I am not going to presume to teach David Duke his business. He remains one of my heroes and the only man who dares stand where he does.
At the East Tennessee meeting, after Horus and I handed out the Mantra and were allowed to speak first, a fact appreciated by a tired old man, David explained why he does not use the Mantra. David is dealing in hundreds of millions of hits each week, and when he switches from talking about Jews to speaking as a white man for whites he gets a huge drop.
Dr. Duke, out in the real world, finds defense of the white race as a white man, a losing proposition.
No matter how we may bitch about that, he is out there in the real world getting a real and enormous audience. He and Don get sniped enough by people who do nothing and attack them for ideological impurity or say they are underground Israeli agents, and I am not going to join that crowd.
Dave’s response is therefore non-racial. He advocates that all races should be preserved as a sort of Whole Earth thing that appeals to his audience.
So there we have it. He will advocate white survival, but only very obliquely and only very carefully.
Don Black found the Mantra approach very useful in a short press interview, but it is not the basis of a viable large-scale program.
Yet.
Well, if white survival was practical in the short term someone would have taken it up.
I did predict that a 9/11 would take center stage a couple of years before 9/11. I did point out that the Clintons were running on the basis of being “white blacks,” and, long before she went down in flames to Obama, I said that after all these years of supporting white Democrats who represented blacks, they would soon demand a real, honest-to-God BLACK man.
And the group which will represent whites, by far the most powerful racial group, when each group has spokesmen, will demand white survival.
It gives you an idea how hard this will be to do when you consider that even David Duke can’t do it.
But, like 9/11 and the actual black president, it will come to pass.
#1 by Daniel Genseric on 09/20/2012 - 10:43 am
Something tells me Bob had to sit and think about this article for a couple of days. Had Bob just plopped down and written what he really thinks about The Good Doctor’s refusal to lead, I hazard we might be ducking for cover.
Bob, I suspect were he actually “dealing in hundreds of millions of hits each week,” we would not see the desperate need for the Mantra we find everyday.
And so…this is why we spell “Leadership” the way we do.
WE are the true leadership daring to lead by example. Some of us are rough around the edges, holding nothing back. Others are more polished with their intellectual approach. Nevertheless, ALL of us lead by example while using what works for the survival of our people. Two score’s worth of shit results prove BUGS’ measly gains are just the beginning of the butterfly flapping its South African wings before the hurricane which is sure to follow.
I love ’em to death. But, I wish I could say the same of our mealy mouthed Leaders, whatever their reproach.
Thank GOD for coach!
#2 by Simmons on 09/20/2012 - 10:47 am
Those two have a point, and besides they have done more and suffered more than I so won’t pile on.
But it could be explained to them while they are out there doing their money gig they will be attacked by the anti-whites and therefor the Mantra can at least be used for defense. Now if either of them is using the term “anti-racist” without quotes then they are just shooting themselves and us in the feet.
#3 by Daniel Genseric on 09/20/2012 - 10:58 am
“Those two have a point, and besides they have done more and suffered more than I…”
Some would be inclined to argue with you, Simmons. Define: ‘success for our people.’ Securing echo chambers for our people? I think not. 100 BUGSters have done more for the PLE community than 200,000 N&Jsters could EVER do.
Sometimes I wonder. Remember this?
“Racist is a codeword for anti-white.” – Dr. Diversity
I PRAY for the day my services are no longer needed.
#4 by Simmons on 09/20/2012 - 11:38 am
Yeah I agree, the N&J is just a religious response to the new religion of PC its like the theologic debtates of yesteryear.
The Popes of PC have one word to destroy us all and that word is “racist”, and honestly after going thru my blogroll I must say we whites are the smartest dumb asses on Earth. When we lose we create religous beauty out of abstract gibberish.
So DD has as counter religion of jew jabber and DB runs a site for beaten losers to safely debate the kosher food racket or abstract gibberish till the feds pull the plug (like in November).
And the word “racist” rolls on and terrifies the populace, and our leaders are not smart enough to ask the population what frightens them, much less work to lift this burden.
BUGs does though, so there is hope.
#5 by OldBlighty on 09/20/2012 - 3:43 pm
@Simmons
“N&J is just a religious response to the new religion of PC”
If you ask them for hard evidence of their beliefs, they all fall back on faith.
