Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

PLEASE, Just SAY it!

Posted by Bob on October 4th, 2012 under Coaching Session


Genseric asks,
“If America is so ‘free,’ then why aren’t whites free to live and work together?”

This is what the “civil rights” thing was all about. “Desegregation” says that if ANY white ANYWHERE is allowed to escape, the whole program is doomed. This was the basis of the 1947 Supreme Court decision which banned “covenants,” a standard part of most home sales contracts which specified that the house must to sold to another white gentile.

That was when white flight began. Before that one did not have to worry about his neighbor “blockbusting” — selling his home to black or other minority.

No one knows it.White Wolf in Northern Idaho

No one mentions it.

That is why I KEEP writing about the Berlin Wall and white flight.

And no one seems to get it.

The courts ruled sixty-five years ago that integration required force. That which requires force is not natural desegregation, it is integration.

Integration, like the Berlin Wall, discredits its own system by admitting up front that government force is required to jam it down white throats — EVERYWHERE.

That is why I have repeatedly written about the SPLC raising money to get blacks into northern Idaho. Some of us might think this is a bit extreme, but to an anti-white it is perfectly natural.

But no one but me will ever actually MENTION this.

Twenty meme articles leading to this open system thinking and not a sound but “DUHH!”

Simply stating the anti-white position in straight English and a few blunt words is enough to discredit it.

But I am tired of being the only one who DOES this.

Don’t just DEFINE open systems thinking.

DO it.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by Epiphany on 10/04/2012 - 6:17 am

    That convinced me. There is no escape!

  2. #2 by Jason on 10/04/2012 - 7:08 am

    We don’t have freedom of association which is a basic foundation of liberty. Libertarians never mention it because they don’t want to be called racccisss. Even WN (White Nationalists) seldom bring it up. They will write long screeds about how they intend to pull off logistical miracles to destroy the System, but they won’t even mention the simple, obvious things.

    I notice WN never point out how wrong “hate speech” and “revisionist” laws are in Europe and Canada. I don’t get it. Except, I’ve come to the conclusion they don’t so much mind free speech being stomped on, they just want to be the ones doing the stomping. They yearn to argue Holocaust 24/7, but won’t make the easier, more fundamental case, that there is something fishy about throwing people in prison for the words they say about events 70 years ago.

    I’ve asked them online why they don’t bring that up, and all I get is silence. Same is true with freedom of association. If the government is forcing your children to socialize with groups against your will, if they force you to assimilate with people you don’t want in “your” neighborhood, then how much barrier is left to protect your family from direct government control? And all of it Anti-White.

    But none of that is as cool as conspiracy theories, Masonic lodges and Reptile People secretly ruling the world. My opinion of WN has plummeted over the last year. I much prefer the term pro-White. Even much of WN appears to be a form of wordism – an ideology first – only pro-White second.

    • #3 by Daniel Genseric on 10/04/2012 - 8:20 am

      I don’t know if I agree with all of this^

      Some in “white nationalism” (whatever that is) seem to understand your point about freedom stomping and the Free Speech bit. Some even agree they are worried about what some elements of “the movement” will do when in power. They are few and far between and those who do belong here.

      But, the task will be in explaining to the audience HOW we will be any less totalitarian than anti-whites are right now. Because, naturally, there will be those who INSIST on living the Multicultural Good Life no matter how much we show them they are wrong and we are winning. So, how will we secure THEIR blessings of liberty and the freedom to do as they wish?

      I would argue that it’s time for the immigration & assimilation House Party to move to their Faithful Colored Companion’s house if it’s such a grand idea. I think others will suggest this too.

      Who knows? Maybe they’ll even take them in.

    • #4 by Conrad on 10/06/2012 - 6:22 pm

      You don’t need to feel like the Lone Ranger on this. I preach about the “hate speech” and “revisionist” laws in Europe and Canada frequently. Of course race is my primary subject.
      www. jackswar. com

  3. #5 by Daniel Genseric on 10/04/2012 - 7:46 am

    Coach,

    Please take a look at the article I recently submitted on subtext.

    NOBODY wants what EVERYBODY says the people do. Desegregation vs. Integration. Voluntary vs. Involuntary. Or. FREEDOM (small f) vs. tyranny.

    Jason asked about pointing out the freedom double standard. I was writing that as an idea for a mantra-mini tailored for veterans. Asking the question itself is probably enough for them to begin to question what it IS they are fighting for. It’s more like a two part mini. The anti-white reply to the question goes in between the two.

