Old Blighty, not Bob, points out:
The anti-whites are reacting to us again.
They have removed this quote from the Wikipedia entry on Genocide.
“Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”
-Raphael Lemkin
Previously, it was the very first quote, of the very first link, if you Google Genocide. Now they are trying to make it go down the memory hole.
I found it in a far less prominent position here:
http://www.genocidewatch.org/genocide/whatisit.html
#1 by Jason on 10/26/2012 - 7:04 am
Great catch. So I wonder what other steps the Anti-Whites will take? Will they keep redefining genocide? Will we quit hearing about Tibet? Will more sites restrict comments?
This is motivating. We are imposing costs on the Anti-Whites. The more they scramble to silence us, the weaker they get.
#2 by Jason on 10/26/2012 - 7:06 am
Great catch. So I wonder what other steps the Anti-Whites will take? Will they keep redefining genocide? Will we quit hearing about Tibet? Will more sites restrict comments?
This is motivating. We are imposing costs on the Anti-Whites. The more they scramble to silence us, the more fragile they get. So even if we post the Mantra and get no response, we can be sure, someone is having to react to it, even if silently.
#3 by Jason on 10/26/2012 - 7:20 am
Great catch. I wonder what other steps the Anti-Whites will take? Will they keep redefining genocide? Will we quit hearing about Tibet? Will more sites restrict comments?
This is motivating. We are imposing costs on the Anti-Whites. The more they scramble to silence us, the more fragile they get. So even if we post the Mantra and get no response, we can be sure, someone is having to react to it, even if silently.
#4 by Epiphany on 10/26/2012 - 8:00 am
Wow, sounds exactly like what is happening to Whites today!
#5 by Jason on 10/26/2012 - 8:56 am
Great find on Wikipedia. So I wonder what other steps the Anti-Whites will take? Will they keep redefining genocide? Will we quit hearing about Tibet? Will more sites restrict comments?
This is motivating. We are imposing costs on the Anti-Whites. The more they scramble to silence us, the more fragile they get. So even if we post the Mantra and get no response, we can be sure, someone is having to react to it, even if silently.
#6 by seapea on 10/26/2012 - 12:14 pm
http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=a/res/260(III)
The above link use to have the full text of the General Assembly resolution 260 (III) of 9 December 1948 (where we get the geNOcide definition) but now it spits out a “NO AUTHORIZATION” error page. It’s been a few months since I’ve pulled that page up but I find it curious that we can’t view it any longer and still there other pages on the UN’s site that link back to that document which is now being blocked.
Is it getting dumped into the memory hole too? heh
#7 by Undercover Lover on 10/26/2012 - 12:39 pm
I actually thought this was going to happen a while ago. I noticed we brought up international law alot and figured they would try to change/get rid of the law so we would have no grounds.
Shear stupidity. The law is out there for anyone to look up. We already have everything we need from the law too. We have the law itself and the man who wrote it.
Any attempt to change/forget the law could be interpreted UNDER THE LAW as them trying to commit genocide.
Even if they were able to succeed in changing the law, the original law is still all over the internet and them changing “genocide’s” meaning is a violation of genocide’s meaning. Only someone who wanted to commit genocide a certian way would want to alter it.
This is just more proof that we truely are dealing with a bunch of genocidal freaks.
#8 by cecilhenry on 10/26/2012 - 1:54 pm
We need to be pointing out constantly that the ATTEMPT to suppress or hide this aspect of white genocide is itself part of the attempt to achieve genocide.
The attempt to hide the awareness is evidence of the culpability.
This must be pointed out loudly.
#9 by Wm White on 10/26/2012 - 4:01 pm
I don’t know why I happened upon this site “Old Atlantic Lighthouse” but what do I see –“The Mantra,” as its main headline.
Is anyone here (responsible for) or (know about) this site and the person running it? Because it looks like another BUGS ally.
http://oldatlanticlighthouse.wordpress.com/
#10 by Jason on 10/26/2012 - 6:24 pm
Great catch OB. So I wonder what other steps the Anti-Whites will take? Will they keep redefining genocide? Will we quit hearing about Tibet? Will more sites restrict comments?
This is motivating. We are imposing costs on the Anti-Whites. The more they scramble to silence us, the more fragile they get. So even if we post the Mantra and get no response, we can be sure, someone is having to react to it, even if silently.
#11 by DennisK on 10/26/2012 - 8:05 pm
The quote still remains at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide_definitions
#12 by OldBlighty on 10/27/2012 - 1:39 am
I have used that quote for around 2 years and revisited that page often. I also told many anti-whites to search for that quote under Genocide.
The first time I noticed something was up, they added an awkward explanation at the top saying, Don’t be confused, genocide really is just about killing lots of people…
Then I returned this week and the non-violent definition was removed and now it is only found among violent definitions to muddy the waters.
***
When they react to something you are doing, they are telling you, that you are hurting them.
What do you do when they react to something? You push harder at that precise point.
@Epiphany
“Wow, sounds exactly like what is happening to Whites today!”
Yes it is creepy isn’t it? It is a carbon copy of the so called multiculturalism policy, they demand for all white countries and only white countries.
It was meant to be a warning against genocide and they have been using it as a how to manual.
#13 by Jason on 10/27/2012 - 2:22 am
Great catch on them trying to remove information on genocide. We are imposing costs on the Anti-Whites. The more they scramble to silence us, the more fragile they get. So even if we post the Mantra and get no response, we can be sure, someone is having to react to it, even if silently.
#14 by Daniel Genseric on 10/27/2012 - 8:18 am
I’m with Undercover Lover. I have thought for some time they would rewrite or erase the genocide laws. However, even if they do try to wipe it:
The UN Resolution 260, particularly article II, is a manifestation of what all good and moral people hold in their hearts as true already. Wiping it will never erase the memory of it. Wiping it will never do away with a massive negative guttural reaction to the very idea and program of an entire race of people being wiped from the earth.
So, wipe away anti-whites. By your deeds we already know you.