Genetic engineering is going to be a hell of a problem. Who will want children who are as ugly and dumb as THEY are?
I have discussed this with “Christians” who have told me that genetic randomness is actually holy.
Actually, the gene pool itself is NOT random. If you take all the talented men and women you can find and make them celibate, that is not random.
So when genetic engineering becomes available, it will be viciously attacked as unnatural, just as the clergy attacked vaccination as unnatural and Jehovah’s Witnesses do not allow blood transfusions.
But children that parents insist on having with no improvements whatsoever are going to have to compete with those whose parents chose to enhance their intelligence.
Even the POPE will probably admit that heredity is important, but the Church has no genetic morality at all.
A “morality” that ignores 20 to 80% of the human makeup is not a morality.
All this can continue only so long as genetic enhancement is theoretical. But having a kid who is mixed blood and looks it cannot compare to one who is Aryan looking.
As technology progresses, if we can counter the ongoing campaign that white is bad and just make it respectable to WANT whites to survive, that may be enough to trip the anti-white campaign up.
As Horus says, the Mantra is open systems thinking. Everybody else thinks only in terms of PRESENT technology; they still say that if you don’t have big meetings and marches we are not taking power.
They also think the solution is taking over one of the three major TV networks and getting an exclusive on the Morse code key.
#1 by Jason on 09/26/2012 - 7:11 am
I want someone to grab my DNA after I die, tweak it a little (better looks, smarter, able to eat all I want) and bring me back in an Aryan homeland to pursue life as it should have been. Would it be “me”? Not really I suppose, but I’d like to give it a try.
I don’t know how far away this revolution in genetic engineering is, most will want it. No one wants to drive a Yugo when they have can have a Porsche. Most will want an upgrade for their kids.
But I wonder how far off real genetic engineering for humans is? Changing IQ, looks, metabolism, etc. is pretty challenging.
#2 by Jason on 09/26/2012 - 7:29 am
By the way, I had someone online respond to my post about White Genocide by saying he was White and he found my words hateful (I must be from the South, he said). He said he would pray for me that I find “love”. It felt good to tell him,
“…your moral compass is all wrong. You are witnessing the genocide of an entire race, Whites, and yet you say nothing. You will be judged by your silence.”
May not be the best comeback but it sure felt good.
#3 by six gun on 09/26/2012 - 8:08 am
The BNP (British National Party) is talking about genocide like it is normal everyday speech.
Nick Griffin talks about it all the time.
Here’s a BNP video where they talk about genocide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZoj2fLbYk0&feature=plcp
#4 by Jason on 09/26/2012 - 8:37 am
OK, it started out good, and has potential, but they immediately go off into the Conspiracy Stuff, which just isn’t necessary. He talks about the FreeMasons and Illuminati, etc. That distracts – actually ruins it, in my opinion. We have public policies and public facts that PROVE White Genocide, why do we need to prove yet another hidden conspiracy?
I am sure you know that, it just annoys me when so many on our side get sidetracked by this stuff. I think dealing with just the publicly available material would be sufficient and harder for the Anti-Whites to shoot down. With this video they will say, “oh he’s some crank that believes in Reptile People”
#5 by Dave on 09/26/2012 - 10:57 am
There has already been a big change regarding heredity and culture. Someone of Robert Whitaker’s generation cannot imagine the viscous school yard competition for attractive white males among young girls today.
To me it seems weird. I see these obviously “have it together”, affluent, intelligent and attractive white high school boys and they are literally mobbed with girls. I see gangs of girls standing around in their vicinity, peering laterally at them, and calculating opportunities to ambush them. These boys are harassed. They have girls climbing all over them from every direction and they don’t have the time.
There are SO FEW worthwhile young males available in our time the plight of young girls has become hell.
THANK YOU POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. YOU HAVE DONE A GREAT JOB OF BRINGING UNIMAGINABLE RUIN ON SOCIETY.
#6 by Jason on 09/26/2012 - 7:45 pm
Well that’s interesting, because the view I get from young guys is that there aren’t many high quality women to choose from. Maybe both are true.
