Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

O’Reilly Uses Anti-White

Posted by Bob on July 3rd, 2012 under Coaching Session


Dozens of times I have seen my own words FINALLY break out in the major media.

But this is the first time in my life anyone ELSE has known it!

First, congratulations and thanks to you.

My condition makes it hard for me to think of the most obvious examples, but I can think of one.

Economists and libertarians and liberals and everyone else had never talked about any aspect of immigration but the fact that, apparently free of charge, Mexicans and American businesses made money when the labor went from Mexico across the imaginary boundary to the US.

I did a piece in my 1982 book about the fact that the reason Mexicans became more valuable the minute they stepped across the line was because they were leaving a country run by Mexicans for one settled by and ruled by Americans. But everybody still kept saying it was a free benefit, so an unlimited number of people should be allowed to cross the border.

The European Union declared that it wanted free movement of capital and goods and LABOR. Labor is just another factor of production, you see.

So I simplified and simplified until I got it down to the words, “Labor VOTES.“

It would be long story while I tracked those two words as you have tracked “anti-white.” It did in fact have a HUGE effect on discussions of immigrants, whereas before only one side had had any argument at all.

In other words, it would take me a book to explain even one instance of how NOT to use books for this purpose.

“Anti-white,” like everything else I did, was impossible for anyone but us to track.

O’Reilly would tell you that he has said “anti-white” dozens of times, but what he said was “anti-white AND anti-Semitic.” Farrakhan’s anti-white rhetoric was routine in black churches, as Obama’s minister showed, but when they started attacking a protected minority, THE protected minority, the shouts begin.

And ONLY then.

But you can imagine what a pleasure it is for me to celebrate WITH others as our seed sprouts roots.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by Gar5 on 07/03/2012 - 11:49 am

    The anti-White establishment is a mighty redwood tree; too strong to cut down with an axe (violence).

    In order to get rid of it we must spread our vines (terminology) and absorb all the minerals (people) from the soil around it. Then it withers and wilts and comes crashing down.

    It is such a delight to see our vines grow more and more everyday.

    I watched the O’Reilly clip on YouTube and he says “anti-White” so naturally that I miss it the first time and have to listen again closely.

    Marine le Pen also used “anti-White racism”, if only she would drop the last word.

  2. #2 by Bob on 07/03/2012 - 1:36 pm

    Did O’Reilly use it or not?
    It wouldn’t be the first time all my informants were wrong and I was too lazy to see the thing.

    • #3 by dungeoneer on 07/03/2012 - 1:58 pm

      Against Geraldo he used it awhile back and knocked him flat.

      • #4 by OldBlighty on 07/03/2012 - 11:03 pm

        O’Reilly has done it on two separate occasions, as far as I know. He did it back in March and said it 4 times in regards to Professor Bell, in this video alone:

        http://frontporchpolitics.com/2012/03/bill-oreilly-scewers-geraldo-obamas-mentor/

        It starts at 2.35.

        • #5 by Simmons on 07/04/2012 - 11:46 am

          What is more telling is that the professional anti-whites did not get after Loudmouth. I assume they wish it to blow over, but I also assume that soon they will be issuing orders to their sidekick respectables on words and phrases that are not acceptable.

          Our intellectuals true geniuses that they are are basically what props up the anti-whites, but then again their vanity for their stupid and nearly irrelavant little intellectual obsessions is what draws their little audiences.

  3. #6 by Adelheim_ on 07/03/2012 - 2:08 pm

    Here is a youtube link (19 sec) where Bill O’Reilly says anti-White.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzowAgXCVWQ&feature=player_embedded

  4. #7 by Bob on 07/03/2012 - 3:46 pm

    Gar 5, good point, that last word does ruin it.

  5. #8 by Jason on 07/03/2012 - 7:28 pm

    I wonder if ANY of the other pro-White groups will notice that the Mantra is the only approach that is starting to change the national (international) dialogue?

    If you get a chance, please let me know if you got my private message. I can receive and reply, but not sure if I can send. Thanks

  6. #9 by c-bear on 07/03/2012 - 11:32 pm

    I heard someone at work say “code-word”. It was applied to something other than “anti-white”, and probably unintentional, especially since it came from one of the more liberal types, BUT I heard it. It’s exciting. When he said that 4 or 5 heads turned followed by a brief pause of uncomfortable silence. That tells me that not only has this anti-white been exposed to our terminology, but several others as well. These are people with whom I have not had ANY discussions on race. My hope is that these people are also some of the silent audience who have seen us expose the anti-whites online. The impact of us imposing OUR terminology is beyond measure.

    • #10 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/04/2012 - 12:42 am

      c-bear, one hopes, but “______is a codeword for racism” has been popular phrasing by anti-whites for years.

      To check myself on that, I googled the phrase “is a code word for racism,” and clicked on page 10 of the results to try to find some old examples….came up with this one from a 1997 court case concerning the Tawana Brawley affair,

      “‘These people’ is a code word for racism,’ defendant Alton Maddox said.”
      http://articles.nydailynews.com/1997-12-18/news/18051005_1_brawley-advisers-tawana-brawley-evidence

      The variety of examples show that EVERY word is a code word for racism! “Crime is a code word for racism” is a statement I remember hearing on commie radio here in Berkeley, the idea being that anyone who considered crime a subject worthy of discussion was a racist.

