Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Interrogation for Fun

Posted by Bob on May 21st, 2012 under Coaching Session

Our Dave’s statement about the close relation between Mantra Thinking and my time as an interrogator continues to be a source of fascination and of joy to me.

Despite my bitching, our commentary is at a high level, but I long for a seminar participant who gives ME something to mull over.

An interrogator is irritating. He lets you get away with NO assumption.

So in my racial discussions, when someone says : “It’s just the color of the skin,” I am the only living human being who asks, “Why is that?” “What does the color of the skin mean to people?”

Everybody knows that. But that is exactly the kind of obvious remark in normal discussion that an interrogator in a serious interrogation will not allow to pass.

I have had people give me the Old, Old Story about how whites mistreat non-whites, tell me about racial discrimination and so forth. We have to accept that now but the time will come when you stop blacking out and can be more free in some of YOUR discussions.

Let me repeat that I had the anti-whites on their asses in such a short time that it was a standing joke as my colleagues watched another “anti-racist” get chopped up and they would bet on how many minutes I would take at it this time.

I used different methods depending on how the anti-white recitation started out, as I could long since handle any of them in a DISCIPLINED way.

If the standard sermon started out on how non-whites were oppressed, I would ask, “Is ALL of this just Evil Oppression?” You would be surprised at how difficult a question like that is to a person who is used to merely Reciting the Creed.

I would point out that all countries with colored skins were poor unless they sat on top of oil extracted by others. “Is all this just hate?”

This doesn’t sound like me now, but back then it was a game, because I wanted the people who were listening, and who had seen victims get in the Whitaker Slaughter House before to enjoy some variety, so others would come listen.

And it made things VERY hard on the anti-white.

It was, as Dave would indicate, a habit that made a good questioner. I went on to kill them with the developing Mantra, but an interrogator, unless time is limited as your case, NEVER allows his victim to just ride along and say what he always says.

And someone who is fresh from a thousand sermons from Father Mommy Professor is more shocked at being questioned than any black kid who was driving slowly through a rich neighborhood with a screw driver by happenstance.

Father Mommy Professor’s congregation was always so shocked to be questioned on doctrine and heresy that it made the process not only irresistible to an interrogator, but just plain FUN.

I am anxious for you to get past the Blackouts so you can eventually have some productive fun. An interrogator on a bus-man’s holiday can really make a curse for the bad guys.

But you have to get the basics right first. No more complicated stuff when they say race doesn’t exist. The Mantra says THEY define white. No more Jewaholism. No more maudlin “I love all races equally when only ours is threatened.”

The list goes on and on. But take my word for it, once you get those Blackouts hammered out, you can have some real bus-man’s vacation FUN.

  1. #1 by BGLass on 05/21/2012 - 9:45 am

    Even just pointing out that their entire “personality” is a recitation and this goes for any race. To say: where did you first hear what you’re saying? Who told you to say that? Where did you first hear it? Can you remember? Everybody says what you did, so is it the same person telling them to say it? Do you always repeat what others are saying? Do you REALLY believe what you are saying? etc. Depending on the kind of party, just a few questions can clear a room.

    Shrinks talk about “the authentic life.” The “lived” life, etc. This is to be in one’s own skin. And that is connected to experiencing oneself as having interests, a point of view based in experiential reality (what really happened to you) not Wordism.

    No one really discusses the Downside of the Wordist Life. It comes with a “cut-offness.” A separation of self from visceral experiences. This is the real reason, maybe, that 1/4 of all adult women are currently on psychotropic drugs and all the feminists support it. Something fundamental that can connect the dots (THINK!) has exited.

    If only they could understand the HIGH PRICE (to their soul, psyche, finances, everything) of The Wordist Life.

    At first glance this is not apparent. So many rewards are clearly offered to the Wordist. But… at the end of the day, this “cut-offness” byproduct is a source of great pain that manifests in many ways.

    Just one question exposes the Gulf between (repeated) Word and (experiential) Reality. It can be jarring— often accompanied by a deer-in-headlights look.

    At first —for people who have never tried actually asking a question— it’s a bit frightening. Because ONLY THEN do they realize how far gone some people are—- that they are surrounded by people who, in a very significant way, are “not there.” —like waking up in a room full of pod people and saying ‘what are we really doing here?”

    —- imo, this can only be fun if one has really conquered “death” in their own life.

    Otherwise, it’s just too scary to realize you are bound up with a society of people who don’t think or give a damn about self-preservation. — the root of “white flight”

    “White flight” is not due to areas of non-whites, but areas of Pod People whites. (MOST areas that are “fled” are STILL majority white when they are fled, if you look at the history of some areas).

    —it seems more like they have become –in the unspoken perception of the flee–ers– non-white enough THAT NOW the Pod People Type Whites are now seen as a liability.

  2. #2 by six gun on 05/21/2012 - 10:10 am

    “So in my racial discussions, when someone says :It’s just the color of the skin.” I am the only living human being who asks, “Why is that?” “What does the color of the skin mean to people?””

    The is the very sort of question that busts the opposition.

