Saving our race requires a radical solution only because, from the beginning, anti-whites demanded that whites be allowed no escape. This needs to be understood clearly.
With the constant agenda of racial mixing, constant government action and Thought Policing to make sure not one single white can escape the program, the only solution to the White Problem is the disappearance of whites.
All that the Traditional Values crowd wants is that the white race disappear by weddings. And our unthinking response has been to ALLY with them, to PIGGY BACK with them.
Suicide by assimilation has been official Catholic policy for centuries. That is the reason that not one Catholic country has ever founded a white country.
It took four hundred years for someone to point this out.
As genetic engineering expands the mere wish to save our race will make it possible. But traditional values types are fanatically against ay such alternative. They have made it bluntly clear that they value ceremonies ONLY.
With the center collapsing, we need to make it clear that we are a new generation. We are simply pro-white, not pro-right.
No more piggy backing. In this new world, even the Conservative Thought Police are beginning to partially to admit that “This has nothing to do with race” is imbecilic. That is a major step forward.
“Demography is Destiny” is a major step forward.
This is developing naturally and steadily, simply because the pretence by which paycheck conservatism has been able to use pro-whites is simply collapsing. At long, long last, racial issues are becoming too clearly racial for this fatal pretense by which the South put aside all its concern for racial survival, and by which South Africans VOTED for their present situation.
#1 by backbaygrouch on 01/11/2013 - 2:12 pm
“[N]ot one Catholic country has ever founded a white country.”
France: Quebec, then Canada. Catholic Quebec is the most race conscious province to this day.
Spain: Costa Rica, Uruguay, Argentina and Chile. The balance of Latin America is mostly run by Whites whose race consciousness would put Protestant Alabama to shame.
United States: Maryland was founded by Catholic Lord Baltimore. William Penn received his charter from the crypto-Catholic Charles II and was enabled by the Catholic James II.
The racial/ethnic integrity of many peoples has been spearheaded by Catholics, very often the clergy. Examples: Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Poland, Croatia, and Slovakia, to name just a few.
The dismal state of the Christian clergy today is shared by all sects. But there is no incompatibilty between Christianity in its many manifestations and racial integrity. The Church is just one of many infiltrated institutions that has to be retaken if the White race is to survive. Raising the specter of sectarian divisions plays into the hands of our genocide driven enemies, the same foes that have bedeviled us since Our Savior was crucified.
#2 by dungeoneer on 01/13/2013 - 2:11 am
Bob “[N]ot one Catholic country has ever founded a white country.”
Historically undisputable.
BBG “The balance of Latin America is mostly run by Whites”
Just like all of our white countries are run by white anti-whites who are importing millions of non-whites and demanding “assimilation” for us while they keep their little islands of whiteness intact.
BBG “The racial/ethnic integrity of many peoples has been spearheaded by Catholics, very often the clergy. Examples: Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Poland, Croatia, and Slovakia, to name just a few.”
So there are Catholics in those countries that are openly defending white racial interests against anti-white genocide policy? I think not.
This is nitpicking BBG.
#3 by shari on 01/11/2013 - 3:40 pm
Religion is where it’s so difficult for many whites to come to grips, even now, when many have cast aside the particular sect they grew up with. I suppose because, inside, we know we have been given something very valuable, even if the anti-white poison has caused so much harm.
Even the pagan stories, just don’t make much sense, if Christ’s coming and resurrection never happened. But the present crisis will not allow us to be “religious” first and white second. No, it’s no time to be consevative.
#4 by Iceknight on 01/11/2013 - 3:55 pm
I must admit whilst I’m busy spreading the Mantra, I find it rare to get objections from the religious types and I’m a fair-weather Catholic myself.
On the odd occasion when I do, I simply ask “Would Jesus support the GENOCIDE of White CHILDREN?”
Funnily enough they’ve never given me a response!
#5 by Conrad on 01/11/2013 - 10:06 pm
OH, I LOVE THAT.
I like to ask Christians, how did humans get here?
God made us, they say.
Did God make them all the same or different? They have no answer.
I say – God either made Adam & Eve WITH the ability to change and separate or He made the different races.
They still have no answer.
The Pharisees ask Jesus is divorce permissible? Since they are no longer two but one, let no one split apart what God has joined together.”
I say – isn’t the reverse true also, what God has made separate let no man put together.
If you work against God – – you work FOR THE DEVIL.
………….
Jack’s War
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=jack%27s+War
………..
