Listen to the silence. There is absolute silence in the media about the fall of the USSR. The fall of the Third Reich is practically still a major news item, going on its seventieth birthday.
There are more reasons for this than the obvious one.
NO establishment wants to remember the fall of the USSR. Today it is impossible even for older people to remember how impossible that seemed in 1980.
A major science fiction book, “The Mote in God’s Eye,” told of a very deep space mission. It was a joint project of the United States and the USSR two centuries from now. That reflected the 1980 mentality.
But what is really ironic is that this book was NOT written by leftists. In fact, JERRY POURNELLE, its co-author, WAS THE MAN WHO SOLD REAGAN ON SDI, the program that caused the USSR to give up, fold up, and die.
Believe me, gang, I know.
The whole Soviet Economic Growth thing and the myth of Soviet Science were absolute, total Big Lies, faithfully taught by Mommy Professor. Threatened with a real piece of real modern science, the USSR panicked. Teddy Kennedy began meeting with them, a last desperate push across the whole American left was made to stop “Star WARS.”
They even made the last Superman movie with Superman demanding the Nuclear Freeze.
A commenter said he wished I would explain what I said how to force the whole world to keep the anti-whites from keeping their assets abroad.
The answer is that he should look at the comments. Most of them are good, but the fact is that I must limit my discussions because the basics are not gotten. You have to stop falling back into slack-jawed silliness before I can even hint at something more complicated.
Look at where this comment took place. I had done an article on how to KEEP the victory years ago, an informer system. Everybody sort of agreed and then began thinking about News and Jews or whatever, and when I reminded you of it, the Machos had never HEARD of it, and they banged on their drums and demanded blood and guts.
In other words, when I DO explain something, I get maybe two comments and total memory blackout from you.
Do you really think I am going to try to delve into such intricacies?
I might try to tell someone young and smart what to do, but all the young and/or smart people who have ANY energy are busy with what we are doing now.
In other words, you have to get a consistent good grade on the present course before you go advanced.
And, as usual, the bottom part of the class is the real drag.
#1 by Linux Lewis on 04/22/2012 - 7:26 am
I would be curious as to know Mr Whitaker’s views on Yuri Bezmenov… fraud or real mccoy?
#2 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 04/23/2012 - 8:32 am
Yuri Bezmenov is a race mixer, but seems to be a very accurate source of Soviet theory.
#3 by phil white on 04/22/2012 - 8:14 am
About five years back Yaggdrasil and I were trying to persuade young storm front blood and guts types to back off a bit.
I posted that my army combat in cities training told us to attack buildings starting on the top floor. (Usually that means a helicopter assault). Once you cleared the top floor you worked your way down stairs.
The main reason for this is that if you start out the easy way and go in on the ground floor first the enemy retreats to the second floor etc. Eventually they will fight like trapped rats.
We wanted to allow a line of retreat where by they could jump out first floor windows.
But we would position M60 machine guns surrounding the building and cut the enemy down as they ran from the exits.
Yelling on our web sites that “This Time There Will Be Real Gas Chambers” is not a good way to fight this propaganda war any more that forcing enemy infantry to fight to the death. If you do you just might loose.
I’d rather fore go having revenge for desert so as to make sure I get to eat the meat and potatos first.
#4 by Dick_Whitman on 04/22/2012 - 10:25 am
Excellent import of that concept (urban combat and starting on the top floor when clearing a building). Good thinking. I was taught the same thing.
As far as the “This Time There Will Be Real Gas Chambers” people, they tend to be either
1) trolls
2)mentally unfit for political combat and therefore should find another way of releasing their stresses (try more exercise, or perhaps Xanax?)
#5 by phil white on 04/22/2012 - 6:17 pm
I have to give the early guys on storm front some leeway.
They knew where things were headed twenty years ago and in those days it was pretty lonely.
Also the lack of any visible community support made things look very bleak back then.
Also there may be some correlation between being among the first to disent and mental instability.
#6 by Genseric on 04/22/2012 - 8:36 am
When I was 13 years old I put two very simple things together; 2+2=4 (yeah it took me a while). One part was what my grandfather taught me about race at a very early age. The other was what had just recently finished in the USSR. After thinking on this for a while, I went to my mother and told her that it was “just a matter of time before the U.S. suffered the same fate as the Soviets.” I explained it to her in great detail.
Silence.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fQoGMtE0EY
#7 by phil white on 04/22/2012 - 9:07 am
Can you find a link to were I can get a copy of Bezmenovs’ “Love Letter to America” or his other writings?
