As I pointed out, pro-white membership organizations have to restrict any argument that criticizes Nazis.

If readers would consider that in a Mantra fashion, it would explain a lot more of the world to them. Leftist outfits have to restrict any criticism of Communists in exactly the same fashion. That is why all media evil always came from Nazis or some made-up outfit like SPECTRE.

I doubt one single reader took out time to think that out. I have spent many years thinking out what I explain to you. Some goofs think it is “esoteric” or cryptic, but that is because it represents a kind of THOUGHT, and they, after Mommy Professor, are not used to anything worth thinking about.

Dave did point out that anti-whites justify genocide in exactly the same way Nazis did. That is true and answers the follow-up of the discourse on white evil that half of the anti-whites spew out when they first answer the Mantra.

BUT…

Do not tailgate. Do not get into an argument about what the Nazis were precisely. Only a pro can use the word without getting locked into an argument on history.

You are GOING to do that. Catch yourself after you have destroyed your whole Mantra argument by letting them get you off it a few times.

Another thing I have said over and over to the point where some commenters have actually noticed it that I not only do not go out of my way to keep those who would quit if I did, or did NOT, criticize the Third Reich, I try to get them out ASAP.

The same thing is true of people who will leave because of something we say about abortion or about religion. Through the decades most of the groups I have been in were destroyed by such people.

None of our arguments or opinions are official, with the sole exception of fighting white genocide.

That reality has to be internalized. You’re in the big leagues now, and tantrums are not allowed.

If you have anything except white genocide that will make you take your toys and go home, we not only do not try to keep you, we DEMAND that you go now.

In his reply to “How You Go Wrong With Mini-Mantras,”

Asgardian 117 has done what I dream of your doing, digging into the real meaning of my article and bringing out implications in a way that makes me a little jealous but ecstatic.

“I have noticed what Bob has said, I’ve actually encountered it. They have a VERY difficult time with the whole mantra, but what they do is break it down and answer every sentence, even though their answers are sometimes silly and nonsensical it gives normal white people the idea that the anti white is actually debunking the mantra even though they are not for the masses that are asses perception is everything, we cannot afford that perception when we are trying to alert/awaken normal white people who do not know how to articulate what’s going on without using a racial slur and getting buried with that nasty HATEWORD.”

That last phrase gave me an insight.

It reminded me that some of our major accomplishments seem so obvious in retrospect what we don’t even notice them.

I keep mentioning that all my stuff is legal even in the most Thought Police countries.

My stuff is also far, far less likely to get you in trouble as you go more and more public.
The article was about the hazards of mini-Mantras, it certainly was not attacking those who use them in the field.

time for freedom gently reminded Old Coach of the experience that goes into mini-Mantras out in the field:
“But the kind of Mini Mantras that are listed in the Bugs Swarm are for the most part excellent to use because they keep the context that White people are forced to tolerate conditions which bring about our racial destruction, that is, genocide…White Genocide. Moreover, they always do an excellent job of demonstrating the inherent hypocrisy and contradictions of the multicultural state as they are applied to White people and ONLY White people.”

I think if we stick to the Mini Mantras that are listed here, we should do ok. Of course however, whenever I post to a web message board I always lead off with the Main Mantra because that is of course the best one…period.”

Like any dedicated coach, I do a lot of warning. You CAN easily screw up with a mini-Mantra, and it is easy to let get your eyes off the ball.

But when Knut Rockne invented the Forward Pass, the players had to develop it out on the field.

We have gotten an incredible amount of public attention, given that our working membership is well under a hundred.

But there is a way for anti-whites to limit the damage.

They can’t deal with the Mantra.   But they can deal with the Mantra one bite at a time.

If you look at the “answers” to the Mantra you will see that they recite it line by line and claim to answer each line.

They are already dealing with White Genocide.   The term is out there, and it is deadly.

But if they can keep it away from the context, they can deal with it partially.  As the Indiana student paper said, it is just a matter of some population groups having more children, not a purposeful plan.

A mini-Mantra is a blow to the enemy.  But no matter how great it makes your intellect seem, none of your answers has the effect of the full Mantra.

I keep begging you to hit the predictable answer with Mantra discipline.   When they shout the anti-white stuff, the answer is that they are justifying genocide.

That is but one example.

When they reply with anything else, they will use the word “white. ”   You can use that to point out, BRIEFLY, that their side claims our race does not exist.

The Roman Army we model ourselves on did not just throw their spear and march in order and then, when the enemy began to retreat, let each Roman soldier go his own way and then allow the Legion break up into a mob.

When you use white genocide you then use their reply against them.   Please don’t come back here and beat your chest about a smart reply you made up.   That is sickening.

Keep your formation.  Only reply to make another Mantra point.

Let the amateurs ramble on.

A few commenters have recently repeated some of the more important points I have made twenty or more times here.
You are catching on a lot faster than the Names in any movement ever did.

This is not an insult. What I am most proud of is the moral courage and Patience I have had over the years in going on when absolutely nobody around me could get the most obvious points. In 1968, Wallace and Nixon had a landslide between them, and this is half the story if you had seen the polls before election day.

