Archive for May, 2012
One or two commenters have remarked that the Mantra is too American. Both said that the term “respectable conservative” is an AMERICAN term.
The reality is much more interesting — and important — to us BUGSERS.
The term “respectable conservative” was entirely alien to political discussion until I started using it in Whitaker Online at the turn of the century! Hard rightists would refer to the Buckley types as cowards or ignorant, but putting them into a professional category, people who get paid to be a kept opposition, was introduced in my first book and never used again until I re-introduced the term “respectable conservative” and it got taken up around 2000.
Like “the melting pot”: translated into “multiculturalism,” almost every concept that Europe lives by is American. World War II is trying to become “The European Civil War.”
The Latins used to say anyone of any color was “French” regardless of their skin color if they were CULTURALLY French.
Until New York and Harvard and Hollywood explained to them that they had a multiculture.
I have never seen any other person mention this.
There are respectable conservatives in Europe doing exactly the same job respectable conservatives do in America.
The subtext is that there IS NO European political dialogue. It is ALL hand-me-down American. I have to use “respectable conservative” in Europe because Europe needs it.
One commenter said, joking, “It’s lonely at the top, isn’t it, Bob?”
As usual, I smiled, but then I processed the SUBTEXT of that remark.
Strictly speaking, the LAST thing that a person at the top will be is LONELY. One of his major expenses is hiring people to keep people from reaching him. That led me to what a BUGS commenter would see as the Top.
I am at the top of the IDEA CHAIN. That is VERY lonely indeed.
It is SUCH a relief to finally see you doing what I have done through the years. You who are in there in the fight see things that by now you take for granted. On good example is commenters noticing the term “anti-white.” That is a DIRECT connection to US, but who but a BUGSER would know that?
Someone could say that the term “anti-white” was used regularly against Louis Farrakhan and other black separatists. But that is totally untrue.
You can read the old statements until your eyes drop out, and you will NEVER find any statement about someone being anti-white. In every single case, it was “Anti-White and Anti-Semitic,” and the reaction had nothing to do with the anti-white part.
Now even O’REILLY has had a clip with a black raving about how he hates ALL whites, without a mention of the Jewaholic’s Drug of Choice.
No one needs to EXPLAIN why it is important that Don Black referred to the SPLC as “Anti-whites claiming to be anti-racists.”
But you can imagine how impossible it has always been for me to explain how I could tell from the wording that it was MY logic the writer was using. What added to the difficulty was that I found that there was a complete inverse relationship between how my idea spread and its being connected with my name.
A LOT of my thinking comes from the fact that national columnists and their friends read or heard quotes from Whitaker Online and were given points for original thought. Derek Black said this outright when he told me up front that he had tried every way he could imagine to avoid the word “genocide.’
The point here is, Derek did not have to explain what he meant. You do not have to explain what you mean when you quote the exact phrase that can only have come from us.
This is why my entire concentration was on points and words that no one else considered novel. It is LOT different for Derek to tell me that or for you to quote “anti-white” than it would be if you were the ONLY person who worked with that connection.
I honestly believe that a major reason that the Space Telescope is up and the Soviet Union is down is due to a strategy I could not even explain to someone on the outside.
It was VERY lonely.
It is such a relief to have you here!
I quoted White Dude’s report of an anti-white saying he was TIRED of us, meaning Swarmers.
You often see some mention of how TIRED anti-whites are of our message.
OK, Journeyman interrogator, what are they saying?
They are saying we are TEMPORARY.
As you move from journeyman to master, that subtext will jump out at you the way it does at me.
Step One is you have to SEE that they are referring to us as temporary. SECOND, you have to deduce, automatically, WHY they make this assumption.
I have explained that repeatedly here in articles some thoughts were off-subject. I have pointed out, over and over, that that there is a group that is ALLOWED to be “the other side” and get paid to do it. If they start to say something HURTS, it is terminated by a subtle process by which the establishment makes it clear that they will no longer tolerate this.
If it’s effective, they refer to what is hurting them as ‘ The old argument that…” Or they get rid of it by the “extremist” route:
Some William Buckley or Rich Lowry type gets the message, and earns his paycheck by declaring that idea/slogan/concept to be “extremist.”
These Mantra Whiners certainly have no idea of this process, but anti-whites are now whining to the Establishment to do this to the Mantra. They have no idea that we are actually getting around a process no one dares to mention, they just know that, when their side gets hit too hard by an argument, the argument vanishes
And they are demanding that a Rich Lowry (present NR editor) or some other Bill Buckley type make us disappear, and soon.