    We’ll see if it works on the dam.

    If America is so “free,” then why aren’t whites free to live and work together?
    (anti-white stupid enough to bite and its response goes here)
    Why do anti-whites insist on talking about Freedom when they know it does not apply to us whites? They say we have this thing called Freedom while they DEMAND we live next to the very people who they insist our posterity has a moral obligation to mate with. Our children must accept this genocide or they are labeled “racists.” Next they claim this “anti-racist” status gives them the right to ACT this way. What they really are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  4. #6 by Wm White on 10/04/2012 - 10:18 am

    Bob’s article: (Nail + Hammer = Direct HIT)
    —————
    The basic test of freedom is perhaps LESS in what we are free to do than in what we are NOT free to do. –Eric Hoffer

    Those who see their lives as spoiled and wasted crave EQUALITY more than they do freedom. If they clamor for freedom, it is but freedom to establish “equality and uniformity.” –Eric Hoffer
    —————
    As the white cause in the west seems to diminish with each treacherous white leader I hear speak (last nights presidential debate comes to mind) I think of Eastern Europe and the USSR and how in a moment they all disintegrated into natural freedom fighter nations. I don’t know when or how ‘critical mass’ will erupt in the west but history cannot be stopped. That is the way life is; that is way history is.

    Mantra thinking!

  5. #7 by Bob on 10/04/2012 - 11:21 am

    But an open system would be more than just answering Genseric’s question and talking about the definition of “freedom.”
    Could it be that the system of chasing down ALL whites result in a white racial consciousness that could save our race in the longer.
    That is almost exactly what the whole chase down ALL whites mindset predicts.
    Don’t just define freedom in reaction to the article, go to open systems!

  6. #8 by Bob on 10/04/2012 - 11:45 am

    Genseric, we made those very arguments over the years in fighting integration. The victory of civil rights mean that the decision has been made that getting rid of whites, aka, anti-racism, trumps EVERY freedom.

    • #9 by Daniel Genseric on 10/04/2012 - 1:07 pm

      It wasn’t in reaction to the article. It was in reaction to Jason’s question. http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/09/30/white-flight-and-the-berlin-wall/#comment-58332

      I absolutely agree on the last point in your statement, coach. BUT…. I suspect had “the movement” ACTUALLY made the point about white genocide back then, as you have coached me to do in the mini above^, we might not need the Mantra right now.

      Perhaps there is a better way of wording/prompting the TRANSITION from talking about Freedom to white genocide. Perhaps freedom has nothing to do with white genocide? Perhaps there is a better question to ask our veterans and service members what it is they REALLY fight for? Perhaps.

      But, I haven’t seen that.

      Again, please see my article, “Subtext: Freedom”. I SAY it right there. It might not be fit for publication, but some here might find a need for it.

      question: If America is so “free,” then why aren’t whites free to live and work together?
      ————
      Pro-white answer: Because they want genocide for every white person and ONLY white people. “ALL whites must GO…”

      White Nationalist answer: As far as I know, Whites are FREE to live and work Wherever they want.
      anti-white answer (the reply we GET): Anyone is FREE to have sex and work with Whomever they want.
      ————
      Pro-white reply: Only in every white country is it necessary to SAY that. It’s a lie anti-whites repeat over and over and over… Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white

  7. #10 by Feu denfer on 10/04/2012 - 1:44 pm

    About a year back all the newspapers in Norway was screaming “Apartheid” because some schools in the “diverse” parts of Oslo had put the 5 remaining white kids in the same class to prevent them from changing to other schools. In order to secure a multicultural paradise, the principal had to recognize race as a social factor.

    Representatives from the loonie-left and respectable right who had spoken up for an all Sami-school and an all muslim school was of course in a fury. How dare these schools put whites in the same class?

    Sami schools for the Sami
    Muslim schools for the muslims
    “Diversity” for whites.

    “If diversity is great, why are we not allowed to leave?”

    • #11 by Gavin on 10/04/2012 - 3:40 pm

      I never really understood why anyone would care if a group of White people wanted to have their own community. I never really thought it was any of my business if some White people wanted to set up their own White town or website or business or whatever…I found it kind of weird that anyone would have a problem with that. Then I realized that the anti-Whites can’t allow White people to have anything of our own because they don’t want any of us to escape their genocidal system. Every White person on the Earth must become part of the “melting pot” whether they want to or not.

  8. #12 by Sentinel on 10/04/2012 - 3:52 pm

    “Diversity” ASSURES the right of non-Whites to live among White people, while DENYING the right for Whites to live among White people.