I get the impression, “Conspiracy theory folks” of all kinds, are looking for the same feelings they would get, if they joined an organized religion.
So we could try telling these folks, if they want those religious feelings, they should join a church group or whatever and get it out of their system.
***
As for David Duke, what is he running for? Leader of the world, or leader of whites?
And do people understand that millions of views, when you have many videos, does not translate into millions of viewers?
If you have lots of videos as David does, one N&Js devotee watching a few videos a week, means he has an audience of a few hundred thousand at best.
As for David’s feelings about us, I would be very surprised if he didn’t feel threatened by us. The man has dedicated his entire life’s work to one thing and we question it’s effectiveness.
#6 by Daniel Genseric on 09/20/2012 - 6:28 pm
Personally, I don’t understand DD’s message, other than “the Jew done it” that is. My money is on Interstellar Purveyor of Diversity. And his single-handedly trying to confuse our tagline “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” is enough to cause me to personally ignore him. It is the same as me insisting that David always says “The Arabs did it.”
“I would be very surprised if he didn’t feel threatened by us. The man has dedicated his entire life’s work to one thing and we question it’s effectiveness.”
We don’t just question it. We take it one step further and SHOWCASE it’s ineffectiveness. Simply by using the Mantra and not some quip from his latest paperweight or Name The Jew vid we have suggested he may become obsolete.
#7 by Wm White on 09/20/2012 - 11:21 am
“It gives you an idea how hard this will be to do when you consider that even David Duke can’t do it.” –Bob Whitaker
This is what history reveals. The masses must perceive their need for leadership; timing is essential. “No revolution before its time,” remains true, and there is nothing to be achieved by sending a message to those who have ears, but will not listen. Only events can get the ‘masses’ attention. Words are only relevant NOW to people who can see ahead (Bob and the BUGSters), not for those whose heads are buried in the swill trough of Political Correction. –Eric Thomson (with my Bugs adapted editing)
________
We are preparing the groundwork for the inevitable events that will usher in, like a storm, ‘white survival re-awakening’. The signs are everywhere but the events that trigger that awakening may be years or decades away. If the Christians can wait over 2000-years; we can continue the Mantra message for the next couple of decades. After all, what is 20 or 30 years historically speaking (only a generation)?
#8 by shari on 09/20/2012 - 3:12 pm
I rather think we are looking for a younger man or men to lead. Those young enough to still be hot headed, yet old enough to have some experience. I hope that it doesn’t take 20 or 30 yrs though. Time is so crucial, RIGHT NOW. Bugs is the forgeing ground.
#9 by A Smiling Weirwood on 09/20/2012 - 3:29 pm
This is my first time posting on this site, though I read it often and “amateur swarm” on my own, without reporting.
That being said, I was prompted to post this because of the note of disappointment (moreso than frustration) which I detected in Bob’s post. Of course, I could be totally wrong, but that’s how I took it. Bob & the BUGSters are the last people I want to see discouraged. So, my thought:
Is the refusal of DD and DB to fully endorse and utilize the Mantra even a bad thing? My understanding of BUGS is that it feels that the old “educational”, N&J approach has utterly failed. I think Horus said in one of his podcasts that if it was going to work, it would have worked by now. So BUGS is about influencing the masses in the way they are ACTUALLY influenced, not in the manner that we would PREFER them to be influenced. So you use a consistent message and, if you will, “healthy propaganda”.
BUGSters do not use n****r in their posts, they do not go on Third Reich rants, and they rarely, if at all, mention YKW. My understanding of your work is that you do this to avoid the preconditioned triggers that people have due to their brainwashing.
That is, if someone mentions “YKN” in a hostile light, or talks favorably of “Mein Fur”, or calls someone on Youtube a n****r, the brainwashed, white & normal person whom you are trying to reach will immediately SHUT DOWN and tune you out. “Well, the J’s…” and you have lost that person. “Mein Fur…” and you have lost that person. “N****r…” and you have lost that person.
Not to criticize DD or DB FOR WHO THEY ARE (I know nothing about them, really), but in terms of WHAT THEY ARE PERCEIVED TO BE: I would say this could even be a good thing for BUGS.
