Most AMPWs attack the Mantra and throw in a sure-fire answer to it that the other side, they say, could easily use to knock it down. This is humorous to any of us who have actually USED the Mantra, but keep in mind that none of those people have ever seen any debate using the Mantra.
Thus Jared made up a sure-fire argument that would knock the Mantra down in his quick dismissal of it. He said all the other side has to do is say that whites made their own immigration and assimilation policies, and, theoretically, could reverse them in a split second.
Like every other argument the anti-Mantra pro-whites (AMPWs) throw in, that one has been tried in the real world, and we have cut it to pieces. 
From the get go we know that white traitors are the problem, both the active and passive race traitors.
I am a white man. I am NOT a traitor. This distinction never occurred to Jared because he has never had any reason to think of it. He is too busy with the same old stuff. The same is true of all the other TOOs who throw in a sure-fire answer to the Mantra.
If a country favors a tyrant, as the Democratic Republic of Korea’s population unquestionably does its ruler, does that make telling them that they are living in Hell any less valid?
Whites, like the North Koreans, accept white genocide first of all because it’s the law and they have to live with it.
Jared’s naiveté I can understand.
But NOT BUGSERS’. I have seen comment after comment talking about Jared’s answer referring to “We” and ”Us” as in “We are largely responsible for white genocide.
The “We” they are referring to is white people.
How in the HELL can a BUGSER call anti-white whites “We.”
WE, meaning BUGSERS, have no relationship whatsoever with passive or active traitors to our race!
That is the mistake Jared and TOOs make, but you have not the slightest excuse for it!
#1 by Jason on 10/23/2012 - 7:17 am
Bob nailed it. Whenever anyone tells us the Mantra can’t work for this-or-that reason, ask them what kind of roadtesting they’ve done to establish that. It will always be a big fat zero.
“We” Whites talk about all Whites, as if there was no such thing as race-traitors. As if we didn’t have millions of traitors among us. It is not “Whites” in general who decided to flood their countries with Third Worlders, desegregate their schools, and force assimilation. It was Anti-Whites that did that, including big numbers of White race traitors.
None of those Anti-White measures would pass a popular vote among Whites, even to this day. These Anti-Whites have assumed a position of power among Whites, but they have no loyalty to Whites.
They are not mere puppets being led astray by “the Jew” or helpless victims of Illuminati mind control. No, they are fully responsible for their actions.
If normal Whites have a flaw, maybe it’s being too good-natured; not seeing the prevalence of traitors in their midst. This is why we must push the concepts of “Anti-Whites”, “race-traitors”, and “White Genocide”, into the mainstream, so that future generations have some protection. And we must add to that the Sociopath (or the borderline case disguised as a Hipster or Yuppie) who may not necessarily promote genocidal policies, but has a nonchalant attitude toward the genocide of his people.
#2 by Daniel Genseric on 10/23/2012 - 7:44 am
Of course Bob nailed it. He’s been nailing it for more than 50 years. Can you imagine the level of mental anguish involved with being the only one?
We BUGSters sometimes mistakenly use the word “we” because WE are a loyal lot. Something that can’t be said of the fifth column. WE must hold our people accountable for their actions. WE must learn to be more shrewd.
#3 by Jason on 10/23/2012 - 7:53 am
No, I can’t imagine that anguish. I think most of us start off able to see things as they really are, but it gets drilled out of us by “education” and “culture”. The final blow is when no one backs us up.
WE loyal Whites are going to correct that. I don’t want anymore White kids growing up feeling their lot in life is to subsist in a hostile world with no one on their side.
#4 by markwn on 10/23/2012 - 11:34 am
Off topic, but will hammer on this RamZPaul thing one more time.
Forgot yesterday to mention GAR5’s brilliant collection of Mantra bullet point concepts, stats, rebuttals, etc that SWARM higher-ups could suggest to him.
RamZPaul could literally spend only a few hours in GAR5 and be INSTANTLY armed to raise hell…for months…with immediate results.
Within a matter of DAYS, he could be cranking out multiple videos.
He’s got a rapidly increasing audience and could really make Mantra thinking go MORE MORE MORE viral…and spread the “grey goo” !
#5 by premiseblog on 10/23/2012 - 3:06 pm
“GAR5′s brilliant collection of Mantra bullet point concepts, stats, rebuttals”
Could you provide a link please?
#6 by Jason on 10/23/2012 - 4:59 pm
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/mini-mantras
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/mini-mantras-ii/
#7 by Gar5 on 10/24/2012 - 12:21 pm
http://mantra.awardspace.us/
Thank LinuxLewis for making the web based version 🙂
#8 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/23/2012 - 12:28 pm
These comments are from White GeNOcide Project’s thread to Jared’s reply:
Chicken Truck
October 22, 2012 at 9:24 pm
It is our own policies that are insane, so it is a kind of self-induced genocide, or genocide by inactivity.
That statement by Jared is just a version of the familiar statement that the white race is committing suicide rather than being subjected to genocide.
But as you point out, the anti-white white elites have sold out the white masses, and so saying that whites are committing suicide is like saying that if you killed your family and then yourself, your family committed “suicide”.
(That point was made by a bugser at Bugs recently, but I thought up these two slogans myself):
White GeNOcide!
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white!
Thunder Road
October 22, 2012 at 9:48 pm
And of course there’s a lot more anti-whites participating in white genocide than just white anti-whites.
