Bill Maher was on the Comedy Channel interviewing the star of the movie about Che Guevara.
The star of the movie was there, a young guy who didn’t claim to know anything about politics. He was there to promote his movie and make money.
Bill Maher said, “You know that Communism is not a viable system?”
The movie’s star just grinned. But he was in a bad situation. The movie was made by people who saw The Revolution as an Adventure and watched by people who took it seriously. So Maher kept on trying to sound intellectual and the guy playing Che Guevara grinned and evaded.
Obviously a lot of people think there was some kind of dialogue going on here. The Mantra Mind sees two guys playing their roles without making a single point.
If you are to be effective in fighting an evil, you learn about it, you assess it, and you see it clearly.
As a leftist, Maher cannot dismiss Communism. So instead of pointing out that that system had to kill people who tried to escape from it, he uses “viable.”
Actually, Communism is SILLY. A bunch of people who call themselves Intellectuals decide they should run every facet of society, that they should decide what consumers want. If you put it that way, Communism is just plain silly.
But when you bring in words like “viable” or “materialistic,” the argument makes you look good, makes it look like you might be one of those Intellectuals yourself.
We deal with the same problem debating White Genocide. If you want to be an Intellectual so badly that you hate anybody pointing out the simple fact that the goal has always been to get rid of the white race, it is because you share Mayer’s aching desire to be seen as an intellectual.
When one deals professionally with mental illness, he must see giant gap between a person who just needs listening to and a person who is wholly delusional. One rule is that you NEVER enter into the patient’s delusion.
But when you use words like “viable” on a straitjacket case like a person who fancies himself to be a Marxist Intellectual, you are as delusional as he is.
You are not the doctor treating the patient. You are two straitjacket cases babbling at each other.
#1 by Asgardian117 on 07/08/2013 - 11:18 am
It makes maher “look” its ALWAYS about how they LOOK they cannot discuss the actual topic so they have to dress it up. Mantra style thinking takes the dress of and shows ppl what things actually ARE.
#2 by BGLass on 07/08/2013 - 11:21 am
It’s kind of gross to watch people on t.v. trying to “sell to the public” what they want the public to want (“for its own good.”)
Silly AND arrogant. It exposes that they really do not know that THEY ARE NOT somebody else. It’s like when a baby still thinks it’s an extension of its own mommy.
the missionary mentality that can’t just take up its own space and live its own life.
the idea that you can DECIDE WHAT SOMEBODY ELSE wants is just bizarre—- and shows you can’t have any normal human relationship (where you would really GET TO KNOW others BY ASKING who THEY ARE, and what THEY want.)
It can be embarrassing to watch.
#3 by Bob on 07/08/2013 - 12:18 pm
Has anybody noticed that the SPLC article site has reopened and that an AMPW has gone to bat for the SPLC?
http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/07/02/white-rabbit-radio-font-of-racist-genocide-claims-run-by-michigan-man/
#4 by OldBlighty on 07/08/2013 - 12:39 pm
That’s what a traitor looks like.
#5 by OldBlighty on 07/08/2013 - 1:20 pm
The SPLC allowed 90% anti-White replies, blocked every on message BUGSer and allowed this AMPW to give Pro Whites “good advice”.
Listen to the SILENCE…
The SPLC are telling us which style of opponent they prefer!
The anti-Whites have been beating this opponent for 50 years, so they know they can beat him for 50 more.
If you were the anti-White SPLC, would you suggest an opponent that can beat you?
#6 by daedalus on 07/08/2013 - 5:13 pm
I thought the AMPW dude was a plant – meaning an splc member posing as both pro-White and ANTI-mantra.
A give away was the article’s over emphasis on a stupid ole ‘horus’ living in a basement, blah blah.
It segued nicely into the splc definition of how to be a ‘real’ racist, not a Mantra kind.
On second reading of their hit piece, I’m thinking that’s going to be their strategy to shut bugsters up.
So. They seem to be clueless, but posing as clued in.
#7 by Jason on 07/08/2013 - 8:06 pm
I’d like to think the AMPW was a plant, but having run into them for real (online), that is the kind of dullard thing they say.
#8 by jo3w on 07/08/2013 - 7:59 pm
I actually wish I didn’t go back and read the new responses on the SPLC article. The guy who favors himself as the supreme intellectual actually says,” Who says there is a race problem? Problem with racism, sure.” Does he actually believe that racism is not a race problem? The mantra could just as easily read, Everyone says there is a racism problem that will be solved when the third world pours into every and only white countries. I bet this guy gets a lot of traction with the audience because he is so sure of himself. His certainty when expressing his (mommy professor’s) opinion of history will win over many audiences. They will defer to his self proclaimed expert opinion because they still believe that the “truth” is found in a university classroom! I think there is a lesson in this somewhere.
