http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2013/07/02/white-rabbit-radio-font-of-racist-genocide-claims-run-by-michigan-man
I was warned against self-styled Intellectuals when I read The Cry and the Covenant about age 12.
Dr. Ignac Semmelweis showeed that the reason obstetricians of his day were killing thousands of women and babies
was because they went from autopsy to the maternity ward wiithout washing their hands.
The medical Intellectuals ruined Semmelweis. In themid-ninteenth century they had all sorts of fancy explanations
for “childbed fever,” including psychological ones.
The idea that a big-time head doctor should wash his hands with carbolic acid insulted them, and they shouted out about how
Intellectual they were.
And the mothers and babies died.
I knew Communism was just plain silly when self-styled Intellectuals were all for it. An economy run entirely by a
group of self-styled Intellectuals is insane.
So now we have white genocide hiding between claims of Intellectualism.
To self-styled intellectuals that’s childish, like asking a major league medical professor in 1850 to wash his hands.
You talk to yourselves and tell yourselves how Intellectual you are.
Semmelweis and Occam say your Final Solution to the White Problem is evil.
NOTE: The last time I put in a comment, they closed the site, giving them time to pad the Comments (I’ve been bere before).
Within two minutes of my putting in this comment, they closed the site and put in a new one.
#1 by Simmons on 07/09/2013 - 11:16 am
The one comment by an AMPW was a fraud as well. My guess being that it was wrote by an anti-white deathly afraid that what they wrote would be used against them by the other cultists for being too realistic, typical party line cult outfit of the Left.
But its on the record the splc now allows WNs a voice on their website. As they should since we are anti-genocide activists.
#2 by OldBlighty on 07/09/2013 - 12:11 pm
I put in a comment not long after yours Bob. As usual it was NOT approved.
And the fake comments added by their moderator, are no better than those written by *unpaid* Youtube thugs.
So the SPLC is funded to the tune of 10s of millions of dollars and as far as I can determine, this their operation:
1. Write anti-White nonsense.
2. Censor all opposing views.
3. Do a tribal victory dance.
4. Collect money from rich dupes.
5. Go back to 1.
#3 by Bob on 07/09/2013 - 12:17 pm
OB, how long after?
My comment went straight in and whenI looked again they had switched the site.
#4 by OldBlighty on 07/09/2013 - 12:25 pm
My comment is censored between:
Reynardine said,
on July 9th, 2013 at 9:09 am
and
Ruslan Amirkhanov said,
on July 9th, 2013 at 10:11 am
I wouldn’t put any trust in their time stamps, Bob. They haven’t been honest about anything else.
#5 by Asgardian117 on 07/09/2013 - 12:26 pm
All the money in the world will NOT protect them from the truth. They can censor their website ALL THEY WANT, the words already out. Matthew Heimbach is a perfect example. The cant handle bob so they censor him.
#6 by Lord Nelson on 07/09/2013 - 4:02 pm
For such a multi million pound operation the SPLC is actually pathetic. We are probably giving them more attention then they deserve.
I say just keep posting the Mantra far and wide. My email page probably gets more hits than their website.
đ
#7 by OldBlighty on 07/09/2013 - 4:09 pm
The emperor has no clothes.
#8 by Daniel Genseric on 07/09/2013 - 9:12 pm
Now, let me start by saying that this WHOLE “debacle” could have been avoided. And by adding that I truly enjoyed and value ARH.
But, that “anti-seimitic” video is the reason they wrote a hit piece. Bob warned about weaving agendas into the Mantra message. This is the direct result of not heeding such warnings. The Poverty Palace Police LOVE anti-semitic propaganda. Don’t believe me? Go back and re-read the SPLC hit piece and then re-read this comment.
Love me, hate me, love the vid, hate it. Whatever.
It’s the simple truth.
This is where I continue distancing myself from anti-NON WHITE sentiment and champion only that which is mine – WHITE FOLKS, our heritage and culture.
Let me be crystal clear, I am here to fight white genocide; not The Jew.