C. C. Rider
October 22, 2012 at 10:10 pm
When it comes to defining “white,” Jared tends to be an inclusive kind of fellow.
John Randolph
October 22, 2012 at 10:22 pm
Yes, he’s like the Mormons who baptize people into their own faith who would protest if they knew about it! Lol!
But hey! I recognize his great contributions, and I entered the white movement through his site!
And he stands up for whites publicly, which is to always be admired.
Wow. If you had told mature adults in 1950 that in 50 more years it could be dangerous to a white person’s career to stand up publicly for whites, you would have been regarded as ridiculous.
http://whitegenocideproject.com/too-hard-to-awaken-whites-to-white-genocide-an-exchange-with-jared-taylor/
#9 by Cleric Preston on 10/23/2012 - 4:31 pm
http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/pm-backs-antibullying-law-20120526-1zbj8.html
In Australia there is discussion of legislation that will give jail terms for those who bully someone to the point that person commits suicide.
The 1948 Convention says that same thing, at the racial level, where it specifies ‘infliction of physical or MENTAL HARM upon members of the group’ is GENOCIDE
Bully people of my race into suicide IS Genocide.
Anti-Whites don’t care about ‘means’, they care about results.
If I’m shot by a black, or I shoot myself the result is the same.
If I convert to the Catholic faith and beome an Augustinian monk, or I become a hedonist and father mixed children in Thailand, the result is the same – White Genocide
#10 by Conrad on 10/27/2012 - 4:17 pm
Suicide is the word that the traitors use to escape the guilt of their treason. They are the ones that taught the message of self-hate to white children for the past several generations. If one convinces their victims that poison is not poison and continues to give the poison to them, it’s still murder or in this case, genocide. It’s a lot like gas lighting someone. Gas light = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaslight_%281944_film%29
#11 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/23/2012 - 1:11 pm
I am a white man. I am NOT a traitor. This distinction never occurred to Jared because he has never had any reason to think of it. He is too busy with the same old stuff.
Jared’s naiveté I can understand.
Bob, I was pleased that you mention “naiveté” in regard to Mr. Taylor, because I’ve wondered if I were being naive myself in thinking that naiveté is the explanation of a lot about him.
But I still (naively?) find that explanation hard to believe, considering what I presume to be his intelligence and breadth of knowledge.
I had my first hint of what I considered to be startling naiveté on his part at his mini-conference following the cancellation of his conference in northern Virginia several years ago, when he expressed what seemed to be genuine surprise that anti-whites had succeeded in blocking his conference. (And then he apparently made the same mistakes in setting up his next conference that also got blocked! After that, he got it right!)
I feel a bit odd about his particular naiveté of lumping all whites together, because having been on the left for so long, I still automatically regard masses and elites as being very different from each other. (I realize the division between “whites” and “traitors” doesn’t fall strictly along the same line).
Wasn’t Jared also a liberal when he was younger? Am I misremembering? I guess he was never on the far left.
All of this feels above my pay grade.
#12 by Feu denfer on 10/23/2012 - 2:52 pm
Jared Taylor just put up a video comment about white genocide!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEMCJD5hBNY
#13 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/23/2012 - 4:54 pm
JASON: this short video by Horus that Feu denfer links is perfect for TOO!
I love the line that almost slipped right by me, “We’re creatures of light and sound.” Duh.
#14 by Frank on 10/23/2012 - 9:24 pm
HD, you are correct: PERFECT for TOO. I just posted the link there.
It’s so important for TOO folks to understand why effective talking points “just won’t work”. 🙂
#15 by premiseblog on 10/23/2012 - 3:29 pm
“Whites, like the North Koreans, accept white genocide first of all because it’s the law and they have to live with it.”
This is exactly it! It is the “Asch experiment” writ large on a race.
“No, you Whites are NOT witnessing Genocide being committed against your own race.”
“How Political Correctness Works The Asch Experiment”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4PiHwebc2U&feature=relmfu
“The correct answer is 3, No White Genocide”.
#16 by Wm White on 10/23/2012 - 4:21 pm
“What you mean ‘we’, white man?”
by the kosher writer for MAD Magazine,
E. Nelson Bridwell.
#17 by OldBlighty on 10/24/2012 - 3:08 am
The anti-whites are reacting to us again.
They have removed this quote from the Wikipedia entry on Genocide.
“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”
-Raphael Lemkin
Previously, it was the very first quote, of the very first link, if you Google Genocide. Now they are trying to make it go down the memory hole.
I found it in a far less prominent position here:
http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/whatisit.html
#18 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/24/2012 - 4:56 am
For anyone not familiar with the Wiki wars but interested to learn, here’s an instructive two minute video, followed by what used to be a lovely rant before he softened it, by the always intelligent and always confused (but maybe not in this case) Robert Lindsay, who’s been an occasional writer at Amren.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIYhE-hei2Y
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/wikipedia-ziopedia-or-judeopedia/
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2010/08/27/the-wikipedia-jews-2010-update/
#19 by Harumphty Dumpty on 10/24/2012 - 4:59 am
I wish the editor function still worked. I would have made that post shorter and more business-like.
#20 by Frank on 10/24/2012 - 8:10 am
Speaking of “We” and “Us” … here is a little gift for Harumphty, and Bob, that gives a clear picture of what those words might mean. A “beyond wordism” depiction of “us” …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyCPwqRujd4
(Apologies if any of “us” feel this is off-topic. My love for this aspect of “us” and joy in sharing it is uncontrollable.)