For the life of me, I can’t see how David Duke getting behind the Mantra is going to make a big difference in reaching the Sleeping White Titan, normal white folks. Why? Because, IMO, “David Duke”, in their minds, is synonymous with a KKKlovingnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. I would imagine that the vast majority of his “real world” results and hits comes from people who are already awakened, with possibly some Muslims (due to the common ground on how they view YKW), and anti-Whites monitoring his site.
I very much doubt that too many apple-pie eating church goers and brainwashed sports fans would tune into David Duke, because “David Duke” probably flips their triggers and shuts them down as much as n****r and swastikas and praising Zyklon-B does.
The same thing with DB. DB will never be introduced on a t.v. show without connecting him to SF. SF is a trigger word, just like DD or Mein Fur. IMO it’s a “no go” with the brainwashed masses. Once again, not in terms of WHO THEY ARE, but in terms of HOW THEY ARE PERCEIVED, having them use the mantra over and over might be tantamount, to the brainwashed masses, to having the 3K’s publicly start using the mantra. Is that really a good thing? Would it really help the mission of BUGS if the Mantra, which struggles to have the moral high round in the minds of the BRAINWASHED audience, was inextricably wed to SF, DD, and the 3K’s?
As someone once said… “Neither is new wine put into old wineskins. If it is, the skins burst and the wine is spilled and the skins are destroyed. But new wine is put into fresh wineskins, and so both are preserved.”
BUGS is new wine, and this new wine has been poured into Horus, johnnywhiterabbit, Beefcake, et al. (I hate to leave someone out, but I can’t name all of you!), and a plethora of powerful and unique YouTube videos. I would wager that the “How Whites took over America” video reached more of the unconverted “white and normal” than the past two years’ worth of DD’s videos, which were probably just preaching to the choir.
BUGS, the Mantra, etc., is the best hope for whites, and is the spearhead of creativity and energy and vitality. You have made a difference, are making a difference, and will make a difference.
I think Horus talked in his podcasts about something like a “top-to-bottom” or “bottom-to-top” connection, like lightning, when a public figure is going to start talking Mantra-speak. I would imagine that it will probably be someone we have never heard of, and might not even suspect… and they will probably be “white-and-normal”… those are the leaders who will probably make a difference, if any…
Mea culpa for the length of this comment.
#10 by Harumphty Dumpty on 09/28/2012 - 2:17 pm
Excellent comment. But I’ve been surprised that, going by just my small sampling, many college-age whites today have never heard of David Duke. I’ve found the same with some older adults.
#11 by Karlfried on 09/20/2012 - 4:14 pm
My Name is Karlfried. I am a farmer in Germany. I like the method of Robert Whitaker´s “Mantra”. In our country, the founder of the protestant religion, Martin Luther, did a very similar thing 500 years ago: “Der kleine Katechismus”. Some thousand years ago Moses did a very similar thing with the “Ten Commandments”.
All three men have the same plan in common: Put the most important things in a very easy form and repeat it again and again, for hundreds of years, if there is a need for it.
In my opinion, for our future Robert Whitaker is the most important of the three. Why this?
The others speak about how to live, and Robert Whitaker speaks out that the first thing is to live, to be existent. That is absolutely the most important thing.
#12 by Daniel Genseric on 09/20/2012 - 11:37 pm
“Karlfried” is on moderation. He posted the following in response to this article.
“My Name is Karlfried. I am a farmer in Germany. I like the method of Robert Whitaker´s “Mantra”. In our country, the founder of the protestant religion, Martin Luther, did a very similar thing 500 years ago: “Der kleine Katechismus”. Some thousand years ago Moses did a very similar thing with the “Ten Commandments”.
All three men have the same plan in common: Put the most important things in a very easy form and repeat it again and again, for hundreds of years, if there is a need for it.
In my opinion, for our future Robert Whitaker is the most important of the three. Why this?
The others speak about how to live, and Robert Whitaker speaks out that the first thing is to live, to be existent. That is absolutely the most important thing.”
Welcome, Karlfried!
#13 by Daniel Genseric on 09/20/2012 - 11:39 pm
“A Smiling Weirwood” is on moderation. The following is his response to this article.
This is my first time posting on this site, though I read it often and “amateur swarm” on my own, without reporting.
