Archive for June, 2012
I said in an article that our Boss here was not Bob, but whether what we try WORKS. A commenter asked, quite reasonably, “How do you know if it works?’
I am delighted that BUGSERS have already become experts at doing what it took me decades to learn: they look for OUR words, like “anti-white,” to appear. Only we know they are unique, and that is how I tracked my own trend during earlier battles.
In more specific terms you can only learn to gauge whether a particular approach works if you are in the midst of a debate, and can tell what is getting through. This is difficult, but there is joy in knowing that the other side has no idea you are doing this.
You can have the joy of knowing that the anti-whites, like all my foes and hurtful allies over the years, have not the slightest idea you have a means of tracking success which has nothing to do with Bill Buckley or some other Name approving you.
In fact, as I have said repeatedly, tracing an idea to me is fatal, because very, very few people really put their cause above their ego. So I had to find the signals and see them while absolutely no one else saw them, as we do with “anti-white,” “respectable conservative“ and the rest of a long list..
Most people simply will not join in a cause which has no polls and no score card. This is an INTEGRAL PART of my exercise of power. I took no credit, I had no ego. All I wanted was power.
And if there is no poll or other public indicator like a national columnist naming you, people will simply refuse to do the WORK.
I just want to rule the world. The rest was for the Big Names.
If you genuinely cannot figure out, in all those exchanges, whether something is working or not, you should stick strictly to the BUGS routine. If one in a hundred of our regular readers did that, we would be on our way.
Our routine has changed the language of politics enormously already, and nobody notices it but us.
Finding out how to judge our success in general and your success in particular is learned in the field.
But a few of us have greatly changed the language already.
Don’t vary it until you are sure you can judge the results.
Discussing theoretical changes with theoretical results is what makes one a Stormfronter instead of a BUGSER.
A new commenter calls himself Southern Nationalist. What became Whitakeronline.org began its existence as part of the League of the South Online.
When the League of the South split, I continued writing for both sides. Since WOL was the most popular column on both web sites, they accepted this, but of course considered me a false friend.
Finally I took the big step and set out as WOL alone.
Both sides in the LOS banned discussion of race. In fact at the beginning it was frequently claimed that the Confederate Army had a huge number of blacks in it! The LOS also tried to get a good image by claiming the CSA would be melting pot, just like today‘s USA.
Which, of course, left it to us murmurers to wonder why we should leave the Big USA to become a small USA. Both sides in the split went along with this version of today’s BNP idea of sounding just like the mainstream. Prevented from saying anything good about my own people, I used the column in the early days to chide both sides. That’s when I made “respectable conservative,” a combination never used, and certainly never explained, by anyone before.
So welcome to my comrade, Southern Nationalist.
But am I a Southern Nationalist now?
That goes right along with the question, am I an American patriot now?
That would depend on what those words MEAN, of course. Today, that is the way the Patriots hook you. People worship the American soldiers in Afghanistan, but I don’t. To often they will say they are Americans and will then immediately say, in effect, that they have no loyalty whatever to the American people, as in “We the People.”
Their eyes go blank and they say they are not for “We the People,” which would be bigoted and nationalist, but for the “Principles America stands for.”
In the Declaration of Independence, which was written in a time of a war for survival, Jefferson was appealing for help from abroad. Jefferson realized that simply saying “We the People” would not appeal to OTHER peoples in France and England.
By contrast, when we actually wrote and ADOPTED our OWN Constitution, it began by saying that we are the people of the United States who wanted to make a better union FOR OURSELVES.
And WE adopted it.
From the point of view of the Constitution, this “principles” crap is treason.
A Higher Principle is, in fact, the very first thing every traitor claims.
You can be a Wordist, or you can be a nationalist. Look at the Muslims in the US Army. It is a matter of their faith and culture versus this bureaucracy that has given them a piece of paper to make them “documented.”
In the real world, that “principles” rap is an excuse to shoot your own guys in the back.
Or to destroy your own race in the name of Americanism.
I hope beefcake is used to me giving everybody a hard time. It’s as close as a coach gets to “Welcome to the club!”
