Archive for May, 2012
One or two commenters have remarked that the Mantra is too American. Both said that the term “respectable conservative” is an AMERICAN term.
The reality is much more interesting — and important — to us BUGSERS.
The term “respectable conservative” was entirely alien to political discussion until I started using it in Whitaker Online at the turn of the century! Hard rightists would refer to the Buckley types as cowards or ignorant, but putting them into a professional category, people who get paid to be a kept opposition, was introduced in my first book and never used again until I re-introduced the term “respectable conservative” and it got taken up around 2000.
Like “the melting pot”: translated into “multiculturalism,” almost every concept that Europe lives by is American. World War II is trying to become “The European Civil War.”
The Latins used to say anyone of any color was “French” regardless of their skin color if they were CULTURALLY French.
Until New York and Harvard and Hollywood explained to them that they had a multiculture.
I have never seen any other person mention this.
There are respectable conservatives in Europe doing exactly the same job respectable conservatives do in America.
The subtext is that there IS NO European political dialogue. It is ALL hand-me-down American. I have to use “respectable conservative” in Europe because Europe needs it.
One commenter said, joking, “It’s lonely at the top, isn’t it, Bob?”
As usual, I smiled, but then I processed the SUBTEXT of that remark.
Strictly speaking, the LAST thing that a person at the top will be is LONELY. One of his major expenses is hiring people to keep people from reaching him. That led me to what a BUGS commenter would see as the Top.
I am at the top of the IDEA CHAIN. That is VERY lonely indeed.
It is SUCH a relief to finally see you doing what I have done through the years. You who are in there in the fight see things that by now you take for granted. On good example is commenters noticing the term “anti-white.” That is a DIRECT connection to US, but who but a BUGSER would know that?
Someone could say that the term “anti-white” was used regularly against Louis Farrakhan and other black separatists. But that is totally untrue.
You can read the old statements until your eyes drop out, and you will NEVER find any statement about someone being anti-white. In every single case, it was “Anti-White and Anti-Semitic,” and the reaction had nothing to do with the anti-white part.
Now even O’REILLY has had a clip with a black raving about how he hates ALL whites, without a mention of the Jewaholic’s Drug of Choice.
No one needs to EXPLAIN why it is important that Don Black referred to the SPLC as “Anti-whites claiming to be anti-racists.”
But you can imagine how impossible it has always been for me to explain how I could tell from the wording that it was MY logic the writer was using. What added to the difficulty was that I found that there was a complete inverse relationship between how my idea spread and its being connected with my name.
A LOT of my thinking comes from the fact that national columnists and their friends read or heard quotes from Whitaker Online and were given points for original thought. Derek Black said this outright when he told me up front that he had tried every way he could imagine to avoid the word “genocide.’
The point here is, Derek did not have to explain what he meant. You do not have to explain what you mean when you quote the exact phrase that can only have come from us.
This is why my entire concentration was on points and words that no one else considered novel. It is LOT different for Derek to tell me that or for you to quote “anti-white” than it would be if you were the ONLY person who worked with that connection.
I honestly believe that a major reason that the Space Telescope is up and the Soviet Union is down is due to a strategy I could not even explain to someone on the outside.
It was VERY lonely.
It is such a relief to have you here!
I quoted White Dude’s report of an anti-white saying he was TIRED of us, meaning Swarmers.
You often see some mention of how TIRED anti-whites are of our message.
OK, Journeyman interrogator, what are they saying?
They are saying we are TEMPORARY.
As you move from journeyman to master, that subtext will jump out at you the way it does at me.
Step One is you have to SEE that they are referring to us as temporary. SECOND, you have to deduce, automatically, WHY they make this assumption.
I have explained that repeatedly here in articles some thoughts were off-subject. I have pointed out, over and over, that that there is a group that is ALLOWED to be “the other side” and get paid to do it. If they start to say something HURTS, it is terminated by a subtle process by which the establishment makes it clear that they will no longer tolerate this.
If it’s effective, they refer to what is hurting them as ‘ The old argument that…” Or they get rid of it by the “extremist” route:
Some William Buckley or Rich Lowry type gets the message, and earns his paycheck by declaring that idea/slogan/concept to be “extremist.”
These Mantra Whiners certainly have no idea of this process, but anti-whites are now whining to the Establishment to do this to the Mantra. They have no idea that we are actually getting around a process no one dares to mention, they just know that, when their side gets hit too hard by an argument, the argument vanishes
And they are demanding that a Rich Lowry (present NR editor) or some other Bill Buckley type make us disappear, and soon.
I have to explain the process to you.
That WORRIES me.
I NEED for YOU to connect these dots for YOURSELF.
White Dude was right, this complaint is a great sign for our effectiveness.
But there is always more to be learned through Mantra Thinking.