#7 by Wm White on 09/26/2012 - 11:13 am
Bob Whitaker has had several gems on ‘genetic morality’ from previous Blog posts.
____________
In this century, genetic morality is not going to be ***A*** question. Genetic morality is going to be ***THE*** question.
____________
It has been pointed out that social scientists HATE science.
Marxists and social scientists in general consider genetics to be the ultimate enemy.
____________
The completely unnoticed basis of today’s revulsion against genetics is the feeling that Nazis were evil because they took genetics into account. It’s this ‘unnatural’ conditioned response that makes it a heresy to advocate any (child bearing) which dares to even suggest or advocate child bearing by (the beautiful and the smart).
It hits us in a weak spot we don’t recognize as a brainwashed, conditioned response. In fact it infuriates us. Today, the mere mention of advocating for “beautiful and intelligent” children by “attractive and intelligent” white parents is immediately identified with an ‘alien’ mindset or as naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
____________
Today there is a fury against the idea of intelligent white women having children (white children that is). It’s considered a form of enslavement, a pure evil. But that is not because of Hitler. They use Hitler. But that fury was here long before Hitler, before GERMANY, existed. That fury is altogether a conservative one that has been ‘adopted’ by anti-whites, NOT one that they invented by anti-whites.
Judaism is not our worst enemy. What we have made of Christianity is our worst enemy. And it is not just the Catholic Church. White Protestant countries are even more sterile TODAY, than any Catholic country has ever been.
_____________
(some editing by me for clarity and brevity)
#8 by Epiphany on 09/26/2012 - 11:38 am
All this demonization of Germany and the Nazis, present in the U.S. Media all these decades, is merely a disguised attack on Whites in general.
#9 by Wm White on 09/26/2012 - 1:10 pm
As I was re-reading Bob’s post, the clarity of this particular observation struck me as truly authentic and void of any illusion as to our present and future situation, as white people:
“if we can counter the ongoing campaign that white is bad and just make it respectable to WANT whites to survive, that may be enough to trip up the anti-white campaign.”
It reminded me of Spengler’s insightful observation about our present and dangerous time in history, “Only dreamers believe there is a way out. Optimism is cowardice.”
Bobs statement was a direct, non-illusionary, observation of the future of white people. Many white counties will have minority white populations in less than 50-years. In a hundred years the trends are clear –no majority white countries (with a few exceptions). To deny this is somnambulism and misplaced optimism.
One solution to halt this ‘white genocide’ has to be (as Bob stated) changing the mindset of whites and non-whites to an acceptance, or even an ambivalent equivocal attitude, –that we (white people) have a right to survive just like any other minority and to say other is not only contemptible but offensive to all decent and respectable people.
#10 by Simmons on 09/26/2012 - 1:47 pm
I want more white people. Any anti-white lurkers present want to tell us they want fewer white people please let us know.
#11 by j1mmyZeta on 09/26/2012 - 5:46 pm
“I want more white people.”
Only under an anti-White system and under heavy brainwashing could such a statement be considered “controversial” or “extreme” whilst we are being targeted on multiple fronts every single day.
On the other hand if you said “I want less white people.” in front of an audience for a primetime TV show, you’d probably be met by a few cheers.
It’s amazing how well people have been trained to respond negatively to suggestions of White survival, and positively to calls for White genocide.
#12 by Gavin on 09/27/2012 - 12:44 am
This is true. I was watching a “comedian” by the name of Louis C.K.
He does a HILARIOUS routine about White people in the future (our children and grandchildren) being “fucked in the ass” for eternity and deserving it. Rather than reacting with astonishment and outrage as any other race would do when someone says something like this about them…his largely White audience laughed uproariously and applauded. I believe that many White people are extremely naive and just think these kinds of things are just “funny jokes” and not serious fantasies that evil people actually wish to see fulfilled. I am not so naive, I think it would be quite foolish of us ignore what kind of fantasies are percolating in the heads of some people.
To be honest I wouldn’t mind if they wanted their White children and grandchildren to be tortured in the future, that’s their decision…all I ask is they let those of us White people who don’t find that so hilarious opt out.