#9 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 1:56 am
You may be right. I’d vaguely wondered why the splc article spent so much time on AntiRacist Hitler, but of course Joos who care about Israel, and donate to the splc, are going to see the video as just an attack on Israel. And a very vicious one since it has Hitler in it.
When ARH came out, I loved it but wondered if it fit our idea of what propaganda should be. After all, Bob had nixed a mini that a lot of us had happily been using:
African countries for Africans.â¨
Asian countries for Asians.â¨
Israel for Jews or youâre an anti-semite!â¨
White countries for everyone or youâreďťż a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjeÂÂÂws!
â¨Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
To me, ARH seemed considerably stronger than that mini!
But when Bob emerged enthused about ARH, I supposed that, perhaps because the video was so very very good, it leaped the bounds that we’d previously been operating under.
But now I wonder (nothing more…it’s too multifaceted a question for me to get my brain around yet) if Bob shouldn’t have made the same call on ARH as he made on the mini above.
I wonder if Bob would have approved ARH if he’d been consulted about it at its inception.
Otoh, I feel the video is so good that maybe it does rightfully leap our usual bounds that we hold to.
We couldn’t have gotten a free ride forever re the splc. Or could we? I don’t know. But you raise a very good question.
#10 by OldBlighty on 07/10/2013 - 3:52 am
It is a strange video. You say it is anti-Jew, meanwhile over on SF, the Hitler lovers and Revisionists were saying it was anti them. So it seems that video disturbs a lot of people.
As for the SPLC, they have a right to complain about criticism of their anti-White pal calling for the flooding of Europe with non-Whites, when they come out in opposition to White Genocide.
Still waiting for your answer SPLC. When is the SPLC going to come out in opposition to the genocide of Whites? You have been saying for years, genocide is wrong, haven’t you?
#11 by Daniel Genseric on 07/10/2013 - 9:14 pm
OB,
I didn’t say it was anti-Jew. I said THEY say it is because that is their interpretation. They can run with that and I understand HOW and WHY they do it. It benefits their sales process. So, we get a hit piece and exposure of political dissidents as such because of an error committed by our side.
Reality check time. This is as real as it gets and they mean business (war), people.
I don’t want any part of continuing to make errors detrimental to the financial or physical health of BUGSters. FOCUS.
——————
@H (from my comment which was “moderated” below)
I was referring to what happened with BoardAd and company.
I wrote a mini a long time ago, H. In essence, it contained the very point you and Adelheim make in ARH. You know what Bob wrote? âGenseric, that is worse than posting NOTHING at all.â I got my d!ck slapped. Was Ole Bob right?
Hell yes.
Not saying you intended to, but please donât pollute the message with sideshows and personal agendas. Other than that, I loved your video and appreciate the talent it took to not only produce it, but to COORDINATE the entire event.
#12 by jimmy blue eyes on 07/09/2013 - 11:03 pm
BOB BOB BOB…. was reading an article about rand paul…and one of his associates who writes for and with him…..and I swear…there is a version of the mini mantra in here…a usa today article…that I first discovered on drudge
http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/2502637
#13 by jimmy blue eyes on 07/09/2013 - 11:16 pm
Correction….not on drudge…I have way too many news apps on my phone, lol….but the quote is “diversity is a codeword for non-white”
#14 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 2:04 am
Man….why is my reply to Genseric’s important question “awaiting moderation”? This thread will be long dead by the time it gets moderated.
#15 by OldBlighty on 07/10/2013 - 2:46 am
You have to log in from the SWARM forum, otherwise the moderation kicks in.
#16 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 3:13 am
Thanks. But it didn’t kick in for my short comment. I just came here from viewing the working page, so I’ll try again.
#17 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 3:16 am
Nope. didn’t work.
#18 by Jmcaul on 07/10/2013 - 3:18 am
I just saw Bob’s comment on the website. I added the following (awaiting their moderation) we’ll see if they approve or censor so for the record, here it is:
“Let me just be sure I understand this article correctly: When blacks advocate in their own racial interest it is seen as healthy and good. When Asians advocate in their racial interest it is seen as healthy and good. When Mexicans or Jews advocate in their racial interest it is seen as healthy and good. When Whites advocate in our racial interest it is ‘racist’ and bad. Ok. I get it. thank you SPLC for clarifying your position!”