      But O’Reilly’s use of “anti-white” in that 19 second clip linked above is truly exciting! He just slipped it in there with no emphasis on it at all! It makes me wonder how many of the people who have sold out might love the opportunity to be more real. I hope that isn’t a naive thought.

      • #11 by Jason on 07/04/2012 - 12:52 am

        HD, I am going to send you a test PM. Please let me know if you get it by replying to it. I’m afraid none of my messages are being sent. Sorry for clogging the blog with this post – feel free to delete.

        • #12 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/04/2012 - 1:36 am

          I just sent you two replies, and each time this appeared on my screen,

          “Recipient “ID” and “Name” doesn’t match. Cheating huh?”

          What the hell does that mean?? Maybe that the name you used for the message was “jason Here,” and not just “Jason”?

          Also, I checked “save” before I sent the two replies, and neither of them is saved in my sent folder.

          This site reminds me of an old wreck of a car I once had, except the car didn’t snarl unintelligible automated statements at me.

          • #13 by Jason on 07/04/2012 - 2:16 am

            Thanks and I again I apologize for the clutter on this blog. Well at least you got my message. Well, I changed my screen name to “Jason” instead of “Jason Here” so people didn’t have to write it out. If it causes a problem I will change it back.

            • #14 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/04/2012 - 3:55 am

              I don’t own a gun because I’m sure I would shoot my computer. Pure self-defense.

      • #15 by steadiness on 07/05/2012 - 5:42 pm

        This.

        In politically correct America, if a nationalist speaks out, he is widely condemned by everyone who wants to be respectable as a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews and such. So nationalists are forced to speak in code.

        As a result, the left can accuse nationalists of speaking in codewords and dog whistles.

        When I abandoned the left, they had just rolled out their strategy of accusing every conservative of being a dog-whistle nationalist, and were busy smearing George Zimmerman as racist.

        The phrase “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” stuck to me. It makes more sense to liberals who are used to accusing conservatives of being racist than conservatives, though they will deny it vehemently if poorly. They best they can do is accuse us of whining, and point back to their hierarchy of oppression.

        Here’s another zinger that they can’t deny that hits their sacred hierarchy: Zimmerman was called white to strip him of minority privilege.

  7. #16 by six gun on 07/04/2012 - 8:07 am

    PLEASE would Admin respond to this messaging issue.

    I just received a message from Jason (jason-here).
    The Jason on this thread.
    There is a bug in the messaging system.
    Well there may be several bugs. I note this blog version is not fully updated. It is 3.4, the latest being 3.4.1

    I had a look at the changelog on this update
    http://wordpress.org/news/

    There are 18 bug fixes, in 3.4.1, with as I expected security fixes.

    After all the loons hacking websites, this blog should be updated as a matter of urgency.

    I also note there is better handling of plugins.
    The messaging system is a plugin.

    But returning to the messaging.
    jason-here sent me a message.
    I clicked the reply link which created a reply.
    The reply was addressed for “Jason Here”.
    I wrote the reply and clicked send.
    This returned the error message HD has posted about.

    “Recipient “ID” and “Name” doesn’t match. Cheating huh?”

    The recipient ID will be for jason-here.
    The message was automatically addressed to Jason Here.
    The ID and name do not match.
    The message should be addressed to “jason-here”
    You cannot edit the recipient name in the message.
    Thus there is a bug.

    The mismatch between the ID and Name prevents the reply message being sent.

    I sent myself a message which I received.
    I then replied to that message.
    I got the error message I was cheating.
    This reply is not received.
    The mismatch prevents the system sending a message.

    I can find other WordPress users have had issues with this error message.

    The resolution may be here

    http://wordpress.org/support/topic/plugin-wp-private-messages-recipient-id-and-name-doesnt-match

    It sounds like this would mean getting into the website files and editing one.

    I just downloaded the messaging plugin.
    There is one php file runs the show.

    At line 277 we have

    if($name != $to) { _e(‘Recipient “ID” and “Name” doesn\’t match. Cheating huh?’, $wpulang); return; }

    This is where the error message is coming from.

    I wonder what version this plugin is. The plugins went commercial some time ago.

    http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/user-messages/

    What version plugin does this site have?

  8. #17 by six gun on 07/04/2012 - 9:33 am

    I will install WordPress 3.4.0 on Xampp on my PC and see if I can sort this out and find what the issue is.
    The message system is an important feature of the site as we go forwards.

  9. #18 by Dick_Whitman on 07/04/2012 - 10:17 am

    Magic.

  10. #19 by six gun on 07/04/2012 - 10:30 am

    OK I installed version 3.4.1 of WordPress onto my PC.
    I have an Xampp server on this computer.
    I went through some of the plugins.
    I found that there is a messaging plugin that works fine and does not throw up the errors.

    http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/private-messages-for-wordpress/

    It takes 1 minute to download and install.

    I was able to message myself and reply to that message.
    The selection of the user you wish to mail is slightly different but essentially it works the same.

  11. #20 by Jason on 07/04/2012 - 6:27 pm

    Six Gun, does that mean we all have to download and install WordPress on our computer?

  12. #21 by six gun on 07/04/2012 - 6:40 pm

    No –
    I expect it will be a browser based webinar. You probably will have to have javascript enable on the browser (which most people have switched on).
    Sometimes you have to install a bit of software.
    After that if it runs like all the webinars I have attended it is a password accessed.

    I see O’Reilly has been anti-Whiting when it came to Prof Derrick Bell.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_NP5jAPmPc&feature=plcp

Comments are closed.