Someone gave a link to a site about Dante’s Inferno, and the first and only thing I read in it was “the nine circles of Hell.”    If you went to a link defining the Commandments and it referred to the Nine Commandments I doubt you would read any further either.

“Why is this disinformation produced?”   I didn’t bother to find.  Have they repealed the Tenth Circle for traitors, or the First Circle, where Virtuous Pagans are not actually tortured?

That would make the title of Solzhenitsyn’s book, the First Circle, a bit off.

I don’t care.  There is plenty of internet crap where they simply repeal inconvenient facts.  In the Wikipedia version of Zoroaster, it declares his a false religion, that ancient Persia had no effect whatever on Jewish and Christian doctrine, and Z was absolutely sixth century BC, which Christians declare because the first record of Jewish monotheism is seventh century BC.

The BBC version of Zoroaster dates him from 1200 BC or up to a thousand years before.   This would mean that Cyrus, “who did the Lord’s work” for the Jews is likely to have introduced them to monotheism in the form of Zoroastrianism.

My essential point is that one simply cannot use the internet without having “Why is this information produced?” firmly and constantly in mind.

The days of just quoting some source are over.