I tried googleing it and found nothing.
Another example of coalitions falling apart after defeating an enemy might be post colonial Indian subcontientand civil wars in Africa.
#8 by Genseric on 04/22/2012 - 12:22 pm
http://www.keepandshare.com/doc/3540793/love-letter-to-america-tomas-schuman-yuri-bezmenov-1984-recommended-pdf-february-11-201?dn=y&dnad=y
#9 by phil white on 04/23/2012 - 9:14 am
thanks. I read lov ltr 2 amica last night
#10 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/22/2012 - 8:59 am
“total memory blackout”
Many of us are new here and have nothing to remember. I didn’t understand the informer thing because you recently introduced it, I believe, in a context in which some posters had been talking about punishment, and I took “punishment” to be what your informer scheme was primarily meant to address.
Your 2010 post on the topic explained the subject with extreme clarity, and when RobRoy finally posted the link to that, I understood completely, or at least so I believe.
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/07/11/don’t-lose-the-victory/
If that link had been posted sooner it would have saved me, and I assume others, several days of confusion.
#11 by Gavin on 04/24/2012 - 12:19 am
Some people seem to think that “punishment” in itself is an end.
Incorrect. “Punishment” is a means to an end. It is the end that is important, not the means.
It seems to me that a lot of people calling for “punishment” are just doing it because a long time ago some guy found that a good way to get what he wanted was to “punish” those who had done things he didn’t like…and then everyone got the idea that this “punishment” thing was some sort of natural law that must be applied in a particular circumstance.
Our goal is not to “punish” our enemies. Our goal is to save our race and keep it saved, the question of “punishment” should only arise to the extent that it achieves that goal.
#12 by Dave on 04/22/2012 - 9:40 am
If you get the basics, you don’t need advanced study because the basics, among other things, are about the standards that people apply to themselves.
It really doesn’t matter what people think is important politically, what they want to be free to do, how secure they think they should be with respect to their property and rights, or their demands that others be in agreement with them. Because as long as you are thinking along those lines, you are missing it, you are missing the basics. And what is basic is the nonsensical way that people perceive and think about what they GET TO DO
.
That is why the standards prevailing in every (formerly) white country MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL.
THAT is an enormous opportunity for those of us who care about power. Robert Whitaker’s frustration is this “herd of cats” among us with minds that JUST DON’T WANT TO GO THERE, that is, to power and where power really resides.
Your mind has got to occupy the right space. Your mind has to be in the right place. Power is laying there right at your feet.
#13 by BGLass on 04/22/2012 - 10:38 am
“Assume the position” was good advice Dave, and making silence should the loudest message takes attention. Informers can be a hard sell to the wrong kind of syrupy “christians”— they take Jesus “forgiving them” for the grossness of their endless sins the next step, so first, they wind up with no discernment whatsoever, and so don’t even really know what a sin IS, or why Eternal Law would bother to call it a sin, (that you get blowback from in the real, natural world).
Like the Republican laughables who go on and on about “Anti-Abortions”— so long as its a fetus and they can still be proactive war and so on, and who —if you ask them— could not give you any answer about what constituted “high morality” before they were given this “anti-abortion” thing to harp on— i.e. are way too empty vessel-ish to even apprehend what used to be called character. The neo-con yuppie type mentality that “home schools” praying their children will get the “better scores” so they can run the system, and have no idea what HS was initially for, or why real history could be important, etc.
That kind of syrupy-“christian” really thinks Jesus said they could live like dogs —with no real morality— and always be forgiven.
If you think forgiveness works this way in the present— why wouldn’t you want to think future generations could be forgiven, the way Jesus would.
They live in the Clean-Slate-Illusion— where nothing real matters. Where history has no consequence. Where you can bomb the world endlessly with no blowback. Where nothing means anything, in other words.
The idea of ongoing consequence is psychologically a hard sell—- deep down, it could mean THEY aren’t let off the hook, by Jesus or anyone else.
One has to know they are clean as a whistle to go for it, probably.
#14 by Dave on 04/22/2012 - 12:32 pm
BGLass,
Robert Whitaker takes a 180 degree opposite approach than the approach Mommy Professor takes.
What does Mommy Professor say? Mommy Professor says, “Think outside of the box”.
In opposition, Robert Whitaker says, “No! If you want to be effective, your behavior and thinking must be HIGHLY CONSTRAINED”.
