The Heritage Foundation fired a researcher Jason Richwine because of a paper he had written at Harvard University, that infamous center of Nazi Propaganda, which, among many other things, noted that the lower IQ of Hispanics is largely hereditary.
National Review fired John Derbyshire for an article he wrote that among other things pointed out that five of six blacks were less intelligent than the average white.
A professor, Roger Lane, at a conference referred to himself as “The discredited professor from Emory.” He was the one who wrote such a grossly invented paper for gun control that his fellow mommy professors had to fire him despite his tenure.
It’s all a joke to him because he was immediately given high-paying jobs for his loyalty.
The researchers at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit in England who falsified global warming information so grossly, as revealed in their email, that even The Silence couldn’t protect them, lost nothing. The Silence has descended on this incident.
You have heard of Political Correctness. Marxism declares everything is political. Until around 1980 someone who read Marxist correspondence was familiar the term. “Politically correct” in Marxist terms is precisely the same as “doctrinally correct” in other religions.
I doubt if there is a single literate person today who actually believes that all races are equal in inherited intelligence. What National Review and the Heritage Foundation and the Global Warming industry are upholding is what I call Politically Factual.
Politically Factual is information which cannot be challenged in exactly the same way that attitudes or terminology must be Politically Correct.
Politically Factual is an important term for BUGS. We deal in information everyone knows is true but which one can be fired for pointing out.
#1 by Jason on 07/10/2013 - 8:12 am
I doubt if there is a single literate person today who actually believes that all races are equal in inherited intelligence
That is so true. It’s good to be reminded that nobody actually believes this stuff. I would add, I doubt hardly any illiterate person believes it either.
I still can’t wrap my head around why so many humans (including Whites) will spout some Political Fact they know can’t be true.
#2 by Asgardian117 on 07/10/2013 - 10:38 am
They have to jason the anti white establishment gives them no choice, if I came out now and recited the mantra at work I would probably be fired and possibly arrested. We as bugsers have to get ppl on message so they cant do the above BS because if 350 million ppl are sayin the same thing what can they do?
Ps non whites run with “we are all the same” because it bemefits them.
#3 by Gar5 on 07/11/2013 - 12:59 pm
Entirely because of image.
I remember when my father filled out an application for my school of choice years ago; he said we were Christian.
He drinks, swears, doesn’t believe in God, and never goes to church.
In public everyone’s a saint.
#4 by Jason on 07/11/2013 - 9:54 pm
I understand the need to say things publicly that one doesn’t believe privately (whether right or wrong I understand it). Frankly, it doesn’t bother me as much if it is done cynically. If you are working at a company that requires you to celebrate “diversity” to get a paycheck, that is one thing. But when people maintain this fiction in private circles, with people like me who make their feelings clear, I don’t understand it.
It will be obvious that certain people believe in racial differences by their actions (and even some statements), yet they will turn around and claim, even in PRIVATE, that “race isn’t that big a deal” to them and they embrace multiculturalism.
I wonder if it is because they don’t want to see themselves as knuckling under to power. I suspect THAT is what they don’t want to admit to themselves. They want to maintain the fiction, within their own mind, that they live in a totally free country where they can speak their mind. So, they end up proclaiming that they just “happen” to believe in the exact same thing the PC Police tell them to think.
#5 by jain on 07/10/2013 - 12:11 pm
Politically Factual is information which supports Politically Correct tenets, such as “All humans are equal”.
“Hate speech” is modern blasphemy: profaning the Holy Cows that are the sacred colored people.
No one is allowed to doubt their Holy Cows, and just how equal they are.
#6 by shari on 07/10/2013 - 7:38 pm
The discredited Emory professor was Michael Bellesiles. And yes, he talked to the students at the local U after he was discredited. They can tell “students”ANYTHING.
#7 by c-bear on 07/11/2013 - 4:48 am
I’m really not sure if anyone here reads new comments to old articles. If so, let me know, and I won’t be off subject. On 07/02/2013 “For Our Sake, Listen to the Silence! “ I had some old, but prevalent resentments stirred up. I’m sure, anyone who has been at this thing for any amount of time can relate to your experience with your PhD dissertation.
(And here comes the vent)
I’m getting really fed up with being screwed over for being pro-white. I’ve found my way so far, just scraping by. It is not because I stink. I don’t have a giant wart growing off my nose. I’m not dumb, or mean.
I’m over 40 and I still have all my hair, with only the slightest hint of silver. I am physically fit, and the ladies say I’m attractive. I graduated Highschool with honors at the age of 16. My family is, and has been, very successful for many generations. I come from good lines. Both sides of my family have been here in the States since Colonial times.
It all started in college. I spent much of my free time in the library. One day I happened on a book describing the Bolshevik Revolution in gory detail. I started asking questions. Not but a few weeks later I began getting harassed by the radical-liberal element. Then came the black thugs. Surrounding me in packs, they began knocking books out of my arms, and slapping my hat off from behind. This happened almost daily for weeks. I would try taking alternate routes, showing up late for class, the students would snicker. I went to the faculty, the dean. They told me it was all made up. An honor student, I dropped out after 3 semesters.
I get decent jobs. At work I’m a superstar. I run right up through the ranks, and just when I think I might have a career (usually after a few years), I’m outed for being “one of those ray-sists”.
(SIGH)
I am certain my story is not just mine alone. How does a guy make it in this world, if he’s just white and normal? I see so many younger white guys turning to booze and crime as a way out.
