This goes with the piece called “Quotability.”

The reason my brothers and sisters can use the computer is because I went to each of their houses, spent the night, and taught them.

All of them are, believe it or not, older than I am.

Every one of them had good friends who were past masters of computers, pros.

But not one of them knew a computer man who could EXPLAIN THE BASICS.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the big difference between BUGS and other pro-whites.

It sounds like a very simple difference.   The Occidental Quarterly asks, “Have I written the correct factual information?”   BUGS asks, “Did they GET it?”

The Reagan, or Kemp-Roth, tax cut brought in a vast increase in tax revenues.    But Kemp did not get the concept until he had lunch  with the economist Laffer about 1970.   All of us economists  who were not hopeless Marxists  knew the concept.

The Kennedy tax cut of 1963 had caused a huge increase in Federal revenues while it made enormous sums for the taxpayers.   Kennedy got rid of the thirty-year-old 91 percent tax on incomes over $300,000, which had hardly collected a dime.

Everybody had learned to get round it except a few prize fighters.

Kennedy cut taxes across the board, the recession ended and tax revenues skyrocketed.

Everybody knew it.   But nobody SAW it.

By the time Johnson took office, he had a huge increase in revenues to work with, caused directly by his predecessor’s across the board tax cut.

Everybody knew that, but nobody knew that.

It had been done, but it had not been explained.

Until Laffer explained it to Congressman Kemp in that restaurant with the Laffer Curve.   There were two decades between the Kennedy tax cuts and the Reagan tax cuts.   Selective tax cuts had been tried — by a liberal, in public — and had worked like a miracle.   But, like the Mantra, until that Magic Lunch, nobody GOT it.

Fifteen years passed between the Magic Lunch and the Reagan tax cuts.

Twenty years all told.

All America had to do was develop the atomic bomb, because by 1945 the skies over Japan were clear enough to send a single B-29 over the island.

But since then, the development of The Bomb Has been Step One.   Step two is all-important.   Step two is Delivery.

This is why having the truth, as The Occidental Observer has, will not do the job alone.

No matter how much truth they have stored up, TOO will not succeed without learning  delivery.

Explanation is delivery, and that is the indispensible job of BUGS.

I have written many, many press releases.

The first thing you have to do is forget about YOU.   There are two groups who matter.   One is the person and/or cause you are writing FOR.   The other is the person or persons who might publish it

No press release sounds at all like TOO or the usual comment here.

When it came to the person I am writing it FOR, President or wildcat striker, I really looked forward to the look on their faces as a coal miner or trucker or Southie heard the exact words, in his own language, fitting precisely into the press release terminology.

Likewise, the press lapped it up.   The reporter is there like every other working person, looking forward to quitting time when he can go home to his liquor and his divorce.     He wants it to sound as if he had been sitting right there with the subject, as I had.   And that’s the way I made it sound.

Notice there is no “in other words” here.   I made it QUOTABLE.

There were over thirty replies to “Racism is a Hate word.”

I finally asked if anyone could claim their in other words was as quotable as “Racism is a Hate word.”

More replies, but not one addressed that.

The philosophy here is that of the Mantra.  It takes a lot of work to produce something people can’t help but use.

I have said many times that I got my picture on the front page of the New York Times.   I did it because the reporter had to use my picture because I wrote his article for him.    After that many quotes in the article, my picture had to be used.

All this is practical stuff.   On the work page, they hash this out because in the heat of battle you can’t be a windbag.

Attack slogans are short or the attacker is dead.

At http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktMlXMjMiL4 Adelhiem is debating a professional anti-racist. He asked me to critique it.

Before listening to a word, I said, and still mean:
“I will do it. But first let me congratulate you on having the courage to do it. With all the tens of thousands at Stormfront, I was the only one who would do the Fox network interviews here.”

Bob: I will look at it, but the point is that you DID it!
I am deeply impressed.
And no, I will not be less impressed when I look at it.
We need warriors with your courage. Technique can be learned, moral courage cannot.

Adelhiem: It is an hour and twenty minutes long. I simply can’t listen that long at a stretch, so I cut it down to fifteen minutes segments.
The first fifteen minutes, Adelheim is on top. The professional anti-racist is reduced to actually arguing that Europe is not becoming brown, which point would be racist if Adelheim made it. But Adelheim is doing fine at that point, even if he is not aggressive enough.

After listening to that fifteen minutes, I wrote:

Listening is hard for me. I have listened to fifteen minutes so far. You are EXCELLENT!
Your poor opponent is trying desperately to say Europe is staying white.
Please note this: This is the first time I have ever heard any pro-white stay right on genocide for fifteen straight minutes. As with me, the other guy is left rolling on and on; the only thing he has said so far is contradicted by his own side.
But it is your DISCIPLINE that leaves him rolling around aimlessly.
Good job, soldier.

I have now reached half an hour. The anti-white is making the usual point that nobody can define race, and Adelheim DID come back with the fact that the whole premise of anti-racism is based on identifying whites and non-whites.

Now at half an hour, I detect some natural flagging in Adelheim. Because he wants to be nice, Adelheim appears to be trying to introduce variation.

