The DaVinci Code resulted in a shock which, if everyone hadn’t been trained by Mommy Professor, would have led to a serious complete rethinking of history.

Before the book came out, every Catholic and Protestant theologian or Church-goer, if asked about Jesus’ sex life, would have said there wasn’t one.

This was so obvious it didn’t need any discussion. But when the Da Vinci Code came out, everybody suddenly realized they had no idea about this.

So they came up with an explanation which leaves everybody OK. It was Constantine’s fault you see.

Yea, right.

So this kept anybody from talking about the obvious difference between Saint Paul’s church, which was based on a then degenerate intellectual Zoroastrianism and Jesus, who never denounced sex or marriage at all.

And this is the story of people who do not do Mantra Thinking: Things keep being found out that upset history, so an answer is developed and accepted that happens to make everybody feel good.

Mantra Thinking says that the more any answer can be explained as the most convenient one, the more certain it is to be a lie.

The end of every TV Documentary consists of The Sermon. It explains how all the information given it can be rammed into a Politically Correct context.

History looks entirely different to a Mantra Thinker. I think the DaVinci Code itself threw in the Constantine theory to make it all right.

Which makes all the News in the book irrelevant. You’re no smarter when you started than when you finished.

If you dismiss The Sermon though, things like this change history for you.

Each new Gospel, right up to the Book of Judas around 300 AD, had more and more straight LATE, Degenerate Zoroastrianism.

Apparently it was considered Intellectual then to show you knew Persian Thinking, just as a Buckley today would use French to impress you.

So the fanatically dysgenic legacy of Saint Paul took over Christianity. It was an assumed that Jesus, too, wanted to spay or neuter anyone who could be taught to read.

And with the Constantine Explanation to fight off Mantra Thinking, no one is going to figure out anything different

Yes, a lot of us would like to shout, “You’re damned right I’m a racist!”

The problem is that the person calling you racist is mindless.

So for you to confess to a mindless accusation makes you mindless too.

If someone irritating said “You’re a ghost!” you would look a little ridiculous shouting, “Yes, I’m a ghost!”

You might want to ask them first what the hell makes them think you’re a ghost, what a ghost is, stuff like that.

What you are proud of is that that the traitorous, mindless piece of crap CALLS you a racist.

I have often said, “Lord, I am so glad you call me a racist. You call anybody who disagrees with you a racist, and I certainly disagree with you.”

I have used the same line about Nazis.

It deflates the living hell out of them.

I have no monopoly on this now. I starred in a You Tube drama by our Scandinavian BUGSERS did about this very point.

Before we were banned, it got 110,000 views on You Tube, largely because of my acting skill.

Without me it would have 109,999.

SPLC had a fundraiser that sounded like me with a gallon of bourbon in me.

SPLC was raising hell about the LACK OF BLACKS in Northern Idaho!

This was a fund-raising issue, taken seriously by SPLC donors.

I saw no one but me on our side even comment on this.

Nor would anyone else get the point. I doubt if Adolf Hitler himself ever stated that “The Aryan race cannot survive if there is one single Jew left on earth.”

But leaders of Hispanics, Jews, blacks, gypsies, you name it, are all saying, ALL THE TIME:

“My people cannot survive if the future allowed one single white gentile to exist.”

No, they have to build giant conspiracies between Commies or Jews to show what the official attitude is.

Meanwhile, all the authorities are saying, “No other group can exist if the future allows one single white gentile to exist.” When will someone besides Bob throw their own words in their faces and demand why we not only are not allowed to survive, but are not allowed to TALK about our survival?

I want less world views and more militant translations.

The Mantra is a militant translation.

The Mantra is NOT “the sounds of one hand clapping.” The Mantra does not dazzle you with the Old Man’s Wisdom.

The Mantra is one old man who is sick and tired of people trying to show people how smart they are and refusing to take down their words and use them against them, again and again and again and again and ad infinitum.

My whole career has been spotted with incidents where people have been trying to take over groups.

My reaction to trolls in BUGS has been less feeling threatened than being flattered. But the poor bastards who decide to take over BUGS face the same kind of problem as that faced by the anti-whites trying to argue with us.

There’s no THERE THERE.

Other organizations come with bank accounts and, far, far more important, with contributors’ lists. These are lists of people who have given before and who give fairly regularly. A SINGLE contributor’s name, address, and giving history can sell for several hundred dollars. When groups are sold, almost all the assets consist of the CLs.

Another valuable thing a group has is its endorsements.