#9 by Asgardian117 on 07/08/2013 - 10:14 pm
Coach, the splc keeps holding “ted kennedys” comments in moderation never to be released. Cowards.
#10 by Simmons on 07/08/2013 - 6:40 pm
They got nothing, that kid ain’t going nowhere in that org.. I can understand the responses, those are cultists waiting for the party line and cannot be expected to produce anything of any use, but the kid who wrote that basically said Horus was a poopyhead, that kind of writing won’t get him to the big time.
Two of our best Bugsters given a week would clean that site out, and when a cultist loses the locus they move on and go find another one to glom onto. Maybe those idiot white anti-whites would go work in the organic vegetable patch.
To end a too long post, the best anti-white response was about China’s 56 ethnic groups and the need to treat them as endangered species (in a way with AA). Talk about head slappin stupid.
#11 by Jason on 07/08/2013 - 8:48 pm
This is a video of Jared Taylor and Matt Heimbach (White Students Union) talking to Tim Wise, a black moderator (who has been on O’Reilly) and another black pundit I’ve seen on CNN.
If Bob gets a chance, his critique would be interesting and useful for future pro-White spokesmen. The first 8 minutes can be skipped b/c it is just Tim Wise yammering.
http://www.amren.com/news/2013/07/matt-heimbach-and-jared-taylor-debate-tim-wise-and-michael-dyson/
#12 by Asgardian117 on 07/08/2013 - 10:16 pm
Did you see the look on ***-wises face when matthew accused him of genocide? His eyes almost blew out of his head
#13 by Jason on 07/09/2013 - 3:21 am
Yes. EVERYTHING they talked about paled in comparison to the accusation of genocide. Crime stats, IQ stuff, South African politics … none of it hit like the charge of genocide.
#14 by Bob on 07/09/2013 - 9:55 am
My reply today:
I was warned against self-styled Intellectuals when I read The Cry and the Covenant about age 12.
Dr. Ignac Semmelweis showeed that the reason obstetricians of his day were killing thousands of women and babies
was because they went from autopsy to the maternity ward wiithout washing their hands.
The medical Intellectuals ruined Semmelweis. In themid-ninteenth century they had all sorts of fancy explanations
for “childbed fever,” including psychological ones.
The idea that a big-time head doctor should wash his hands with carbolic acid insulted them, and they shouted out about how
Intellectual they were.
And the mothers and babies died.
I knew Communism was just plain silly when self-styled Intellectuals were all for it. An economy run entirely by a
group of self-styled Intellectuals is insane.
So now we have white genocide hiding between claims of Intellectualism.
To self-styled intellectuals that’s childish, like asking a major league medical professor in 1850 to wash his hands.
You talk to yourselves and tell yourselves how Intellectual you are.
Semmelweis and Occam say your Final Solution to the White Problem is evil.
#15 by Simon on 07/09/2013 - 11:33 am
The SPLC article is not a report – it’s a psychoanalysts attempt to explain away a radical movement that opposes the status quo. And the SPLC is responsible for enforcing the status quo.
Whenever this occurs we need to point out that psychoanalysis is SILLY. Anti-whitism is a religion that holds Mommy Professor’s word as infallible. Anybody who opposes Mommy Professor is neurotic and crazy who’s behaviour must be ‘explained’ as a manifestation of unconscious sexual frustration and unresolved childhood trauma. The explanation is never of course is that their opponents are passionate and determined men who perceive a grave injustice in society and are trying to put things right.
We are also expected to swallow the idea that Mommy Professor and his anti-white choir are miraculously free from such dark psychological compulsions and they have freely arrived at the truth entirely through reason and logic.
#16 by Simmons on 07/09/2013 - 11:51 am
Yes Simon and it rests solely on the false notion that the anti-whites are morally superior. Our side will quibble the details and leave this notion unscathed.
Bob has been there before with the Soviet threat. Buckley and his cult and the money power behind “respectable” anti-communism never stripped the ComSymps of the false notion of moral superiority (commies meant well they really did but they hated jesus and IBM).
IMO the phrase “Evil Empire” was a dagger to the heart of the West’s traitorous ComSymps, and by the time “Tear down this wall” was spoken all these red vermin were angling for another cult locus to glom onto to retain their perceived notion of moral superiority (which they use to bludgeon their political opponents) (when Reagan died the day of his funeral was a prosecution for his weak support for Apartheid, see where they went?)
Strip the anti-white cult of this false notion of moral superiority and it will vanish faster than AmRen can post a crime and IQ essay.
#17 by Scythian on 07/10/2013 - 11:36 pm
When the internet finally took hold, the anti-white establishment must be in shock. How much money you think they spend to try to shut us up? They even recruited the evangelicals!