To beefcake’s proposal on how to handle the term “white,” he was getting complicated, so I said “Bullshit.”
Please note that this is not an announcement that The Guru hath pronounced upon this as the leavings of cattle.
Bob just said “Bullshit.”
Humpty Dumpty says he started this wording discussion and expands on it and wanted a Final Papal Decree on it from Bob.
The judge of all our efforts is not the Coach.
The judge is the score board.
How does it WORK?
Out there on the field.
My job here is to get YOU ready to judge things out in the field. After generations of competing egos and Leaders on our side, this is a very difficult concept to get used to.
Please note that, like other coaches, I haven’t been out in the field for YEARS. I certainly haven’t been in a field where the other side, or our side, has had the Mantra repeated to them.
I’ve dodged censorship, but not bots. The BNP years ago was very complimentary and astonished about my getting a book with the Mantra and a lot more in it past the British Censors.
But your dodging the bots and dealing with all the suppression is exciting and fascinating.
Try it and report on the RESULTS.
While I became a coach, our entire non-movement spent all its time talking about how to answer things, and no one but me was out there finding out what WORKED. And when they saw my stuff working in the real world, they just went back and theorized. My results on the scoreboard never even occurred to anybody as important until people like Lord Nelson came around.
No, I do NOT want to judge your discussion, except for a “bullshit” now and then, and that’s just my opinion.
I want to hear reports from the front. If you got a theory, TRY it.
I am not going to be here forever and I need for our more senior members to get in here and coach.
In article comments, Simmons says:
“… when I go to a thread that a BUGster has Mantraed I will make it personal to an anti-white, but not threatening. I will ask, “why are you an anti-white and why do you advocate for the genocide of whites, thanks.”
“’Personal but not threatening,” .Remember in human history the virus has killed more than the sword swinging berserker by far.”
That’s a PRO talking.
A commenter is trying out asking people “Who told you to say that?” That is VERY good!
But do it with DISCIPLINE.
What I am saying here results from the subtext analysis of that brilliant insight.
This article also discusses an argument that you might want to try out on someone at some point. With discipline. Right now you MUST tell anti-whites who say there is no such thing as white that they pick the countries that must allow immigration and assimilation by that exact criterion.
But now that some of you are at the journeyman stage, you know when there’s a break you can experiment in.
A bit of subtext on that “Cult” spat: Every apprentice begins in a cult. That is, no matter how natural a talent he is, he has to spend some time having the most basic rules hammered into him. He makes his actions automatic, and THEN he begins to create new ways.
I really do consider myself a Coach, and I really do conduct this seminar that way.
Some things that are absolutely true and absolutely absurd were unspoken until the publication of Parkinson’s Law about 1951. It was a humor article, but it was the ironic humor, the bald truth as told by an Englishman before the Weakest Generation.
There have been a lot of Laws since. Parkinson’s Law opened a way of communicating cynicism that is true by ironic humor and calling it a Law.
Parkinson’s Law stated that “Work increases to fill the time allotted to it.”
To the humorless bureaucrats Alfred Northcote Parkinson was used to, this was a bad joke. But everyone knew that if you assign a whole department to something, they will stay busy with it, as Parkinson said, “No matter what the effect on the product, if there is indeed a product.”
The Law I outline as the title of this piece is recognized by everyone, but stated by no one. When a person being questioned by the police says “I didn’t do it.“ the statement is taken down, but it is weighed against the Need to Say Law that is the title here: he NEEDS to say he didn‘t do it.
So people say “There is no such thing as race“ or “Global Warming exists and can only be cured by bureaucrats taking over the world economy.” People were dumb enough to accept the first as Pure Idealism until the top environmental scientists were caught cooking the figures..
So we learned again that what is said is what a person needs to say. It’s a lot like the Intelligence Need to Know Rule. It could be called the Need to Say Rule. When someone says race does not exist, it might be useful to point out that in public people HAVE to say that.
This brings up the whole spectrum of Hate Laws and personal violence and career ruination.
Anti-whites have no shame. I would be embarrassed to repeat what everyone has heard a thousand times the way they do. Maybe this is a way to peel off a little of that absolute lack of concern about being an obvious damned fool.