Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The Sociopath’s Question

Posted by Bob on September 28th, 2012 under Coaching Session

One of the hardest questions to deal with on race is “Why should I care about my race‘s survival?”

First, label this what it is:

The Sociopath’s Question.

A sociopath has no loyalties, just as a psychopath is incapable of guilt.

No one can explain to a sociopath why he should care about his own kind.

Or any other kind.

Given a modicum of power they can and will do anything. Example, the TSA “Freeze” order.

But the answer to the question, which we are concerned about, is, once again, the truth.

CALL IT The Sociopath’s Question.


  1. #1 by Jason on 09/28/2012 - 7:55 am

    Now that is strong. I have been hit with that question before and I could only fire back was “do you ask Tibetans why they should care about their survival”. But this is much better.

    This hard question is actually a great opportunity to demonstrate that ONLY a SOCIOPATH doesn’t care about the future of his people.

    Should we mention others who didn’t care about the future of their family and people, like Charles Manson or the Green River Killer? They were obviously killer sociopaths, so perhaps too extreme? Does that get us off track? Just brainstorming. The basic idea is great.

    I’ve noticed in online debates, people do not like being called a traitor or compared to Benedict Arnold, no matter how above issues of group loyalty they act. So accusing them of what they really are – disloyal jerks, whether from treason or sociopathology .

    • #2 by Daniel Genseric on 09/28/2012 - 8:14 am

      Nobody is running around China screaming “Why should I care about my race‘s survival” while TENS OF MILLIONS of non-Chinese stampede across the border.

      Nobody is running around Africa screaming “Why should I care about my race‘s survival” while TENS OF MILLIONS of non-Africans stampede across the border.

      Nobody is running around Mexico screaming “Why should I care about my race‘s survival” while TENS OF MILLIONS of non-Mexicans stampede across the border.

      Nobody would be uttering absurdities such as this in non-white countries were assimilation (i.e. intermarriage) subsequently DEMANDED. They ONLY present this as Morality & Diversity in white countries while claiming “anti-racist” protected status. What they really are is anti-white.

      Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  2. #3 by Simmons on 09/28/2012 - 11:19 am

    Mantra answers this, “What kind of black man doesn’t care for his race?”

  3. #4 by steadiness on 09/28/2012 - 12:57 pm

    the latest article at American Thinker is “Don’t let Romney be the Republican Party’s Last Hurrah”. Romney is American Thinker’s colorblind Republican Party’s last hurrah.

    Since the ’70s, in order to avoid kissing black ass, white men have been claiming they don’t care about race and hate everyone equally. Dirty Harry says this in his first movie.

    “why should I care about my race’s survival” is a question from someone who thinks their race’s survival is not in question. It’s taken this long for affirmative action and mass immigration to go from being an insult to a threat.

    Whites born after 1980, who have spent their entire lives watching affirmative action and mass immigration at work, who go to college and don’t see very many white faces, recognize it as a threat to our survival.

    • #5 by Vale on 09/28/2012 - 1:39 pm

      I agree. 2012 will be a watershed for White complacency about race. People have been saying race is “irrelevant” for as long as I can remember, and White people have been disempowered every step of the way.

      The 2012 election will make it all too clear just how powerless White people have allowed themselves to become.

  4. #6 by PotionMaster on 09/28/2012 - 5:22 pm

    On several large, anonymous forums I’m familiar with, frequented by mostly young males the attitude is exclusively and virulently against multicultism. There is a big consensus that something has been taken from us and we want it back. Fascism is ‘cool’ and it’s perceived that identifying with fascism now makes you a rebel against the system, which it does. A lot of people see the professionalism and pride on the faces of Nazis in pictures and they yearn for that type of modern male to be a role model for them. They turn on the TV and get nothing but limp wristed hollywoodized femi-males so it’s no surprise they look into our past for inspiration. It’s also surprising to me that a lot of people on the sites claiming to be socialists or economically left are now denouncing immigration with the same fervor that they denounce capitalism.

  5. #7 by Peter Cottontail on 09/28/2012 - 6:40 pm

    Since the presidential race was introduced as a topic here, I will relay some of my mantra thinking about a recent event.

    A semi-viral video of a black Obama supporter talking about getting a free phone from Obama is the Romney campaign’s thinly veiled attempt at getting whites more interested in his campaign. They hope her negative image will galvanize whites. Since they refuse to openly mention our race, it is their only hope. I assume it will fail miserably and they are forced to reach out to us as a race. It will happen.

    • #8 by steadiness on 09/28/2012 - 8:54 pm

      the Romney campaign isn’t stupid enough to try to fabricate a video like that. For one thing, the media would tear him to pieces for it, for another, he doesn’t have to, that’s what they actually believe.

      Anyway, on the issue of electoral politics. Here’s a slogan that I’ve done well with.

      What if blacks and hispanics tried to form a minority coalition party? They wouldn’t have enough votes, so they would need to slice off some gays and women and other disaffected whites.

      • #9 by Peter Cottontail on 09/28/2012 - 9:48 pm

        I was not implying she is a Romney plant, more so this is how his campaign will try to use the opportunity. His campaign will try to make her the modern-day Willie Horton. We can’t let him get away with it. We need to demand our genocide be discussed.

  6. #10 by Lord Nelson on 09/28/2012 - 6:42 pm


    From now on it should always be referred to, and addressed as, the ‘SOCIOPATHS’ question.

    Quote from the original Admiral Lord Nelson: “A commander can not go too far wrong, if he simply places his ship of war along side that of the enemy”.

    Quote from me: “A Pro-White can not go too far wrong, if he/she simply ‘LABELS’ and ATTACKS the anti-whites OVER and OVER and OVER, AGAIN! For being the sick, brainwashed, Genocidal Bastards, they truly are”.


    Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White!


Comments are closed.