12/2012 - 8:39 am

    As for concern with Justice (capital J), I try to keep in all in line by remember that the ultimate test of any strategy in nature is EXISTENCE. It is the struggle for existence that comes first. To say that we were “just” or “good” or “idealistic” and yet we DIED OFF, would amount to a complete failure. That which allows our people to survive and thrive IS good. And some of the rules of the game may be a little edgy at times (when it comes to things like social dynamics and how you influence the masses), but we didn’t create the rules, they just exist. Abide by them or be buried by those who do.

  3. #3 by David Joop on 04/12/2012 - 8:54 am

    “Tribunals may give you a thrill, but I know an informer system LASTS.

    So is it okay if we tell the anti-whites “we’re going to make them pay”?

    • #4 by Jason Here on 04/12/2012 - 8:57 am

      I think I heard Horus say that it was best NOT to sound threatening. Just stay on talking points. Hopefully he or Bob or others will weigh in.

      • #5 by David Joop on 04/12/2012 - 9:05 am

        It was just a (slightly lame) attempt at a joke.

        You know ‘make them pay’ – the double meaning as either revenge or simply paying money.

        I don’t advocate actually telling them it.

        • #6 by Jason Here on 04/12/2012 - 9:40 am

          Oh sorry, my funny meter is off this morning.

  4. #7 by Jason Here on 04/12/2012 - 8:55 am

    Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.
    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.
    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

  5. #8 by beefcake on 04/12/2012 - 9:32 am

    Jason Here,

    The reason we use GENOCIDE and not population shit is because, what is happening truly IS Genocide. White people are not just being moved around, the population is not just being changed from one thing to another, these conditions imposed on us lead to the destruction of our group, via assimilation.

    The OTHER reason is in front of the AUDIENCE, we have to EXPOSE that the Anti-Whites do NOT have the moral high ground.

    That is the thing about White People psychologically, they have an innate need to “Do the RIGHT thing”.

    The problem is for a long time Mommy Professor and her religion of Political Correctness has gotten them to believe that supporting conditions that would lead to their race no longer existing, aka White Genocide, is in the moral right.

    The Mantra, points out to them that Pro-Whites, those who oppose White GeNOcide, are in fact the ones who hold the Moral high ground.

    Genocide is a CRIME, and that is what we are accusing the Anti-Whites of, in front of an Audience.

    Everything Anti-White-bots to say supports that Genocide.

    Weather it be conveniently forgetting which race is which, or what a White country is, it all comes back to Genocide.

    When they say Race does not exist, for example, WE point out how that supports Genocide.

    “YOU are saying Genocide is IMPOSSIBLE?!

    Only an Anti-White Genocidal maniac would say that we have no right to preserve something and that is has no right to exist.

    Naturally if you SUPPORT GENOCIDE of White people you would insist they don’t have a right to exist, and that Genocide is impossible.

    What did White people do to lose our Right to exist?”

    – note I like to end things with a baited question.

    Also, when they try to say that intermarriage is not Genocide, then you can STILL Bring them back to GENOCIDE.

    “Assimilation is a known form of Genocide as it was attempted on the Aboriginal people.

    Do you think that what was intended to eradicate Aboriginals should not be called Genocide?

    Why do you say what was attempted on the Aboriginal as Genocide is suddenly not Genocide when attempted on us?

    What makes White people Uniquely evil that is ok to Genocide us with Assimilation?”

    Anyway, Jason, I hope my little rant and example explains again WHY we use Genocide, and bring everything back to Genocide.

    • #9 by Jason Here on 04/12/2012 - 9:48 am

      Very helpful thanks, I would like telling them that if they claim race doesn’t exist, they are saying genocide is impossible. Knocks them off their moral high horse.

  6. #10 by beefcake on 04/12/2012 - 9:35 am

    Hmmm… I see you just wanted to see the discussion Jason, you already understood.

    Anyway, I stand by what I wrote there, unless Bob wants to throw a boot at me for messing something up, I think I’ll copy&post that in the are you new to the swarm thread.

  7. #11 by Gavin on 04/12/2012 - 10:32 am

    All words and concepts are made made. They are tools. We should only focus on tools in so far as they help us achieve our goals. When you make the tool “justice” a goal in itself, you get caught up in wordism and make yourself a slave to the words rather than making them work for you.

  8. #12 by dungeoneer on 04/12/2012 - 11:14 am

    Seeing anti-whites defeated and shriveled up before our charges is the karmic payoff of all time.

  9. #13 by ANOTHERWHITERABBIT on 04/12/2012 - 2:14 pm

    i too am like bob when it comes to computer navigation i can’t seem to find the talking points for swarm could someone please enlighten me to where they are sorry for posting here but I don’t know where else to go.

  10. #16 by AnotherWhiteRabbit88 on 04/12/2012 - 4:56 pm

    The BUGS buddy program would be highly helpful, only I’m using a Mac. Is it possible to make one for the Mac OS?

  11. #17 by Coniglio Bianco on 04/12/2012 - 5:57 pm

    As I stated earlier tribunals would be useful not just to punish the perpetrators of White genocide but as a preventative measure to ensure that it doesn’t happen again.

    The Nuremberg trials had very little to do with dispensing justice and everything to do with decapitating the leadership of the German government. This was done in order to eliminate the possibility that the NSDAP could be resurrected again in the future.

    I think we could learn a thing or two from our enemies.

  12. #18 by Adit on 04/12/2012 - 10:03 pm

    Is there some reason why we can’t have both? Tribunal the most egregious to let everyone know we’re serious and then proceed with the informant/beggaring process. I’ve never understood why they are thought to be mutually exclusive. Perhaps I’m missing some basic point of psychology here. I’d find it helpful if Bob or someone could explain why its one or the other and not both.

  13. #19 by beefcake on 04/12/2012 - 10:29 pm

    Well, for the most egregious of crimes, the punishment I like is simple, and fitting.

    They are kicked out, and must live among the non-Whites. They are forever exhiled from any exclusive white country or countries.

    They would have to live out their days, knowing the harsh reality of what they have lost, learning the truth the hard way, they get to LIVE in the version of the FUTURE they Desired.

    They may still have some family living in the White countries, and those could be given a special tax like the lesser Anti-White idiots and their descendants. That reminder Bob talks about most. They need to be reminded, and so do the rest of the whites so they NEVER forget the attempt at Genocide against Whites.

  14. #20 by Jason Here on 04/12/2012 - 11:00 pm

    We also have to separate the juicy personal thrill we get from contemplating how we would handle anti-White genocide criminals, versus what procedures would actually be in the long run best interests of Whites. They aren’t totally the same thing. There are all sorts of scenarios involving fire ants and honey that we can reflect on, but it might not be prudent to carry that as our banner.

  15. #21 by Tom Bowie on 04/13/2012 - 2:09 pm

    What many people are so upset about is what Anti-Whites have done to them and theirs. Everybody White and Normal is in a rather nasty mood over what has been done.

    What happens when the R-word is replaced by Anti-White and the roles are reversed. Everything they did to us will come home with interest.

    Think about changing places; I do.

  16. #22 by Gavin on 04/19/2012 - 4:28 pm

    “The last I looked the long-persecuted Christians were still flowing over with money.”

    Perhaps one of the reasons the long-persecuted Christians were so successful is because they were able to successfully present themselves as the long-persecuted Christians to the point where the even 2000 years later the idea still endures.

Comments are closed.