BUGS has one contributor and one known endorser.

When an outfit is having a major effect on public information, a big asset its enemies get by taking it over secretly is discrediting it. Again this takeover asset runs into a major block by the nature of BUGS. Absolutely none of our arguments that are causing so much trouble have anything to do with the credibility of BUGS.

If BUGS were exposed as a den of Satanists, it would have no effect on the simple fact that “assimilation” is aimed at ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

The Feds spent fifteen million bucks or so convicting David Duke because of the importance of his name. Nothing about Bob’s message is based on Bob’s name.

They are concentrating some fairly heavy resources on us, or would if it would do any good.

So if you can think of anything they could do to us or with us, I’d like to hear about it.

In Who the Hicks Are I discussed how Mantra Thinking shows us that the greatest crimes are not committed by Dramatic Villains but by attitudes that no one later gets upset about.

My first example was that of Doctor Jenner.

When discussing Dr. Jenner, the first sentence is always “People noticed that in a smallpox epidemic, the milking girls didn’t get the disease.” Then prattle on about how Dr. Jenner decided he would find out WHY the milking girls didn’t get it.

Usual thinking starts right there. Mantra Thinking grabs hold of the first sentence: “If people knew that milking girls didn’t get this disease, why did hundreds of years pass until Doctor Jenner began to ask why they didn’t?

While victims of smallpox begged in the streets, scholars learned Latin and Greek and looked at Galen and Aristotle, the latter of whom insisted that men had more teeth than women.

Paracelsus and Newton were two of the giants of their age. Both of them spent a lot more time on truly mad mysticism and on finding the Philosopher’s Stone than he did on what he is now famous for. Paracelsus was practicing medicine, but his only excuse for doing so was that people found out he CURED things.

When the doctors drove him out of another town because his Latin was bad and he had no degree, he retorted that he had used the paper degree to better purpose long ago. We are surprised that Paracelsus, of all people, would look for truth in the wrong place, in mysticism.

Newton surprises us even more. The man who explained the entire universe to us was looking in the wrong place for Truth.

This is a mystery to educated people because educated people are nincompoops. If Paracelsus had the kind of reputation for curing people that milking maids had for smallpox, why weren’t the Great Intellectuals looking at HIM instead of their Latin texts?

If Newton had dedicated his life to finding Wisdom in dead languages, he would have ignored gravity.

The real idiots here are the people who do not see that this Renaissance crap was incredibly and criminally stupid. No, not just a mistake.

And that is the whole point of Mantra Thinking. When Intellectuals make the same mistake again and again, and you learn nothing from it, that shows a mental weakness far more disturbing than the horrible Mistake That Saved Smallpox itself.

In the Canterbury Tales, a peasant complains to the priest about the fact that he is unintelligent and unhealthy, and the priest is an obviously hale and smart man. He then goes on to bemoan the fact that the best men in any community seemed to be the priests, so that the only men who breed are the lesser men.

He goes on to bemoan loudly the fact that as this keeps us, generation after generation of Englishmen, growing dumber and weaker.

Chaucer broke all the rules because he wrote in English when French was the Only True Tongue in England. He said what only peasants would say.

And as soon as he did, he pointed out an old peasant who was bemoaning dysgenics.

Dysgenics became, centuries later, a theme for Intellectuals. But then it wasn’t called own breeding or some common word. It became a GREEK word, which made it intellectual.

Most people would agree with that and say it is Fashion that makes Intellectuals miss pretty well everything that doesn’t come dressed in Greek or Latin or French.

To them it is a shortcoming. To me it is a crime. To other people it is merely not seeing things clearly. To me it is babbling idiocy.

And to me it is a crime.

What if a PEASANT missed vital point that was expressed in GREEK?

What if peasants totally missed out on dysgenics for fifteen hundred years because the Bards never discussed it?

This is not just raving, this is Mantra Thinking.

I have pointed out before that long before Doctor Jenner was born, it had been noted that, in the midst of smallpox epidemics, the girls who milked the cows didn’t get the disease.

Nobody noticed this but peasant gossips. It never even began to occur to any University Doctor to find out WHY the milking girls didn’t get it. They studied Galen In Greek.
\
These FACTS are known generally. But I am not speaking of KNOWLEDGE, I am speaking of a WAY OF THINKING.

Anyone else will read what I wrote, and his reaction will be pleasant, Uppah Claaass chuckle at the foolishness of scholars.