Bad move!

I will listen more and comment more.

Desbots are often programmed  by the Thought Police s to see “Anti-racist is a  a code word for anti-white”  as a personal insult to some readers.

But calling someone a racist, which you have to do if you  claim to be anti-racist, is a personal insult.

In cases where despots  have been programmed to take out “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white”, we could substitute “Racist itself is a Hate word.”

Or try variants.

You know the discipline.  I am  suggesting a few TRY it to see whether it WORKS.

___________________________________________

Most of the first replies to this article are straight out of the Occidental Quarterly. lengthy talk about what the word “racist” means and quotes they used to Win the Argument.   It makes me tired.

What got on MSNBC were two words, White Genocide and a quote, and Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, White Countries for Everybody.

The whole point of my approach is not to be philosophical or to wow ’em with my smarts, but to have them QUOTING me.

All the first comments showed was that you have missed the whole point.

Anti-racist is a Hate word took a lot of thought to get it down to short and very quotable.

Get with the program!

In discussing the MSNBC commentary, we started far from the point and it got worse.

I did too.

But Ioannes turned the tide by  reminding us this was a hard-earned victory for our methods:

“While I do post the manta along with minis and record once in a while in the swarm sections; I do not post much in the comments section of Bob’s blog.

“But reading the above comments inspired me to make one.

“I have been posting the mantra for what I am guessing is four or more years now. When I first posted the mantra, there were anti-whites that would try to use the obvious tricks but they would go away. In other sites, posted mantra response would get cricket sounds.

“After watching the MSNBC Video, I knew that what we were doing is working. We are kicking the anti-whites in the groin and in their anti-white brains; at the same time pointing out the results of their anti-white religion.

“Just recently, I went back to a newspaper site that I had posted mantra concepts 3 years earlier. On racial stories, the LTE’s and the comments were not about smearing the whites. The LTR’s and comments were about smearing the political correctness officer. The anti-whites were rabid, bringing out new smear words that were even new for the anti-whites. They (anti-whites) were asking the question, ‘Where is all the cutting and pasting was coming from?’

“Detractors of the mantra can say all they want. We are Legion.”

Back in their day, the three hundred Spartans reaching the front might have been on the back page of the newspaper.

The big news was the gigantic Persian invasion.  The second page would have been a description of the giant religious holiday Athenians were busy with.

We have to do the same thing here.   BUGS history consists largely of happenings one scarcely notices.   For one thing, we create a new vocabulary.  There were over thirty comments on the MSBC article, different excitements, including a debate between two BUGSERS — now THERE’S tough cookies duking it out — and my frustrated statement about the difference one must learn between BUGS, a seminar on reality, and the despair and wild hopes that are bread and butter to groups that go on membership and contributions.

During that discussion, we developed a word to define the latter kinds of organization: “membership groups.”    That word is a million miles from perfect.  White Genocide was a million miles from perfect.   All our words are imperfect, but instead of getting stuck on definitions, we go with them.

After the MSNBC  report and the White House Petition, we would be fools to try to use a new word for White Genocide.    Now we have fixed an equally imperfect word which will do what a word is supposed to do, make our discussion easier.

During all the excitement, the word membership group simply came out as a term for those who raised funds and whose success is measured by their official numbers.

As I have said in earlier articles. Membership Group is NOT an insult.

We have to discuss them because we will need to  form Membership Groups.

Yes, we are a  membership group, too.   Certainly whoever gets on the net and puts in the Mantra and mixes it up and raids pays a membership fee that is harder to spare than a small monthly payment.

But we need a word, and we now have developed  one.

Quibbling does not keep us from adopting a word simply because it’s useful.

If you want to illustrate how people just live with what evolves, take the names of churches.   Every church claims to be catholic, but there is a Catholic Church.   They all claim to be the only truly orthodox one, but they all  understand that The Orthodox Church refers to a specific group.

How on earth can a nitpicking theologian talk about the Baptist Church when almost all use baptism?

They do.

We will be using “membership group” long after all that was said about them by me and everyone else in that particular article is ancient history.

The discussion is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eg2zR8oJ-M

Please note that all of the three or four commentators on White Genocide at MSNBC were colored.

Also please note that MSNBC used our best phrases up front, starting with Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans and White Countries for Everybody.

You have noticed that when white anti-white announcers talk about us, they scream the whole litany of hatred for pro-whites like a drunk Klansman with his to robe on inside out.    The first part, which is all that interests me, was made by smiling colored announcers.

It didn’t smell of hatred, as white anti-white announcers would.

One of the announcers compared the Genocide Petition to other white reactions to race policy in the past, including the anti-busing movement.

In other words, this story cannot be compared to one put out by an anti-white white, left or right.

Those smiling coloreds are their replacements.

And they’re coming fast  and are as unwilling to wait as the white traitors are to be replaced.

Race front and center terrifies and infuriates the sellout whites, so it is not at all unwelcome to the colored guys and gals coming along.

Like turncoat Southerners, the market has been vastly overloaded with whites selling hatred for whites for a long, long time.

How could one note this reality when he sees an all-powerful, perfectly united conspiracy?