This is the way I understand it:
The Caribs, for whom the Caribbean is named, were residents of the islands where Columbus first landed.
As I came up, there were two established facts about the Caribs: 1) They were NOT cannibals, and 2) Caribs were dying in slavery, so a priest arranged the importation of black slaves.
You can look all this up in Google, but what will you have when you do?
The reason no one disputes any more that Caribs were cannibals has to do with the advance of science, among other things, you can analyze the doo and find out what people ate. The Caribs did have that word “long pig,” but “historians” declared that only the ignorant thought that was a word for human meat.
I could scour Google and still come up with information that is as false as my vaguest impressions.
I distinctly remember when Viking settlements in Canada and Indian cannibalism were absolutely MYTHS.
The fact is, it is debatable whether scrutiny of expert information on history is any less false than an old man’s remembrance of when and, above all, WHY some things were Absolute Facts in their day that are not repeated today.
If you become an uncritical part of the Google Age, you are as blind as the so-called scholars of the Age of Chained Books.
So what you get here is not Refined Google. What you get here is WHY certain things are “facts.”
The Global Warming Experts are STILL mystified by what a big scandal it was when their email revealed they were openly cooking information based on what they were ASSIGNED to prove. I understand their bafflement perfectly. They simply cannot believe that cooking information to suit grantees has not been a standard practice since the Popes took over the process a thousand years ago.
You have to BEGIN with something no one should understand as well as BUGSERS: What gets through is what someone WANTS through.
And as soon as someone catches onto what every single scholar who works on grant money has always known, he goes into his Conspiracy Phase.
This is not a Conspiracy, and someone who goes nuts on that score discredits everybody who tries the simple facts calmly. It is the same thing that Jewaholics do to the fact of white genocide.
Any BUGSER quickly learns that information comes through a filter.
That is exactly why the Mantra was so hard to develop and is so hard to get out.
White Dude reports:
“MANTRA SUCCESS! A MUST READ!
“I came across somebody on Yahoo Answers complaining about the mantra being all over Youtube. This really MADE MY DAY! In addition to obviously fighting for Whites and our countries, it’s moments like this mantra posters live for. It’s so gratifying to know we are making a difference.
“Keep up the great work all!”
Yes, good work, but also some desperately needed REVENGE!
All of us have suffered all our lives from Political Correctness Sermons. You are really enjoying a book and suddenly the author introduces a black or a Jew and starts preaching at you the same stuff you have suffered through for years in school.
Some of us, being naturally courteous folks, worry about dropping the Mantra right into a page concerned with cod fishing or botany.
For me, this is delicious. All my life I have been enjoying a book or a movie when it suddenly became a Political Correctness tale about Evil White Men or the Evil South. I get a special kick out of it when you do exactly the same thing to THEM, they are on a page talking about botany when you throw the Mantra right into their faces.
Marxists, including all those who don’t know they are Marxists, insist that EVERYTHING if POLITICAL.
Let’s take ‘em up on that.
I really screwed up when I titled an article Replace First Line of Original Mantra?
What I really meant was shouldn’t we ALWAYS start with Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everybody.”
I apologize to Genseric for my mistake in the title.
You dealt with the exact question Ole Dumbbob asked.
I would make such a dumb mistake at a critical point in BUGS development.
But you did a great job on the ensuing discussion.
For years I have carefully avoided too much open discussion of the Mantra.
You were apprentices and I was the only journeyman present.
I think the older hands here can easily imagine what would have happened if I had thrown the Mantra wording out for general discussion several years ago. I had hammered it out with YEARS of nose-to-nose battles.
On the other hand the whole point of BUGS, as I have so often stated, is to produce, NOT people hearing the Sacred Words of the Guru, but MORE JOURNEYMEN.
So this article was a big step for me, and you passed the test admirably. You did not come into this discussion as a loose group fresh from theorizing on Stormfront, but as writers who have learned to despise theorizing of that sort, and are ready with your EXPERIENCE in actual conflict.
This is a big day for me. After fourteen long years, I have JOURNEYMEN!
Frank really nailed it:
“First the Coach GIVES us a weapon and teaches us how to use it.
“Now he’s telling us we have gotten to the point we’re allowed into the weapon FORGE.
“The Coach is getting us to do what he wants w/o TELLING us what to do.
“Sweet way to trick your apprentices into taking the baton and RUNNING.”
Frank and Genseric are dead right; We don’t want you in the forge with us if you have the slightest tendency toward tossing around hot metal.
My screwing up the question shows why I am getting a little desperate NOT to be the only journeyman or master here any longer than I have to be.
Let’s PLEASE ignore my mistake and concentrate on the important point: That you can get in there with the hot metal and not destroy the forge.
The British Constitution is not written down. So it consists entirely of Statutes and interpretations.