We are talking about people who allowed millions to die and tens of millions to be horribly disfigured by a preventable disease. It was a crime, and to be understating about it, it was at least a misdemeanor.

I do not look at passive-aggressive condescension to white genocide in an indulgent Uppah class way. I look at the way a professional Jew looks at the Passive-aggressive stance tens of millions of Germans took on Nazi anti-Semitism, “Why should I care?”

But in this case it is WHITES who are being passive-aggressive about the survival of WHITES.

It is almost impossible for others to learn the word in a Mantra way.

I could say that tens of millions of children made hideous, crippled or dead was the direct results of “Intellectualism.”

Who would understand it?

More important, who would be able to think that way when ANOTHER horror caused by “routine” attitudes was exposed?

I have trouble instantly coming up with examples. But a very good example of “Why is this information produced?” occurred to me.

We used to say that the fashion industry was run by queers. This was one of those Lowah Clahss remarks that was not true. Then came AIDS. The fashion makers were nearly wiped out.

Then, about twenty years ago, Barbara Walters started talking about “Why is it that gay men especially have such talent when it comes to designing?” If she had said that twenty years before, she would have been a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. But after the AIDS epidemic, it was no longer a question about who were designers.

So the information manufactured had to be “Yes, gays ARE the fashion industry. So why are they so GIFTED?”

If you find white men dominating, the required discussion is how they are discriminating to keep out non-whites.

We all KNOW that. But I can’t even get BUGS people to THINK that way.

Ok, what would a consistently well-paid have said on the same subject in the 1960s, before AIDS?

I can tell you exactly. He would give a smirk and say “I know what the Lowah Class says about how it’s all queers in the fashion industry.”

Then he would announce that “They did a study and found that fashion has the lowest percentage of homosexuals of almost anything>“

I heard them say it!

Repeatedly!

But it is very frustrating that YOU don’t think that way. Instead of Mantra type insights I get too many lectures about how society works and names and stuff.

Another example. In the story of Doctor Jenner and vaccination, it always begins with “Everybody had long seen that cow milking maids didn’t get smallpox.”

Let me repeat that: “Everybody had long seen that cow milking maids didn’t get smallpox.”

Let me repeat that: “Everybody had long seen that cow milking maids didn’t get smallpox.”

George Washington was stricken sterile by the same smallpox that killed his brother. Academic medicine bled him to death when he got pneumonia.

A major portion of each generation was hideously marked by smallpox. Millions died of it.

And everybody knew that “Cow milking maids didn’t get smallpox.”

The did not know that people who read Galen could cure it. They didn’t know that a person who read Greek and could cast your astrological chart could cure it.

“Everybody had long seen that cow milking maids didn’t get smallpox.”

Could somebody PLEASE get off explaining The State of the World to me and tell me what is wrong in the sentences above?

International Law says that you owe decent treatment to an enemy who surrenders in uniform. An enemy caught out of uniform can be, like Major Andre, dangled from a tree for up to half an hour while he dies in agony.

But there have been cases where soldiers have been too goddamn stupid to know what the enemy uniform LOOKS like. A person who is that stupid ought to be strung up himself.

People told us all the time that they were dedicated to our destruction. We were just too goddamned stupid to know it.

Acting like a retard is not the same thing as an intellectual error..

Not understanding that another person is being an idiot makes you as retarded as he is.

It is time for us to really face the fact that before the Mantra we were retards.

This means that we not only to confront retards, but we have to go a LOT farther to clean the feeble mindedness out of OURSELVES.

Only a very slow three-year-old takes everything he is told literally. No Jew is going to say, “I was raised on tales of how Evil you are and I want you off the face of the earth!”

If someone says he is for open borders and a “melting pot” in all white countries and only white countries and you don’t understand what he is REALLY saying, I do not want you to be around me and any dangerous machinery. You will never be able to hold your head up as long as you mistake idiocy for intellectual error.

You have a lot more to do than just learn the Mantra.

Your whole MIND has been at a level that should scare you.

Listen to anti-whites and listen to the retards on our side. The anti-whites never say one single thing traitors have not said throughout and before history, “I sold you out because I am for a Higher Cause,” “Why should I be concerned about what you call ‘my’ people?” and “You are a guilty people, and you all deserve what I did to you.”

Good God, gang, these are statements every traitor has made in all history! They are not even gussied up with a LITTLE sophistication.

I keep hammering on the fact that you have GOT to go back and see what idiocy, stupidity, childishness you have fallen for.

And when I say this the only comments are about your profound world view or insight.