That’s Mantra thinking. That’s standards. In contrast, Mommy Professor has no standards and the standards that Mommy Professor says she complies with are fake. They are simply there to veil the fact that she has no standards.
Robert Whitaker says you HAVE a weapon. That weapon is the enemy’s sword. When the enemy thrusts his sword at you, you learn to grab the blade with your hands (without cutting yourself) and you use his sword to upend and pivot him so you can step on his throat.
That’s Mantra thinking. It is like all the damn fools who think guns are going to protect them. If my enemy has a gun, I know where I am going to get my gun. My enemy has supplied it for me.
That’s Mantra thinking.
#15 by Justin on 04/22/2012 - 1:40 pm
You know the difference between amateurs and pros?
The pros have utterly mastered the basics. In my experience, a Delta operator is only better than your average three-year grunt because he has utterly mastered the basics. The rest is just equipment and repetition, and training with other peers who are equally masters of the basics.
#16 by Dick_Whitman on 04/22/2012 - 2:21 pm
This should be posted at the SWARM (and is) but some “progressive” at daily KOS is wiping the floor with anti-Whites.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/20/1085138/-How-racist-Whites-Took-Over-America-#comments
#17 by Dick_Whitman on 04/22/2012 - 10:47 pm
I was monitoring that exchange at daily KOS all day. The moderators ended up erasing his best responses. The little prissy pants cunt moderators couldn’t handle him. And he never used any foul language or racial epithets.
If the thousands of anti-Whites at Daily Kos couldn’t handle that one guy, then the anti-Whites are in serious trouble.
#18 by Epiphany on 04/22/2012 - 2:48 pm
You are correct! Americans quickly forgot about the Soviet Union, soon after it had collapsed. A large part of the History of the 20th Century is forgotten!
#19 by Coniglio Bianco on 04/22/2012 - 6:57 pm
If Bob spent less time employing Активные мероприятия on his own people and more time explaining things in a simple and straightforward manner we’d all be alot further ahead.
#20 by dungeoneer on 04/22/2012 - 8:25 pm
Stop wasting our time Coniglio,coach shot your fox.Take the instruction like a white man.
#21 by phil white on 04/22/2012 - 9:10 pm
That sounds like a quote from Lee critsizing .Stone wall Jackson. Something like “You will take it an learn from it as a man learns.”
#22 by Coniglio Bianco on 04/23/2012 - 10:22 pm
Little do you realise that you have proven my point precisely.
Coach knows what I am talking about. He is smart enough to know that I know what he is up to.
#23 by OldBlighty on 04/24/2012 - 12:26 am
You don’t even know, what you don’t know.
#24 by Gavin on 04/23/2012 - 11:20 pm
I have progressed a lot with the style of coaching that Bob is using.
One of the great things is that because Bob and I are comrades I can read what he writes and understand why he writes it and in doing so realize how to conduct myself. I have learned a lot just by observing Bob.
There is another intelligent pro-White who I frequently read who does the “simple and straightforward” thing and that helped me as well. His style gave me hope and confidence and taught me a lot. However, I didn’t learn much from him that I can use in my everyday life to convert the average person to our side.
#25 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/24/2012 - 5:34 am
I’ve wished too that Bob had a more traditionally expository writing style, but it’s finally occurred to me that asking him to change his writing style would likely be asking him to change his personality, change who he is.
Sometimes he just brilliantly points at things, and we have to muddle out for ourselves even what it is he’s pointing at.
But Bob’s topics aim to change our accustomed ways of viewing the world, and a thinker who tackles that rock-hard task, and uses an accustomed expository style to do it, can find his readers missing his point entirely since the readers just fit the author’s detailed but accustomed phrasings into their own accustomed notions.
Maybe a state of confusion in us leaves our minds more open for a fundamentally new idea to enter.
But I mention again Bob’s original 2010 post on his informer scheme designed to maintain victory
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/07/11/don’t-lose-the-victory/
which is a masterpiece of succinct clarity. In this essay, though it seems written in Bob’s customary style, we have to figure out nothing for ourselves, since everything is laid out with perfect clarity. (Or maybe all I’m saying is that I understood this one!)
I think the reason I like this little essay so very much (aside from the esthetic pleasure of its deft construction and clarity) Is that it made me realize with a jolt how much I’m still caught up in the liberal dream that humans can be “better” than they are, and can live stably with each other mostly on the basis of shared warmth and congeniality.
