It’s amazing how much you can get away with if you just put the right “spin” on your actions.
Take the anti-White establishment. If you are to ask any of the governments or institutions that comprise the anti-White establishment what their racial policy is, they will most likely respond that they are “colorblind,” they are race neutral, they don’t make distinction between races or that they have no racial policy. All of this is meant to tell you that they just don’t care about any race or anything racial all that much. Many people just take what they SAY at face value without looking at what they actually DO.
In practice the racial policy of the anti-White establishment is absolute genocide against our White race. If you examine the real world actions they take (non-White immigration, integration, assimilation into White countries) it is all geared entirely to the destruction of our race. It is a genocidal racial policy completely hostile to the continued existence of our race. It is the furthest possible thing from the “Well golly gee I just don’t really pay that much attention to this ‘race’ thing” attitude they present.
Imagine an establishment that was completely hostile to the natural environemt. Everything they did was harmful to the environment. They engaged in acts of pollution, deforestation, elimination of animals species etc… with zeal, totally bent on the destruction of the natural world.
Of course they never called it a program of environmental destruction. Instead they used terms like “post-natural” and claimed they were engaging in a program of “anti-naturism” describing “naturism” as all the bad things about the natural world, poisonous plants, violent predators, sunburns etc… They claimed anyone opposed to their program of environmental destruction was an evil “naturist” who wanted people to get attacked by animals, sunburnt and step in poison ivy.
Whenever you asked them what their environmental policy was they responded that they didn’t make distinctions between the natural and man-made world and they had no environmental policy. They didn’t hate nature, they just didn’t think it was superior to artificial environments. Most people just took them at their word and didn’t even realize that what was going on was nothing less than the total destruction of the natural world. When it was pointed out that this was environmental destruction, some people even cheered for the end of “naturism” and all the animal attacks, and poison ivy rashes and called you an evil “naturist” for being opposed to it. They said anyone concerned about environmental destruction was a “nature supremacist” and wanted to burn down people’s houses because they weren’t part of nature.
This is of course the exact predicament we are in today, but instead of nature being destroyed… it is our race. We are facing an establishment that claims to be “race neutral” while committing itself totally to the genocide of our race. So what is the first step for us?
Just like the first step for someone concerned about the destruction of nature would be to demand the right to speak about nature, the first step for those of us who are concerned about the destruction of our race is to demand the right to speak about race… something we are currently denied.
The next step for those concerned about the destruction of nature would be to point out their rhetoric about not making distinctions between natural and artificial environments and wanting to protect houses from being burnt down by crazy “nature supremacists” was just a cover for a program of complete destruction of the natural environment.
Likewise the next step for us would be to point out that all their rhetoric about not making distinctions between races and wanting to protect innocent non-Whites from evil “White supremacists” who want to hurt them… is a cover for a program of genocide against our race.
#1 by Jason on 07/02/2012 - 6:49 am
“We are facing an establishment that claims to be “race neutral” while committing itself totally to the genocide of our race. ”
There is something so obscene about referees that claim to be neutral, while turning a blind eye to ONLY ONE group being wiped out. It’s hard to fathom that level of hate.
#2 by six gun on 07/02/2012 - 9:09 am
A lot of the people I end up discussing with claim to be colour blind. They say they are not anti-White but simply pro-people. In reality they do not care for any people. They simply care about themselves. I suspect there are the brainwashed and there are those who are scared.
Those who are scared are often the non-Whites, especially in the USA. They have enough about them to realise that if the Whites broke away, they could not be part of this. They would not benefit as they do at the present time.
White separatism should not be threatening to anyone but it is constantly depicted as a threat. I see time as again claims we are haters.
Who told them we are haters? What do we hate other than our own genocide and those who push for this to happen?
Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White countries for everyone and if Whites attempted to make White countries for the Whites, they must be evilnaziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews.
It is as simple as that.
Churchill said the new fascists will be the anti-fascists. Where this is the perversion of the word fascist to mean ruthless authoritarians. I believe this man should have been hanged as a traitor to my people but of course the new heroes will be the old traitors.
I saw RamzPaul talking about the disintegration of the Disunited State, that place that called itself the United States. That ironically the flooding of California and the South West of America would cause the disintegration of America. The Hispanics are not going to listen to Washington, they do not have loyalty except to their own. Once the Union starts to go, it will go like the USSR did. Suddenly countries appeared that we could only find on old maps. The guys jumping the fence may in the end be the key to a White America. I’m sure you chaps would settle for 25 all White States. Half a cake is better than none.
#3 by Bob on 07/02/2012 - 1:13 pm
PLEASE point out to that every traitor has always said that.
#4 by Gavin on 07/02/2012 - 3:47 pm
Said what exactly Bob?
#5 by Simmons on 07/02/2012 - 3:44 pm
We whites have a legal right to a group defense. The best response I ever got to that was from 8glen who basically stated over and over that there was no genocide against whites being committed.
But that is for us to determine and denying us the right to group defense is a crime in and of itself.
If white drones want to stay out in the neutral zone as the lone wolfer “individualist” then their fate will sharpen the minds of the rest. Left us be honest they will make martyrs if anything.
#6 by OldBlighty on 07/02/2012 - 9:15 pm
“The best response I ever got to that was from 8glen who basically stated over and over that there was no genocide against whites being committed. ”
I saw the same with MrViciousBiter:
“There is no genocide, I am not pro white or anti-white. Blah, blah…”
So they are on a consistent message of genocide denial, which is pure defense. They are losing.
“If white drones want to stay out in the neutral zone”
More like the passive aggressive zone?
“as the lone wolfer “individualist” then their fate will sharpen the minds of the rest. Left us be honest they will make martyrs if anything.”
Dead on target.
#7 by Bob on 07/03/2012 - 1:31 pm
Gavin, all traitors claim they have a Higher Loyalty than the people they betrayed.
#8 by c-bear on 07/03/2012 - 11:06 pm
BUT.. It IS about nature. I am naturally white. Being white, red, brown, yellow is all part of nature, just as there are different color flowers. The sky is blue, as are two of my children’s eyes. The forests are green, as are my eyes. I have 6 children: 3 blonde, 2 brunette, one red. I like that kind of diversity. The anti-whites claim to be color-blind, as they celebrate “diversity”. I have actually heard anti-whites idealize about a future singular race of brown humans – the “human” race (void of diversity). They like to say that I “just don’t get it.” They are correct. I don’t “get” why they want to destroy the diversity they are celebrating. I don’t “get” why they can’t see the silliness of it all.
#9 by dungeoneer on 07/05/2012 - 1:20 am
Thanks Gavin for stepping forth into the arena
“What if it was nature instead of our race?”
The illogical silliness and the militant ignorance would be the same.
The question bothers me.We at BUGS work on the observable phenomenon that everything is racial.