So if all original copies of the original United States Constitution disappeared, would that have the slightest effect on the Constitution itself?
Of course not.
That makes it clear that the Constitution has nothing to do with a document. As with the British Constitution, what matters is its MEANING.
Today Americans say that the Supreme Court is the Constitution. In fact the current opinion of five of he nine members of the Court is the Constitution. This makes the Supreme Court the Supreme Branch of Government. When the Court rules, both the executive and legislative branches only exist to ENFORCE the Constitution, meaning the opinion of five members of the Supreme Court.
In 1803, when the Court began to assume its role in Constitution, most of the authors of the written document were still alive. The Federalist Papers barely mentioned the court, except to point out that it would be the weakest branch of the new government.
Today, your civics course refers to three COEQUAL Branches set up by the Founders, so that the fact that of what two of the Founders said about the Judicial Branch means nothing compared to Father Mommy Professor’s dictates.
In fact, when one Branch BECOMES the Constitution, those two Founders are even wronger.
Actually, each Branch has interpreted the Constitution. President Tyler said he only vetoed bills which he considered as violating the Constitutional power of Congress. When the Court decided that the Indians still owned a major part of Georgia, President Jackson vetoed the decision by refusing to enforce it.
The platform on which Lincoln won the election of 1860 had as its main plank a refusal to enforce the Dred Scot Decision. Article III requires Congress to limit the appellate powers of the Supreme Court.
In the case of secession the final decision was made by an fourth branch of the Federal Government, the armed forces.
And in the end it is this Fourth Branch which interprets and enforces the Law of truly unfortunate Lands. That is what a Constitution is meant to PREVENT.
Mantra is probably one of those terms they like to use in the New Age crap.
Like the Beatles, they also fall for a “guru,” who usually has a dozen Cadillacs.
We are definitely not hippie or New Age. Those are fads. We are in a serious and lasting fight that the media is trying to crush, not use as a fad.
I like being an old fashioned, very American Coach.
One commenter was saying that the Mantra was being determined by the only source that mattered, and I actually tightened up before he said “BUGS” rather than “Bob.”
My whole goal is to get everything I have so practiced and thought out that I can be DONE WITHOUT, and not make William Pierce’s chilling mistake of leaving no heirs.
Hell, I don’t just want an heir, I want a whole set of replacements. That’s what real teachers and real coaches do that gurus cannot.
A Coach is interested in his TEAM.
A Guru is interested in HIMSELF.
The first line about everybody says there is this race problem has given anti-whites their best chance to try to change the subject,
From our experience USING the Mantra — which is what counts — the first line should now be “African for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody! WITHOUT the everybody says line.
Please note that I have admitted you’ve come very far when we consider changing the Mantra itself.
Naturally we will continue to need to move wording around to get around the despots.
But please remember that having to get around censorship is an HONOR. It demonstrates you are dealing with tyranny, which shows you are hitting the bad guys where it HURTS.
Our Dave’s statement about the close relation between Mantra Thinking and my time as an interrogator continues to be a source of fascination and of joy to me.
Despite my bitching, our commentary is at a high level, but I long for a seminar participant who gives ME something to mull over.
An interrogator is irritating. He lets you get away with NO assumption.
So in my racial discussions, when someone says : “It’s just the color of the skin,” I am the only living human being who asks, “Why is that?” “What does the color of the skin mean to people?”
Everybody knows that. But that is exactly the kind of obvious remark in normal discussion that an interrogator in a serious interrogation will not allow to pass.
I have had people give me the Old, Old Story about how whites mistreat non-whites, tell me about racial discrimination and so forth. We have to accept that now but the time will come when you stop blacking out and can be more free in some of YOUR discussions.
Let me repeat that I had the anti-whites on their asses in such a short time that it was a standing joke as my colleagues watched another “anti-racist” get chopped up and they would bet on how many minutes I would take at it this time.
I used different methods depending on how the anti-white recitation started out, as I could long since handle any of them in a DISCIPLINED way.
If the standard sermon started out on how non-whites were oppressed, I would ask, “Is ALL of this just Evil Oppression?” You would be surprised at how difficult a question like that is to a person who is used to merely Reciting the Creed.
I would point out that all countries with colored skins were poor unless they sat on top of oil extracted by others. “Is all this just hate?”
This doesn’t sound like me now, but back then it was a game, because I wanted the people who were listening, and who had seen victims get in the Whitaker Slaughter House before to enjoy some variety, so others would come listen.
And it made things VERY hard on the anti-white.
It was, as Dave would indicate, a habit that made a good questioner. I went on to kill them with the developing Mantra, but an interrogator, unless time is limited as your case, NEVER allows his victim to just ride along and say what he always says.