    You’re a racist!

    What’s a racist?
    What is racism?
    Which definition are you talking about?
    What did I say that was racist in your opinion?
    I see, so in your opinion I’m a racist.
    What makes your opinion correct?
    Do you really think I’m a racist or can’t you think of anything better to say?
    You know the people who start hurling insults are the ones who have lost the argument.
    Have you lost the argument?
    Why do you think your argument is so weak?
    Do you even have an argument?

    Do you know what we are protesting against and what our aims are?
    So you’re just making it all up then is it?
    Yeah I thought you didn’t know what you were talking about.
    You’re just a hater and that’s why you like to attack people.

    I don’t think most of the other side really know what they are talking about.(:

  3. #3 by Dave on 05/21/2012 - 10:14 am

    Another “basic” is never to remove your eye from the value of what the Establishment wants to make obsolete through “progress”. It is really an abuse of law, but Mommy Professor and her minions never see it that way.

    So behind the interrogator’s questions is a power that Mommy Professor cedes. Do you really think Mommy Professor’s debt machine of indoctrination constitutes power? Her followers merely succumb to slavery. What power resides in that?

    WE are lions. Anti-whites are mice.

  4. #4 by Simmons on 05/21/2012 - 11:50 am

    Another basic for interogation is the notion of responsibility. We are dealing with a cult, people join these cults to avoid responsibility from guilt (ie white guilt). The Mantra exposes this nonsense.

    There is a time when the personal pronound “You” becomes a powerful tool in your interogation.

  5. #5 by six gun on 05/21/2012 - 4:33 pm

    I realise it is only supposed to be one comment per day but it is a quiet day.
    Was watching some of Bob’s older renditions, maybe even pre-Mantra. Is helpful for me in understanding the present format.

    Article Two of the convention defines genocide as “any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.

    For me I am English. This is my ethnic group. My Nation.
    A group of people with a common genetic background, culture and history.

    Are we not looking at a multiple genocide here?
    It is perhaps clearer to people in Europe.
    In the US there are Whites from all over Europe and you see each other as Whites.
    In Europe we see ourselves as White but even more so as ethnically English or French and so on. I am White but I am also English.

    Take another look at the Emma West video – my Tram Experience. She initially asks people if they are English. People are replying they are not English.
    Emma then switches to British and people can say they are British as this is a citizen issue, not an ethnic group.

    The woman who starts swearing at Emma for waking up her baby says I’m English….

    The Nation is the people, people often of a common ethnic group.

    This genocide is taking Whites down, but it is a genocide of ethnic English, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, French, German, Swedish, Italian and so on.

    Not only is the White race disappearing but all the Nations will be gone as well.

    • #6 by Gavin on 05/21/2012 - 5:56 pm

      The race as a whole is being targeted. For the anti-Whites it is a racial thing, they are targeting every single White population and only White populations to be blended out of existence.

      This does include all the different White ethnic groups, so it would be accurate for an Englishman to speak about the genocide of his ethnic group. However at BUGS we concentrate on the broader picture where our entire race is under assault including all our our constituent ethnic groups.

  6. #7 by OldBlighty on 05/21/2012 - 11:39 pm

    Since Bob was talking about having fun with anti-whites, I thought you guys might enjoy this anti-white fool. lol

    “Of course I do. I’ve read your “movement’s” little pitch. A child could understand it.

    You are utterly retarded to think that anything so complex as a double negative with an abstract subject and predicate and passive construction can ever achieve widespread Sapiens dissemination.”


    The post above was here:

    This is his website:

    • #8 by OldBlighty on 05/22/2012 - 2:41 am

      Actually I’m not sure if he is anti-white, I think more likely he is insane. Nothing to see here folks.

      • #9 by Koanic on 05/22/2012 - 9:05 am

        You are correct Blighty, I am not anti-white, despite the butthurtness of your acolyte there.

        The point that has him so upset, is that the Mantra isn’t something stupid people will heartfeel and mouthjabber. It’s too complex and abstract for them. “That’s racist” is about their speed. Come up with something equally dumbed down.

        I never said it wasn’t a good way for smart people to win arguments.

        As for my alleged insanity, many sufficiently advanced intelligences have appeared insane to me at first glance. Vox Day, Mencius Moldbug and Texas Arcane, to name a few. My blog is certainly challenging for the average reader, and deliberately so. However, I think you will find little to disagree with in the following two posts:

  7. #10 by dungeoneer on 05/22/2012 - 3:01 am

    “once you get those Blackouts hammered out”

    I recently remembered a good question for the anti-whites` “I believe… white genocide” “I think….white genocide is good”:

    “You believe/think what the anti-white regime orders you to believe/think because you know that any white person who disagrees with turning all white countries brown i.e white genocide is demonized and ruined for “racism”.


  8. #11 by Jason on 05/22/2012 - 7:38 am

    Thanks, this comment made a lot of sense. The fun of all this is watching the shock of the anti-Whites when you don’t come at them with same the old tactics that have failed White Nationalism and/or Pro-White movements for the last 50 years.

Comments are closed.