Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

No Reservations

Posted by Bob on September 10th, 2012 under Coaching Session


In 1900 Americans Indians were known as the Vanishing Americans. As a result they were given reservations.

For whites there can be no reservations.

In fact one of the of the SPLC’s great victories, for which it raised many millions, was to destroy the white reservation in Idaho. They are still raising money to get more blacks into northern Idaho.

Compared to anti-whites, Hitler was a piker. He offered to send Jews to America for ransom. There is no where on earth which will even allow anyone to TALK about white survival for ransom or otherwise.

Once again, no one talks about the real problem here:

If any area is allowed to be all-white, it is assumed that ALL whites will end up there. Anti-whites have a word for it: It’s called White Flight.

It is exactly the same problem that showed Communism was ridiculous: If they allowed people to leave, the people WOULD leave.

But no one ever MENTIONED that but me.

The entire anti-white movement relies on the assumption that if whites are allowed to have ANY area of its own, there will be flow into those areas which will drain all other areas of whites.

Talking about white flight is quite an admission.

The Berlin Wall was quite an admission.

Fortunately, absolutely no one on the other side is ever going to mention it.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by Jason on 09/10/2012 - 8:32 am

    It is just like communism. They cannot allow us to escape. Although, at least the communists paid lip service to the value of the workers. They don’t even give us that.

    Normally, if you hate someone, you want them out of your world. You are happy to see them leave. This aspect of the psychology of Anti-Whites makes no sense to me. I don’t want to get mired in the quicksand of “root causes” while doing Mantra work, but this element is still not clear to me. They don’t want to let us go. They want to keep us surrounded by non-Whites, being hated and genocided. It’s like a level of hate even the communists didn’t have.

    Is it the envy/hate some people feel toward those they want to destroy but still depend on. Or some pathological desire for revenge. I don’t fully get their mentality, but maybe this kind of hate is self-destroying as Bob has alluded to.

  2. #2 by Daniel Genseric on 09/10/2012 - 9:16 am

    No Reservations with Bob Whitaker:

    “It is exactly the same problem that showed Communism was ridiculous: If they allowed people to leave, the people WOULD leave.” – Bob

    Is it any wonder that what we have going on with the U.S. southern border is a carbon copy of what the USSR perpetrated against Soviets along their borders? Certain immigrants whom the anti-white regime deems “valuable” are let into the “worker’s paradise”; they are FILTERED. After all, none of the other white countries are coming here by the MILLIONS. White migrants are kept OUT. The anti-white establishment won’t let them in. Vis-à-vis Border Patrol, whites and others are kept IN to fill their slots in the Neo-American, anti-white wet dream.

    So, again we ask a simple question no one wants to answer:

    If America is the “land of opportunity”, then why are there so many Border Patrolmen keeping people IN? They sure aren’t tasked with keeping non-whites OUT. WHY?

    And so The Union awaits the same fate nobody wants to anticipate.

  3. #3 by Gavin on 09/10/2012 - 9:51 am

    American Blacks getting their own area called Liberia in Africa is good.

    Indians getting their own reservations all over North America is good.

    Whites having our own area anywhere on the planet is “hate” and “racism” and must be prevented by any means necessary.

  4. #4 by JustAWhiteMom on 09/10/2012 - 10:16 am

    This is a huge chink in the anti-white left’s armor. If they concede ANY living space to Whites, they have conceded the value of our identity and acknowledged the evil of their genocidal mass immigration and integration campaign. If they refuse ANY living space to Whites, they reveal that total anihilation is their goal. They cannot win.

    The Indian Reservation argument is irrefutable.

  5. #5 by elcyCesreveR on 09/10/2012 - 11:04 am

    “If any area is allowed to be all-white, it is assumed that ALL whites will end up there. Anti-whites have a word for it: It’s called White Flight.”

    That is also why they ALWAYS refer to white nationalists as “white supremacists”. The anti-whites wear their subconscious on their sleeve. If all races are equal, why are you singling out whites for feelings of “supremacy” when they would like their own homeland?

    you see it all the time when anti-whites say things like “The reason africa is for the africans is because nobody wants to move there”

    The “white supremacist” phrase also works as a mechanism for conditioning whites into what they think is a moral contract with non-whites, when in actuality it’s a declaration of genocide against whites

  6. #6 by Dave on 09/10/2012 - 12:05 pm

    What our enemies are saying is that we have no opportunity to buy life. What our enemies are saying is that we must fight.

    Such enemies are worth having. They are an inspiration.

    • #7 by Jason on 09/10/2012 - 6:57 pm

      Good point. They have put us on ‘death ground’. Which is what the concept of White Genocide makes clear. We just have to make enough Whites aware of it.

  7. #8 by Epiphany on 09/11/2012 - 6:37 am

    African Americans say bad things about us all the time, and they are never called racists!

  8. #9 by BGLass on 09/11/2012 - 9:31 am

    You hear White flight all the time.

    But no one says, White flight just means White people looking for a place to live.

    If Asian people were always moving, looking for a place to live, it would seem strange to watch. When Indians looked for a place to live, and had policies against their freedom of association and having a place to live, it was called genocide.

    If there was no genocide, no policies against them, there would be no ‘white flight.’ They would have homes, as they used to do, and then just live in them for many years and generations.

    One difference seems that white people did not move into teepees and start wearing beads and feathers and eating indian food; but in ‘white flight’ others move into the equivalent of white teepees and wear the clothes left behind.

  9. #10 by Harumphty Dumpty on 09/11/2012 - 12:18 pm

    What a wonderful blog, that pulls so much together for me…thanks, Bob!