Here’s the clip for anyone interested:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4f9zR5yzY
#13 by Jason on 09/27/2012 - 4:55 am
I think you are on to something. I don’t think these Liberal Whites have any true idea what awaits their own children and grandchildren. They seem to think they will be in some “cool” protected enclave forever. I have thought that those Northern Liberal Whites will feel every bit of pain they inflicted on the South when the browns and blacks no longer need them.
I do not want to extend any helping hand to the bastards.
#14 by shari on 09/26/2012 - 2:35 pm
Well we have another white person coming in a few weeks. From what I have seen of him, in utero, he looks good. Long legs and back. Height from Mom, I think. If he also gets some of daddy’s heft, he really will be a bonny boy. Eyes are bound to be blue, like both mom and dad. Grandson!
#15 by Jason on 09/26/2012 - 7:38 pm
Congratulations! I hope we make his world a little better.
#16 by Sentinel on 09/27/2012 - 1:59 am
Congratulations to your family — a heartwarming reminder of why we fight.
Might I suggest the name Robert? 😉
#17 by BGLass on 09/26/2012 - 3:51 pm
Congratulations, Shari
@ “…There are SO FEW worthwhile young males available in our time the plight of young girls has become hell….”
No one talks about it, but many Northeast schools are still pushed (like in msm) for more academically accomplished Whites. But Cambridge MA, Harvard, is about 65% (“non-hispanic”) White. Sarah Lawrence is in Yonkers (Whites under 40%). New Haven (Yale) according to wiki: “. Non-Hispanic Whites were 31.8% of the population in 2010, down from 69.6% in 1970. NYU is in Manhattan (it became perceived as more desirable after Cuny changed admissions policies)– but in nyc HALF the population speaks a foreign language at home. And so on.
So that’s the NE school environment during the students’ prime reproductive years of the early 20s.
#18 by shari on 09/26/2012 - 7:49 pm
Thank you Lass. Thank you Jason. I hope so too because he, nor any white child, deserves to face being a despised minority everywhere on the planet.
#19 by Peter Cottontail on 09/26/2012 - 9:27 pm
Take the good with the bad. They took our message and made it their own…but are not “pure” like Bugsters. It is an extension of our message and is evidence of how effective we are spreading it.
#20 by Karlfried on 09/26/2012 - 10:52 pm
To Dave #5
In Germany the situation is so: In school, white male pupils are the aim of coulered female pupils. Typical: Tall, white, blond, blue-eyed boy has a girl friend small, non-white, dark haired, dark-eyed from Turkey, Afghanistan or Afrika. Not seldom the boy is younger than the experienced and clever girl. The girl had made the first steps of coming together. At this young age the boy does not understand the situation. The boy´s parents are usually left-wing dreamers saying: “The race and the way one looks does not matter at all.” This they tell their boy from his early childhood on.
On the other hand the girl, coming from Afghanistan or so knows that race and lookings are the most important things that matter. Getting a tall blond German boy as husband is the very best thing for her that she can acheive in live. She will do everything to comfort him in order to get married. I think that this situation is similar to your post.
Though this are somehow typical situations the number of such cases is limited. — The boy may make a change for a European girl after some time. — Among the left-wing parents, most say race does not matter, but in reality they are only saying so. In reality they try to avoid a non-white mate for their son. By indirect means (private school, “white” sports and many small and unseen measures). — Even among left wing dreamers, only the most silly ones, only a small minority of them, really encourage their children for non-white girl-friends. Despite the fact that they speak the opposite. Speaking so and privately doing the opposite is typical for the left-wingers.
A side-remark. In Germany we have a large influx of Polish and Russian people. Either with German ancestry or pure Poles or Russians. Their girls compete with the African girls for the Germans boys and often they are the winners. These couples (German-Polish or German-Russian) are seen in Germany as “German”, there is no way that you can distinguish their children from other German children. — Anyhow, the normal way is that a German boy does marry a German girl. That is by far the largest number of couples.