Nixon immediately appointed a pro-busing Head of the Education Department and disclaimed all appeals to what they called “Wallace” voters, National Review of course leading the charge.

Then came Watergate, and finally and suddenly Bill Rusher, NR’s publisher who had been in the lead denouncing any association with dirty old working people, met with me.

We are not talking about the few years that even our oldest BUGSERS have been here. I fought for this obvious coalition year after year after year. But every single Name in the Conservative Movement was on the other side.

Rusher came in too late, after Watergate. But we did get Reagan the nomination in 1980. Read the Name in History in the Reagan election of 1980, and every single one you see was part of the solid bloc of Names who had opposed appealing to “Wallace voters.”

Suddenly, after the 1980 election, they became the “Reagan Democrats” and everybody had always been all for them.

If you read history or fund raisers, you have no idea how things actually work.

We know that fully half of the time immediate reply to the Mantra will be a genocidal rant about how the about why the white race deserves genocide.

But our people are seldom ready with that simple reply:    “You deny genocide, then you do a genocidal rant about how the white race deserves genocide.”

PERIOD.   Period is the most important letter of the BUGS alphabet.

Bill Rusher gave me a free lifetime subscription to National Review in 1975, so I have been kept up to date with respectable conservatism since I got out of the business.

Paycheck conservatives have evolved perfectly to suit the media establishment. Anyone who says anything that truly hurts our rulers, as all the conspiracy theories say, like Joe Sobran or Pat Buchanan, is frozen out.
But it is not a “conspiracy.”

I was hardly part of any circle, left or right, but as a matter of getting my pay I knew in detail when each formerly conservative position became taboo.

The reality is understandable if you Mantrify it. That is, you cease to scream and make it a matter of information nobody else is privy to, and look at the obvious facts nobody looks at.

The obvious fact is that paycheck conservatism says that everything is a mess today but every liberal policy before January 1, 1971 was not only OK, but denounces anybody today who thinks like the founders of National Review in 1955 more loudly than anyone else today.

Paycheck conservatives tell about any objections to integration more loudly than anyone, just to prove they are part of the Modern World. That is their job.

To Mantrify the situation, paycheck conservatives ratify each policy they once denounced. When National Review signs on, everybody agrees that “both sides” have agreed and all opposition is extremist.

The system under which we live is a very sophisticated one, and it adapts. At the beginning of the 1960s there was not one national television debate that had a conservative in it. By 1980 those who made their livings as professional conservatives were either outstanding, like Pat Buchanan who had the top political column in America, or they had learned to fit into the system.

Those were the staffers who took “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.” out of Reagan’s speech THREE TIMES behind his back.

The mantrification of paycheck conservatism is what they say, “We are in a national catastrophe today, but every single step that led to it was wonderful.”

And no one but me will ever boil that down to its absurd reality.

Membership organizations need to hook their fund and sign up drives on the latest news event. They have to prove that the Great Black-eyed Pea Shortage that is in all the papers was directly caused by the Conspiracy.

When our Populist Forum scheduled marches and press conferences, our main concern was what was NOT in the news.
Membership outfits in DC like the Heritage Foundation go with the headlines. That is when we MADE news for news-starved reporters.

We rode on the silences. This is an indication of the difference in how BUGS should view the world. You raise money by reading the latest news. We gain attention at this stage by making news they can use.

Slow news days are big problems for the press. A coming cause has to produce interesting stuff for that period. That is why New Dawn is such a continuing story. That is why a White House Petition with four hundred signatures can make national.

The last time I did this, we got attention for the coalition with the hated “Wallace Democrats” and coat and tie conservatives that elected Reagan. Nothing in the news ever did a bigger job. It was effective because we MADE it news.

Not one Soviet expert had anything to do with the collapse of Soviet Empire. We and our slow news days approach were absolutely indispensable to it.

And now, back to the news…….

I thought one of our best BUGSERS was engaging in blatant tailgating. He was explaining how he had answered somebody who called him an extremist.

But reading what he said, I saw he was doing what we should do: Instead of denying the charge, he used it to make his own point. Tailgating means letting yourself be thrown off track by anti-whites labels and charges.

But what our BUGS commenter did was point out that allowing us free speech is the best way of AVOIDING an extremist result. I used this point back when I was respectable and was being interviewed about my 1982 book, The New Right Papers.

And I got that many years before from the anti-whites. One of their standard arguments was that the world is mostly colored, so if we wanted to counter Communism we had to integrate.

One of the articles in the New Right Papers was “Lid on a Boiling Pot,” which pointed out specifically how ignoring working class whites could lead to extremism.

Membership organizations cannot use this warning because any criticism of Hitler, for example, will cause some soreheads to stop joining or contributing.

And pro-whites who are pure theorists won’t develop concepts like this which work out in the real world. There is no substitute for getting out there and seeing for yourself what actually works.

Social science is all lecture because any test of its theories always discredits them.

BUGS develops by your insights being tested out in the field.

BUGS is a lab course.