Saving our race requires a radical solution only because, from the beginning, anti-whites demanded that whites be allowed no escape. This needs to be understood clearly.

With the constant agenda of racial mixing, constant government action and Thought Policing to make sure not one single white can escape the program, the only solution to the White Problem is the disappearance of whites.

All that the Traditional Values crowd wants is that the white race disappear by weddings. And our unthinking response has been to ALLY with them, to PIGGY BACK with them.

Suicide by assimilation has been official Catholic policy for centuries. That is the reason that not one Catholic country has ever founded a white country.

It took four hundred years for someone to point this out.

As genetic engineering expands the mere wish to save our race will make it possible. But traditional values types are fanatically against ay such alternative. They have made it bluntly clear that they value ceremonies ONLY.

With the center collapsing, we need to make it clear that we are a new generation. We are simply pro-white, not pro-right.

No more piggy backing. In this new world, even the Conservative Thought Police are beginning to partially to admit that “This has nothing to do with race” is imbecilic. That is a major step forward.

“Demography is Destiny” is a major step forward.

This is developing naturally and steadily, simply because the pretence by which paycheck conservatism has been able to use pro-whites is simply collapsing. At long, long last, racial issues are becoming too clearly racial for this fatal pretense by which the South put aside all its concern for racial survival, and by which South Africans VOTED for their present situation.

One commenter stated that, no matter what I happened to write about, he had put the Mantra in a thousand places.

A THOUSAND!

Yes, that is STILL what we are all about.

It took fifteen years for BUGS to get here.

Fifteen years of constant thought development.

One thing a teacher, as opposed to a leader, is always looking for is the time when he should get out of the way. A great high school algebra teacher can be the making of a mathematician, but after that momentous year, he must let the student go ahead.

Getting the Mantra out through the Desbots and the Thought Police is an exciting business. I have not been in on that, and I am lost in admiration of those who are. Now that you have gotten out there in the field, the important page here is no longer my article, but the part of the Swarm devoted to “Where Did You Place the Mantra today?”

My page is just entertainment, something to hold readers.

One writer in the Main Event, the “Where Did You Post” section, actually explained why he had put the Mantra into non-political locations!

Hell, if I were still out in the field, I would have stick ‘em ups like those you put on your refrigerator, but much bigger, printed up and I would carry them and stick them everywhere. We got some good publicity — at this point all publicity is good — from a Mantra that had been stuck up on a Men’s room wall.

The Mantra is the message.

If my writings detract from that more than they help get people in here to pay their dues in Mantra-posting, my writings are dispensable. NEVER let what I say get your eye off the crosshairs.

The paycheck right will not resign anytime soon, and after the 2014 election they will announce, as they did after 2010, that they are sill relevant.

But the center collapsing is of historical importance. Kerensky jumped into that gap for a few months after the fall of the Czar. The socialist German government set up by the revolt that unseated the Kaiser was replaced by a German kind of Normalcy under Hindenburg.

That German Normalcy collapsed with the election of 1932, when, between them, Nazis and Communists held a majority in the German Parliament, the Reichstag.

So the next stage is on its way.

And only we know it. Reality will be completely covered for at least four years.

So now we may concentrate on brilliant predictions of exactly what is going to happen or you can listen closely, VERY closely, to the advice of Ole Bob, who has been here before.

I am sure that if I were to comment on a mid-game chess move, the reaction of an expert on the game would nod and think I was a complete newbie.

A CHESS-LOVING newbie.

Professional politics is handled on a strictly two-year basis. “A year is forever in politics.”

But that applies to paycheck politics. It’s checkers at most.

But politics for power is chess, but chess with more variables. Comments are usually at the level of a chess watcher thinking about how a move was to get a bishop.

War is power politics. The history of war is exclusively dedicated to which side had the butchest men. But, to repeat, no war hero ever made the slightest difference in the outcome of any war.

The outcome of any real war has been determined before the first shot is fired.

One of the best examples of this is how the Soviet Union was saved from Stalin’s idiocy in 1939 when he joined with Hitler in dividing Poland.

Hitler had been trying to get a common border with Russia. That is why Danzig was so crucial. Danzig was a Free City. It had voted in Nazism, but France and Britain had a treaty which allowed them to declare war if Germany took it.

German forces could not reach East Prussia, and Russia, without crossing Danzig.

You will not see this mentioned anywhere else.

History talks a lot about Danzig, but not about this basic strategic point.

Both France and Britain had a heavy leftist presence in its politics. They were able to protect Russia.

Then Stalin produced every intelligent leftist’s nightmare. He joined with Hitler in invading Poland, so that Germany would have a huge border right up against the USSR.

If Britain and France had not declared war against Germany, and ONLY against Germany, the USSR would have been doomed instead of having one third of the human population of earth to rule over by 1950.

The left had influence, but not open domination, in the UK and in France. They were “out of power.”

Due to a complete ignorance of power politics, no one is going to point to one of history’s most ingenious balancing acts.

“I am embarrassed to have to ask such a thing and mean no disrespect, but can someone explain how I can use the information in today’s article to help end White genocide and secure a future for my White children? Thank you.”

The best questions I get in comments begin with an apology.

As another commenter pointed out earlier, writing is a lot of work, and I want comments on what I WROTE, and an apology means the commenter has READ what I wrote and is so on target he doesn’t want to hit too hard.

Dungeoneer answered Jm’s question by saying that I give you things to demonstrate and give you a chance too think of things in a Mantra way. Which is very true.

Jm’s concern maybe is that I keep insisting that YOU stick to the Mantra, while I seem to roam all over the place.

I am trying to an officer’s job, which is to work out a strategy while the soldiers do their job.

The problem is that in our case, the only people worth consulting with on strategy are the soldiers who know what the whole thing is about and, more importantly, how convincing people really works.

This is unique to our war. The last thing any general wants is his soldiers’ opinions. Hell, even the general’s opinion is of no importance, since the outcome has already been determined by the time the first shot is fired, by people no one hears about.

As I have said here at least fifty times, I do not expect to be here when it is time to go beyond the Mantra alone, so I want to leave you with as much practical preparation as I can for that time.

“How Things Work” is one of my regular topics. It is what I got paid for in practice: making things work in real power politics.

I repeat things endlessly because many commenters would see “upstate New York congressmen” and talk about that. But it is for you to get into any political maneuvering in the real world, and then the question of what sort of gathering to make a decision is likely to come up.

Do we “include everybody?” The paradox here is that “including everybody” means excluding everybody who is not already part of the elite. While I have to give examples from my time and my experience, the point of this article was to warn you that the bigger the assembly, the more the new people, you, are effectively excluded from it.

Go back and read “Democratizing Dictatorship” again and be sure that, when you finally have a chance to enter real politics, and are at the beginning, the elite doesn’t exclude you by “including everybody.”