#19 by H.Avenger on 07/10/2013 - 3:11 pm
What he said. No one actually takes these guys seriously. And if someone does….they invariably are AntiWhite.
Debacle? lol. Typically a debacle would be something based on actually facts that will hold up over any length of time.
This all comes down to the basics. Firestaters start fires. Attacking the firestarters would have been good strategy 3.5 years ago. Now it becomes a fools game. You have an actual fire to contend with and the fire is rising.
#20 by Asgardian117 on 07/10/2013 - 3:30 pm
Its no longer a “fire pit” H. đ
#21 by Daniel Genseric on 07/10/2013 - 8:54 pm
I was referring to what happened with BoardAd and company.
I wrote a mini a long time ago, H. In essence, it contained the very point you and Adelheim make in ARH. You know what Bob wrote? “Genseric, that is worse than posting NOTHING at all.” I got my dick slapped. Was Ole Bob right?
Hell yes.
Not saying you intended to, but please don’t pollute the message with sideshows and personal agendas. Other than that, I loved your video and appreciate the talent it took to not only produce it, but to COORDINATE the entire event.
#22 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 9:57 pm
Genseric makes a point about ARH that we should consider. Bob nixed a popular mini we were using for much less:
African countries for Africans.
Asian countries for Asians.
Israel for Jews or you’re an anti-semite!
White countries for everyone or you’re a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews!
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
I loved ARH when it came out, but wondered if it fit our idea of what our propaganda should be, and I thought of that rejected mini.
But when Bob enthusiastically endorsed the video, I thought, well, maybe it’s so very good that the old rules don’t apply to it.
If the idea of ARH had been vetted by Bob at its inception, I wonder if he would have approved it or nixed it.
I’d wondered vaguely why the splc piece dwelled so long on ARH, but after I read Genseric’s comment above, I understood. Of course Jews who love Israel, and also donate to splc, see the video as just an attack on Israel. And a very vicious attack since it has Hitler in it.
The unfortunate reality is that a lot of us here have careers and families and need to protect our identities. At least I assume. I’m old and have much less to protect.
Otoh, it was Bob or someone who posted quite strongly that if any of us think we can do what we’re doing and forever escape close scrutiny, we’re mistaken. I think that’s probably right too. Some disagree, but I think an organization like the splc can probably get personal info on just about anyone they want through various networks. Even good private investigators have contacts in gov’t departments that give them what they need, I believe.
This is something we all need to think about IMO, including Bob.
If this comment escapes the moderation machinery, I’ll put up another related one that I need some input on.
#23 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 6:30 pm
HORUS tried to post this reply to me, but it didn’t go up, so he sent it to me as an email. So let me see if I can get it up.
No luck, let me try it in 2 parts.
I posted the below for you on the following BUGS thread. It is not showing up for some reason. And on number 3, I do not mean to insinuate that Ole Bob was the sole master mind on the delivery date for ARH….just that he was aware of the discussion etc
“HD,
1) Bob was probably enforcing some discipline in regards to the Mantra. There is a difference between Mantra posting and Mantra thinking. IMO, you are probably over reading into things.
2) I would heed Seapea’s advice in regards to your petition idea.
3) In regards to ARH, Bob not only knew about the idea. He picked the delivery date. And was Johnny on the spot demanding to see it on that date. Timing is very important for any endevor. Had it been 3 years ago….I would probably agree that it would not be an idea time to release something like ARH. The Mantra was not out there far enough.
(continued in next post)
#24 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 6:36 pm
(continued from last post. From Horus)
4) Those that do not have websites and are just out there posting the Mantra do not have to think too much about Genserics proposition. Once you have website up….you have to make some type of decision. IMO, you are not going to be PhiloSemitic and fight White GeNOcide long term. I have always said the Jewish Elites are not the ONLY ones pushing White GeNOcide. But you would be a naive fool to think they are not involved. You would be a fool twice to just put your head in the sand and ignore them. Since every day we get more and more quotes from the Jews bragging about their involvement. Furthermore, it would be dishonest on the part of a website owner like me to just ignore them since someone is always going to be sending the quotes to my inbox. Everyone knows I am not consumed with the Jewish Question. I don’t do N&J’s. I am tired of hearing about them. Unfortunately for them…..so is the rest of the planet.
