Archive for June, 2012
Solzhenitsyn once mentioned a true story from the Gulag. A Quaker woman was allowed to visit the Gulag, and the only inmate she quoted only asked her “How are the Negroes in America being treated?” She reported this as the only concern prisoners in Gulag had!
They were just fine but “Your Negroes” were persecuted. She was religiously quoted in Political Science lectures.
One of the regular stories they told us in grammar school was that William Penn was sweet to an Indian, and the Indian, a chief like all Indians, promised no Indian would ever kill a Quaker.
And, the history teacher told us gravely, no Indian ever killed a Quaker from that day on.
I must have been VERY young, because I could smell improbabilities from a very early age.
The North Carolina ancestors of Richard Nixon were known as “fighting Quakers.”
In fact ALL Quakers who lived near Indians were known as “fighting Quakers.”
Pennsylvania’s Quakers never fought Indians because they seldom SAW Indians. The people in the mountains kept the Indians away from Philadelphia and farmland. Benjamin Franklin HATED Quakers, read his biographer about their hypocrisy.
So when it came to voting money to defend the mountains, the Quakers reverently said they did not finance war. In other colonies the safer residents just said, “No, I’m all right, Jack, so screw you.”
This was about all the Gulag she reported. European Intellectuals reported it as the whole story of the so-called Gulag, which they simply refused to admit existed except as regular prisons.
For the fiftieth time, let me repeat this: all this is SAFELY in the Memory Hole.
So the Berlin Wall was a neutral device “To keep some people in and some people out.”
The German public was ASTONISHED to discover that escapees were shot on sight.
That is one hell of a solid Memory Hole! A lot VISITORS like Robert Morley found guns pointed at them when they viewed the Hungarian trench from the inside while touristing Hungary.
The Quakers’ passive aggression was one of the best weapons the Reds had. The fake Leftist Hippies used the same passive aggressive approach to win for the Communists in Nam.
Those who help preserve the Memory Hole are at least as guilty as those who provide it. At least those who provide it are straight, ideological Communists. In some ways, they are like an enemy wearing a uniform.
We capture enemy soldiers, but International Law lets us EXECUTE those aiding the enemy OUT of uniform.
Saturday September 15, 2012 will be a day to remember. Ole Bob will put on his White Rabbit Costume and give a talk to the Stormfront Conference. Well maybe you won’t see Ole Bob in a White Rabbit Costume. But you will hear him speak at the Stormfront Conference. And He will be speaking first thing in the morning after Don and Derek Black. After Bob, you will hear Truck Roy and yours truly talk about Practical Politics. There should be some Q&A time allotted as well for the Swarm etc. You can find out all about the Conference at the below Stormfront thread.
Until last year, I had never been to a Stormfront Conference. And I was pleasantly surprised. Bob is no neophyte to these things. And even he was excited about the BUGS presentation last year. It is damn difficult to get Bob excited. This conference will be like the previous one on Practical Politics with a few new topics thrown in for discussion. The location will not be disclosed until the morning of the Conference. Over at White Rabbit Radio we have headed into animation. And we are currently busy working on our 2nd animation. So we will have all kinds of interesting topics to discuss at the conference.
Youtube has taken down our first animation for “hate speech”. And we are currently protesting this via their formal process. As most of you know the video had garnered 110k views in just a couple months. Obviously, we want it back up on our main channel where we can continue to rack up numbers. But anyone can go to www.whiterabbitradio.net and still view it. No sooner than Youtube took down our animation than dozens of copies went up on various Youtube channels. We appreciate all those that helped spread the first animation. Stay tuned. White Rabbit Video is just getting warmed up.
Read I before you read this II.
If you are to be a successful senior staff your Member calls on in questioning, you have to know up front that people act like people. When a genuine military hero and honest man testifies about military expenditures, he BELIEVES that same lie his less honest compatriots do not.
When a leftist idealist testifies, and there ARE real ones, you should not be up there if you don’t have a nasty little mind that starts with the assumption that he will testify just like Father Mommy Professor would.
You wouldn’t have the slightest difficulty making this a part of your thinking as if we were talking about industrial lobbyists.
But with Idealists, your first thought must be, “What’s the agenda?”