    If I can imagine a world in which the countries immediately to the south and north of us would be all-white countries and proudly all-white, THEN we would have EFFECTIVE BORDER CONTROL, with some form of impassable “Berlin Wall” running the entire length of those borders TO KEEP US IN!

    But our anti-white establishment has no need for a “Berlin Wall,” because the anti-white movement world wide has made sure there is no place for us whites to flee to anywhere.

    Our “White Flight” is limited to bouncing around inside the pinball machine until (the anti-whites hope) the game will be over, with whites world wide having been flooded and “assimilated” and blended out of existence.
    —-
    I’m having a little trouble with this blog’s final line, if anyone feels like expostulating on it a bit:

    “Fortunately, absolutely no one on the other side is ever going to mention it.”

    Is Bob saying that’s fortunate (I mean it’s inevitable, right?), because then we get to say it? It seems to me it would be even better if the anti-whites were to say it, but of course that’s a nonsensical possibility in the real world.

    Part of my problem in understanding Bob sometimes is maybe because I’m not as grounded in the reality of the world, and so I don’t view his statements fully from that perspective.

    • #11 by Harumphty Dumpty on 09/11/2012 - 1:31 pm

      For visitors here, I should have expanded one line of my comment:

      Our “White Flight” is limited to bouncing around inside the pinball machine until (the anti-whites hope) the game will be over, with whites world wide having been genocided by having had our countries flooded with non-whites and ourselves forced by law to integrate with the non-whites so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

      I also just created a thread on SF around this blog…my view of the function of SF for us has changed since hearing Don Black say that SF gets around 50,000 separate persons visiting each day, and 90% of those are just visitors!

      So our posts there should be aimed primarily at the 90% who are just visitors, no?!
      http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t912758/#post10583444

      • #12 by Harumphty Dumpty on 09/11/2012 - 1:55 pm

        With SF threads that we’re hoping will be much viewed by visitors there because of our posts on them (those would be threads mostly in Swarmfront, I guess), it’s good if bugsers can drop a worthwhile comment on those threads every now and then to make the thread newly visible when visitors arrive at SF and click on the menu item, “New Posts.”

        Ah! It’s especially easy to put up on the “where did you post the Mantra today” thread in Swarmfront the links we put up on the same thread here, as White Dude especially has done…hey White Dude, consider still copying a few links into there instead of just reporting, so visitors can click on the links and see what it is we do!

        But you guys who do so much know best how to use your time.

        • #13 by Daniel Genseric on 09/11/2012 - 2:49 pm

          Wish I could help you there.

          I had been doing just that on SwarmFront. But, I couldn’t help to take the occasional swat at one or two of the more dried-out, feminista fruit-flies bumbling about some of those threads you speak of. You know, the type who think they can BUY their way out of white genocide whilst shitting all over the place with their Intellectual drivel.

          Look where that landed me. Squarely in the OUT group… hahah

          • #14 by Harumphty Dumpty on 09/11/2012 - 3:56 pm

            You’ll be rested up for your return there! :) I’ve reached the age when I’m beginning to feel avuncular when I see nonsense.

            I just reposted Gavin’s post that’s above onto that SF thread I linked above.

            That thread was getting 8 to 13 views, mostly visitors, until (I assume) it slid off the “New Posts” page. Putting up Gavin’s post will get the thread back on there.

            The title of the thread, “No Reservations for Whites,” I’m sure gets browsers’ attention on that page.

  10. #15 by steadiness on 09/11/2012 - 1:57 pm

    We can look at the e.g. Stuff Black People Don’t Like posts about organized political opposition to white flight, called “regionalism”. Obama has, not surprisingly, been a long-time supporter of regionalism, believing that the suburbs are “responsible for” the cities.

    “‘We are battling apartheid in America.’ So said Obama’s onetime organizing mentor Mike Kruglik in 2005, explaining the philosophy behind his crusade for regional equity. At the the time, Kruglik was directing the regionalist efforts of the Gamaliel Foundation, a national network of community organizations that Obama himself had helped launch in the mid-1980s. Today Kruglik leads the Gamailied offshoot Building One American, which fights for regionalism in partnerships with the Obama White House, although few Americans have any idea that this is the case.” — Stanley Kurtz, Spreading the Wealth: How Obama is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities

    Is anyone in media going to notice that Democrats insist that whites must not be allowed to abdicate their responsibility to support black areas? They’ll even talk openly about white flight without noticing why they care that black areas are abandoned by the tax base.

  11. #16 by Scythian on 09/11/2012 - 5:08 pm

    White flight is racist and “weak”, gotta stay on your block until you’re the last white guy on the block, then for sure you’ll be the “toughest” guy on the block. If whites are not allowed any space on the planet, then whites would literally have to kill non-whites at that point to survive as a race, (Hey, if whites are going to be FARMED OUT for non-whites!) or perish and leave the earth forever! At what POINT in that path do whites get to say no?

  12. #17 by mandela on 09/11/2012 - 7:08 pm

    I am in Politics these days. I wanted to hold a public meeting on the future of our people in this country – very middle of the road, with non controversial speakers. Now the government has cracked down on me, they have been looking at who I associate with, and I have been told not to proceed with the meeting. I have had to use a legal professional to make a statement to the human rights dept.
    All this and I have done nothing wrong – it is a Police State

  13. #18 by mandela on 09/11/2012 - 8:05 pm

    The moral to my story is that we are a long way from being allowed a reservation.

Comments are closed.