One of the rules BUGS has developed is, “Stay on the offensive.”
The really nice thing about that phrase is that BOB did NOT invent it!
And I would know. One of my major strategies has been to recognize my own exact turn of phrase. It is the only way of telling where I am getting in and, therefore, what is succeeding. Recognizing these tiny turns has been the basis of my strategy for well over half a century.
Who but me would have isolated the most obvious-sounding term, “anti-white?” Who else would have noticed that that term was NEVER used in the mainstream, ANYWHERE. It was ALWAYS “anti-white and anti-Semitic.”
So the victory of O’Reilly using “anti-white” doesn’t have to be explained to anyone inside BUGS.
Yes, he had BLACKS screaming they were anti-white for the year before that. But respectable conservatives always use “anti-white” in the mouths of non-whites, but never never, NEVER has it been uttered in National Review or by Hannity without the required “and anti-Semitic.”
SO I am an expert at recognizing a new term and knowing whether it came from ME.
I get tired all over every time I see another news item anywhere in our pages.
Anybody can read the latest. Only a FEW of us can do the hard job of getting out there and REPORTING on our MESSAGE
We are improving. More and more exchanges, independent of me, go on about the wording we get back and the wording of how we deal with it. News items and enemy speeches are available with billions of dollars behind them. Every news item here helps the enemy.
If someone started talking about how bad whites are, I had to come up with the obvious reply: We are accusing them of genocide, so they seek to JUSTIFY genocide. How many thousands of Jew-obsessed tomes would have to be written to have the effect of that short point?
Stormfront was a major cause of our existence. Stormfront has had news items for years that appear nowhere else. And Stormfront is MUCH bigger than we are.
Render unto BUGS what is Bugs’s and unto SF what is Stormfront’s.
#1 by Jason on 07/19/2012 - 8:02 am
But WHY couldn’t most of us, when the other side starting raging about the evils of White people, stop and realize, “oh, they just tried to justify genocide”, and realize that actually HELPS our side? No, instead our instinct is to argue about how bad their people are or how superior we are (I mean untrained BUGsters).
Most of us are not used to playing to an audience. Most males are into mano-a-mano stuff. And I guess we lose sight of what our goal is – our goal is to EXPOSE White Genocide and the Anti-Whites. But we get obsessed with wanting to win a point here or there, and end up missing the bigger prize.
And most of us are not wordsmiths and propagandists. I do think the MORAL component is the most important. I just saw a video on why capitalism still fails compared to socialism when it’s voted on – it’s not the technical arguments about which works better – no, it’s the simple moral arguments of things like “fairness”, that make people feel compelled to vote Lefty.
That is why our struggle must first and foremost be sold as a MORAL crusade, in my opinion, just like bringing down the Evil Empire. If you win the moral high ground, you win. Period. If we convince enough Whites (and others) that this is, in fact, White Genocide by Anti-Whites, we win. All the later action, any trials, all the imagined fun that comes later is just a mopping up operation. THIS is the real struggle right now.
So, we must paint the enemy as EVIL. But we don’t do that by coming off as belligerent and scary. That makes US look like the dangerous one. Pro-Whites need to learn how to portray themselves as honest victims, because the truth is that’s what we are, and besides, it works. No, not to win sympathy from Anti-Whites, but to get enough Whites to feel morally entitled to fight back.
#2 by six gun on 07/19/2012 - 8:38 am
A goodly proportion of why I come here is 2066, the latest White minority date for the UK. It makes me angry, it makes me sad, it makes me feel lots of emotions.
A few days ago I was contacted by 2 Englishmen who are not in BUGS. I have seen one operating alongside us for as long as I have posted on youtube. He has made some good Mantra videos, he is very active.
They want to do a geographically focussed campaign. I posted here about this. I said I did not know if this had been done before.
I am not interested in attention for myself but I notice no-one asked me anything more, albeit I had some unrelated messages to me on SF where I mentioned it again.
I have set up a temporary website on a subdomain which I have decided I am going to build up, how quickly it develops depends on me learning this web system which is ahead of what I am familiar with.
It is a full blown website. I have put in a full screen chat room. I have incorporated into it the most recent WordPress blog with a fully functional messaging system.
I have featured another pro-White’s blog into the site.
We have already started talking to the other guys on Messenger, planning targets.
Each of these steps took minutes.
Once I get my head round it we could probably incorporate a webinar facility for communication and education.
If BUGS is going to move on into internet age this is where you must go.
BUGS is already well behind.
I discovered a big contributory reason why the White genocide petition is falling off. To my mind this is disturbing. I said I had discovered this and written a piece, only Jason seemed to show an interest. I’ve done some more digging and it is not to do with change.org.