No, not “What’s his EVIL agenda?” Father Mommy Professor explains Forbes’ dedication to free market by the fact that he is filthy rich. But the fact is that Forbes GENUINELY believes in the free market.
When a dedicated leftist professional educator demands bigger government, incidentally including a much larger education budget, it is not because one of the Learned Elders whispered this to him at the regular 3 am meeting in the White House.
In South Carolina, the biggest lobby against expanding the rights of weapons’ permit holders is SLED, the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division.
US Steel wants to control steel imports, SLED wants to control weapons the way they used to.
In the old days, I knew the only man in South Carolina without a badge who had the statewide permit to carry a gun.
The chief of SLED liked him.
Control of guns is the main prerogative the profession of law enforcement has.
Every human being in every occupation is touchy about the one thing his occupation controls.
This includes honest policemen. This includes HEROIC policemen.
The one thing an interrogator can never forget for a second is that he is dealing with PEOPLE.
I do not want my insights to die with me, as I have made very clear.
I want some of YOU to absorb and USE listening to the silence and to stop and look at the “subtext.”
Uncle Bob Wants You to ask the question, “Why was this information produced?”
There is another type of thinking I do which can give you amazing access to reality. And, like everything I say, it is obscure because it is so simple.
Let me start it this way. You are a staffer on a committee and a genuine military hero like Ollie North or Audie Murphy is testifying. But he is testifying about military expenditures. You look over to your boss and shake your head. The simple fact is that what the hero is saying is not true.
Your boss may call you over to whisper in his ear what is wrong, but it is hard for some conservatives to believe that a staffer for an extremely conservative Republican would call a war hero, especially a CONSERVATIVE war hero, something very close to a liar.
He is a fine man, but he is testifying about MILITARY money. The finest, most honorable person in the world is just plain biased on some things.
Most of my first book in 1976 was dedicated to explaining how there is no fundamental difference, realistically, between General Motors and the National Education Association. The NEA has at least as large a stake in big government as General Motors has in a protectionist policy on auto importation.
My doctor brother and I used to laugh about the desperate attempts to find something dangerous about caffeine, as they did about cigarettes. It would seem an odd thing to read about research on caffeine and then laugh.
But the logic is that a lot of people could get promotions or raise money if caffeine were found to be dangerous. Look at the tens of billions that have been made from tobacco suits and tobacco regulation!
When I talked about the Human Betterment INDUSTRY in my first book it was not just a dramatic use of wording.
A major portion of today’s American population actually makes its living directly or indirectly from what I accurately call INDUSTRIES but most people think of as “social concerns” or something.
Now a CRITICAL point:
This is not hypocrisy.
This is not a Conspiracy..
This is human beings acting like…well, PEOPLE.
Silence is a most effective technique precisely because it WORKS. It works because no one on our side listens to the silence.
There was a period when all the major talk shows had on identical twins who had been separated at birth and adopted into widely different families. I know, for example, that identical twins adopted separately this way tend to commit the same crimes at the same age, but this was about how they liked the same products and did so many of the same things.
This was fascinating, even to me. The audiences ate it up.
I saw the way the whole thing stopped. A set of identical triplets adopted at birth into Catholic, Protestant and Jewish homes was being presented by a psychologist. Donahue simply said to the psychologist, “Doesn’t this tend to prove that heredity is more important than environment?”
In Donahue’s terms, this was asking “Are you a Nazi?”
The whole fashion, which had been going on for months, ended that day.
No one noted its instant passing but me. Conservatives are past masters at knowing when the Memory Hole is open.
After months of hype,. no one heard the Silence. Anyone who reported the silence lost his livelihood.
There is no money in heredity, but every educational program, the whole Human Betterment Industry which spends trillions each year, depends on environment. I discussed that in my first book.
We no longer go so much for this heredity versus environment thing, but a lot of people do.
I never see them using identical twin tests. It is not discussed.
These people tend to write things about stuff some Big Name published.
Only BUGS is here to hear the Silence.
And if all the rulers have to do when something out there is ONCE AGAIN a total failure in the real world is to be silent about it, that is what they will do
Absolutely nobody talks about the Soviet economic system collapsing because it was SILLY. No one, then or now, ever mentions the people shot down in cold blood trying to get OUT of the Workers’ Paradises
No one thought to mention that all this talk of Humanity and open borders and “assimilation“ was only for WHITE countries. Pro-whites are at least as shocked at such a thing being mentioned as are others.