    Diversity is just an open-air prison for White people.

  9. #13 by Karlfried on 10/04/2012 - 5:05 pm

    Some easy rules.
    Do the easy-to-do things first.
    Do the most important things first.
    Do those things for those you have the abilitity to do.

    Do not do things which are not important.
    Do not do things which do not bring progress to our aim.
    Do not things that distract from our aim to survive as a group or race.

    About words.
    The sense or use of a word depends on definition and understanding.
    A certain side in politics tries to make every word, that is good for the world, sound negative.
    And they try to make words, which in their consequences mean genocide, sound positive.
    If we admit that, we soon will have no words to express any thought about a good future for our race and our children. Because the words are either tabooed or twisted to mean the contrary of the real sense.

    What is the answer? A full attac at the core of the enemie´s word-twisting. Let us take his two key-words.
    Racist.
    One who thinks: Human races are existing, race issues are important und he loves his own race most. That is plain clear thinking and 99% of word population think that way.
    If you define the word this way, there is truth in calling me a racist. And not a lie and not an offence.
    Supremacist.
    I am a German and I love the German people and culture most and I think our German culture
    with beer, soccer, Mozart, Goethe and inventing as well as producing things is much better
    than many other cultures in the world and the German culture ist better fitted to the Germans than any other culture in the world..
    If you define the word this way, there is truth in calling me a supremacist. And not a lie and not an offence.

    Both words, racist and supremacist, are not bad at all. They describe completely natural feelings, and 99% of world population will agree, because they themself think the same way.

    encepermwas

  10. #14 by Cleric Preston on 10/04/2012 - 6:50 pm

    Epipheny- There is an escape.
    You ONLY say ‘There’s no escape’ as an excuse to not post the mantra.

    Given the point of this site is to destroy the Anti-White system through a consistent message, I have to ask, where exactly have you posted the mantra, EVER ?

    You don’t the post mantra, stop wasting bandwidth with negative defeatist comments.

    • #15 by Conrad on 10/06/2012 - 7:09 pm

      I post the mantra everywhere. I even mail it out in those junk mail postage paid envelopes that I get in the mail. It’s also in my book – JACK’S WAR.
      www. jackswar. com

  11. #16 by apator57 on 10/04/2012 - 7:30 pm

    Govt instituted JIM CROW LAWS & punished any white who wanted 2 do business with nonwhites on the white’s private property.
    Govt reputed JIM CROW LAWS because they said it inihibited r natural rights of freedom of association.
    Govt inverted JIM CROW LAWS n2 INTERGRATION LAWS & punish any white that doesnt want 2 do business with nonwhites on the wite’s private property.
    Govt is heavily vested n the subjugation of white’s natural rights, especially r rights of association & rights concerning r private property.

  12. #17 by Jason on 10/04/2012 - 7:30 pm

    So what else do we need to be saying in forums and in public to discredit what Anti-Whites are doing with regard to destroying every last White neighborhood and school? Sorry if I am dense on this point.

    Do we need to say something new to point out how White Flight is a reaction to the Anti-Whites hunting us down? Do we need to remind people of the 1947 court ruling that made all White neighborhoods illegal? If so, how?

  13. #18 by c-bear on 10/05/2012 - 1:35 am

    Swarming one evening, I made a comment about “forced integration” to which one anti-white replied “No one is forcing you to do anything.” I continued into him as to make a complete fool out of him until he went away hurling insults like a child (hook, line, and sinker). Reading your post tonight brings me back to that session,and the way I said to myself “WHAT?! Is he completely insane?!” As with the rest of the anti-whites attempting to argue with us online, the answer is YES.

    • #19 by Cleric Preston on 10/05/2012 - 5:25 am

      The internet makes it so easy for us to point out the obvious. I remember replying to one Anti-White who said that same thing to me on youtube “All anybody has to do is ‘Goggle forced integration little rock’ and click images and they’ll see the pictures of young White schoolgirls being forced at BAYONET POINT by the army to ‘embrace Diversity’ in their own schools”

  14. #20 by Epiphany on 10/05/2012 - 5:41 am

    Intergrationism is based, paradoxically enough, on a Colonial Assumption. Namely, that Black people are better off around Whites. After all, the latter, the Whites, will supposedly teach the Blacks how to be more “Civilized.”
    This does not happen! Sometimes, the exact reverse happens, and Whites begin to mimick the pathologies of Black people! Notice, the Wiggers!

Comments are closed.