One last thought ….since I am on vacation reading BUGS and posting ……. hoping this goes through.
(continued next post)
#25 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 7:15 pm
I worked for over an hour trying to get the complete post from Horus up. Can’t get the last part up.
But hey, I got 2 out of 3 parts in just over an hour! That’s great for this website! đ
#26 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 10:25 pm
I want very much to include this petition among the August ones, without making a huge deal of it. I think including the petition just this once would be good for a lot of reasons. When has an organization attacked by the splc ever had the opportunity to speak back from the White House, no less? (I think many of you don’t yet get that that petition site is now an internationally used forum and is a fairly hot item in the news and political world.)
(Aug #3 of 4) Honor Southern Poverty Law Center for FIGHTING WHITE GENOCIDE!
The Southern Poverty Law Center has written an article that explains very clearly how WHITE GENOCIDE is being carried out world-wide by massive immigration and forced assimilation in White countries.
Their article quotes,
“When anti-whites talk about mixing races, it’s only in white countries. They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
The article conveys very well that massive immigration and forced assimilation is genocide not only when it’s done to Tibetans in Tibet, but also when it’s done to Whites in White countries.
We ask the officials who will decide the award to please overlook any calumnies that the SPLC’s article expresses toward others who fight White Genocide, since the organization’s fund-raising requires that.
I have doubts about running it. I don’t want to make us more of an ongoing target for the splc than we already are, but on the other hand, I don’t like the feeling that they have us so in their grip that we need to worry about them one way or the other. But that last may be letting my feeling outrun reality.
I think running that petition (as long as we don’t make a big deal out of it, which would be undignified and would be a distortion of our focus) would be a good thing, if we feel that we can bear any heat that may come from it.
To not run it, what I need to hear at least in private from some of you whom I know, and who know me enough to trust me, is that it makes you too fearful of your personal anonymity. Just PM me at SF, let me know who you are, and say something like, “I’d rather you didn’t run the petition for the reason you stated,” and I’ll know what you mean, and our correspondence will remain private. And if I know you, there’s a good chance I’ll be swayed.
So far, no other reasons are swaying me from running the low key petition above. But my mind is open, and I hope I’ll get some feedback about this either on this thread or in private.
#27 by seapea on 07/11/2013 - 5:16 am
I like the SPLC petition. You may want to consider posting it w/o the tie-in to the monthly petitions, let it stand out there on it’s own. Post it mid-month, while the iron is hot.
Honor Southern Poverty Law Center for FIGHTING WHITE GENOCIDE!
#28 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 9:34 am
If we had 300 Stalwarts already instead of the present 86, so that I could ask half of them to sign mid-month instead of on the FIRST in order to get that petition up, I’d probably risk that complication in the Stalwarts’ operation, since your idea strikes me as a good one.
But I never again want to try to get a petition up on my own. Only the few who’ve tried that have any idea how hard it is. It’s not something I’m willing or probably even able to do anymore.
The Stalwarts aren’t a convenience, or just an entertaining lark (although I certainly enjoy them), they’re a necessity, and that’s why I urge everyone unceasingly to become one.
Anyone who has not, please do. Those who have, please think of someone you know who might also join:
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hey-buddy-can-you-spare-5-minutes-at-the-beginning-of-each-month-to-help-stop-white-genocide/
And thank you, seapea, for being a Stalwart! đ
ErwinRommelRabbit, are you a Stalwart?
#29 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 9:56 am
Lord Nelson, jimmyblueeyes, are you Stalwarts? Horus, thanks for signing every month on the FIRST… that’s what the Stalwarts are about…if everyone who does that will also “formally” become a Stalwart, that makes the group concrete and helps it grow.
http://whitegenocideproject.com/hey-buddy-can-you-spare-5-minutes-at-the-beginning-of-each-month-to-help-stop-white-genocide/
I agree with your comment above btw, but I think the need of some of us here for anonymity needs to be taken into account if it can be. Already we’ve lost a moderator, and a traitor is posting freely here among us, which is at least a bit weird and uncomfortable. In the long run that will probably be small potatoes, and seems to already be for bugsters with thicker skin than my own…thank goodness for them!