I have to explain the process to you.
That WORRIES me.
I NEED for YOU to connect these dots for YOURSELF.
White Dude was right, this complaint is a great sign for our effectiveness.
But there is always more to be learned through Mantra Thinking.
This is the way I understand it:
The Caribs, for whom the Caribbean is named, were residents of the islands where Columbus first landed.
As I came up, there were two established facts about the Caribs: 1) They were NOT cannibals, and 2) Caribs were dying in slavery, so a priest arranged the importation of black slaves.
You can look all this up in Google, but what will you have when you do?
The reason no one disputes any more that Caribs were cannibals has to do with the advance of science, among other things, you can analyze the doo and find out what people ate. The Caribs did have that word “long pig,” but “historians” declared that only the ignorant thought that was a word for human meat.
I could scour Google and still come up with information that is as false as my vaguest impressions.
I distinctly remember when Viking settlements in Canada and Indian cannibalism were absolutely MYTHS.
The fact is, it is debatable whether scrutiny of expert information on history is any less false than an old man’s remembrance of when and, above all, WHY some things were Absolute Facts in their day that are not repeated today.
If you become an uncritical part of the Google Age, you are as blind as the so-called scholars of the Age of Chained Books.
So what you get here is not Refined Google. What you get here is WHY certain things are “facts.”
The Global Warming Experts are STILL mystified by what a big scandal it was when their email revealed they were openly cooking information based on what they were ASSIGNED to prove. I understand their bafflement perfectly. They simply cannot believe that cooking information to suit grantees has not been a standard practice since the Popes took over the process a thousand years ago.
You have to BEGIN with something no one should understand as well as BUGSERS: What gets through is what someone WANTS through.
And as soon as someone catches onto what every single scholar who works on grant money has always known, he goes into his Conspiracy Phase.
This is not a Conspiracy, and someone who goes nuts on that score discredits everybody who tries the simple facts calmly. It is the same thing that Jewaholics do to the fact of white genocide.
Any BUGSER quickly learns that information comes through a filter.
That is exactly why the Mantra was so hard to develop and is so hard to get out.
White Dude reports:
“MANTRA SUCCESS! A MUST READ!
“I came across somebody on Yahoo Answers complaining about the mantra being all over Youtube. This really MADE MY DAY! In addition to obviously fighting for Whites and our countries, it’s moments like this mantra posters live for. It’s so gratifying to know we are making a difference.
“Keep up the great work all!”
Yes, good work, but also some desperately needed REVENGE!
All of us have suffered all our lives from Political Correctness Sermons. You are really enjoying a book and suddenly the author introduces a black or a Jew and starts preaching at you the same stuff you have suffered through for years in school.
Some of us, being naturally courteous folks, worry about dropping the Mantra right into a page concerned with cod fishing or botany.
For me, this is delicious. All my life I have been enjoying a book or a movie when it suddenly became a Political Correctness tale about Evil White Men or the Evil South. I get a special kick out of it when you do exactly the same thing to THEM, they are on a page talking about botany when you throw the Mantra right into their faces.
Marxists, including all those who don’t know they are Marxists, insist that EVERYTHING if POLITICAL.
Let’s take ‘em up on that.
I really screwed up when I titled an article Replace First Line of Original Mantra?
What I really meant was shouldn’t we ALWAYS start with Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everybody.”
I apologize to Genseric for my mistake in the title.
You dealt with the exact question Ole Dumbbob asked.
I would make such a dumb mistake at a critical point in BUGS development.
But you did a great job on the ensuing discussion.
For years I have carefully avoided too much open discussion of the Mantra.
You were apprentices and I was the only journeyman present.
I think the older hands here can easily imagine what would have happened if I had thrown the Mantra wording out for general discussion several years ago. I had hammered it out with YEARS of nose-to-nose battles.
On the other hand the whole point of BUGS, as I have so often stated, is to produce, NOT people hearing the Sacred Words of the Guru, but MORE JOURNEYMEN.
So this article was a big step for me, and you passed the test admirably. You did not come into this discussion as a loose group fresh from theorizing on Stormfront, but as writers who have learned to despise theorizing of that sort, and are ready with your EXPERIENCE in actual conflict.
This is a big day for me. After fourteen long years, I have JOURNEYMEN!
Frank really nailed it:
“First the Coach GIVES us a weapon and teaches us how to use it.