And someone who is fresh from a thousand sermons from Father Mommy Professor is more shocked at being questioned than any black kid who was driving slowly through a rich neighborhood with a screw driver by happenstance.
Father Mommy Professor’s congregation was always so shocked to be questioned on doctrine and heresy that it made the process not only irresistible to an interrogator, but just plain FUN.
I am anxious for you to get past the Blackouts so you can eventually have some productive fun. An interrogator on a bus-man’s holiday can really make a curse for the bad guys.
But you have to get the basics right first. No more complicated stuff when they say race doesn’t exist. The Mantra says THEY define white. No more Jewaholism. No more maudlin “I love all races equally when only ours is threatened.”
The list goes on and on. But take my word for it, once you get those Blackouts hammered out, you can have some real bus-man’s vacation FUN.
I may be preaching to the converted, but I seem to have seen the Mantra begin with “They say there is a race problem…,” and I now find that isn’t direct enough. Now that my mind is aging, I may be more in tune with many of the minds we have to deal with.
To this seminar, I suggest that the lead, which is the last thing I added to the Mantra, should be included whenever possible as the first punch.
I also favor capitalizing ONLY and ALL in relation to white countries. That is more important to me than whether White is capitalized or not, which is an echo of the time we spent all our resources on that kind of detail.
I use white rather than White because it is easier to show that THEY define white every time they assign guilt and every time they demand a country take immigration and assimilate. Insisting on White screws that simple message up.
Those in charge define the rules and the definitions.
So there are Two Sides: The Ruling Side and everybody who opposes it in any way.
So pro-whites are lumped in with anti-white Catholic theologues as “the right,” because they both oppose some Ruling Side, leftist, European programs.
Professional conservatives are allowed to make their living by the Ruling Group. So no one demands a death penalty for heresy more than conservatives do.
Conservatives earn their keep by RATIFYING liberal policies. The Ruling Class puts in a policy and conservatives denounce it for a generation.
But then conservatives demand the death penalty for the same heresy that was their platform a decade earlier. At that point liberal columnists announce that “Even a conservative columnist now agrees with this policy>“
The Magic Phrase: “BOTH SIDES AGREE.”
I have to keep reminding people that “racist,” though the term is denounced by liberals, and respectable conservatives demand racists be burned alive, is effective because it never occurs to anybody to question it because BOTH SIDES agree about it.
So it comes as a shock when we don’t have a Blackout and point out that even if BOTH SIDES AGREE, “racism” is just the speaker’s opinion.
It was William Buckley, who was the only columnist to endorse the six-year prison sentence given by Austria for Holocaust Denial, who made it BOTH SIDES.
Dave, our own BUGSER Dave, not Dr. Duke, is exactly right when he points out how closely related my time as an interrogator is related to Mantra Thinking. You cannot let the other side get away with ANYTHING.
BOTH SIDES has nothing to do with reality.
One commenter said I am just like Jim Jones, and thank God we are not in Jonestown. I guess it would be Bobstown.
How many people would take an insult like that?
No one has even mentioned my discussion of the fact that after I wrote about Jewaholism and then wrote another argument, over seventy comments came in about Jews and Jewaholism and only one comment on the new article had anything to do with the new article.
I pointed out briefly that that was enormously insulting, but no one has mentioned it since.
It seems to me that insulting me is free of charge here.
Someone once called me white trash, and I pointed he had just proven I wasn’t. I pointed out that at that time in South Carolina, if he had called white trash white trash they would have pulled out their broad-bladed knife, which they opened with one hand, and slashed his face if he was lucky, his throat if he was not
Anything even vaguely approaching a Cult would make it fatal for a person to call me Jim Jones.
It doesn’t bother me. I expect a lot of silliness.
But if you’re going to learn to Mantra Think, you first have to be able to see reality.
Out of the eight or nine Crusades, only one was at all successful. More interesting is the fact that, in two or three of them, the Crusaders were on the verge of victory, their numbers were there and all enemy fortresses and forces had been dispersed.
In every one of those cases, the different leaders got down to disputing who was The Leader and how to proceed with the attack on that basis. In all two or three cases the Moslems had time to completely recover and totally defeat and in one case almost wipe out the Crusaders.
In one huge battle between a German tribe and Rome, the Germans were doing fine until one of their great leaders died. They then proceeded to go into official mourning, right there in the middle of the battle. It was a matter of Principle or Morality or whatever the hell else nitwits used to justify something besides fighting to win.
The Romans, surprisingly, did not go along with this quaint custom. They went out for a good old fashioned slaughter while the Germans were weeping.
I don’t CARE about Justice. I care about winning.
The traitors who are destroying us deserve no mercy, and the person saying this has been in through world wars. I am only interested in saying what is most effective to win and, once we gain the advantage, don’t follow the history of those dumbass Germans or the Crusaders.