That being said, I was prompted to post this because of the note of disappointment (moreso than frustration) which I detected in Bob’s post. Of course, I could be totally wrong, but that’s how I took it. Bob & the BUGSters are the last people I want to see discouraged. So, my thought:
Is the refusal of DD and DB to fully endorse and utilize the Mantra even a bad thing? My understanding of BUGS is that it feels that the old “educational”, N&J approach has utterly failed. I think Horus said in one of his podcasts that if it was going to work, it would have worked by now. So BUGS is about influencing the masses in the way they are ACTUALLY influenced, not in the manner that we would PREFER them to be influenced. So you use a consistent message and, if you will, “healthy propaganda”.
BUGSters do not use n****r in their posts, they do not go on Third Reich rants, and they rarely, if at all, mention YKW. My understanding of your work is that you do this to avoid the preconditioned triggers that people have due to their brainwashing.
That is, if someone mentions “YKN” in a hostile light, or talks favorably of “Mein Fur”, or calls someone on Youtube a n****r, the brainwashed, white & normal person whom you are trying to reach will immediately SHUT DOWN and tune you out. “Well, the J’s…” and you have lost that person. “Mein Fur…” and you have lost that person. “N****r…” and you have lost that person.
Not to criticize DD or DB FOR WHO THEY ARE (I know nothing about them, really), but in terms of WHAT THEY ARE PERCEIVED TO BE: I would say this could even be a good thing for BUGS.
For the life of me, I can’t see how David Duke getting behind the Mantra is going to make a big difference in reaching the Sleeping White Titan, normal white folks. Why? Because, IMO, “David Duke”, in their minds, is synonymous with a KKKlovingnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. I would imagine that the vast majority of his “real world” results and hits comes from people who are already awakened, with possibly some Muslims (due to the common ground on how they view YKW), and anti-Whites monitoring his site.
I very much doubt that too many apple-pie eating church goers and brainwashed sports fans would tune into David Duke, because “David Duke” probably flips their triggers and shuts them down as much as n****r and swastikas and praising Zyklon-B does.
The same thing with DB. DB will never be introduced on a t.v. show without connecting him to SF. SF is a trigger word, just like DD or Mein Fur. IMO it’s a “no go” with the brainwashed masses. Once again, not in terms of WHO THEY ARE, but in terms of HOW THEY ARE PERCEIVED, having them use the mantra over and over might be tantamount, to the brainwashed masses, to having the 3K’s publicly start using the mantra. Is that really a good thing? Would it really help the mission of BUGS if the Mantra, which struggles to have the moral high round in the minds of the BRAINWASHED audience, was inextricably wed to SF, DD, and the 3K’s?
As someone once said… “Neither is new wine put into old wineskins. If it is, the skins burst and the wine is spilled and the skins are destroyed. But new wine is put into fresh wineskins, and so both are preserved.”
BUGS is new wine, and this new wine has been poured into Horus, johnnywhiterabbit, Beefcake, et al. (I hate to leave someone out, but I can’t name all of you!), and a plethora of powerful and unique YouTube videos. I would wager that the “How Whites took over America” video reached more of the unconverted “white and normal” than the past two years’ worth of DD’s videos, which were probably just preaching to the choir.
BUGS, the Mantra, etc., is the best hope for whites, and is the spearhead of creativity and energy and vitality. You have made a difference, are making a difference, and will make a difference.
I think Horus talked in his podcasts about something like a “top-to-bottom” or “bottom-to-top” connection, like lightning, when a public figure is going to start talking Mantra-speak. I would imagine that it will probably be someone we have never heard of, and might not even suspect… and they will probably be “white-and-normal”… those are the leaders who will probably make a difference, if any…
Mea culpa for the length of this comment.
Welcome Weirwood!
#14 by Jason on 09/21/2012 - 1:32 am
Welcome Karlfried and Weirwood, great posts.
#15 by Jason on 09/21/2012 - 1:15 am
It is a shame David Duke isn’t taking up the Mantra. I am sure he does get a decline when he drops the endless Jew-focus and talks Mantra, because people have to actually THINK. Who are the people he loses when he switches to “just defending Whites”? Mainly a lot of people who were never going to be pro-White anyway, possibly including a lot of Middle Easterners. The Jew-centrics are basically only anti-Jewish, not pro-White, in my experience. They hate Jews more than they love Whites (if they like Whites at all).
Instead of getting 100,000 hits for a routine that Father Coughlin was doing 70 years ago (and getting much larger crowds), he could be getting 10,000 hits doing Mantra type material and the impact would be FAR BIGGER. If he has a desire to be remembered for doing something really big, he is missing it.
