Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The Google Era Mistake

Posted by Bob on May 27th, 2012 under Coaching Session


This is the way I understand it:

The Caribs, for whom the Caribbean is named, were residents of the islands where Columbus first landed.

As I came up, there were two established facts about the Caribs: 1) They were NOT cannibals, and 2) Caribs were dying in slavery, so a priest arranged the importation of black slaves.

You can look all this up in Google, but what will you have when you do?

The reason no one disputes any more that Caribs were cannibals has to do with the advance of science, among other things, you can analyze the doo and find out what people ate. The Caribs did have that word “long pig,” but “historians” declared that only the ignorant thought that was a word for human meat.

I could scour Google and still come up with information that is as false as my vaguest impressions.

I distinctly remember when Viking settlements in Canada and Indian cannibalism were absolutely MYTHS.

The fact is, it is debatable whether scrutiny of expert information on history is any less false than an old man’s remembrance of when and, above all, WHY some things were Absolute Facts in their day that are not repeated today.

If you become an uncritical part of the Google Age, you are as blind as the so-called scholars of the Age of Chained Books.

So what you get here is not Refined Google. What you get here is WHY certain things are “facts.”

The Global Warming Experts are STILL mystified by what a big scandal it was when their email revealed they were openly cooking information based on what they were ASSIGNED to prove. I understand their bafflement perfectly. They simply cannot believe that cooking information to suit grantees has not been a standard practice since the Popes took over the process a thousand years ago.

You have to BEGIN with something no one should understand as well as BUGSERS: What gets through is what someone WANTS through.

And as soon as someone catches onto what every single scholar who works on grant money has always known, he goes into his Conspiracy Phase.

This is not a Conspiracy, and someone who goes nuts on that score discredits everybody who tries the simple facts calmly. It is the same thing that Jewaholics do to the fact of white genocide.

Any BUGSER quickly learns that information comes through a filter.

That is exactly why the Mantra was so hard to develop and is so hard to get out.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by cecilhenry on 05/27/2012 - 1:19 pm

    I would be curious about people’s thoughts regarding adding a line to the Mantra.

    Because ‘diversity’ is such a buzzword for the media etc I like to include a reference to it such as:

    “DIVERSITY is just a codeword for anti-white. More diverse = less white. How more offensive can you get??? Diversity means Genocide.”

    I would be interested in any suggestions. I think a reference to attack the diversity craze is useful.
    After all, ‘diversity’ basically means ‘not white’ and NOT ME, but ANYTHING else—just as long as its not white and doesn’t benefit whites.

    • #2 by six gun on 05/27/2012 - 8:29 pm

      Diversity is certainly a big lie.
      By not mixing races the natural diversity of people is maintained. By mixing in the melting pot we have coffee people by the score = no diversity.

      I wrote on youtube somewhere yesterday that people state diversity is good. Diversity is bad. The more homogeneous communities are the more stable and harmonious they are. The very idea that throwing disparate people together and thinking the world will be wonderful is sheer stupidity.
      There is only an obsession with diversity in White communities.
      The reason for this diversity is to achieve race mixing and White genocide.
      There can ultimately be no other outcome. It might take 100 years, it might take 200 years but it is achieved in the end. So even if a proponent stated this was not their intention, the outcome is virtually certain and under UK law this is sufficient for the necessary intent. I suspect the same applies in other parts of the globe.

      The Mantra is basically sound +/- the modifications on trial at the moment.
      Yes strap lines like
      Diversity is just a CODE WORD for White geNOcide.
      or a mini Mantra

      Diversity is demanded only in White countries and all White countries.
      Diversity is a code word for White geNOcide.

      Multiculturalism is a code word for less racial diversity.
      Multiculturalism is a code word for the geNOcide of all races exposed to it.

      This is an angle which I have not seen employed much for our advantage.

      There is no doubt that many of the Blacks in the USA for example have gone down a cultural drain. The Blacks of say the 1950’s may have been relatively “oppressed” but they were many times more decent that the ghetto gang culture degenerates of today.

      Once upon a time Blacks were as keen on no race mixing as Whites and that was not just because they might acquire a hemp neck tie. Mohammed Ali was a good example.

      This is far from our primary concern but the same forces that pushing for the extinction of White people are also dragging others into a pond life cesspit as well.

      There are lots of lines you can put together using multiculturalism, diversity, less diversity, code word, White geNOcide.

      Those mentioned are all in keeping with the Mantra message but I don’t think it is necessary to alter the Mantra. I would just use them as and when necessary to reinforce the Mantra message.

      • #3 by runner on 05/28/2012 - 2:07 am

        six gun said: “So even if a proponent stated this was not their intention, the outcome is virtually certain and under UK law this is sufficient for the necessary intent. I suspect the same applies in other parts of the globe”

        Can you please post this U.K. law? The U.N. Convention on Genocide has been ratified by 142 world countries.

        • #4 by six gun on 05/28/2012 - 5:26 am

          R v Nedrick (Ransford Delroy) (1986) 8 Cr. App. R. (S.) 179

          The case was decided by the Court of Appeal [second only to the House of Lords – the Supreme Court] where although the intention of the accused was not to kill the child the jury were held could find intent was present b/c the actions made this outcome virtually certain.

          Being part of a process where all White countries are flooded with non-Whites, where racial mixing is being promoted is virtually certain to result in racial mixing with the ultimate obliteration of the indigenous people.
          To say I did not intend to cause the genocide of the indigenous Whites would not be sufficient. Even if it could be shown it was not your intent, this would not necessarily lead to your acquittal.
          We are broadcasting the virtual certainty of this outcome with the Mantra. The statistics of White minority status dates are widely publicised.
          It would be reasonable to believe the accused would know their actions would result in this. The jury could find them guilty even if they claimed they were not to be directed at genocide and if it could be shown they were not directed at genocide.

  2. #5 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 05/27/2012 - 2:20 pm

    The Federal Government and the Media Mafia are lying to us.

    We know that their agenda is White Genocide and to lower the surviving population of Earth to subjects of a totalitarian One World Government, reducing the population to slaves of the New World Order Masters.

    Knowing what their goals are makes it easier to discern the lies, and the purpose of the lies.

    Even if they had a totally different agenda, they would still lie to us, in order to promote that agenda.

    Hence the old adage (if the adage is good, it will remain in use) you can’t believe anything you hear, and most of what you see.

  3. #6 by Gavin on 05/27/2012 - 7:40 pm

    So the mistake of the google age is…not looking at why a piece of information is available?

    I read this article several times and got kind of frustrated that I wouldn’t seem to pick out the point.

    • #7 by Genseric on 05/27/2012 - 11:40 pm

      “WHY is this information being produced?”

      Forget ‘available.’ It is FORCED down our children’s throats at gun point.

      Immigration, assimilation and intermarriage in EVERY White country and ONLY in White countries.

      • #8 by Gavin on 05/28/2012 - 12:51 am

        Yes, information is a commodity, made to order.

        Everyone knows that pizza makers, tailors, construction firms etc… make their products to the specifications of those who are paying them but they seem to think that “academics” are somehow not responding to market demand.

        Recently there was an announcement that a new “institute to study anti-semitism” was forming lead by some Professor. Why an institute to study anti-semitism but no institute to study anti-Whiteism? There is money in defending Jews but no money in defending Whites.

        He who pays the piper calls the tune.

        • #9 by Genseric on 05/28/2012 - 11:04 am

          So, in short (AGAIN), “It’s the money, DUMMY.”

          All the more reason to adopt coach’s idea of money punishment for anti-whites; all the more reason to adopt it wholesale.

Comments are closed.