As one commenter said, even the Tribunals demanded by the most chest beating glorifier will miss a LOT of the enemy. In the real world, most of the guilty will buy their way out, and, above all, the search will end.
Almost my sole interest is that we USE the money method our enemies have worked out so well.
Believe it or not, what I am most afraid is not Tribunals, but that once the tribunals are over, you’ll forget all about the pay system to keep people researching who and whose heirs must keep paying, not just after the tribunals are over, but ten years from now and a century from now.
Yes, yes, we are talking about Mere Money versus Human Life and all the rest. But in the real world and in the long term, all that chest-beating crap amounts to getting all the steam off.
Nobody remembers the Nuremberg Trials. Nobody is afraid of being called to a Tribunal in the real world. The Holocaust is remembered every day because it pays out billions of dollars each year.
As I just pointed out, professional conservatives are still decrying Hitler and none of them are asking that any Communist crime be punished for the simple reason that they will lost their JOBS if they get off the Holocaust-racist message.
Whatever else you do when the time COMES, please do not STOP with tribunals.
Keep the steam on.
With mere, dirty old MONEY.
This is more important to me than the whole question of your dramatic tribunals. I disavow tribunals now because they get us off the subject. I am even more worried that having anything that dramatic will blow off the steam and lead to the just as dramatic Love Fest afterwards.
WHATEVER YOU DO, KEEP ON THE STEAM!!!
The respectable conservative mantra has always been “It’s not about race.”
John Derbyshire was just fired by National Review because, among other things, he warned whites against going to a place which is almost all black. He did not make on single statement in that article that could be factually disagreed with by anybody who read it.
It was a set of banned truths.
For example, people often slip into saying that police are not allowed to “profile.” Then you watch a TV program the hero of which is a Police Profiler.
Racial profiling is outlawed, but not because it is not based on facts. A black person is six to twenty times as likely to have committed a crime than a white person.
This is the important point: The police are required to ignore that. Border patrols are required to insist that a person who is blond and has no accent is just as likely to be an illegal Mexican immigrant in El Paso as a brown person who speaks only Spanish.
This is for REAL, gang!
What is also for real is that any respectable conservative who repeats what I just said is fired.
Any respectable conservative who asks to for a definition of the word “racist” that he has just been called will be looking for a new job in this depression economy.
The same is true for any law enforcement officer.
Meanwhile, who mentions any of this?
Your Obedient Servant and no one else.
If commenters would stop worrying about how complicated Mantra Thinking is, they could concentrate on reading articles like this and learning that Mantra Thinking is ridding your mind of all the standard blocks. That is extremely difficult, but it is NOT complicated.
When someone says “racist,” point out that what he means is that IN HIS OPINION something is racist.
This changes the dialogue. He is now demanding laws to punish, not Racism, but ANYTHING HE CHOOSES TO CALL racism. But nobody, I mean NOBODY but me, and now the White Rabbit, can be trusted to say that.
I just had an article about how the media get away with short statements in the midst of articles which are dead wrong, fatally wrong, but anyone outside of Bob and Company will talk about the whole article and try to put that totally false statement “in the context” of the article.
We are always seeing professional conservatives say, “It’s not a matter of race.” According to present wage-earning respectable conservatives, nothing is a matter of race.
This Week Magazine had an article about different kinds of diets. It said, in passing, “Tests have shown that people on low carb diets do not lose more weight than those on other diets taking in the same number of calories.”
Low carb diets threatened to begin doing to the giant Nutritional Education Profession exactly what the discovery of bacteria did to medicine. Bacteria began the total destruction of everything Doctors of Medicine at the University had been paid to learn and know for a thousand years.
There have been plenty of those tests, but they certainly have not shown what the professional nutritionists would give a fortune to prove: that calories are all that matter.
If this had been a headline in a newspaper, it would have been subjected to complete scrutiny. I have been on low carb diets, and while it may not be true that “Calories Don’t Count,” it is for sure I lost a more weight and took in more calories.
But here is the problem: This was NOT a newspaper headline. It was a line in an article. A person who doesn’t think in Mantra terms wouldn’t even notice it.
Yet right here is what we observe all the time: An outright lie, but a lie in low key, a lie told while your attention is focused on where the article is taking you.
Another article in This Week said that “a test had proven” that people who are strongly against gays have gay tendencies themselves. In other words, instead of stating the standard Politically Correct line, they stuck it in the middle of a paragraph in the middle of an article.
ONLY, I repeat, ONLY a Mantra Thinker would say, “Hold it right there!”
I am not saying that there are no such tests. I am saying that the statements are lies.
I remember very well when anyone who said that blacks TESTED lower than whites was anaziswhowantedtokillsixmillionjews.
A Mantra Thinker is always on guard for that stray sentence that completely strips the speaker or writer of any credibility. Unlike most people, the instant he hears a statement like this dropped in, he goes through ALL the implications.