Jack’s War
#6 by Lord Nelson on 01/11/2013 - 8:09 pm
At the highest level, all our institutions have sold us down the river. It’s time for all pro-whites to accept this fact and stop taking all the old established institutions seriously. They have no credibility left whatsoever.
Anti-Racist is just a code word for Anti-White!
#7 by Conrad on 01/11/2013 - 9:52 pm
FYI – Inspirational.
http://nationalvanguard.org/2013/01/the-choice-of-achilles-john-alan-coey-against-the-new-world-order/
……….
Jack’s War
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=jack%27s+War
#8 by Jason on 01/12/2013 - 8:34 am
I have normally thought of myself as on the Right, but the Traditional Values types are another form of culture-only believers. They have their religious belief that genes don’t matter as a counterpoint to the Left’s view that gene’s don’t matter either, due to culture and environment. Both the Left and the Right agree that genes don’t matter.
My understanding is that Spanish priests spent over 200 years trying to turn little brown indigenous people in nice White men, with generations of patient teaching and indoctrination. Yet their descendants are still in New Mexico living almost like dirt poor Mexicans did 300 years ago. White institutions start thinking that the cultures and ideas Whites create can be pointed like a ray gun back on Africans or Asians and turn them into White men.
Or, they just get so intoxicated by their belief systems they don’t even think it through that clearly. This is just a way of saying they all believe in Wordism. These people come to believe in their sacred books so much, that they identify with them on an ego level. They are truly hurt when you tell them bringing Evangelism or Catholicism to South America won’t make any difference in the long run. They want to believe their words and miracles are “all powerful”.
They watch their societies slowly turn brown, whether today, or in Ancient Egypt or Persia or India, and as things crumble (and become less White) they say, “let us return to moral values! Let us perform the rituals twice as much!”, but that isn’t the problem.
I wonder about societies like the Aztecs and Mayans in which they devolved to mass child sacrifice as a way to appease the gods and bring the good times back. Maybe those White gods had been White men who had helped build a great society, but then vanished (or got absorbed), and now all they could do is repeat rituals they didn’t even understand.
It makes you wonder why there wasn’t more discussions about race in those societies as they degenerated. Maybe there was and I just haven’t heard of it. Or it has been hushed up.
So I agree, we have to separate from all that. I am not anti-religion either, and not anti-Christian. All humans have had religion. But we have to be about RACE and openly so. This is about racial awareness and loyalty
#9 by Conrad on 01/12/2013 - 11:53 am
I think that you’ve hit the nail on the head there. If race was not important we would not see it in nature. I think that race (subspecies) is the root of speciation.
“…the formation of new species as a result of geographic, physiological, anatomical, or behavioral factors that prevent previously interbreeding populations from breeding with each other.”
………
Jack’s War
#10 by Jason on 01/12/2013 - 8:51 am
Oh, and it might help to explain to Traditional Values types that our views are not as a result of some competing form of Wordism. Some Whites cannot conceive of a non-Wordist approach. Many Whites think that we “create” rayyccism by our evil thoughts.
They should understand there is no guilt for recognizing facts of reality and being loyal to your people. But too many seem to think that all facts are just social facts, which can change depending on what cultural leaders think.
#11 by BGLass on 01/12/2013 - 8:53 am
@ “….The balance of Latin America is mostly run by Whites whose race consciousness would put Protestant Alabama to shame….”
But a White Society would not be merely “RUN by Whites.” It would be a White SOCIETY.
In a White Society, there would exist the opportunity for ALL JOBS to be White. Not just a small, “elite” class running the natives, (shaving off the wealth and basically living as officials, bureaucrats, etc.)
“Class” is not money (which is what people are told nowadays). In reality, some farmers are very rich with big land tracts, and some are subsistance–yet they have a way of life in common.
The SADDEST thing about a society s/a described in Latino areas, is that the Whites HAVE TO PUSH to be bureaucrats (if you’re ambitious, it’s the only real job to try to get—“running the natives.”)
Many Whites really do not wish to live that way. But Latin societies like that force them to do so! Jobs: “elite racist bureaucrat running the natives” or real shit work, as the “middle” is gone.
Only homogenous societies really have a “middle.”
The other model is —as described— a couple Whites running the natives.
That is not a White Society. (Or whatever race). Latin-land is like euro feudalism (small “elite” running the natives)— but even getting rid of the white natives (which they had in europe)
No doubt the Latin Whites are “racist,” but you can be as “racist” as you like— (resenting non-whites), but that is not the same as a Homogenous Society.