This won’t take 20-30 years (I say this will all the authority of … well OK, I have no authority). We are about to have 8 years under a black man and the realization that the old GOP playbook won’t work anymore. The process of looking around for something new will begin.
Quite honestly, I would relish these days. It’s good to be an early dissident. We are like people who know a great truth before the rest of our countrymen (most of you years ago), and that is always a bit of a thrill. What shocks me is how much impact this team has already had while being fairly small.
I feel like I’m working with John the Baptist, waiting for our Jesus to arrive. But in reality, the tides of history, combined with our preparation of the battlefield, will let many such leaders flower.
#16 by Daniel Genseric on 09/21/2012 - 1:53 am
Oh yeah! Almost forgot. Another writer, this time at Fox, uses “anti-white”:
“[Tim] Wise has had a long history of anti-white statements…” Also, note how anti-white is NOT in quotes, but White Privilege is? If you want, skip to last two paragraphs.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/09/16/questions-at-university-minnesota-duluth-after-transgender-campus-event-booked/
#17 by OldBlighty on 09/21/2012 - 3:59 pm
“Mainly a lot of people who were never going to be pro-White anyway, possibly including a lot of Middle Easterners. The Jew-centrics are basically only anti-Jewish, not pro-White, in my experience. They hate Jews more than they love Whites (if they like Whites at all). ”
We have got to create a white passport system for our message boards, sometime in the near future. I’m betting with that in place, most of the divisions in WN would disappear over night.
#18 by DennisK on 09/21/2012 - 4:10 am
David Duke has a product, and an audience who buy that product. It would be much easier for someone who hasn’t built a brand, to incorporate the Mantra from scratch. But Duke would have to reinvient himself. There is WN ideology which he needs to pander to, to work with, and this legacy prevents the mantra approach.
Whoever is going to use it, will be new, fresh, unencumbered by ‘the movement’. David Duke has had to for many years, try to justify preserving the white race, and his approach has been based on this justification.
One example is Nationalist Alternative (natalt.org), who often use the mantra and talk of anti-whites. Their platform seems to incorporate it seamlessly among other issues. At no point to they try to argue why whites should be allowed to survive, it is ASSUMED. Right from the start.
The lesson is this. START with the mantra as a basis, and build from there. Much easier than retrofiting the idea into another framework.
#19 by Wandrin on 09/21/2012 - 8:40 am
There’s various ways people can react to an environment where the other side controls the moral high ground and then there’s a completely different path which involves trying to reshape and retake the moral high ground.
The people best suited to promote the Mantra will be the people who are instinctively attracted to it. People who are otherwise good communicators may not be as good if they’re not really in tune with the message.
So, different strokes for different folks.
No need for any disappointment imo.
#20 by BGLass on 09/21/2012 - 11:42 am
–See a lot of immigration neo-con justification.
But no one is saying Japan should become non-Japanese because other populations are cheaper.
Somewhere on earth there can always be found somebody else who is cheaper, all things being relative. Even when whites accept lower wages, “immigration” does not stop. If “cheap labor” as the justification for “immigration” does not work, then other arguments are substituted, such as “immigration is charity to oppressed populations,” which exposes that it’s just a justification.
If somebody was cheaper than black Africans, would it be ok to fly that cheaper population to Africa by the tens of millions?
Should working black Africans pay taxes to import cheaper non-blacks by the tens of millions until African cities become non-African?
Eventually, if the “newcomer population” is “developed” and has “higher wages” would they, in turn, pay taxes to bring in tens of millions of a cheaper ethnic group to live where they had before?
That non-whites are “cheaper” is just a justification for making a place non-white.
#21 by steadiness on 09/21/2012 - 1:21 pm
Weirwood is absolutely, absolutely right. That comment should be a front page article.
Bob has already posted some excellent articles about the Jewish Question, such as “Thus Endeth My Interest in the Jews” and others on nationalsalvation.net, which I try to quote to the Stormfront idiots when they run around embarrassing us.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been trying to post race-realist pro-white ideas, and then some idiot comes along to talk about what’s in the Talmud. No one cares what’s in the Talmud, not me, not the average Jew, not the white person reading who is ashamed to notice that he or she is white and ashamed to be concerned for the survival of our race.