No, the hatred we ourselves and our compatriot masses will feel against our word-worshipping enemies, who peddle the same nonsense I just mentioned in order to conquer and subjugate us, must be stoked and maintained by some measures such as Bob describes, so we will all be motivated to protect the society we construct against the inescapable attempts of those enemies to wrest it from us once again. That’s the hard struggle of life as Darwin observed it.
In his 2010 essay I discovered what Bob means by the word PRACTICAL. He means simply, ACCEPTING REALITY.
Grim stuff, reality, to someone like myself who spent most of his life as a liberal.
#26 by Epiphany on 04/23/2012 - 2:55 am
Well, I had another Epiphany!
All the anti–Racists have got is
their nostalgia for U.S. involvement
in the Second World War.
Of course, these anti–Racists,
these anti–Whites, feel nothing about
pedding anti–German and anti–Southern hatred
among the U.S. population.
Now, let us hit them where it hurts!
Point out to them that the U.S. should never have gotten involved in the First World War. That they compounded their error further by getting involved in the Second World War.
Keep bringing up the Soviet Union! Keep bringing up Stalin!
After all, the Soviet Communists had committed much the same types of military attrocities and crimes against humanity that are associated with the German National Socialists. We can beat them, we can beat them at their own game!
They sweep Soviet History under the rug, because it is too much of an embarassment for those who wish to create nostalgia for the Second World War. What will they do when they find that Dear Ol’ Uncle Joe did much the same type of stuff as the Fuhrer?
Just think, had we only stayed out of the First World War, neither the Soviet Communists nor the German Nazis would have risen to power. Please, keep on emphasizing that. I know we can do it!
#27 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 04/23/2012 - 7:59 am
Doesn’t the frothing Anti-Dixie hatred by the Anti-White Racists prove that Dixie is a White Homeland belonging to the White Race that they claim does not exist?
If Dixie were anything less than that, then how could they possibly have such irrational hatred of it?
#28 by phil white on 04/23/2012 - 9:20 am
I think rearguing WWII is a side issue. I could shoot holes in the “Wasn’t Hitler Wonderful” argument.
We need to stick to things no one can argue with.
The Mantra, youtube videos about minoritie forcing tabasco sauce down white toodlers throats. etc etc etc.
For heavens sake, just look “at post #24. Even our own bugsters think “The Jews were perishing in the holocaust.” That just proves trying to reargue WWWII is a losing proposition. Stay away from WWII!
Stick to what people can see with their own eyes. Mexicans flooding our country, black on white attrocities, guys like Michal Moore trying to justify white genocide. Forced intergration, m edia gloating that the last blonde will be born in 2202.
#29 by Epiphany on 04/23/2012 - 2:59 am
As soon as I realized that the Union did not fight the South to free the Black Slaves; it occured to me that Roosevelt had no intention of rescuing or avenging the Jews, who, were perishing in the Holocaust. The same ULTERIOR motive was involved in both wars– to build up the corporate structure of this society.
Well, the good news is that we can boycott most of it. It is just a matter of discipline!
#30 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 04/23/2012 - 7:45 am
Yes, the Hitler Channel (the History Channel) is not going to let us forget “the greatest generation” or how wonderful that mass slaughter of White Women and Children was for the world (One World Government).
Communist Mass Murder is not news worthy or worthy of class time; that would cut into the time allotted to praise the greatest generation– of sheep!
#31 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 04/23/2012 - 7:52 am
Every empire will fall.
Why?
Because the very act of forming an empire dooms it to failure.
Only a Nation of similar people, with similar intentions and goals, can endure.
Every empire will tear itself apart.
I can’t wait for the Federal Empire to fall. The sooner the better.
#32 by Bob on 04/23/2012 - 11:34 am
Old Man just had a blackout, the kind I discussed in THIS article. There is no such thing as a “race mixer.” All the mixing is aimed at WHITE countries.
Old Man, please READ here before you pontificate here.
#33 by H.Avenger on 04/23/2012 - 12:04 pm
RACE Mixing
=
WHITE Mixing
Always say White Mixing…..state the truth
AntiWhites are NOT talking about “race mixing” in Asia or Africa. White Mixing.
#34 by Coniglio Bianco on 04/25/2012 - 3:43 am
You also see the expression ‘race traitor’ a lot. The only race that is being betrayed by traitors is the White race. Therefore ‘race traitor’ should be ‘White traitor’. They are literally White traitors and also traitors to the White race so there is a double meaning there. Both of which make our point.