“Now he’s telling us we have gotten to the point we’re allowed into the weapon FORGE.
“The Coach is getting us to do what he wants w/o TELLING us what to do.
“Sweet way to trick your apprentices into taking the baton and RUNNING.”
Frank and Genseric are dead right; We don’t want you in the forge with us if you have the slightest tendency toward tossing around hot metal.
My screwing up the question shows why I am getting a little desperate NOT to be the only journeyman or master here any longer than I have to be.
Let’s PLEASE ignore my mistake and concentrate on the important point: That you can get in there with the hot metal and not destroy the forge.
The British Constitution is not written down. So it consists entirely of Statutes and interpretations.
So if all original copies of the original United States Constitution disappeared, would that have the slightest effect on the Constitution itself?
Of course not.
That makes it clear that the Constitution has nothing to do with a document. As with the British Constitution, what matters is its MEANING.
Today Americans say that the Supreme Court is the Constitution. In fact the current opinion of five of he nine members of the Court is the Constitution. This makes the Supreme Court the Supreme Branch of Government. When the Court rules, both the executive and legislative branches only exist to ENFORCE the Constitution, meaning the opinion of five members of the Supreme Court.
In 1803, when the Court began to assume its role in Constitution, most of the authors of the written document were still alive. The Federalist Papers barely mentioned the court, except to point out that it would be the weakest branch of the new government.
Today, your civics course refers to three COEQUAL Branches set up by the Founders, so that the fact that of what two of the Founders said about the Judicial Branch means nothing compared to Father Mommy Professor’s dictates.
In fact, when one Branch BECOMES the Constitution, those two Founders are even wronger.
Actually, each Branch has interpreted the Constitution. President Tyler said he only vetoed bills which he considered as violating the Constitutional power of Congress. When the Court decided that the Indians still owned a major part of Georgia, President Jackson vetoed the decision by refusing to enforce it.
The platform on which Lincoln won the election of 1860 had as its main plank a refusal to enforce the Dred Scot Decision. Article III requires Congress to limit the appellate powers of the Supreme Court.
In the case of secession the final decision was made by an fourth branch of the Federal Government, the armed forces.
And in the end it is this Fourth Branch which interprets and enforces the Law of truly unfortunate Lands. That is what a Constitution is meant to PREVENT.
Mantra is probably one of those terms they like to use in the New Age crap.
Like the Beatles, they also fall for a “guru,” who usually has a dozen Cadillacs.
We are definitely not hippie or New Age. Those are fads. We are in a serious and lasting fight that the media is trying to crush, not use as a fad.
I like being an old fashioned, very American Coach.
One commenter was saying that the Mantra was being determined by the only source that mattered, and I actually tightened up before he said “BUGS” rather than “Bob.”
My whole goal is to get everything I have so practiced and thought out that I can be DONE WITHOUT, and not make William Pierce’s chilling mistake of leaving no heirs.
Hell, I don’t just want an heir, I want a whole set of replacements. That’s what real teachers and real coaches do that gurus cannot.
A Coach is interested in his TEAM.
A Guru is interested in HIMSELF.
The first line about everybody says there is this race problem has given anti-whites their best chance to try to change the subject,
From our experience USING the Mantra — which is what counts — the first line should now be “African for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody! WITHOUT the everybody says line.
Please note that I have admitted you’ve come very far when we consider changing the Mantra itself.
Naturally we will continue to need to move wording around to get around the despots.
But please remember that having to get around censorship is an HONOR. It demonstrates you are dealing with tyranny, which shows you are hitting the bad guys where it HURTS.
Our Dave’s statement about the close relation between Mantra Thinking and my time as an interrogator continues to be a source of fascination and of joy to me.
Despite my bitching, our commentary is at a high level, but I long for a seminar participant who gives ME something to mull over.
An interrogator is irritating. He lets you get away with NO assumption.
So in my racial discussions, when someone says : “It’s just the color of the skin,” I am the only living human being who asks, “Why is that?” “What does the color of the skin mean to people?”
Everybody knows that. But that is exactly the kind of obvious remark in normal discussion that an interrogator in a serious interrogation will not allow to pass.
I have had people give me the Old, Old Story about how whites mistreat non-whites, tell me about racial discrimination and so forth. We have to accept that now but the time will come when you stop blacking out and can be more free in some of YOUR discussions.
Let me repeat that I had the anti-whites on their asses in such a short time that it was a standing joke as my colleagues watched another “anti-racist” get chopped up and they would bet on how many minutes I would take at it this time.