One of BUGsers’ most infuriating and effective strategies is that we don’t let go.
While The Party Line in The Week goes unquestioned, a professional interrogator would be useless if he let ONE such remark go without wringing every drop of sweat and admission he possibly could out of it. These sentences, in the hands of a Mantra Thinker, can destroy the entire credibility of the writer.
But the average person would simply do what most of our main page commenters do: He would take the article on diets AS A WHOLE and discuss what his World View on that question is.
It is almost impossible to explain how the Mantra works until you use it. As comments here show, once you use the Mantra you go into a phase where you simply cannot believe others DON’T use it.
In my experience, nobody who has used the Mantra has ever STOPPED using it.
Mantra Thinking is in the same category. I don’t define it, I expect you to grow into using it. Once you do, I don’t think you will ever STOP using it.
Much of my writing here that doesn’t seem to relate to the Mantra uses some Mantra Thinking on such a wide range of subjects that the thinking itself very hard is to see. Commenters are usually so lost in making general comments on their world view that they don’t notice the Mantra Thinking connection.
Most never will.
But it is VITAL to me that SOME do.
That is the reason I keep bitching so unkindly about Black Outs.
Always remember that I am honestly, seriously, deeply worried about making the mistake Roger Pearson did. My whole, repeat, my WHOLE concern is in NOT leaving a hole when I go that cannot be filled.
So when I read Dick Whitman’s comment, published in full in another article here, it was my idea of fulfillment.
When I write about Black Outs, it is out of FEAR, which is where most genuine anger comes from.
I bitched about your Black Out when you were having that long discussion on David Duke.
Insults and unfounded accusations about Doctor Dave didn’t worry me because I know him pretty well, and he has been subjected to so much abuse, including physical beatings, that you would have to be a past Master to hit him with one that would really bother him.
I have written that Dave is a great man and he has been a hero of mine all my life. He doesn’t need my protection.
My problem was not with what you did say, but with what you DIDN’T say.
You discussed a lot of things about Jews and about Dave, but what really saddened me was the hole you left.
After eighty or so comments I had to be the ONLY one to talk about the all-important difference between Dave’s approach and mine. He is using the old one I used to use! He is exclaiming the virtues of survival for ALL RACES!
Dave is NOT focusing EXCLUSIVELY on the ONLY race whose numbers are actually DECLINING, the ONE race which the media is openly bragging is being done away with.
He MENTIONS that plenty, but that is not his FOCUS.
Seventy comments, and no one mentioned that. So after waiting it out, I had to bring it up.
It is NOT enough that ***I*** answer it.
In fact it is a failure in my life’s purpose if I have to deal with it myself alone.
My job is only done when YOU can handle it.
The Coach’s job is produce not only players, but that some of those players become Coaches.
I am a coach, not a substitute player.
I’ve played both high school and college basketball. I’ve seen coaches scream at my teammates and I, in at least one case (in High School), remember a player bursting out in tears. I saw a coach slap a teammate in the face for being too soft. These coaches demanded excellence and when we made stupid mistakes, we would hear about it. The meanest coach I ever had (and most demanding) now coaches at a very high level (he won a lot and made his players better and went from coaching high school JV teams to Div 1 College in 10 years).
I see Bob as being no different than any of these coaches. He demands excellence and when we make stupid mistakes, we hear about it. DON’T TAKE IT PERSONALLY! Just like these coaches I had, Bob wants to win and make you better.
Now for the troll situation. Because our enemy cannot handle our message outright they will use dirty tricks. Trolling is one such dirty trick. And the sophistication of the trolls will increase. As you see with the current troll, he was here a long time and even took time to spread the Mantra in the past.
In fact, trolls will use spreading the Mantra as their pretext to be here to engage in trolling activities. They’ll spread the Mantra one minute, and then start attacking other pro-Whites the next (or engage in other trolling activities).
Eventually what we’ll see is a troll or a couple trolls (who used to post here or do at this time) start websites committed to smearing BUGS or FTWR. Their main purpose will be to keep others from staying on our message. In fact, there will be people who posted here for years who will one day turn on us and start stirring shit against BUGS.
They’ll say “Don’t start posting at BUGS, those people are all cult members…I used to post there..stay away…BUGS is there to keep you from discussing the Jews…Whitaker is a Jew…blah,blah,blah…etc., etc.”
You guys need to remember that this is a legitimate war. The enemy (anti-Whites) can not handle our message. All they can do is use dirty tricks against us while trying to censor us. And as the message spreads farther (and the anti-White system starts collapsing even faster), the dirty tricks will become MORE DIRTY and more sophisticated.