Our battle is all uphill. We must use every trick in the book to have any hope of winning.
I’m not going to say any more about this unless directly asked.
#3 by cecilhenry on 07/19/2012 - 12:11 pm
Okay six gun:
You know a big reason why the White Genocide petition will not succeed but you won;t say anymore unless asked??
Come on, its White geNOcide—if you’re against it SPEAK UP now!!
I question the purpose of not speaking your mind straight out. Why would anyone let something fail if they ACTUALLY give a damn.
I have no patience for that kind of ‘I know better but you better recognize me before I’ll tell you the REAL truth’ rhetoric. So just stop that–we need your contributions.
This is too important for personalities.
I have a question for Bob et al regarding news items and the fact that Bob doesn’t like to see news items.
What do you use that’s topical to get the Mantra out if not news items??? Aren’t they a good tool with a focused issue to spread the Mantra through.
I look for news items as a way to plausibly point out Mantra thinking. Is this ineffective? How else to bring it up?
How can I present the Mantra thinking in, say, a sports report??? Seems difficult. Would be great if I could see a way through that of course, but I don’t at the present.
#4 by six gun on 07/19/2012 - 12:46 pm
cecilhenry – I wrote a piece about it and messaged it in.
I did discover a bit more since.
I am not the only one who is getting frustrated that some of us are sending bits and pieces in but get no acknowledgement.
I’m not talking about us being frustrated that our efforts are not published but we don’t even get acknowledgement it has been received.
Jason has said several times.
There are others here as well.
If the reply was “bloody rubbish” – fair enough, it may well have been “bloody rubbish” but at least we would know.
I have said this WordPress blog is not up to date and the most recent blog has security fixes.
I’ve said there is a bug in the messaging system. This messaging system is not being updated. There are others which are being updated and don’t have a bug.
I have talked about a chat room.
I have spoken about the organisation of the website so people can find the gems on here.
I am not doing this for my own benefit.
There is more than me not to get any feedback from anyone in the management and it is not helping the cause.
I mentioned 2 guys had approached me about a geographically focussed campaign.
No-one made a comment. Not even, oh that’s interesting, that’s not been done before.
Someone wrote on the frontpage that they wanted Bob for an interview but emailing doesn’t work.
I can understand if Bob is not up with the technology. That is not his strength, but someone has got to sort this out.
People talk in terms of the Mantra changing the world. That cannot happen unless we start going up through the gears.
I’m not going to labour the point now. Either there is a realisation that changes are needed or this is forever going to be small scale.
There isn’t time.
We will lose Bob one day and then what?
Unless there’s sophisticated technology and communications in place, with training programmes and a network of people throughout the White world, the game will be up.
Anyway I will always help where I can.
At the moment I am frustrated about the set up so I’m setting up my own website for this English project. We do have a chat room.
#5 by patrickwhiterabbit on 07/20/2012 - 5:55 am
Six Gun-I am interested in this UK thing. Please PM me here (i don’t use SF) or post something here, a link to this site of yours perhaps?
Cheers
#6 by six gun on 07/20/2012 - 6:03 am
Will do.
#7 by Simmons on 07/19/2012 - 3:18 pm
Speaking of short point as Bob mentioned, I emailed John Derbyshire a one sentence email asking if we who oppose genocide should be called “racist” in reference to his work at V-dare yesterday.
#8 by Simmons on 07/19/2012 - 3:20 pm
CofCC news site has a question that needs answering
http://cofcc.org/2012/07/what-is-your-favorite-defense-against-the-racist-slur/#disqus_thread
#9 by steadiness on 07/19/2012 - 10:35 pm
Since I’m new to the pro-white scene, I don’t really know about the history of Stormfront. I checked it out a few times over the years, but it always seemed pretty pointless.
Now I go there and just see endless Jewaholism and poorly written articles everywhere. Maybe it hasn’t always been like this, maybe Stormfront was important at some point in the past 20 years, but it’s really more of an embarrassment than anything else.
Anyway, everyone knows that if SixGun said pro-white stuff out loud, he would go directly to jail and no one would be able to defend him. There will come a time to speak openly about ending white genocide. And if you look at the anonymous parts of the Internet, you can see that it’s coming on fairly quickly. There’s a… storm front… on the way.
#10 by six gun on 07/20/2012 - 5:45 am
It has been like that for as long as I can see.
A few weeks ago a poster put up a thread about putting all the National Socialism business to one side as it was not helping our cause.
I came out strongly in favour of that.
Many supported my view, many did not. I got the usual names. If they are not throwing stones from one side they are throwing them from the other.
It makes me weep when I put up threads about BUGS and there was little practical response but at the same time many were posting on a thread about Marching Songs.