#35 by Gavin on 04/23/2012 - 1:35 pm
One that anti-Whites will throw at you is: “Technically mixing gets rid of both races so it would be genocide of the other races too!”
At which point I respond:
The other races will be just fine.
No one is flooding Black countries with non-Blacks and trying to blend Black children out of existence.
No one is flooding Asian countries with non-Asians and trying to blend Asian children out of existence.
You are only targeting White countries for this genocide by assimilation.
If you anti-Whites get your way there will still be Blacks in Africa, Jamaica and Haiti, still be Asians in Asia, still be Arabs in Arabia but EVERY White country will be non-White. It’s TARGETED genocide.
You call yourselves “anti-racist.” What you are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
————————————————-
The funny thing about this anti-White statement is that they are not even trying to deny that they are engaging in the genocide of our race. They admit that what they are doing is genocide and then try to justify it by saying that if other races are destroyed as well that somehow makes it “ok.”
They don’t like to be uncovered as anti-White, so they claim that they are also anti-other races and not just Whites. When you throw the obvious truth that they specifically targeting Whites, it packs a punch.
#36 by Harumphty Dumpty on 04/23/2012 - 2:55 pm
The TWO components of White Genocide: FLOODING, and ASSIMILATION.
Thanks for another good one.
#37 by shari on 04/23/2012 - 12:47 pm
Non-Whites have never been big on mixing with other groups of non-White, I don’t think. Race mixing has ALWAYS been White mixing.
White girls used to know how to stick their noses in the air, even if they were poor. When it comes to forgivness, I do hope White men will forgive their own women. These damnable schools have to go.
#38 by BGLass on 04/28/2012 - 10:08 am
often unconsciously, women feel sold-out by the men. Why didn’t they do something? But they have a hard time seeing their complicity, especially after a couple generations.
No one feels more sold out by men than the white “feminist” women— a) crap 70s economy b) women prepared for nurturance and child raising SHOVED into the economy— a corrupt world for which they were not prepared, would necessarily feel totally overwhelmed by, would not be able to master, would not be able to “be providers” enough, would harm their own children, etc, etc. (not to mention the world of work corruption that business can be) to be tax earners. To them, this was a selling into slavery, and left children childless.
We are very adaptable (for good and ill). The anger over the situation was sublimated— and pumped back into “blaming men.”
This was not really “blaming men for patriarchy” (their mothers had actually been happier than they). But the sublimated rage over being “pimped out” into the economy— was allowed to be re-channeled (allowable in public for public brownie points) back into the rhetoric of “feminism.”
That was the neatest trick. Creating reasonable rage over the situation in white women THEN channeling that rage into feminism. But IN REALITY, the women were mad at men who couldn’t pay for kids (economy), the stress of 2 households, etc, etc— angry at their VERY REAL present… not the “system of patriarchy,” but they said that, because that was the only “truth” they were allowed to say, and then the little kids would hear it.
And certainly, by then, the women in the workforce felt “oppressed”— and were.
The only safeguard is to ask, at every turn: “Is that really true?”
Is what you are saying really what you think? Did it originate in your own experience or from what “people say,” what is “acceptable to say?”
Billions have been spent on the subject of “sublimation” in psychology— second only to sex abuses and “compliance.”
Sex abuse creating intense trauma-fear— and producing compliant human subjects—- has whole libraries devoted to it. If only people knew.
#39 by BGLass on 04/28/2012 - 10:16 am
Both the men and women deserve the greatest sympathy.
There is NOTHING to forgive! When the house of a strong people is entered— it is always because their hands are tied!
Better to analyze how the hands were tied. Then there is nothing to forgive. You simply see “how it went down.”
#40 by BGLass on 04/28/2012 - 10:24 am
Mr. Whitaker’s point about basing societies in IDEAS versus people-groups leading to persecution (on the basis of what people say or think) is a good one.
Opposition has it— that genocides will be caused ONLY if groups of people exist. (Actually only if whites are eradicated, but they do not admit that). They will admit they believe that genocides are caused because groups of people who are alike exist.
In reality— ALL THE GREATEST genocides have been due to societies based in IDEAS.
Opposition pretends that genocides are not even more prevalent when IDEAS become the base for society. They also IGNORE the connections between Ideas and “a people.”
Surely, there are genetic predispositions that then lead to various groups holding ideas that best suit what they are inclined to. Like, a creative gene pool will want freedom to think, from oppressive governments. So their genes and idea are connected.