“How Europeans Took Over America” was so effective an anti-white featured it.
It is now banned by YouTube.
Don’t FORGET that.
For humans, St. Peter insisted on The Golden Rule.
Animals, he said, were “made to be taken and destroyed. “
That’s safely in the Memory Hole, of course, since there is a whole industry called Animal Rights. In fact, there is a Memory Hole about the Golden Rule, since so many people make their living by interpreting the Ten Commandments.
“So the mistake of the Google age is…not looking at why a piece of information is available?”
I read this article several times and got kind of frustrated that I couldn’t seem to pick out the point.
Two things the world really needs is writers who have the guts to admit they screwed up and readers to say they just don’t GET it.
Most of the old writers who make total goofs of themselves are crippled by readers who think that if they do not understand The Master, it is because of a lack in them.
Often I know I’m saying something important but I haven’t gotten it straightened out in my mind.
So I thought about the basic point here again.
In the Chained Book Age , when books were so few they were chained and guarded, someone who could read Greek and Latin and had access to the chained books and had actually READ them, was King.
In the University Age, professors used this old superstition about Classic Authorities as a front, telling each other, as they had since the Chained Book Age, that the public should be ordered around by the Intellectuals. Those who did not agree with Father Mommy Professor just Didn’t Understand and should leave the world to their betters.
Now we are at an opposite pole in ONE sense: We have information by the ton dumped into our laps.
But the basic problem is the same one we had in the Chained Book Age: Is it all true? How much of it is embarrassing tommyrot?
If there is tommyrot, why would anyone PRODUCE that tommyrot?
The world has changed greatly since I wrote about this problem in my first book in 1976. Back then, the idea that the National Education Association had a vested interest in big government that was as blatant as big business’s financial and power interests was entirely new.
Those who live off of government want big government. That was wildly radical in 1976, and many conservatives who thought of themselves as the PROPER Ruling Elite resented it as much as leftists did.
Try Googling any subject and you will get nothing unless you understand why what comes up under your subject is there. There are ads. We know why they are there. There is Political Correctness, you know why that is there, and it is not just because it is The Truth.
But most people think it IS the truth. To really understand Internet information, you must understand why it is THERE, why it is PRODUCED. You understand instantly why you get so many ads, but you don’t go into the SUBTEXT, you don’t do the Mantra Thinking, which is taking the obvious and applying it to its full depth.
All information is produced for a reason. If you don’t think about that reason, you cannot analyze the data.
All this makes the subject much clearer to ME, and I wouldn’t have done it if Gavin hadn’t just flat said, “This is not clear.”
A British reader repeated the observation that, to an Englishman, Conservative means The Conservative Party.
One of the first accomplishments of Whitaker Online was to invent the term “respectable conservative” and make it part of American discourse. Our problem was not the slightest bit different from yours. Here, “conservative” meant Republican or Reagan or, God forbid, William Buckley
Our very few readers at the end of the last century were from the League of the South, who had an enormous acquaintance among professional conservatives. National Review readership is, in fact, very concentrated in South Carolina.
Within months, National Review began to have mentions of why they needed to be, SPECIFICALLY, “respectable.” Please note the highlights and the quotes. It was MY terminology.
The BNP, like other conservatives, spends a lot of time trying to get camouflage behind the other side, minorities on their board, etc. To them, the very IDEA of taking on the very terminology of politics is as alien as it would be to Jared Taylor.
You have exactly the same terminology we do. There is no European terminology, European “opinion” is entirely filter-down from the Boston Globe.
The same is true of American dialogue. The first thing the Tea Party did was have a public worship of MLK.
I am an ex-AMERICAN football player. I am no good at soccer and, God knows, no good at Cricket.
But in many ways, the game is the same. Everything I do is against the tide of what the average person understands.
In fact, the very reason the Mantra works is because it declares OUR wording.
If Brits cannot imagine that a conservative can be anything but a Tory Party membership card, you have your work cut out for you.
The American Groveling-to-British Titles Habit, which made the world what it is today by getting us into both World Wars, is well under way as Elizabeth II approaches her Diamond Jubilee.
This is one of the few points on which Sam Dickson and I differ. He has what he considers the classical conservative respect for the monarchy.