Wars require disciplined personnel to carry out a plan of action in order to neutralize an enemy system. Wars are stressful and uncertain. But we (pro-Whites) are willing to accept the stress and uncertainty because we feel/believe/understand the importance of saving our race (by destroying the anti-White system by disseminating the mantra to the tipping point).
We will disseminate the Mantra to the tipping point.
We will disseminate the Mantra to the tipping point.
We will disseminate the Mantra to the tipping point.(1)
William Pierce, the highly successful leader of the National Alliance, was a man I knew, liked, and respected. As soon as he died, the organization became moribund.
Something he said near the end of his life has become the basis of what I want from BUGS.
He was asked if there was anyone to take over after his demise. He is reported to have replied, “Yes, but none of them are still alive.” This struck the people who quoted it to me as a piece of ironic humor.
It didn’t amuse me.
It scared the hell out of me.
The man was stating frankly that he had thrown his LIFE away!
I didn’t consider that a bit amusing.
If you can keep that ironic remark in mind without a blackout, you can understand that I am on the hunt to have people on hand who can take the BUGS message right on without a break, whether I am here or not.
For years Brian has been the anchor for our tech work and done the WORK of being editor.
I have been urging him for years to take over and MAKE DECISIONS as editor. HE felt he was too young. So I am ECSTATIC that he has decided to get in here and take control.
One thing I had to learn over the years was delegation. It takes guts to delegate. But you have probably had experience with management that thinks it has to monitor every single step taken by those it manages. You can’t play that game in the big leagues.
If you delegate you become responsible for others’ mistakes. It’s scary.
But if you DON’T delegate, your managerial sphere is going to be VERY limited.
And if you don’t delegate, especially after the age of 70, you might be saying that everything you have worked for dies with you.
Intellectually I begat White Rabbit and he begat beefcake. But it never occurred to White Rabbit or beefcake to clear their initiatives with me.
To put it another way, Ole Coach will advise you when you need it, but you’re the one in the field.
I can’t do your blocking or your passing for you.
And one day the guys on the field now will have to coach their own teams.
If not, the season will be over forever.
Upon Bob’s insistence, I would like to announce a change in comment policy regarding the daily article.
Starting tomorrow we will enforce a policy of one comment per commenter per article per day. Any following comments or those that are off topic will be deleted, regardless of merit.
Bob and I don’t wish to discourage commenting, but we are doing this to encourage a well written and thought out comment to reduce mental diarrhea.
The swarm will not be affected by this change.
Using the title again will galvanize your interest.
I wrote an article on Jewaholism and the comments reached 62 before Brian had to make an editorial decision to end the comments
In my next article, I congratulated you on a major step forward in our history, and only one of two comments on it had anything to say about that. The rest of the comments to that article was still about Jewaholism and bitches about Brian’s editorial decision.
This ignoring of my congratulations and concentration on Jews is as insulting as you can possibly be to me and to my message. But I am sure no one noticed that but me.
No, commenters were too busy telling me how I insulted them or how I am a Cult Leader.
But if this sort of thing really bothered me I would have gotten out of this business long ago.
So the comments on Jewaholism are over seventy and climbing, while my congratulations’ comment score is one or maybe two.
Which shows you the ratio interest in Jews is to interest in what I have to say here.
I’m used to this. I expect it.
Clearly if I want to get even OUR readers really involved, I should talk about Jews and other fascinating issues.
But I am not interested in large numbers of enthusiastic dues-payers.
I’m looking for a few good BRAINS.
The ONLY time we should see links without explanation in Swarm is when it is a straight REPORT of putting the Mantra on the web.
There seem to be LOT of blackouts here. I will see a link that has vaguely to do with something a Stormfronter would be interested in.
If you put a link in BUGS, a WORK area, explain WHY it is there, don’t just drop it in to waste our time.
If it is not a REPORT, a link has to be EXPLAINED.
Surely you can stop having a blackout about that simple rule.
One commenter said he gets confused when he wants to trace ideas to me. He seems to indicate a certain guilt about this.
No way, Jose!
You are doing EXACTLY what, years ago, I could only call Mantra Thinking.
Years ago, when those who are now called the “old hands,” Lord Nelson, the Trucker, WR, had not yet begun here, I would talk about Mantra Thinking. I still do.
But, like the use of the Mantra itself, it is really impossible to explain MT to people who have not been here, been out THERE with our message, and had practice in these things.
Other people are sincerely trying to sell you doctrines. I am trying to sell a Way of Thinking. My goal is and always has been to get you to see the holes in the world that I see people falling through all the time the way I do.
Back in the Chained Book Age, it made no difference whatsoever whether what you said was true or not, or whether what you said WORKED or not. All that made the slightest difference was quoting an Authority, and above all quoting him in Latin or Greek. So no matter how many studies you did, men had more teeth than women because ARISTOTLE said so.