This article is about cleaning up your mental act. It is NOT about profound philosophies or wherever your mind is tripping over now.

It is about the fact that seeing the enemy as a different intellect is a DISEASE. What is wrong with what they say is IN what they say, not in your recollection of Nietzsche.

Start with this: Marxism is not an intellectually different point of view. It is saying that if you turn the economy over to a bunch of bureaucrats, it will efficient.

For a century and a half, those who said that were treated as intellectually different.

What kind of mind recognizes an obvious retard as a person who thinks differently, ANOTHER MIND LIKE HIS OWN?

You know what that person is. And it’s time we really concentrated on getting it out of us.

This article is about cleaning up your mental act. It is NOT about profound philosophies or wherever your mind is tripping over now.

This article is about cleaning up your mental act. It is NOT about profound philosophies or wherever your mind is tripping over now.

This article is about cleaning up your mental act. It is NOT about profound philosophies or wherever your mind is tripping over now.

We could use more examples of things like socialism and white genocide which can be destroyed by actually SEEING what they said.

This article is about cleaning up your mental act. It is NOT about profound philosophies or wherever your mind is tripping over now.

One of the rules BUGS has developed is, “Stay on the offensive.”

The really nice thing about that phrase is that BOB did NOT invent it!

And I would know. One of my major strategies has been to recognize my own exact turn of phrase. It is the only way of telling where I am getting in and, therefore, what is succeeding. Recognizing these tiny turns has been the basis of my strategy for well over half a century.

Who but me would have isolated the most obvious-sounding term, “anti-white?” Who else would have noticed that that term was NEVER used in the mainstream, ANYWHERE. It was ALWAYS “anti-white and anti-Semitic.”

So the victory of O’Reilly using “anti-white” doesn’t have to be explained to anyone inside BUGS.

Yes, he had BLACKS screaming they were anti-white for the year before that. But respectable conservatives always use “anti-white” in the mouths of non-whites, but never never, NEVER has it been uttered in National Review or by Hannity without the required “and anti-Semitic.”

SO I am an expert at recognizing a new term and knowing whether it came from ME.

I get tired all over every time I see another news item anywhere in our pages.

Anybody can read the latest. Only a FEW of us can do the hard job of getting out there and REPORTING on our MESSAGE

We are improving. More and more exchanges, independent of me, go on about the wording we get back and the wording of how we deal with it. News items and enemy speeches are available with billions of dollars behind them. Every news item here helps the enemy.

If someone started talking about how bad whites are, I had to come up with the obvious reply: We are accusing them of genocide, so they seek to JUSTIFY genocide. How many thousands of Jew-obsessed tomes would have to be written to have the effect of that short point?

Stormfront was a major cause of our existence. Stormfront has had news items for years that appear nowhere else. And Stormfront is MUCH bigger than we are.

Render unto BUGS what is Bugs’s and unto SF what is Stormfront’s.

No matter how they say, “Race does not exist” or some sickening smile with “Racism will end when everybody realizes we all just human,” you are saying that genocide is impossible.

Genocide is not destroying humans. Genocide is destroying a PARTICULAR KIND of human.

Mao Tse Tung is estimated to have starved and murdered about fifty million Chinese. But no one objects to China having his smiling picture as its symbol, because those were Chinese, not Jews, Gypsies or any other IDENTIFIABLE group.

They were just a few million of these “humans.”

So call them on it when they use this “humans” crap, just as you do when they use the “no such thing as race” crap.

Brian came up with this Guest Writer Program.

Bob is elated, and not just because he wants to do less work.

Well, not ENTIRELY because he wants to do less work.

The Guest Writer Program, put into effect by Brian, has done very well.

I remind you that my one huge worry was that I would end up like William Pierce, saying on my deathbed that I had no worthy successor. Henry VII had it right: Successors are EVERYTHING.

The ultimate victory for me would be for you to be successors.

Believe me, I now how it feels to break into writing. So let me tell those who had the GUTS to send in articles, so far every one has been a real contribution.

And I noticed that guest articles got more comments than my recent ones.

As for the comments, they outdid my hopes.

One discussion covered the wording of the Mantra. But what DELIGHTED me was it came out as team work, not niggling over a word.

To sum it up, you are showing signs of being ready to get out of the egg and start eating worms.

And starting your own nests.

Seriously, the articles are impressive to me, and the comments keeping them in line are impressive to Ole Bob,

Bob of BUGS has produced a team that can go right up into collegiate and pro.

You now only have to learn to control your nerves and get experience.