This is one of many reasons I am NOT a conservative.
The Queen, who generally keeps out of politics, made it clear a long time ago that anyone in the world who considers themselves Her Subject has as much right to live in Britain as anyone who was merely born there.
In other words, HER birth as Queen is all-important, but no Englishman or Scot or Welshman or Ulsterman has any right to the place where HE was born.
Race treason is part and parcel of the British Monarchy. It is much part and parcel of Classism as it is of Wordism.
One of the lesser known reasons for the Revolution, because it did not affect New England, was when King George decided that the Indians between the Appalachians and Mississippi were his subjects as much as those white looking ones, and forbade any of the whites from settling west of the Mississippi.
To a Classist, the color of the subject truly and genuinely makes no difference. It’s all a mattah of Claahss.
That is, in fact, why black slavery was introduced to the Americas.
By a priest.
Around 1500, local Indians were being forced into slavery in the West Indies. Since they were hunters and gatherers, they died quickly when forced into slave work. So, in the Spirit of Christ, a priest organized it so that slaves were brought over from Africa.
To save, among others, the Caribs.
There were, in fact, plenty of Indian slaves who could work and live in the West Indies. They were residents of the old civilizations of the Aztecs and Mayas. The Aztecs’ slaves were the ones who considered themselves lucky they weren’t used for the mass sacrifices that made up the Aztec religions.
But the King, Whose Ass They Longed to French Kiss, had forbidden Indian slavery. They were His Subjects. So the Good Father brought slaves from Africa.
The Caribs died like flies. For all the talk about the diseases brought by Europeans to America, Africa was the place where WHITES died of local disease. Senegal was know as “The White Man’s Graveyard.” The West India Indians were wiped out in record time.
So we were stuck with Black slavery, which, in the name of Christ, was abolished by killing 600,000 white men in the Civil War.
By the way, the shortest book n the Bible, the Book of Titus, says “If you are a master, be a good master, if you are a slave, be a good slave.”
You’ll find it in the Memory Hole
And no, I do NOT wish that loathsome race traitor Ass Kissee well.
I use the word “subtext” a lot because it is the only word I know that covers the concept. Normally, subtext is used to describe the reason an Old West movie is not supposed to get a helicopter within camera or sound range.
But what about all the sermons we hear about “The poor we have with us always,” that go on and on about the poor. The poor were the SUBtext. What Christ SAID was that the crowd should realize that the poor they have with always, but HE was right there in front of them for a very limited time.
Preachers didn’t preach about THAT, even in the old days. Today they use that quote to concentrate on their REAL religion of Political Correctness. Before it ended up being about the poor or about tithing.
To Jesus, speaking to the people and knowing that His death was near, was not thinking about contributions to SPLC or money to make fat bishops fatter. It is even a bit much to say that ALL the sermons preached on the subject with that title were not even subtext to Jesus when He said “The poor we have always with us.”
And what He MEANT is not even up the level of subtext in any sermon I have ever heard on the subject.
But the only accurate word I know is subtext. As I say, it usually means what is taken for granted, as in “The Old West had a distinct shortage of helicopters.” But when someone says so and so saw him, the subtext is that He saw that somebody.
When Derbyshire and Buchanan were fired, the columns they had written about blacks were unquestionably true. The important subtext is that The Truth is No Defense. That has a deep history in the United States. The Truth is no Defense was rejected by Americans by means of jury nullification in a famous New York case as early as 1735 in the trial of John Peter Zenger, and the Alien and Sedition Acts were thrown out, not by courts, but by the electorate.
In fact, the issue of the truth is no excuse a major basis of the 1800 election, and it was the ELECTORATE, not the courts, who got rid of them.
In fact, rejection of the Alien and Sedition Acts threw out the last Federalist House, Senate, President. The last Federalist official to hold national office was Chief Justice John Marshall, who stated that the Supreme Court IS the Constitution.
With the SUBTEXT, it is odd to look to the Supreme Court to DEFEND the Bill of Rights.
Voters in 1800 would have recognized the reason the right fired Derbyshire and MSNBC fired Buchanan. Raoul Williams kept insisting that the words he got fired from PBS for saying were perfectly correct.
But you can only deal with subtext by SILENCE.