I used different methods depending on how the anti-white recitation started out, as I could long since handle any of them in a DISCIPLINED way.
If the standard sermon started out on how non-whites were oppressed, I would ask, “Is ALL of this just Evil Oppression?” You would be surprised at how difficult a question like that is to a person who is used to merely Reciting the Creed.
I would point out that all countries with colored skins were poor unless they sat on top of oil extracted by others. “Is all this just hate?”
This doesn’t sound like me now, but back then it was a game, because I wanted the people who were listening, and who had seen victims get in the Whitaker Slaughter House before to enjoy some variety, so others would come listen.
And it made things VERY hard on the anti-white.
It was, as Dave would indicate, a habit that made a good questioner. I went on to kill them with the developing Mantra, but an interrogator, unless time is limited as your case, NEVER allows his victim to just ride along and say what he always says.
And someone who is fresh from a thousand sermons from Father Mommy Professor is more shocked at being questioned than any black kid who was driving slowly through a rich neighborhood with a screw driver by happenstance.
Father Mommy Professor’s congregation was always so shocked to be questioned on doctrine and heresy that it made the process not only irresistible to an interrogator, but just plain FUN.
I am anxious for you to get past the Blackouts so you can eventually have some productive fun. An interrogator on a bus-man’s holiday can really make a curse for the bad guys.
But you have to get the basics right first. No more complicated stuff when they say race doesn’t exist. The Mantra says THEY define white. No more Jewaholism. No more maudlin “I love all races equally when only ours is threatened.”
The list goes on and on. But take my word for it, once you get those Blackouts hammered out, you can have some real bus-man’s vacation FUN.
I may be preaching to the converted, but I seem to have seen the Mantra begin with “They say there is a race problem…,” and I now find that isn’t direct enough. Now that my mind is aging, I may be more in tune with many of the minds we have to deal with.
To this seminar, I suggest that the lead, which is the last thing I added to the Mantra, should be included whenever possible as the first punch.
I also favor capitalizing ONLY and ALL in relation to white countries. That is more important to me than whether White is capitalized or not, which is an echo of the time we spent all our resources on that kind of detail.
I use white rather than White because it is easier to show that THEY define white every time they assign guilt and every time they demand a country take immigration and assimilate. Insisting on White screws that simple message up.
Those in charge define the rules and the definitions.
So there are Two Sides: The Ruling Side and everybody who opposes it in any way.
So pro-whites are lumped in with anti-white Catholic theologues as “the right,” because they both oppose some Ruling Side, leftist, European programs.
Professional conservatives are allowed to make their living by the Ruling Group. So no one demands a death penalty for heresy more than conservatives do.
Conservatives earn their keep by RATIFYING liberal policies. The Ruling Class puts in a policy and conservatives denounce it for a generation.
But then conservatives demand the death penalty for the same heresy that was their platform a decade earlier. At that point liberal columnists announce that “Even a conservative columnist now agrees with this policy>“
The Magic Phrase: “BOTH SIDES AGREE.”
I have to keep reminding people that “racist,” though the term is denounced by liberals, and respectable conservatives demand racists be burned alive, is effective because it never occurs to anybody to question it because BOTH SIDES agree about it.
So it comes as a shock when we don’t have a Blackout and point out that even if BOTH SIDES AGREE, “racism” is just the speaker’s opinion.
It was William Buckley, who was the only columnist to endorse the six-year prison sentence given by Austria for Holocaust Denial, who made it BOTH SIDES.
Dave, our own BUGSER Dave, not Dr. Duke, is exactly right when he points out how closely related my time as an interrogator is related to Mantra Thinking. You cannot let the other side get away with ANYTHING.
BOTH SIDES has nothing to do with reality.
One commenter said I am just like Jim Jones, and thank God we are not in Jonestown. I guess it would be Bobstown.
How many people would take an insult like that?
No one has even mentioned my discussion of the fact that after I wrote about Jewaholism and then wrote another argument, over seventy comments came in about Jews and Jewaholism and only one comment on the new article had anything to do with the new article.
I pointed out briefly that that was enormously insulting, but no one has mentioned it since.
It seems to me that insulting me is free of charge here.
Someone once called me white trash, and I pointed he had just proven I wasn’t. I pointed out that at that time in South Carolina, if he had called white trash white trash they would have pulled out their broad-bladed knife, which they opened with one hand, and slashed his face if he was lucky, his throat if he was not
Anything even vaguely approaching a Cult would make it fatal for a person to call me Jim Jones.