Because you are not afraid to face and cut down everybody in what they consider their Intellectual Big Leagues.

It is great feeling to be BEST at something.

Enjoy it.

And send me their scalps.

The Comments hit on the discipline and how it applied. Further it discussed standard suggestions for changing the Mantra.

Yu can always tell a BUGSER from an outsider, a pro-white who has been fighting from a pro-white who has been theorizing, by his undertone of “Did you try it? Did it WORK!”

And underneath, there is development. In the face of the desbots, you have to develop mini-mantras.

I see commenters stating how they ran into a comment and grabbed back into the pile of one-sentence ammunition the Mantra provides and pulled out the grenade they needed.

One of my favorite phrases from Bob’s Mantra is “Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White”. I use it all of the time. In fact, when writing emails and messages I often sign off with that, instead of saying “Sincerely”, “Yours truly”, etc. I do this in order to show my allegiance to the BUGS team and to further hammer in the meme.

There is one little twist to this that I have found useful in the field. Though the term “code word” is regularly used in political and other discourse, some Anti-Whites choose to pretend that this part of the phrase isn’t there, or try to confuse the matter. They’ll do anything except acknowledge the very blatant truth and meaning of this phrase, because they can’t deal with it.

Sometimes they’ll say that “code word” makes us sound like “conspiracy” nuts, etc. They’ll often say, “If Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White, does that mean White is code for Racist?”. Or they will purposefully misquote it and say something like “Mr. Racist here says ‘Anti-Racist = Anti-White’. How does that make (literal) sense?”. I’ve named these the “switcheroo”, I’ve seen these time after time.

I recall learning here on BUGS the importance of including “code word” in this phrase, I was told it implies conscious deceit. Of course we get it, but Anti-Whites love to play stupid on this, and often.

We’re not trying to change the literal meaning of words to suit our agenda, which we’ve been accused of more than once. We are simply pointing out to them that they call themselves “Anti-Racist” to justify their Anti-White policies, actions and attitudes. Almost always, when somebody or something is called “racist”, “somebody” or “something” is White. When somebody is “Anti-Racist”, they almost always are ONLY attacking white targets.

I realize what the original phrase means, and I understand the importance of repetition and all of the hard work that’s gone into pushing it. I usually stick with “Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White”, until an Anti-White tries to muddle this up and get everything off track. Then I dumb it down further and quickly say “Anti-Racist is an excuse for Anti-White”.

This makes the “switcheroo” tough for them to pull off and sounds much less like anything having to do with a “conspiracy”. And, it makes it unnecessary to explain to the Anti-White and the audience any of what I went through above. Short, to the point, and seems to work. I don’t enjoy arguing about this tedious stuff with Anti-Whites, I enjoy making the point and getting the desired reaction (or lack of reaction) from them.

It usually stumps them, or makes them angrier and their arguments more far-fetched, vulgar or ridiculous, which tells me I’m back on track.

Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White,
4MyNation

Anti-Whites are brainwashed fools who do not realize that their actual role in life is to justify and support the Genocide of a particular race of people. Instead they are fooled into thinking they are actually fighting naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.

For decades most of our side (even the ones who were for real) were brainwashed into obliging them by acting like Nazis, and talking about superior White IQ scores, Black crime rates, and scheming Jews.

So for decades the people who actually had the hard job made it look easy. And the people who actually had the easy job made it look hard.

Talking about Black crime stats, etc…. when you are facing a deliberate attempt at Genocide, is a bit like complaining to the police because the guy who stole your car had an unpaid speeding ticket. And yet some people still wonder how we got nowhere after all those years of doing exactly what our opponents wanted us to do.

It’s amazing how clear and simple it all becomes when you take a step back. Start seeing through the BS, and actually start pointing to the crime being committed. What we have is actually the easy job. And it even comes complete with the moral high ground too. But in the beginning, it’s ONLY there for those who have the clear presence of mind to see it, and the sense of destiny and moral guidance to want it.

ALL White countries and ONLY White countries. It’s GENOCIDE!

And don’t ever let the sick b@stards forget it.

Someone in comments on a lead article was using those comments to set up some kind of seminar within our seminar. He made an apology for violating our one comment per article policy, but that was courtesy to the Old Man and appreciated as such.

With all our secrecy, he had to set up this BUGS background seminar right through our comments section, so he did so.

It’s sort of like the lineman who has to come through your kitchen and tips his hat. We all know he’s got to go through the kitchen to do that. BUGS doesn’t have backdoors.