The minute the difference between the US freedom of speech attitude and the British, The Truth is No Defense, is put into its historical context, a breach between us that never healed and makes us non-Britons, it is LOST.
So all the left, the center, the tame conservatives, AND the “extreme right” either join in silencing that question or have never heard of it and wouldn’t use it if they had.
When you’ve got a TAME opposition, you don’t need a Conspiracy.
I said in an article that our Boss here was not Bob, but whether what we try WORKS. A commenter asked, quite reasonably, “How do you know if it works?’
I am delighted that BUGSERS have already become experts at doing what it took me decades to learn: they look for OUR words, like “anti-white,” to appear. Only we know they are unique, and that is how I tracked my own trend during earlier battles.
In more specific terms you can only learn to gauge whether a particular approach works if you are in the midst of a debate, and can tell what is getting through. This is difficult, but there is joy in knowing that the other side has no idea you are doing this.
You can have the joy of knowing that the anti-whites, like all my foes and hurtful allies over the years, have not the slightest idea you have a means of tracking success which has nothing to do with Bill Buckley or some other Name approving you.
In fact, as I have said repeatedly, tracing an idea to me is fatal, because very, very few people really put their cause above their ego. So I had to find the signals and see them while absolutely no one else saw them, as we do with “anti-white,” “respectable conservative“ and the rest of a long list..
Most people simply will not join in a cause which has no polls and no score card. This is an INTEGRAL PART of my exercise of power. I took no credit, I had no ego. All I wanted was power.
And if there is no poll or other public indicator like a national columnist naming you, people will simply refuse to do the WORK.
I just want to rule the world. The rest was for the Big Names.
If you genuinely cannot figure out, in all those exchanges, whether something is working or not, you should stick strictly to the BUGS routine. If one in a hundred of our regular readers did that, we would be on our way.
Our routine has changed the language of politics enormously already, and nobody notices it but us.
Finding out how to judge our success in general and your success in particular is learned in the field.
But a few of us have greatly changed the language already.
Don’t vary it until you are sure you can judge the results.
Discussing theoretical changes with theoretical results is what makes one a Stormfronter instead of a BUGSER.
A new commenter calls himself Southern Nationalist. What became Whitakeronline.org began its existence as part of the League of the South Online.
When the League of the South split, I continued writing for both sides. Since WOL was the most popular column on both web sites, they accepted this, but of course considered me a false friend.
Finally I took the big step and set out as WOL alone.
Both sides in the LOS banned discussion of race. In fact at the beginning it was frequently claimed that the Confederate Army had a huge number of blacks in it! The LOS also tried to get a good image by claiming the CSA would be melting pot, just like today‘s USA.
Which, of course, left it to us murmurers to wonder why we should leave the Big USA to become a small USA. Both sides in the split went along with this version of today’s BNP idea of sounding just like the mainstream. Prevented from saying anything good about my own people, I used the column in the early days to chide both sides. That’s when I made “respectable conservative,” a combination never used, and certainly never explained, by anyone before.
So welcome to my comrade, Southern Nationalist.
But am I a Southern Nationalist now?
That goes right along with the question, am I an American patriot now?
That would depend on what those words MEAN, of course. Today, that is the way the Patriots hook you. People worship the American soldiers in Afghanistan, but I don’t. To often they will say they are Americans and will then immediately say, in effect, that they have no loyalty whatever to the American people, as in “We the People.”
Their eyes go blank and they say they are not for “We the People,” which would be bigoted and nationalist, but for the “Principles America stands for.”
In the Declaration of Independence, which was written in a time of a war for survival, Jefferson was appealing for help from abroad. Jefferson realized that simply saying “We the People” would not appeal to OTHER peoples in France and England.
By contrast, when we actually wrote and ADOPTED our OWN Constitution, it began by saying that we are the people of the United States who wanted to make a better union FOR OURSELVES.
And WE adopted it.
From the point of view of the Constitution, this “principles” crap is treason.
A Higher Principle is, in fact, the very first thing every traitor claims.
You can be a Wordist, or you can be a nationalist. Look at the Muslims in the US Army. It is a matter of their faith and culture versus this bureaucracy that has given them a piece of paper to make them “documented.”
In the real world, that “principles” rap is an excuse to shoot your own guys in the back.
Or to destroy your own race in the name of Americanism.
