Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Us Lowah Clahss Types End Up WINNING, Part II

Posted by Bob on June 24th, 2012 under Coaching Session


We hear abut the defeat of Nazi Germany 65 years ago daily. But no one discusses the fall of the USSR.

At all.

From the point of view of our established religion, every single fact about the fall of the USSR is bad.

It is also a testament to the Mantra Approach.

You see, the greatness of the Centrally Planned Economies (Communist states), was an article of faith to both left and right. So the Communist own estimates of their miraculous economic growth were faithfully reported by all the major media the CIA. And the DOD.

Why?

The more dangerous the USSR, the more money the CIA and DOD got, so left and right played along with this, the left to show that bureaucrats could run the economy just great and conservatives because they do LOVE to flood the military with taxpayer money.

At UVA, which I entered in 1963, they knew very well the Soviet Empire, the Centrally Planned Economies, were running a fake. In fact, I suspected that when in 1958 they put up a basketball sized Sputnik from a design used on American missiles IN STOCK.

But the result was a declaration of the superiority of Soviet Education and tens of billions in an act funding for Universities in the Defense Education Act, the renewal of military welfare for Europe and lots and lots of money for slavering conservatives to put into the military.

It’s TOO simple: We were Fighting a Superpower when we should have been exposing a fraud.

This should be sounding a little familiar to BUGS.

I have never heard of ANYTHING the Soviets had that they invented. But Soviet Superiority was the key to hundreds of billions for the favorite projects of left AND right.

Jerry Pournelle, science fiction author from Louisiana, specifically proposed SDI, which Ted Kennedy promptly labeled Star Wars.

The mythical Soviet Science Superpower had nothing to copy yet. It had nothing to even BEGIN to compete with real US science.

But all of us knew all the way back to 1958 that the Soviet Union would come tumbling down if the fundamental fraud was exposed.

Simple.

As simple as, shall we say, the Mantra?

But “both sides” in American politics had a huge stake in the reality of Soviet Greatness.

If one ever discussed the period of the collapse of the Soviet Empire, one would see what we all saw and everybody but me has carefully not mentioned: The desperate last ditch attempt by the ENTIRE left to save it.

In 1981 Star Wars happened to be the policy picked.

It hit the fake directly. The USSR was supposed to be One of the Two Great Scientific Powers. Suddenly Reagan proposed something the USSR couldn’t even BEGIN to do. Ending Star Wars instantly became the priority of the ENTIRE left, from moderate liberal to outright Communist.

Every discussion between Reagan and Gorbachev was now about ending Star Wars. Gorbachev desperately offered a Nuclear Freeze, and even the last Superman movie was dedicated to the Nuclear Freeze.

Which is a major reason it WAS the LAST of the Superman series. Another lecture on Political Correctness in the middle of Nuclear Freeze hysteria was not what people went see in a fun movie.

An audience killed the major TV movie that was put on for the specific purpose of this Nuclear Freeze, by which was meant ending SDI.

And on and on and on. It was a desperate deluge to save The Worker’s Paradise.

Recently Intelligence has given out reports of Ted Kennedy’s meeting with Soviet reps discussing treason.

Bringing down the USSR was easy, and could have been done in 1958.

Destroying the USSR was not a battle against the USSR, but a battle against moderate Republicans and their Uppah Clahss conservative supporters.

This is what happened, and you will read it stated flatly and simply here and NOWHERE else.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by Simmons on 06/24/2012 - 8:28 am

    Bob will say what is our purpose in debating anti-whites is to get the anti-whites to tell the audience their agenda.

    In 1976 one of the establishment idiots named Gerald Ford on national TV during a presidential debate gave an answer much like that. He was asked a question about the Cold War and he stated in militant stupidity that Poland was not communist. That was an answer a “respectable” moron could give at a NYC cocktail party in a phony debate, but in front of the whole country it basically destroyed the Democratic coalition for the 1980 presidential race.

    The anti-whites are today’s “militant stupidity”, doubt me then ask yourself have you dealt with one you could actually call smart?

  2. #2 by six gun on 06/24/2012 - 8:39 am

    I can actually see this thing starting to come unstuck.
    I’ve been posting Mantra on a Daily Telegraph feature. Ed Milliband the leader of the Labour (socialist) party has just come out and said Labour got it wrong with immigration. The previous traitors had a secret policy to flood the country and rub the noses of the Right in Multiculturalism. Anyway he has said it was wrong. He is probably sensing his voters are sick to the back teeth. He is also probably rejigging the jargon so it is the same process with another name as camaflogue. But the people are waking up.

