The last time White people attacked the genocidal intensions of anti-Whites was in the 1950s when that program was backed by the full hatred of the North for the South, during that decade all attention could be diverted from intelligent criticism of their racial program by screaming about ignorant rednecks.
Southern turncoats were attracted by giving them the image of being educated Northerners.
A standard anti-white tactic was to point out briefly that most of the world was colored. But we pro-whites were the ones who really saw this. Anti-whites treated race as if it were altogether a matter of one black going to a white school.
We were not allowed to ask where this “solution to the race problem” would lead. Those who scream ignorant and Klansmen are harking back to a time when this worked, because the public in the 50s were totally provincial.
We asked where all this total “lack of prejudice” would lead. No one would listen. Everyone cheered for a policy of total white self-hatred. The country club whites hated the working class whites, Northerners hated the South, and that was all the anti-whites pushed.
I have talked about temporal provincialism a hundred times, but, as usual, it got almost no notice in comments. So the shouts of “ignorance” and so forth are not noticed as time provincialism, responses from the 1950s which today’s anti-whites thought had silenced all criticism of white genocide.
#1 by Jason on 02/28/2013 - 7:37 am
I always thought of temporal provincialism as ONLY our problem (as pro-Whites), not a problem for anti-Whites, as well. But indeed the tactics of anti-Whites are stuck in a time warp.
.
Bob has said liberals expect colored people to be their faithful companions forever. What a shock they are in for.
Are we the only ones who are privy to how the chessboard will look? If so, temporal provincialism on the part of others may have advantages for us (as BUGS).
The old world of White Supremacy has come to an end. Some haven’t faced it and some can only mourn it. Those apocalyptic “day of the rope” scenarios are almost an admission they can’t really imagine how the real world of politics will play out.
So what comes next? What will the next 5 to 10 years look like?
#2 by Simmons on 02/28/2013 - 9:41 am
Give the young ones a break. The left is little but very evil satire, built on the sands of their own provincialism (the blank slate theory).
All of us have come from a back ground of N&J or reading the 5000 word essays written by the stick chasers (intellectuals), so we took the Left seriously as an omnipotent force of destiny.
But literally as we BUGsers destroy the taboos that protect the anti-whites we see they are a hollow shell, and literally running on the fumes of the civil wrongs era (Daily Kos today is running a picture way down the page of LBJ signing the voting rights act of 1965) note that running pics of old white men is still no legal justification for the genocide of a racial group, put Kos on the list for financial claims.
#3 by Frank on 02/28/2013 - 11:36 am
FYI: Mike Sledge finished his broadcast today with the words “Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody”. He also got a few other Mantra points into the mix. His show is available at:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/renegadebroadcasting/2013/02/28/reconstructions-live-w-mike-sledge
Mike Sledge, obviously you read BUGS, so please sprinkle your broadcasts with MORE Mantra talking points. Give your listeners something to SAY when called “racist”.
(Sorry if this is OT, but I like to let BUGS-folk know instances of how our message is seeping into the propasphere. Keeps the spirit up!)
#4 by Frank on 02/28/2013 - 12:16 pm
Part of Sledge’s broadcast actually did address the subject of temporal provincialism.
He noted how so-called “White Nationalists” who make a fetish of National Socialist Germany, and insist on the provincial personalities and symbolism of that period are so “over” in today’s world.
So many of “our people” are stuck in this temporal province of long-ago-ism and just-so-history, as if those had anything at all do do with dealing with “right now”.
While Sledge is still stuck somewhat with calling out “the jews”, he does seem to be moving into the fresh air of OST, of Mantra Thinking.
Old habits, habits that aren’t EFFECTIVE, are a wonderful thing to break.
#5 by steadiness on 02/28/2013 - 1:03 pm
Pro-Whites who attack Jews are turning off everyone who isn’t fully redpilled, which is a problem because the Jews are just a puzzle piece. Of course Jewish leaders in White countries support multiculturalism, all leaders in White countries support multiculturalism. All the leaders of White countries are universalists, a.k.a. crypto-Calvinists, and anyone who isn’t is called a provincial bigot.
Sure, Jews and other minorities are allowed to form “national liberation movements”, while any Whites who tried that would be “murderous gangs of fascist thugs” (see Kosovo). But that’s just because they’re oppressed, and as soon as they become just like us they will take their rightful place at our side in the Kingdom of God on Earth.
As to Israel, they are fighting a 60-year-old war with a “national liberation movement”. Israelis would love to send in the IDF and win that war in a week, but the International Community, i.e. Harvard and Georgetown, refuse to allow it.
#6 by jo3w on 02/28/2013 - 1:57 pm
If you guys keep thinking so hard about this stuff, your going to wind up with “trained eyes”
#7 by mandela on 02/28/2013 - 4:47 pm
New post of REPLIES TO ANTI-WHITES MARCH 2013 posted at the swarm link to the right of this page
#8 by Jason on 02/28/2013 - 7:01 pm
Forgive me, I can’t find the thread where we talked about forced interbreeding, but one point I’d like to make.
The anti-Whites will say: No one is forcing blacks and whites to have sex, therefore there is no genocide.
Shouldn’t we point out that it is not a requirement under international law that someone stand over a couple with a gun and force them to breed, in order for it to be genocide? Because that is the premise of their statement. They are saying that since they don’t see rape rooms with white women shackled to a wall, it’s not genocide.
But the UN Treaty doesn’t require any such thing for it to be called genocide. Finding a way to point this out would make clear how ridiculous their point is.
#9 by Cody on 02/28/2013 - 9:23 pm
@ Jason
Here are the mantra responses to the question of love and intermarriage.
“Anti-Whites don’t have to force intermarriage, because the conditions that lead to intermarriage are being forced.”
“You are saying that this whole program of immigration and assimilation and chasing down every white on earth who wants to live in a white community is just for True Love?”
Taken from the topics;
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/02/06/once-again-we-are-samizdat/#comments
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/02/12/dealing-with-the-true-love-crap/#comments
#10 by steadiness on 03/01/2013 - 1:56 am
The Dalai Lama agrees that mass immigration and forced integration is genocide.
#11 by mandela on 03/01/2013 - 1:30 pm
@ jason, good point, will note it down for the next list.
@ Cody. those replies are on my post