I hope beefcake is used to me giving everybody a hard time. It’s as close as a coach gets to “Welcome to the club!”
To beefcake’s proposal on how to handle the term “white,” he was getting complicated, so I said “Bullshit.”
Please note that this is not an announcement that The Guru hath pronounced upon this as the leavings of cattle.
Bob just said “Bullshit.”
Humpty Dumpty says he started this wording discussion and expands on it and wanted a Final Papal Decree on it from Bob.
The judge of all our efforts is not the Coach.
The judge is the score board.
How does it WORK?
Out there on the field.
My job here is to get YOU ready to judge things out in the field. After generations of competing egos and Leaders on our side, this is a very difficult concept to get used to.
Please note that, like other coaches, I haven’t been out in the field for YEARS. I certainly haven’t been in a field where the other side, or our side, has had the Mantra repeated to them.
I’ve dodged censorship, but not bots. The BNP years ago was very complimentary and astonished about my getting a book with the Mantra and a lot more in it past the British Censors.
But your dodging the bots and dealing with all the suppression is exciting and fascinating.
Try it and report on the RESULTS.
While I became a coach, our entire non-movement spent all its time talking about how to answer things, and no one but me was out there finding out what WORKED. And when they saw my stuff working in the real world, they just went back and theorized. My results on the scoreboard never even occurred to anybody as important until people like Lord Nelson came around.
No, I do NOT want to judge your discussion, except for a “bullshit” now and then, and that’s just my opinion.
I want to hear reports from the front. If you got a theory, TRY it.
I am not going to be here forever and I need for our more senior members to get in here and coach.
In article comments, Simmons says:
“… when I go to a thread that a BUGster has Mantraed I will make it personal to an anti-white, but not threatening. I will ask, “why are you an anti-white and why do you advocate for the genocide of whites, thanks.”
“’Personal but not threatening,” .Remember in human history the virus has killed more than the sword swinging berserker by far.”
That’s a PRO talking.
A commenter is trying out asking people “Who told you to say that?” That is VERY good!
But do it with DISCIPLINE.
What I am saying here results from the subtext analysis of that brilliant insight.
This article also discusses an argument that you might want to try out on someone at some point. With discipline. Right now you MUST tell anti-whites who say there is no such thing as white that they pick the countries that must allow immigration and assimilation by that exact criterion.
But now that some of you are at the journeyman stage, you know when there’s a break you can experiment in.
A bit of subtext on that “Cult” spat: Every apprentice begins in a cult. That is, no matter how natural a talent he is, he has to spend some time having the most basic rules hammered into him. He makes his actions automatic, and THEN he begins to create new ways.
I really do consider myself a Coach, and I really do conduct this seminar that way.
Some things that are absolutely true and absolutely absurd were unspoken until the publication of Parkinson’s Law about 1951. It was a humor article, but it was the ironic humor, the bald truth as told by an Englishman before the Weakest Generation.
There have been a lot of Laws since. Parkinson’s Law opened a way of communicating cynicism that is true by ironic humor and calling it a Law.
Parkinson’s Law stated that “Work increases to fill the time allotted to it.”
To the humorless bureaucrats Alfred Northcote Parkinson was used to, this was a bad joke. But everyone knew that if you assign a whole department to something, they will stay busy with it, as Parkinson said, “No matter what the effect on the product, if there is indeed a product.”
The Law I outline as the title of this piece is recognized by everyone, but stated by no one. When a person being questioned by the police says “I didn’t do it.“ the statement is taken down, but it is weighed against the Need to Say Law that is the title here: he NEEDS to say he didn‘t do it.
So people say “There is no such thing as race“ or “Global Warming exists and can only be cured by bureaucrats taking over the world economy.” People were dumb enough to accept the first as Pure Idealism until the top environmental scientists were caught cooking the figures..
So we learned again that what is said is what a person needs to say. It’s a lot like the Intelligence Need to Know Rule. It could be called the Need to Say Rule. When someone says race does not exist, it might be useful to point out that in public people HAVE to say that.
This brings up the whole spectrum of Hate Laws and personal violence and career ruination.
Anti-whites have no shame. I would be embarrassed to repeat what everyone has heard a thousand times the way they do. Maybe this is a way to peel off a little of that absolute lack of concern about being an obvious damned fool.