Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Some subtext

Posted by -Gar5- on July 13th, 2012 under General, Political Correctness

When anti-Whites say “White people are genetically evil” they are saying that race is real.

When anti-Whites say “White people stole land” they are saying land is racial property.

When anti-Whites say “White people controlling White countries is White privilege” they are saying non-Whites controlling non-White countries is non-White privilege.

When anti-Whites say “Humanity is 99.9% the same” they are saying they have no respect for human identity.

When anti-Whites say “You shouldn’t say that,” they are saying they are against freedom of speech and that you need to be censored.

  1. #1 by Wolfram on 07/13/2012 - 5:30 pm

    A good and succinct piece on our terminology
    in relation to their anti-white genocidal agenda.

  2. #2 by Feu denfer on 07/13/2012 - 6:11 pm

    When anti-Whites say “Excluding people is evil” they say independence is evil.

    When anti-Whites say “We have an obligation to help” they say Yanomami indians should work in factories so they can earn money and help poor non-indians.

    When anti-Whites say “White people stole land” they are saying HISTORICAL crime stats matter.

    When anti-Whites say “I was talking about [historical time period]” they are referring to THE period that fits their argument.

    When anti-Whites talk about “the history of racism” they are saying in-group bias is an invention.

  3. #3 by Cody on 07/14/2012 - 12:08 am

    When anti-whites say white people stole land, they are saying Europe is white peoples land.

    When anti-whites justify wrongdoings against the white race today because whites committed the same wrong doings in the past, they are saying their moral belief is that two wrongs make a right, an eye for an eye.

  4. #4 by Epiphany on 07/14/2012 - 5:03 am

    The anti–Whites seem obsessed with revenge. That much is quite true!

  5. #5 by Simmons on 07/14/2012 - 10:07 am

    Good job. Our side for too long took it for granted that the anti-whites were morally superior and hence gave the world lengthy wordism essays which all but admitted all they could do was quibble the details.

    That is no longer, these kind of short statements are our spear that is thrown prior to the main charge.

  6. #6 by BGLass on 07/14/2012 - 10:08 am

    When anti-Whites say “Excluding people is evil” they say independence is evil…..

    —really any relationship at all for whites is evil

    If you have no right to say no to a relationship, no right of exclusion, it is even illegal to reject anyone, then the relationship involves no choice, you do not choose to be in it; there is no will or desire to be in it, perhaps the state sanctions the terms of being in it as in “neighborhoods” where a relationship is dictated by a government happened to put you there, or dictated that if you have appropriate money to “buy in” to that “community” you are then called “a neighbor.”

    Relationships are evil since the concept of real relationship involves exclusion. All real relationships are based in the right to say NO.

    At the extreme, one can’t even mate like dogs, on instinct. Even instinct implies choice, especially instinct.

    All others retain the right of exclusion, however.

    Even in “the ghettos,” youknowwhos dictated THEY lived there. The Jewish ghetto is, today, the height of horror in movies, and yet this is to be allowed to be together, allowed to have an identity, allowed to have a neighborhood, (which is to say the european gentile is, today, MORE suppressed).

    Acknowledgement of this reality can breed a dangerous paranoia. How can you trust anyone when the relationships aren’t allowed to be real?

    In this reality, distrust is the relation. The paranoia can start to gnaw at those who demand things function like this. They have everything, they can live anywhere, they are excluded nowhere, even legally— so why doesn’t it feel good, like real “winning”???

  7. #7 by Epiphany on 07/14/2012 - 10:37 am

    INTEGRATION was not meant to suceed in its claimed goals. Rather, it has suceeded in its true goal, which is to cause unnessary conflict between the Races.

    Segregation protects Whites from Blacks and Blacks from Whites!

  8. #8 by mandela on 07/15/2012 - 6:08 pm

    Thanks Gar5, I liked that

Comments are closed.