John Locke “I see about 7 White people object to the mantra for every 1 White person that agrees.”

Ignore that at your peril.
We distribute propaganda. As this evolves and don’t for one minute think it will not have to evolve.
We must understand the audience.

Why does John Locke find the majority of his audience does not agree with our message?

We do live in very Orwellian times, newspeak/doubletalk/thought crimes… they are all here

The “Race Doesn’t Matter” response is the one that really irks me.

Essentially what they are saying is “White people don’t matter”, none of the other races are facing genocide.

Worked for me. I was *pissed* when I found out people had been lying to me all my life. The race denialists will tell you that there’s more ingroup variation than outgroup variation and they’ll even tell you that principal component analysis shows that people are scattered all over, because it’s not enough to predict based on cultural marxist beliefs, they must take their predictions and hold them up as scientific facts.

They go on and on about clines. Yes, skin color varies clinally. Race is not skin color. What is race? It’s right here in the principal component analysis: http://i.imgur.com/XXT4i.jpg

They’ll tell you that green blob is privileged, and to solve the race problem, it must be blended out of existence.

We are not trying to debunk their “race doesn’t exist” assertion.

We are pointing out that what they are doing is genocide.

And it doesn’t matter if all owls are equal yet they still want to save the spotted owl. They are allowed to think there is unique beauty in spotted owls. They are not allowed to think there is anything unique or worth preserving about their race.

I don’t know if there’s a solution.

What they mean varies.
There is no genocide actually happening.
Genocide means something different to what we [UN] say.
There are no races so genocide cannot happen on racial grounds.
There is no White race, there are Caucasians which is much more than Whites, we are just depigmented Caucasians.
Genocide of the White race isn’t important.
Genocide of the White race is important and it is very good it is happening.

Take a look at Fringe’s video on the Southern Poverty Palace people.
See what these anti-Whites are really like beneath their veneer.
I think those who support this scum would think again if they knew.
Tim Wise is from 21.50 – pure evil
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnyOIarA3-Q

We are not hating, we do not deny people should have “equality” and should be treated decently. We do not deny people have rights.
What we say is White people have rights in their own lands, they should have an equal chance to maintain their own race.
We need Mantra to deal with this.

Belief in equality is the foundation of White Genocide and most anti-Whiteism. Since the mantra doesn’t address belief in equality, I think it doesn’t wake up most White people. To asses effectiveness, notice how many posters disagree with the mantra versus how many agree.

I see about 7 White people object to the mantra for every 1 White person that agrees. It is because they believe in equality.

Art 2 UN Convention says
“any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group..”

Notice genocide does not necessarily involve race.
You might then counter by saying yes but it may involve race.
They can reply with yes it may include this idea of race but race is a social construct.
So the UN is legislating against the destruction of a social construct..

Just so everyone is clear as social construct according to the dictionary is:

A social mechanism, phenomenon, or category created and developed by society; a perception of an individual, group, or idea that is ‘constructed’ through cultural or social practice.

So the dictionary is saying it is simply just the way a group of people are viewed. White people of Europe have been called this thing called a race over the years but it is just a label attached to them with no biological basis.

There has been a big debate on youtube between two of the vocal characters in the area. The social construct chap has lost and very soundly.

Race is a biological entity, not it probably is, it is.
The idea it is a social construct is an ideological construct.
We are all the same so there can be no IQ gaps, not behavioural differences and no objection to mass immigration and assimilation. No objection to the elimination of White people off the face of the map. Funny how removing White people off the face of the map is not worth mentioning but removing a totalitarian ideology off the face of the map is a world stopping deal.

Bob is correct, we all bleed red, its just colour and so on is simply a way to say stop making a fuss and stop objecting to mass immigration.
There is nothing to preserve b/c none of this exists.

It is also a tailgating construct. There are massive debates on youtube which have been going on for years. The racialists always win out in the end, always. I have seen all of their arguments and counter arguments. But so much time is wasted on discussion that should never be.
I would recommend watching the likes of Libertarianrealist and Fringeelements
Fringe has started saying it all and interestingly he has had very little flack. I mean down to the holocaust was propaganda. Anyway now I’m tailgating the discussion.

However, there is also the scientific argument and there are some good Minis on it. But it seems like using the legal definition of genocide works best, as far as shutting them up on race denial. Is that everyone else’s experience too, or do you find success with the scientific angle? Seems like that might lead to endless back and forth.