My heart goes out to them, and I can’t half blame them.
I see the anti-whites world crumbling at the seams, and I’m getting impatient.
Didn’t somebody say something about reparations?
After reading this, I realize, it’s kind of a downer comment. If I bummed anyone out I apologize. I can’t be upbeat all the time.
#8 by Epiphany on 07/11/2013 - 5:09 am
That says volumes about the Left, and their desire to stick up for the Soviet Union. If they fail that, they hope to sweep the whole memory of it away.
#9 by OldBlighty on 07/11/2013 - 12:28 pm
There’s only two groups that impressed me as a new comer to WN. That is Whitaker’s BUGS and Haman’s PLEs.
The reason Anti-Whites are able to punish Pro Whites so effectively, is we are all living in their anti-White PLE.
This is off topic for BUGS, so I’ll leave it at that.
#10 by beefcake on 07/11/2013 - 1:08 pm
That is an ugly experience C-bear, but that ALSO means you know first hand one of the puzzle pieces of the big picture.
You see where it fits into place.
Anti-Whitism absolutely leads to inhuman treatment of anyone White and normal who learns anything about the Truth of team Anti-White and happens to talk about it.
How is a White man supposed to get by in THIS world?
He isn’t, “supposed to” that is by Anti-White design.
What a White man ought to do, IS exactly what we ARE DOING.
We change the world.
That requires a professional consistent message.
First step in dealing with White Genocide is making it open for public discussion.
All of this posting the Mantra is forcing it into the public mindset and forcing it open for discussion.
That is the current objective we are steamrolling toward. Making White Genocide open for public discussion.
Changing the world requires that first step, and THAT is what we are DOING.
Glad to have you on board!
#11 by Jason on 07/11/2013 - 10:50 pm
Almost every white male has had his life made worse than it should have been. We were cheated. But our culture tells us not to “complain” (i.e. state facts). We need more Whites to speak publicly about how they’ve been hurt.
#12 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 11:43 pm
“We need more Whites to speak publicly about how they’ve been hurt.”
I wonder if we could have a special thread for that at White GeNOcide Project. It might work. All those hurts are part of the genocide process. I’ll mention it to the administrator.
#13 by Epiphany on 07/11/2013 - 5:07 am
Well, it just goes to show: though the Left loves to guilt trip everyone else about what the National Socialists did, they get nervous and even angry when the remarkably similar sins of the Soviet Communists are brought up.
Hit then where it hurts! Keep brining up Bolshevik sins!
#14 by Bob on 07/11/2013 - 10:46 am
c-bear, your experience is welcome here, but be sure you tell about it out there
#15 by Simmons on 07/11/2013 - 11:37 am
Ask them if they actually believe that stuff, and then give them a wry smile with a small dose of contempt.
#16 by Simmons on 07/11/2013 - 11:44 am
The Left only survives because the Right validates it with quibbling the details and never ever challenging the notion that the Left is supposedly morally superior.
Even the WN intellectuals do this. There is NO Left wing intellectual work of any quality, its all junk, and fairy tale nonsense. But since our intellectuals have a very large inferiority complex and simply cannot outgrow their college undergrad experience they never challenge the premise or the authority of the Left they simply quibble the details.
Have you ever heard a WN intellectual ask an anti-white to actually prove that the Blank Slate Theory is true and provable and that race is not real and all humans can be blended together with no consequence? No you have not, not once.
#17 by patrickwhiterabbit on 07/11/2013 - 4:27 pm
Off topic (i can’t post anything in the swarm area without it hitting the spam filter) but my latest meme pic has hit over 20k views in just over 3 hours! This one could go viral. It’s getting lots of comments
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=557769830930817&set=a.556631454377988.1073741826.549746618399805&type=1&theater
#18 by Harumphty Dumpty on 07/11/2013 - 10:12 pm
c-bear, yours is a story I’m not likely to soon forget. I’m truly sorry for your experiences.
——–
@ BOB:
Bob, has a decision been made to take on Jewish power now? I’m pretty sure you never announced such a decision.
But was your advance approval of AntiRacist Hitler meant to endorse that policy? It stupidly never occurred to me before yesterday that of course Jews would take the video as being just an attack on Israel, and an especially vicious attack because Hitler was in it, and pushback would of course follow.
I’m not a happy camper at the moment:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/07/09/quick-note-my-second-reply-to-the-splc-article/comment-page-1/#comment-63542
I wish you would read Horus’ comments on that same thread that seem to make plain that he’s decided to confront Jewish power more explicitly, and tell us if that’s a change you think is a good one now and that you want to see attached to the Mantra.
#19 by Epiphany on 07/12/2013 - 2:13 am
The non–Whites envy us. Were it not for Colonialism and the Transatlantic Slave Trade, they would still be living as savages in Africa and elsewhere.
The anti–Racists, of course, are actually terrified of Blacks, Jews, and Hispanics. And they give the latter more power by making excuses for them.
#20 by Jason on 07/15/2013 - 8:13 am
I’m still trying to understand difference between the Politically Correct and the Politically Factual. These 2 are Politically Factual I assume:
1. Race is just a social construct
2. We went to war to end Tyranny in WWII
The first is not actually believed by many people. The second is, I am afraid, believed by most, despite being pretty easily disproven with some reflection.
So, is the Politically Factual that which everyone parrots but no one believes? Or is it also that which people have actually swallowed too?
I like the concept, I am just trying to get it right.