#30 by ErwinRommelRabbit on 07/10/2013 - 10:33 pm
I kinda like the idea. Playing a little dirty? Sure…but the enemy does so why not us?
#31 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 10:34 pm
I urge everyone who’s interested in doing so to right now copy the current splc article on us in case they change it later.
#32 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/10/2013 - 10:52 pm
I think one good effect of the petition is that it would arouse interest among pro-Whites. I think almost all of us who have come to Bugs have come here from being exposed to Bugs at other pro-White sites. We may complain about those sites…no one has more than myself, I think…but there is actually some receptivity there, and we ourselves are the proof. I’m slowly gaining Stalwarts from SF…we have 85 Stalwarts now, and I’ve hardly sent out invitations lately.
I think it will reflect very well on us among pro-Whites if we run that petition. Either that, or it will scare them to death? Can’t be sure! I’m uneasy myself since all this began, but this seems to me like an opportunity to slightly change the vibe of pro-whites not being able to respond to attacks because THERE’S BEEN NO WAY TO. The defensive and even simpering responses that have been sent to the Anti-Defamation League, WHICH THE PUBLIC DOESN’T EVEN SEE, will not be like this response which will be made PUBLICLY, from a HOT SITE at THE WHITE HOUSE.
Hey, my mind is open. I’ve felt very confused about doing a petition like this or not.
I meant this to be a response to ERR.
#33 by ErwinRommelRabbit on 07/10/2013 - 11:40 pm
Sure it would most certainly garner interest amongst other Pro-Whites and I think any of the smart ones who read the petition and then read the SPLC article will get that we’re kinda playing a dirty little trick on the SPLC. I can’t imagine Pro-Whites would be turned off by us skewing a bunch of Anti-Whites words for our own benefit heh. and if they DON’T get it..Well they’re not the sharpest tool in the drawer anyway and I don’t care what they think honestly. We can play this both ways if we’re smart….to the Pro-Whites it’s a big joke. To the Anti-Whites you could argue that the article itself doesn’t even bother attacking the validity of the claim, they simply insinuate that this is somehow a pretext to violence and therefore even the SPLC itself realises there IS truth in it. If there WASEN’T truth to it, why not talk about THAT. Point THAT out?
It’s subversive as hell on all Fronts if played right..
Now what are the possible down sides. The ONLY thing I honestly see is someone going “Look at these guys, they lie and skew things”
Of course they would most likley be the same Anti-Whites who ignore the exact same kind of lying and cheating THEIR side does but ah well, such is the way of things….Overall I say it’s a winning idea!
#34 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 12:10 am
Well thanks, ERR. Actually, if we run the petition, I don’t think anti-whites will even be aware of it, except rarely. But I think it should make an impression in the news and politics world that pays attention to the White House site…and sprinkled in that world are some people who will one day be on our side. And it’s good to show them we have a little spunk and will twist the knife back when we’re attacked. Seems to me. If we can do it, that is. As I said above, I don’t want to outrun our real life capabilities.
Basically, I just want to include the petition and not make a big deal about it…if we run it, I may entitle the SF thread on the August petitions, “Anti-White Watch: White House asked to honor $PLC for fighting WHITE GENOCIDE,” but in my comments on that thread I’m going to very much take a tone that it’s small potatoes, and am going to keep the focus on our message.
#35 by Asgardian117 on 07/11/2013 - 9:08 am
“Such is the way of things” that sounds much different when read out loud when compared to reading it. Its sounds quite nice when read aloud, but flat when read quitely. Just an observation.
#36 by ErwinRommelRabbit on 07/11/2013 - 12:21 am
Exactly. Small Potatoes. Just a nice little counter punch for the SPLC’s article đ
#37 by Daniel Genseric on 07/11/2013 - 9:36 pm
I would just like to comment that naming the jew or strongly emphasizing their role IS NOT OUR JOB. Period. We recently had a few people get in hot water because we did not stick to our script.