Anyway, for as long as I have been paying attention to politics, the Treasoncrats have believed that since they bring together minorities, gays, women, and otherwise disaffected whites, since they were already winning with the current numbers, if they could bring in more minorities, they would always win.
By now, it’s not the nation of America any more. We live under a multi-ethnic state. Ask a Lebanese Sunni if they choose between Hezbollah or the Phalangists. Everyone knows that Hezbollah is Shiite and the Phalangists are Maronite Christians. In a multi-ethnic state, you vote for your ethnicity first.
In Lebanon, the highest offices are reserved for particular ethnicities. The President is a Maronite, the Speaker of the Parliament is a Shiite, and the Prime Minister is a Sunni.
In the US, we’ve had at least one Black on the Supreme Court for the past 50 years. The Blacks insist that the government is racist because there are so few Black Senators, and the congressional districts are gerrymandered under the Voting Rights Act and Blacks elect Blacks.
Stupid conservative Whites accuse Blacks of racism for doing that. Stupid liberal Whites accuse each other of racism whenever they vote for Whites.
Here’s a slogan I’ve gotten uniformly positive results with:
What if the Blacks and Hispanics decided to form a minority coalition party? They wouldn’t have enough votes, so they would need to try to pull off gays and other disaffected Whites to get elected.
Smarter Whites immediately understand what it means. Of course, our issue is not to elect Democrats or Republicans, our issue is white survival.
For years, anti-whites could say that we have no interests as Whites, and two political parties to look after any interests we might have. It’s no longer remotely true.
#22 by Lord Nelson on 09/21/2012 - 5:03 pm
I came here wanting to unload about how much we don’t need the establishment N&J WN leaders. Even though I do respect them both.
Then I read through the comments and realized that everyone else here was already saying exactly what I was going to say.
Great stuff!
BTW: Karlfried & A Smiling Weirwood. Welcome to BUGS.
LN
#23 by Harumphty Dumpty on 09/28/2012 - 2:18 pm
What a fantastic thread!
Jason, your post is my favorite of them all, and probably rebuts more than adequately what I’ll write here:
Truck Roy mentioned on a recent Don and Derek show that there is a lot of understanding in Europe about the extent to which Jewish bankers are a source of the economic problems there, and that anti-semitism is rising.
I also notice that in my conversations with a neighbor, he’s quite irritated already about “jews” and their role in everything, but any reference to anything that would require that he feel “white” makes him fidgety.
I can think of a couple of reasons for that, but one is that “feeling white” involves a large change in his inner sense of who he is, whereas “the jews” are more “out there.”
So for some people, “Jews” may be the easiest immediate opening into eventually becoming pro-white, and as economic conditions deteriorate that opening may become bigger than it is now.
In contrast, our own stuff is basic and makes a different kind of appeal, and at the present stage and probably for a very long time and maybe forever, it’s very important that it not get mixed up with “jew stuff.”
So since David isn’t going to switch to Mantra, I’m kind of glad (I think) that he’s hardly using Mantra at all, as a couple of other posters above have also said.
But Jason, this sentence of yours made a large impression on me:
“Instead of getting 100,000 hits for a routine that Father Coughlin was doing 70 years ago (and getting much larger crowds), he could be getting 10,000 hits doing Mantra type material and the impact would be FAR BIGGER.” (my italics).
Yes, what did Father Coughlin’s success result in? Jew stuff doesn’t have the deep root in the fact of whiteness that the Mantra does, and does not re-organize the insides of whites to make them white, as the Mantra does.
I see that in myself. I am STILL here mainly because all the bullcrap I have to listen to all around me infuriates me, rather than being here out of a deeply felt conscious attachment to the white race, which I’m not aware of feeling to the same extent that most of you do. Not having children, nephews, etc. probably has something to do with that.
But I notice that that feeling is changing…I feel much more white today than I did when I arrived here a year ago. It’s sunk into me that the irritation of all the anti-white bullcrap is not the same kind of irritation as stubbing my toe every hour.
A few years at other white sites didn’t do that for me.
#24 by Harumphty Dumpty on 09/28/2012 - 2:39 pm
And I must deal with skype one of these days so I can ask Bob as he said I could, how he feels about my using phrases like
“other white sites,” and “the white movement,”
instead of
“other pro-white sites,” and “the pro-white movement.”