Everyone else wants to sound super smart, talking about occult knowledge, or the Deep Innards of the Talmud, or they have some other Spiffy Idea they want to sell. Just being pro-White doesn’t get them going.

And maybe using someone else’s words (Bob’s) bothers them. They can’t take CREDIT for it. In a way, this is a great thing. It keeps us from having to deal with a bunch of self-promoting dilettantes.

Oh, and one more thing, the Mantra is actually WORK. It can be fun, but it is work first, because you have to stay on message and you can’t indulge yourself. Apparently that is too high a price for some.

The Mantra is a tool:truth in truth out. Its a open system operating within a closed system because it deals in truth. I dont have to go into a long diatribe about the chemical components of fire or the mechanics
of combustion. If I spot flames all I have to do to clear a crowded theater out to keep people from burning to deathark is to yell the simple message of “FIRE.” We white folks get the message, especially when it involves our existence and the existence of our loved ones. Thank you Mr Bob. Dixie will rise again.

This is EXACTLY what I asked the less than enthusiastic Merlin Miller character over at A3P during their Ask & Answer session the other night. I asked him, “Is it more important to be anti-zionist or pro-white?”

I got Crickets from the Jews Are All Powerful crowd and their candidate. One person privately messaged me “That’s a GREAT question. But, you probably won’t get an answer.” They were right. At least they got it. I made another request of the Conservative Respectable, “I would LOVE to hear Mr. Miller say ‘anti-racist is a code word for anti-white’ tonight.” One of the Faithful N&J Crew snarled at me, “That goes without saying.” I snapped back, YEAH, that is the friggin’ problem. The Mantra goes without saying all over the place. SAY IT!”

Seizing and exercising power is not about admitting you had none to begin with. Why can’t a GENIU$ understand that?

I will follow anti-whites to the end of the earth.

1) Why is genocide a crime until it happens to whites?
2) If America is so “free,” then why aren’t whites free to live and work together?
3) If America “Celebrates Diversity,” then why aren’t Europeans allowed to immigrate and assimilate?
4) If America is so “Tolerant,” then why aren’t white countries tolerated?

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white…

Yes, lately, he has focused lately more on being anti-Zionist than explicitly pro-White, but the information is always factual and able to be backed up.

In the past, Duke has spoken and written much about the catastrophic impact of non-white immigration on our White homelands.

He recently gave a speech to an all middle eastern crowd and asked them how they would like it if a large number of Whites were flooding into middle eastern countries and changing the culture and way of life, etc.

He has has spoken and written repeatedly about how Whites should be allowed the same right to preserve their homelands, culture and way of life as all non-Whites are.

I don’t mean to sound like a cheerleader for Duke, but look at the balance sheet of past articles and books written, as well as speeches, etc.

“Distraction”…no way. Just because he does not spend 100% of his time explicitly promoting the Mantra is no reason to split hairs and quibble.

I am very pleased that Bob himself has spoken highly of Duke in the past too.

How can these folks not realize that White genocide is an absolute certainty as a result of current policies imposed on ONLY White countries – w/o even a heavy emphasis on the non-stop barrage of images of interracial couples and interracial children?

btw…have noticed some good results adding one word below:

Multi-CULT-uralism: ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The anti-White, politically correct establishment is not “like” a religon…it IS a cult!

Can you be more specific?

“…and “graciously” accepting strongly anti-white questions afterward…”

The phrase “anti-white” is like our initial spear throw just before the mob attacks our Mantra defended ramparts.

anyway my comments on Jared speaking

http://mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com/2012/10/05/jared-taylor-at-towson-university/#comment-13460

They have a warped idea of the meaning of the word “genocide” – thinking it means wholesale killing — instead of what is happening to us, a stealthy, long, drawn out killing off of the White race — by destroying our homelands and making life extremely difficult for us and only us — which produces, in the end, the exact same results = no White Children.

With that said, I think inroads ARE being made into the AR crowd as more and more come to realize what is happening to us.

Thanks for the reminder; I won’t get too invested in my present exchange with him. The content of his two brief replies so far has made me feel like I’m back on a SF thread a year ago trying futilely to explain (is it necessary to add the word “futilely” when one has already used the word “explain”?), to someone who has pre-judged us, the utility of hammering home memes and sounds in spite of audiences’ not finding those memes and sounds congenial at first encounter.

He gets hearty pats on the back with no demurrals from Amreners and even from posters on SF for his recent Towson performance, while to my mind, by “graciously” accepting the presence of ongoing chatter during his speech, and “graciously” accepting questions afterward and dutifully answering them in the terms in which they were asked, his main achievement at Towson was to reinforce anti-white terminology and reinforce the anti-white format in which pro-whites are allowed to speak: at the sufferance of anti-whites, and as criminals in the dock to be questioned and prosecuted by anti-whites.

Who will he attract to a movement that behaves like that other than racial masochists?

Possibly that last is an overstatement…my mind is far from clear on all this.

But I’m clear on one thing: WE have the moral high ground, and WE ask the questions!

I’m suggesting to him that when he speaks to the public he at least make the deal that after he has responded to a questioner, HE gets to ask the questioner some questions! Not that he would yet know what to do with that opportunity!