It doesn’t bother me. I expect a lot of silliness.
But if you’re going to learn to Mantra Think, you first have to be able to see reality.
Out of the eight or nine Crusades, only one was at all successful. More interesting is the fact that, in two or three of them, the Crusaders were on the verge of victory, their numbers were there and all enemy fortresses and forces had been dispersed.
In every one of those cases, the different leaders got down to disputing who was The Leader and how to proceed with the attack on that basis. In all two or three cases the Moslems had time to completely recover and totally defeat and in one case almost wipe out the Crusaders.
In one huge battle between a German tribe and Rome, the Germans were doing fine until one of their great leaders died. They then proceeded to go into official mourning, right there in the middle of the battle. It was a matter of Principle or Morality or whatever the hell else nitwits used to justify something besides fighting to win.
The Romans, surprisingly, did not go along with this quaint custom. They went out for a good old fashioned slaughter while the Germans were weeping.
I don’t CARE about Justice. I care about winning.
The traitors who are destroying us deserve no mercy, and the person saying this has been in through world wars. I am only interested in saying what is most effective to win and, once we gain the advantage, don’t follow the history of those dumbass Germans or the Crusaders.
As one commenter said, even the Tribunals demanded by the most chest beating glorifier will miss a LOT of the enemy. In the real world, most of the guilty will buy their way out, and, above all, the search will end.
Almost my sole interest is that we USE the money method our enemies have worked out so well.
Believe it or not, what I am most afraid is not Tribunals, but that once the tribunals are over, you’ll forget all about the pay system to keep people researching who and whose heirs must keep paying, not just after the tribunals are over, but ten years from now and a century from now.
Yes, yes, we are talking about Mere Money versus Human Life and all the rest. But in the real world and in the long term, all that chest-beating crap amounts to getting all the steam off.
Nobody remembers the Nuremberg Trials. Nobody is afraid of being called to a Tribunal in the real world. The Holocaust is remembered every day because it pays out billions of dollars each year.
As I just pointed out, professional conservatives are still decrying Hitler and none of them are asking that any Communist crime be punished for the simple reason that they will lost their JOBS if they get off the Holocaust-racist message.
Whatever else you do when the time COMES, please do not STOP with tribunals.
Keep the steam on.
With mere, dirty old MONEY.
This is more important to me than the whole question of your dramatic tribunals. I disavow tribunals now because they get us off the subject. I am even more worried that having anything that dramatic will blow off the steam and lead to the just as dramatic Love Fest afterwards.
WHATEVER YOU DO, KEEP ON THE STEAM!!!
The respectable conservative mantra has always been “It’s not about race.”
John Derbyshire was just fired by National Review because, among other things, he warned whites against going to a place which is almost all black. He did not make on single statement in that article that could be factually disagreed with by anybody who read it.
It was a set of banned truths.
For example, people often slip into saying that police are not allowed to “profile.” Then you watch a TV program the hero of which is a Police Profiler.
Racial profiling is outlawed, but not because it is not based on facts. A black person is six to twenty times as likely to have committed a crime than a white person.
This is the important point: The police are required to ignore that. Border patrols are required to insist that a person who is blond and has no accent is just as likely to be an illegal Mexican immigrant in El Paso as a brown person who speaks only Spanish.
This is for REAL, gang!
What is also for real is that any respectable conservative who repeats what I just said is fired.
Any respectable conservative who asks to for a definition of the word “racist” that he has just been called will be looking for a new job in this depression economy.
The same is true for any law enforcement officer.
Meanwhile, who mentions any of this?
Your Obedient Servant and no one else.
If commenters would stop worrying about how complicated Mantra Thinking is, they could concentrate on reading articles like this and learning that Mantra Thinking is ridding your mind of all the standard blocks. That is extremely difficult, but it is NOT complicated.
When someone says “racist,” point out that what he means is that IN HIS OPINION something is racist.
This changes the dialogue. He is now demanding laws to punish, not Racism, but ANYTHING HE CHOOSES TO CALL racism. But nobody, I mean NOBODY but me, and now the White Rabbit, can be trusted to say that.
I just had an article about how the media get away with short statements in the midst of articles which are dead wrong, fatally wrong, but anyone outside of Bob and Company will talk about the whole article and try to put that totally false statement “in the context” of the article.
We are always seeing professional conservatives say, “It’s not a matter of race.” According to present wage-earning respectable conservatives, nothing is a matter of race.