The apolgy was nice, but the one comment policy is about something else.

We set up that one comment per article policy because Bob has to have his whole say in one go, so commenters should, as a matter of courtesy, not just drool out whatever occurs to them instant by instant and endlessly.

A workman coming through is more than welcome.

If you are WORKING here, you are what BUGS is about.

When we started BUGS, a term like “mini-Mantra” was VERBOTEN.

Ole Bob was a Tyrant, demanding that pro-whites use the Mantra, the whole Mantra, and nothing BUT the Mantra.

It is critical that you understand WHY I was a tyrant back then. It is a compliment to BUGS today.

Outside of old hands like Brian and Lord Nelson and a few others, those Stormfront days, –and God bless those who set up Stormfront — are forgotten.

But those Stormfront amateurs were a world away from our working man who had to go through main article commentary to do his job. I wave to him as one professional BUGSER does to another pro BUGSER.

It is almost impossible for a real BUGSER to understand why, in the SF days, I had to be so fanatical about using the Mantra, the whole Mantra, and nothing but the Mantra.

I was desperately careful about how Stormfronters used the Mantra because when they won with it, they charged on to use it to preach anti-abortion or News and Jews.

My BUGS buddy wiring through the kitchen would be astonished at the idiot who could misuse the Mantra for that purpose.

The very idea of a mini-Mantra would have been POISON in Stormfronter days. But in BUGS days, it is normal development. Against censorship and with your EXPERIENCE you DEVELOP mini-Mantras.

That is a WORLD away from theorizing about working.

I normally completely smash the other side by an unmerciful repetition of what they said.

It seems to me that one example of this would be never using a term “American citizen” but ruthlessly using “documented worker.”

Eg, “In order to vote in local elections you must have been a documented worker in that area for at least thirty days.”

Instead of “citizenship” one should say that in order to get a passport you must prove that you are a documented worker. Yes, they can then say that a documented worker can’t get a passport, but you just ignore. They use the term “undocumented worker” instead of “illegal alien” to ignore the fact that breaking a law is different from getting a piece of paper from a bureaucrat.

It can be fun to use their own language to make difficult for them.

The answer to that question is the same as the answer to “How do you go from coaching neophytes to coaching journeymen?”

How to change any bit of the Mantra approach now that you’re been out there a while?

Same answer again:

VERY carefully.

Ask your teammates.

And watch yourself! Try to be sure you are part of our general effort rather than deviating off into some theme of your own.

The term “mini-mantra” was not coined by me. At a certain point, the coaches begin making their own new language and their own practices, but all as a team and within the rules.

If you drift, you or your teammates must catch you.

Changes are taking place that I never wanted to discuss THEORETICALLY. Only those that know the game and have spent a lot of time on the field. should make the slightest adjustment.

Ask other team members here whether it WORKS. That is always a tough call.

But if you start throwing in religion or abortion or Jews in place of our only issue, I will raise hell.

Dozens of times I have seen my own words FINALLY break out in the major media.

But this is the first time in my life anyone ELSE has known it!

First, congratulations and thanks to you.

My condition makes it hard for me to think of the most obvious examples, but I can think of one.

Economists and libertarians and liberals and everyone else had never talked about any aspect of immigration but the fact that, apparently free of charge, Mexicans and American businesses made money when the labor went from Mexico across the imaginary boundary to the US.

I did a piece in my 1982 book about the fact that the reason Mexicans became more valuable the minute they stepped across the line was because they were leaving a country run by Mexicans for one settled by and ruled by Americans. But everybody still kept saying it was a free benefit, so an unlimited number of people should be allowed to cross the border.

The European Union declared that it wanted free movement of capital and goods and LABOR. Labor is just another factor of production, you see.

So I simplified and simplified until I got it down to the words, “Labor VOTES.“

It would be long story while I tracked those two words as you have tracked “anti-white.” It did in fact have a HUGE effect on discussions of immigrants, whereas before only one side had had any argument at all.

In other words, it would take me a book to explain even one instance of how NOT to use books for this purpose.

“Anti-white,” like everything else I did, was impossible for anyone but us to track.

O’Reilly would tell you that he has said “anti-white” dozens of times, but what he said was “anti-white AND anti-Semitic.” Farrakhan’s anti-white rhetoric was routine in black churches, as Obama’s minister showed, but when they started attacking a protected minority, THE protected minority, the shouts begin.

And ONLY then.

But you can imagine what a pleasure it is for me to celebrate WITH others as our seed sprouts roots.