Hating other races is NOT a White Society. Nor is structuring a society in which a small elite of one color collects on the larger “society.”
In Latin America, that is their only possibility. America had been a majority White country, with all jobs held by Whites.
In some places (just as the left accuses) “Racism” was not even on their radar, b/c no one else existed. They were “homogenous” (and therefore E-ville, according to anti-white people) To have an all white town is E-ville.
(To have an all non-white town, RUN by whites, is E-ville, too.)
For some: The goal is Latin-land in reverse of what you describe: an all non-white town, run by non-whites, with a “token” white minority (maybe) to show there is no “racism.”
#12 by BGLass on 01/12/2013 - 9:08 am
—I know I get it all wrong… but that point is hard to get across. “Racism” in the sense of resenting other races is NOT THE SAME as a White Society. One can hate blacks, jews, asians, or whatever all one wishes— but that has nothing to do with living in a EUROPEAN SOCIETY.
#13 by Sentinel on 01/12/2013 - 11:24 am
”…Only homogenous societies really have a ‘middle.’”
Good stuff! Race is real.
But lay off the H-word. Opposing our genocide is a positive imperative by mentally-sane standards… And by law. Anti-Whites make it negative by using the H-word, R-word and other heart string pullers. One need not HATE rats to know that living amongst them is unsustainable — and rats can’t even breed with (or vote against) White people!
Point taken though — it’s about having a home all our own, without compromise.
#14 by Dick_Whitman on 01/12/2013 - 1:36 pm
Exactly right BGLass.
Hating non-Whites has nothing to do with wanting to end White genocide or wanting to create the conditions that will allow for White survival and White amelioration.
There are non-Whites in my everyday life that I like and respect more than Whites I know. At the same time I demand that Whites have the right to our own countries, communities, and institutions.
I also support these rights for non-Whites and even people who claim to just “love diversity.” If people want countries, communities, and institutions dedicated to racial amalgamation, then I extend the same rights to them as I expect for myself and my folk.
It’s only the people who would deny me and my race the right to our own countries, communities, and institutions that I consider worthy of my hate. And I don’t even so much “hate” these people as consider them obstacles in the creation of White countries, communities, and institutions. Hate takes a toll on the mind,body,spirit.
A hundred years or so ago some White men wanted to build a canal across Panama. The biggest obstacles in their way was dirt, rock, and clay. The men building the canal didn’t “hate” this dirt, rock, and clay, they just saw it as an obstacle in digging the canal. So they dug, smashed, and removed the obstacles and everyone is better off for it today.
We too have an obstacle (anti-Whites and other assorted globalist scumbags) that we must overcome to achieve our goals. Just as the canal builders had shovels and pickaxes to remove their obstacles, we have the Mantra to remove ours. And one day the world will be better off for the work we’ve done.
Don’t hate rocks. Smash them with hammers and sweep the dust away.
#15 by Dave on 01/12/2013 - 11:19 am
BGLass,
The points you made in your post are excellent. America is currently is non-white society. It is majority non-white. I don’t believe the census counts. I believe the evidence of my eyes and I have been all over America. America is currently a majority non-white country.
“Demographics is destiny”.
The morons of political correctness, in their delusional millennialism, have succeeded in universalizing the colonial situation, a formula for endless war and endless strife. They have created a situation that cannot be parsed. This is an ultimate failure of governance.
So we know what the institutions of the future will be. They are easy to predict. They are the institutions of dictatorship.
Out of this a new kind man is forged. Robert Whitaker is the beginning of this with is his seeding the world with the Mantra, confronting the reality of our situation head on. The Mantra is durable. It is lasting and durable because the conditions that gave rise to it shall not and will not disappear. We must give up dreaming of peace. Peace can’t and won’t happen.
#16 by The Cheshire Cat on 01/12/2013 - 11:47 am
Do not call it THE r-word. Not now.
#17 by shari on 01/12/2013 - 1:01 pm
Another thing about a white society Bglass, is that something called social mobility can and often does honestly happen. Natural ability rises, and the poor have a real chance to better themselves. As Bob has said, a brown society STAYS down. Who would want to conserve that?
#18 by Epiphany on 01/12/2013 - 2:42 pm
I am personally disillusioned with the Conservatives.
#19 by Sentinel on 01/12/2013 - 2:58 pm
Anyone who wants to CONSERVE things as they stand is anti-White.
Leave the Right Wing and join the White Wing.