Our job, as I understand it, is to do one thing and do that one thing EXCEPTIONALLY well. Most of the time we do just that and deliver the goods on time.
Disseminate the truth about white genocide – worldwide. That has been specified as our job specialization since day 1. N&J is theirs. Let’s keep it that way. If you want your personal details to go down in the anti-white Annals of Naziswhowanttokillsixmillionjews with Duke, Black and the other Names, fine.
If you stay FOCUSED on this, you will not get it twisted.
#38 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 9:59 pm
@HORUS:
Horus, I appreciate very much the clarifications of my own position you’ve offered me in private, since it’s probably the best feedback I’ve gotten and may spare me a lot of grief.
But I don’t feel good that you’ve apparently decided to explicitly take on Jewish power, as you state above, or at the least, very strongly imply.
That’s a 180 degree turn around from what was, and it’s never been announced here at BUGS.
If Bob is endorsing this, he should have announced it. I suppose one could say I should have been bright enough to see it when ARH appeared. But how many here were that bright? Only possibly one, so far as I know.
If I and others were attacked and have to suffer whatever consequences come of that because a decision was made to take on Jewish power and we were not informed, I am very very very not happy.
#39 by OldBlighty on 07/11/2013 - 10:31 pm
While I don’t see antisemitism in the antiRacist Hitler video, any more than I see anti-Indianism in the first video, I agree it is a mistake to go after all Jews, instead of all anti-Whites. That is not the moral high ground. That is not why I am here.
And I’m not going to be part of groups that let White traitors off the hook. I know enough White traitors in RL, to know anti-White Jews would be a big fat zero without them. White traitors do enormous damage and they will do it all over again, if given a free pass like all the other times.
A one off video about Hitler and the Jews is not a big deal, but if it is video after video focusing on Jews, that would make me walk.
#40 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 10:50 pm
“While I donât see antisemitism in the antiRacist Hitler video”
No, me neither. In a comment further above, I was clearer…Jews will regard the video as an attack on Israel, and an especially vicious attack because it has Hitler in it. So of course there’s likely to be pushback as a result of it.
You and I certainly agree about White traitors.
“A one off video about Hitler and the Jews is not a big deal, but if it is video after video focusing on Jews, that would make me walk.”
I think I like that view a lot. ARH is so good that I can’t think clearly about whether it might have been a mistake or not.
I’m going to give some thought to whether or not I should promote it in the petitions though. I’m thinking not, or at least not so often.
I’m kicking myself for being so blind. I’m smart enough to have seen how Jews would react to that video. I’ve been a little too trusting here instead of relying on my own ability to draw conclusions.
#41 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 11:37 pm
@ HORUS
Horus, I see ARH as a separate topic from the post I put up for you at 6:36 pm 07/11/2013 above (It’s post #24 now, but could have a slightly higher number later).
It’s that post that really concerns me, because as I said, it seems to say that you are now going to confront Jewish power explicitly, a course that is in huge contradiction to what the announced policy at BUGs still is as far as I know.
If you’ve made an analytical decision you feel confident in that the time has come to confront Jewish power, I guess that’s what you should do, though it seems to me that separates you from BUGS, unless Bob is going to announce a similar change.
But if you have in fact come to such a decision, the things you say in that post make me wonder if you haven’t unintentionally been influenced by the nature of the visitors to your site. At White GeNOcide Project, we just send all stuff about Jews to the trash.
But all we’re trying to explain to readers at WGP is White Genocide, whereas you are doing podcasts where you’re trying to explain many of the detailed workings of the present world, so of course you’re going to need to talk about Jews.
I guess I wish you hadn’t started explaining the world to people, since that involves Jews and sets up a contradiction to BUGS, and we still need you at BUGS.
And of course no one here is “philosemitic” I think…lol!
#42 by Bob on 07/12/2013 - 12:01 pm
NO! I did NOT approve any slathering off into anti-Semitism.