As I pointed out in “You Are not Denying Genocide, You are Justifying It,” we can take advantage of the fact that we know exactly what the enemy’s replies will be. That article stated that we know most of them are going to say how horrible whites are. 
The reply to this is, “So you are justifying genocide.” They are admitting the program is to rid the earth of whites, but that is OK because whites are so awful. Which sounds a lot like what Hitler said about the Jews.
Then there is the “Nobody forces you to intermarry” bit.
This leads us to an interesting insight into their views they never mention. I leave it to you how to use it AFTER you have made the Mantra clear.
The whole white genocide movement is based on the assumption that if there is any white community anywhere, all whites will go there. Integration must be forced, because always no country can be white.
#1 by Daniel Genseric on 2/1/2013 - 12:09 am
Coach,
You’ve groomed quite the infantry here. Just look at the battle-tested troops! Job well done!!
Now, give me back my writing privileges you old cuss! I’m trying to give you a friggin’ day off.
-G
#2 by dungeoneer on 2/1/2013 - 5:02 am
Re: Using the Anti-white “Nobody is forcing interbreeding on you” to point out that it has to be forced on us on a global scale because whites don`t want it
Could we not also do a similar thing with: “There are no mass killings of whites” by saying:
“How can we trust you anti-whites to oppose mass killings of whites when you support the ongoing anti-white terrorism and death imposed on whites as a by product of your mass immigration and “assimilation” genocide agenda?”
#3 by mandela on 2/1/2013 - 2:59 pm
Race mixers are parasites feeding on White communities
Parasites kill their host if their host has no defence
Anti-Whites allow no defence against Race mixing parasites
#4 by Bill White on 2/1/2013 - 3:59 pm
(Miscegenation) — The Final Solution to the White Problem.
#5 by OldBlighty on 2/1/2013 - 8:31 pm
Its White GENOCIDE.
#6 by Bill White on 2/4/2013 - 8:32 pm
Thank-you for adding that important descriptor.
#7 by Bill White on 2/1/2013 - 4:05 pm
“The Devil’s Dictionary”
MULATTO: (noun)
1. A child of two races, ashamed of both.
2. The sad byproduct of miscegenation.
#8 by Daniel Genseric on 2/3/2013 - 12:55 am
Your middle name wouldn’t be Alexander, would it?
#9 by Bill White on 2/4/2013 - 8:31 pm
No it would not.
Who is Alexander White? Does he contribute to the “Devil’s Dictionary?”
As an aside, I understand Bob came up with the Mulatto definition –very clever and probably true.
#10 by Dick_Whitman on 2/2/2013 - 8:14 pm
My article is in the BUGS queue and ready to go. It should be out soon.
#11 by beefcake on 2/3/2013 - 1:24 am
“Nobody is forcing anyone to Interrmary”
BULLSHIT!
Anti-Whites insist Whites cannot be allowed anywhere exclusive for our race, and they enforce conditions which lead to interracial marriages intended to destroy our race.
Nobody is insisting that Blacks need to be prevented from having anything exclusive in order to inflict conditions which lead to intermarriages intended to destroy Blacks as a race and then telling them “nobody is forcing you to intermarry”.
Saying that intermarriage isn’t being forced is trying to conceal the fact that the conditions which lead to it ARE being FORCED.
#12 by Jmcaul on 2/3/2013 - 1:34 pm
Outstanding, Beefcake. THANK YOU!!
#13 by Peter Cottontail on 2/3/2013 - 2:34 pm
Here is Beefcake’s take on “Is Intermarriage Forced?” http://whitegenocideproject.com/beefcakes-bootcamp-27-is-intermarriage-forced/
#14 by Peter Cottontail on 2/3/2013 - 4:49 pm
Anti-Whites don’t have to force intermarriage because the conditions that lead to intermarriage are being forced. ~ Beefcake.
#15 by Karlfried on 2/4/2013 - 8:54 am
#12 by Peter Cottontail on 2/3/2013 – 4:49 pm
I think that your comment has shown the core of the thing.
Thank you very much for that.
#16 by OldBlighty on 2/4/2013 - 12:58 pm
“Anti-Whites don’t have to force intermarriage because the conditions that lead to intermarriage are being forced”
Brilliant! Thank you.