    The Daily Telegraph thread is packed with what would have been called racists (I use that word deliberately, let’s not hide behind R words for our own discussions). But no, the few who cry hateful names are being thrashed. A leftist said the ethnicity of the immigrants should not matter. I said yes it does and launched into my 2066 White British minority spiel. I like that as it effects White Britons in a very visceral way. Remember we live on our little islands and Johnny Foreigner is just over the water. Did I get deleted? Did I get criticised. Not at all. Thumbs up.

    I went to a forum I was banned from long before I found BUGS. There was of course the old crowd discussing politics and Milliband’s U-turn [flip flop]. The lot of them, almost to a man saying I told you so. The working man was screaming for these immigrants out 50 years ago, look at the crime, look at them driving wages down, living in garages and sheds all over London, under bridges, blah blah. Savaging the few who would dare speak against the new tide of sentiment. What they were saying of course was what I was saying except I was on a daily basis being called all the hateful names and a few more.

    I told my friend about 2066. He was quite angry. It is coming and when it really does come it will be as fast as the Berlin Wall came down.

  3. #3 by Dave on 06/24/2012 - 10:47 am

    Men are bridled and are driven inexorably into becoming “Lowah Clahss Types”. 1958 was a bloody time and an ocean of blood was split right up to the day the Berlin Wall was torn down but currently the bloodshed has subsided somewhat.

    The obligation of a slave (e.g., “Lowah Clahss Type”) is to restore the honor of the house of his master and it is either done (i.e., Armenia) or not (i.e., Serbia) and this is where the Russians, the various peoples of Eastern Europe and Central Asia are now. With the collapse of the Soviet Union the “houses” of these peoples got some sort of a restoration and supposedly it is a work in progress, but I wouldn’t count on it.

    The Anglo Saxons, Western Europeans, and Americans think they are exempt from all this. Furthermore, the Americans have a nigger President and STILL think they are exempt. GO FIGURE!!!

    I can’t.

    Nevertheless, I certainly agree that Us Lowah Clahss Types End Up WINNING. It’s in the moral order of things.

  4. #4 by Daniel Genseric on 06/24/2012 - 11:44 am

    FEAR-BASED SOCIETIES ALWAYS FAIL. I REPEAT, A-L-W-A-Y-S.

    It IS lonely at the top, no? Nowadays, the U.S. (see how the A. becomes silent all the time today- The Best Ideas Corporation is dissolving already) has a much more difficult time publicly justifying, sustaining, and promoting what would now be, when adjusted for inflation, multi-trillion dollar programs.

    The Soviets’ major mistake was NOT successfully trivializing and marginalizing The Space Program. What they needed was a distraction, what they did was tailgate in the worst way imaginable. They bought it hook, line, and SINKER. They SHOULD have crafted a meme like, “The U.S. Space Program is ‘revolutionary.’ It is truly a REVOLUTION in wasteful government spending.” Fast forward 50 years and the whole world can see that and it is now time to privatize The Space Program as we punch our ticket on the galactic railway. Time for yet another Reset. Or is it? Depends on who you ask.

    We won’t let the opposition sideline the Mantra or our network, nor will we let them strap it to some monkey’s ass and jettison it into the Memory Hole of outer space. Better yet, ours is a project financed without money. However, we will punish the anti-Whites by ripping from them their most beloved and prized possession; THEIRS.

    FASTER than the Berlin wall, baby…..oh yeah!…think exponential curve. This time everyone has a vested interest. They are SO screwed. They are going to be walking around with their heads on backwards. Watch… I call it political WHIPlash.

    Reference: Ollie North on the reset – http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/war-stories/2012/06/22/russian-reset-part-ii
    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/us_russia_from_reset_to_regret_4F4WsahFbK2Fepa4lWmT9L

  5. #5 by steadiness on 06/24/2012 - 5:52 pm

    The USSR did, however, have some word-class physicists and mathematicians, as well as chess players.

    We have to remember the terrible rot in American schooling brought on by integration. In 1959, an IQ of 85 was retarded. Following the Civil Rights Movement, that bar was lowered in 1973 to 70.

    The USSR really did teach math and physics and chess. In part, they did it through shameless competitions of the sort that Americans would never accept.

  6. #6 by BGLass on 06/24/2012 - 6:24 pm

    He is also probably rejigging the jargon so it is the same process with another name as camaflogue. But the people are waking up….”

    There are so many name changes— and people should ask more about it. How are these things different. i.e., “integration, multiculturalism, desegregations,” for example. But people just adopt a new term, over and over, without comment. They should really ask: a) what facilitated this change in term? b) who demanded it? c) who benefits? d) how is it different, if at all?

    Even now, in journalism schools, they teach to ask, who (benefits), what, when, why, where— “the five w’s” –even if it’s understand a “professional” Capital-J Journalist would be fired for inquiring.

Comments are closed.