Taking blood from sick people never did them any good, but you could quote Galen, not just in Latin, but in the high-class language of upper class Romans, GREEK, stating flatly that what George Washington needed when he was near death from pneumonia was to have his veins opened and a quart or two of his blood put into a bowl.
This kind of crap would be a joke, and a rather superficial one, if it had not chained US to our chained books.
So in these million words, I said over and over that I was showing you DISCIPLINE in how to save our race. I did not want to get sidetracked, but I would say from time to time that what this discipline, this Other Kind of thinking, would end up in was a new kind of thinking.
And when one of you describes it to me, he sounds APOLOGETIC!
In answer, I should sound CONGRATULATORY!
It took me years to get anyone to use the Mantra itself, but now that we are a Swarm the Mantra Thinking has gotten under way, and I can see why no one would notice it but me.
Our thinking is the latest stage in the transition from the Chained Book Age to the Google Age.
In the Chained Book Age, information was hard to come by. Now it overwhelms us. Mantra Thinking asks, “Why was this particular information produced?”
Mantra Thinking is ANALYSIS of information. It is the careful study of the BASICS BEHIND information.
For me, Mantra Thinking is like the Mantra itself: You can’t understand it until you get used to using it. And once you get used to using it, you will see people who use the old thinking as dunces.
So this was glad tidings, and I offer my congratulations. Before we discuss a history of thought, let’s develop the thinking.
Somebody threw in “Israel for Jews” into my nice, neat, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans.
Outside of satisfying your ADDICTION for talking about Jews, what GOOD does that do?
The Jews and Hitler are what every anti-white is desperate to get into. He can get off into a discussion of the Middle East
Worst of all, any mention of Jews or Israel is completely familiar to everybody, and gets their minds off of our NEW points about white genocide that they have never heard of before.
The best thing you can for anti-whites is to talk abut Jews and Communists. We work our asses off to put them on totally unfamiliar ground where they can’t come up with anything, and then some drooling institution escapee EXPOSES JOOS or Commies.
Why don’t you just cut our legs off LITERALLY.
If you come from BUGS and talk about Jews, Israel, or whatever Stormfront addiction you are addicted to, I beg you to GO ELSEWHERE.
And, please, I was in alcohol and drug recovery and I sponsored a number of people, so don’t tell me you can take just one little sip, one little mention of JOOS and then leave it alone.
If you are a jewaholic, don’t take the first goddam drink, and don’t mention the first Jew.
One of my favorite examples of how anybody who is going to exercise power has to go in blind has to do with aviation negotiations and Richard Nixon.
It is impossible to imagine anyone being on top of being President of the United States going in. Most people go there from the Senate or was a governor or a general or a high level executive who knew next to nothing about the rubber or syrup or service his institution produced.
If there is any job that would seem to prepare you for being president, it would seem to be the only other elected national office, one heartbeat from the white House, the vice presidency.
But when he first reached the White House in 1969, having been Vice President for two terms 1953-1961, Nixon admitted he had no idea how to allocate his time. He spent one of his first days in the Oval Office agonizing over the details of a civil aviation agreement. Far be it from me to minimize the importance of civil aviation agreements, especially ones made way, way above my pay grade, But they are at absolute most the business of a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, and just go to the President for initialing.
But it was on Nixon’s desk, so instead of calling on someone to prioritize for him he worried about it.
Even a former vice president goes in blind. But Nixon probably thought that, as a former senator and vice president, he was expected to know how to do his own prioritizing.
In one of the four thousand or so articles here I have talked about the Senior Executive Service (SES). Eventually, everything here relates to everything else.
Before the Civil Service Reform Act in 1978 or so, the government was not very up-to-date on some things.
Before the Reform Act the top three grades, equivalent to generals were called “super grades.” A person who was in supply in one part of the government, say office supplies, would advance grade by grade in that same area right on up to GS-18.
Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, a sizable typewriter company looking for a new Chief Executive Officer would not look for someone who knew all about typewriters. They hired somebody who had been a chief executive officer or his deputy somewhere else and usually in an entirely different industry.
It took less than a century, but the SES caught up with this. Before 1978 if you wanted to fill a slot at the top of anything you had to find someone who had come up in that area. If you wanted someone to take over office supplies, he had to be picked from the few people who had risen to a supergrade, GS-15 or above, in office supplies.
The Reform Act totally scrapped that. The old supergrades were changed to SES, the old GS-16 becoming SES Level I. Since 1978 an SES is expected to be able to manage personnel, supplies, or other things from one end of government to the other, from Defense to the Interior.
In other words, even the Federal Government finally realized that if you go in at the top, you go in blind.
And nothing is a better example of going in at the top than Mantra Thinking.
The specialists, the writers of times on both sides, hate it.
But if even the Feds can get with reality, so can we.