Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Mantra Forces The SILENCE on Genocide

Posted by Bob on October 28th, 2012 under Coaching Session


seapea points out:

http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=a/res/260(III)

The above link use to have the full text of the General Assembly resolution 260 (III) of 9 December 1948 (where we get the geNOcide definition) but now

it spits out a “NO AUTHORIZATION” error page. It’s been a few months since I’ve pulled that page up but I find it curious that we can’t view it any

longer and still there other pages on the UN’s site that link back to that document which is now being blocked.

Is it getting dumped into the memory hole too?

UL says:

I actually thought this was going to happen a while ago. I noticed we brought up international law alot and figured they would try to change/get rid of

the law so we would have no grounds.

Shear stupidity. The law is out there for anyone to look up. We already have everything we need from the law too. We have the law itself and the man who

wrote it.

Any attempt to change/forget the law could be interpreted UNDER THE LAW as them trying to commit genocide.

Even if they were able to succeed in changing the law, the original law is still all over the internet and them changing “genocide’s” meaning is a

violation of genocide’s meaning. Only someone who wanted to commit genocide a certain way would want to alter it.

This is just more proof that we truely are dealing with a bunch of genocidal freaks.

I actually thought this was going to happen a while ago. I noticed we brought up international law alot and figured they would try to change/get rid of

the law so we would have no grounds.

Shear stupidity. The law is out there for anyone to look up. We already have everything we need from the law too. We have the law itself and the man who

wrote it.

Any attempt to change/forget the law could be interpreted UNDER THE LAW as them trying to commit genocide.

Even if they were able to succeed in changing the law, the original law is still all over the internet and them changing “genocide’s” meaning is a

violation of genocide’s meaning. Only someone who wanted to commit genocide a certian way would want to alter it.

This is just more proof that we truely are dealing with a bunch of genocidal freaks

Old Blighty adds:

I have used that quote for around 2 years and revisited that page often. I also told many anti-whites to search for that quote under Genocide.

The first time I noticed something was up, they added an awkward explanation at the top saying, Don’t be confused, genocide really is just about killing

lots of people…

Then I returned this week and the non-violent definition was removed and now it is only found among violent definitions to muddy the waters.

***

When they react to something you are doing, they are telling you, that you are hurting them.

What do you do when they react to something? You push harder at that precise point.

@Epiphany

“Wow, sounds exactly like what is happening to Whites today!”

Yes it is creepy isn’t it? It is a carbon copy of the so called multiculturalism policy, they demand for all white countries and only white countries.

It was meant to be a warning against genocide and they have been using it as a how to manual.

But our Professionals keep explaining to us that anti-whites are not concerned about the Mantra and can knock it over with a sentence.

But then again they have no more taken a look at reality than any of them has ever actually LOOKED at a Mantra debate.

Share it now. Like it while you're at it.
  1. #1 by OldBlighty on 10/28/2012 - 9:29 am

    Bob,
    seapea’s error page is back up as a pdf with the full text of the General Assembly resolution 260.

    • #2 by seapea on 10/28/2012 - 2:31 pm

      Weird, I’m still getting the same error w/ Firefox & Chrome (on Linux) but I have been able to pull the PDF using Opera. I remember that un.org link use to pull up a nice HTML page, not a re-direct to an ugly PDF scan.

      I did find the following site dedicated to UN documents which has a HTML version of General Assembly resolution 260 (III).

      http://www.un-documents.net/a3r260.htm

      • #3 by seapea on 10/28/2012 - 2:54 pm

        I think I figured out the issue. It appears UN.org will block the re-direct to the PDF if the users browser fails to pass the Referer Header (I had by browsers configured not pass the referer header). It appears the UN likes to know where people are coming from when they are pulling up those documents. So if you’ve got your browser configured not pass the referer header, you’ll probably have problems pulling up docs on un.org.

    • #4 by c-bear on 10/28/2012 - 9:10 pm

      After Bob’s entry on the 26th regarding Wikipedia I noticed Lemkin’s quote was back up. Then today after the UN doc issue was mentioned here on BUGS it was also back up. I’m seeing a pattern emerge. Could it be an individual anti-white attempting (an amateur attempt at that) to censor UN documents? If so, they inadvertently made the anti-whites efforts to stifle the discussion on GENOCIDE even harder. Now we’re watching even closer. This is a win for BUGS!

      • #5 by seapea on 10/29/2012 - 7:16 am

        I believe the un.org issue was specific to my browser configuration. Unless someone who hasn’t monkeyed around with their Referer Header can confirm they were experiencing the same issue.

  2. #6 by shari on 10/28/2012 - 10:32 am

    Bugs would not take my password. I finally was able to get a new one after being blocked when I tried. Something funny. I know others have run into trouble as well.

  3. #7 by Dave on 10/28/2012 - 11:38 am

    The Mantra does much more than force the end of silence on the genocide of the white race.

    The Mantra is not a quarrel we are having with our enemies.

    The Mantra is a rebellion against the wholesale nonwhite invasion of white lands, a rebellion against the brutal attack on the political rights of white people, a rebellion against the theft of the inheritances of white people, and a rebellion against the cruel assault on the posterity of white people.

    The Mantra is a not a quarrel we are having with the society that surrounds us.

    The Mantra is a rebellion, an unyielding rebellion. We do not aim to reform our enemies. We aim to destroy them.

    There is no argument in the Mantra; it is an unyielding demand for the cessation of the genocide being enacted against our people.

    No compromise is possible, ever. That is the Mantra.

  4. #8 by backbaygrouch on 10/28/2012 - 1:40 pm

    Can’t put a footnote on it, but a few days ago I read that AIPAC’s Numero Uno goal at this moment is to put controls on, that is, censor, the Internet. Our enemies are starting to sweat.

Comments are closed.