Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Racism Out, White Supremacy In, I Wonder Why? WITH ADDITION

Posted by Bob on November 3rd, 2013 under Coaching Session, Mantra


At

http://takimag.com/radioderb#axzz2jWK17QjQ

John Derbyshire announces, with no reference to us, that the decline in the use of the word “racism” has been generally noted, as has its replacement with “white supremacy.”

But Nick Griffin has no fear of giving credit where it is deserved:

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/alert-stop-white-genocide?utm_campaign=ALERT_-_Stop_White_Genocide_-_Anti-Racist_means_Anti-White&utm_medium=Email&utm_source=SocialToaster

And incidentally, how can one be a white supremacist if his crime is that he wants nothing to do with non-whites?

How can you be a white supremacist when there is nobody around but white people?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/03/2013 - 10:11 am

    The MANTRA is in the middle of the street pounding on its chest screaming FEED ME MORE! It’s taking on a life of its own.

    White Supremacist…HA!!! At least they gave the term racist some thought. Hmm mm mm White Supremacist…..right right right lol.

    It’s LAUGHABLE it doesn’t he come out of the mouth fast enough racist racist racist was quick and easy white supremacist..eh not so much.

    In your own words Mr. “Anti White oops I mean Anti Racist” define the term White Supremacist in relation to the slogan Anti Racist is a Code Word for Anti White.

    We are waiting.

    • #2 by rabbit rebel on 11/03/2013 - 1:01 pm

      Lest we forget, their failure to hide their anti-White racial motives will be even more ridiculous. When they claim to race/Whites not existing, and in the meantime whine about “White supremacy”.

      Or how blatantly obvious they’re making their anti-Whitism by including (ALL&ONLY) White children as “evilnazisupremacists”.

      Their system is crumbling, and we’re having the time of our lives! Keep up the hard work everyone!

      http://s17.postimg.org/lyjyfuk3j/keep_calm_and_mantra_on_2.png

  2. #3 by The Beef on 11/03/2013 - 11:53 am

    I’ve also noticed this, a lot.

    I was sort of confused with the wanting to focus even more effort on “Diversity” and “Hate”, not that I take any issue with bringing the hammer down on ANY terminology Anti-Whites insist on using to silence Whites talking about White Genocide.

    Rather, the term that seems to have been getting used the most, that I have seen, especially in news articles, is “Supremacist” even when it relates to news about the large Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White posters.

    Supremacist seems to be their new go to word.

    We should take every opportunity to drop the hammer on it:

    ANTI-WHITES love to recycle labels for anyone who doesn’t support White Genocide.

    The Newest one is SUPREMACIST. They have also used HATE and RACIST.

    Anti-Whites love to use labels to confuse the issue.

    Supremacistnaziracistwhowantstoclonehitler – whatever they call you, its just another attempt to silence anyone White from talking about White Genocide.

    All this while Anti-White insist there is something inherently evil about White Children from the moment we are born.

    We can easily see why they think anyone who isn’t ok with White Genocide is the “bad guy”.

  3. #4 by -Gar5- on 11/03/2013 - 12:24 pm

    Will these “anti-white supremacists” (anti-Whites) as they’re calling themselves now, still take tax money from those they oppose?

    • #5 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/03/2013 - 2:49 pm

      Would we turn down down monies from anti-whites to fight white genocide?

      Interesting article:

      http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/24/a-modest-proposal-to-the-anti-defamation-league/

      “Your Top Ten report appears to be an important element of your fundraising outreach, which rakes in almost $60 million for your annual budget – on top of your $115 million net assets”

      “The truth is, all our groups are struggling, and our financial survival is at times in real jeopardy.

      Abe, this should worry you.

      What will you do if we go under? How will you raise such large sums of money? How in the world will you pay yourself two-thirds of a million dollars each year if you can’t scare your donors with distorted stories of what we do and frightening myths about why we do it?

      But there is a solution:

      I propose that you give If Americans Knew a nickel of each dollar you raise.”

    • #6 by -frank- on 11/03/2013 - 2:57 pm

      Gar, you answered the statement: “Only another kind of Supremacist would even think of using the term ‘white supremacist’.”

      The answer was “anti-white supremacist”. I like “Supremacist anti-Whites” even better.

      Some form of “Supremacist anti-Whites” will flip the script.

    • #7 by -frank- on 11/03/2013 - 2:59 pm

      “Only Supremacist anti-Whites use the term White Supremacist”

  4. #8 by -cecilhenry- on 11/03/2013 - 12:26 pm

    White supremacist is just a code word for anti-white.

    I see opportunities all over the place where

    ‘Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everyone??’

    could be placed on bullboards.

    50,000 a day in rush hour traffic staring at that bullboard really gets the mind thinking after a while.

    That’s the potential. Just sitting there. LEt the connection and realization come in the silence.

  5. #9 by -Gar5- on 11/03/2013 - 2:13 pm

    Bob, I tested your “Diversity is a codeword for anti-White”.

    http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/diversity-is-a-code-word-for-anti-white/question-4021511/?page=1&new=1&scroll=1#post_118273687

    The anti-White that responded to me basically said nothing about my argument; his response was that I, and other Bugsters have bad grammar . . . I hope you can find that as amusing as I did!

    • #10 by GregP on 11/03/2013 - 4:11 pm

      Gar5,

      They will always use misdirection. And we shouldn’t worry about being 100% correct in grammar.

      But it’s also going to stick out to normal White people, who tend to speak our language better than the diversities in our countries. It will annoy a lot of normal White people (AKA our audience) and redirect them from our POINT.

      Anti-White: someone that promotes, supports, or defends White Genocide.

      “Diversity” is anti-White BECAUSE it is a code word for White Genocide.

  6. #12 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/03/2013 - 2:39 pm

    That’s the same argument they have always had gar…misdirection and evasion of the accusation. The mantra hammer will do the same to diversity as what was done to racist.

  7. #13 by -frank- on 11/03/2013 - 2:50 pm

    Only another kind of Supremacist would even think of the term “White Supremacist”.

  8. #14 by mandela on 11/03/2013 - 4:35 pm

    Saying White Supremecy does not justify the Rape (plunder, despoilation) of Whites.

  9. #15 by pdappui on 11/03/2013 - 5:44 pm

    Dear BUGSers,

    I’m new here, and I know you guys will take my suggestions with a grain of salt. I have a few points.

    1) What to do with hate? Joe Sobran, a brilliant conservative columnist (of the non respectable variety) once said that “an anti-Semite used to mean someone who hated Joos (my ironic spelling), but now it’s someone hated by the Joos”

    This is a brilliant model that can be amended accordingly.

    How about

    “A White Supremacist used to be someone who hated minorities, now its simply a thought-criminal whom the anti-white establishment hates.”

    This can be amended as the occasion/environment demands. I’ve used “neo-liberal establishment” or “global capitalist establishment” or even “McCarthyite establishment” instead of “anti-white establishment” if that’s what my audience is more disposed to appreciate. The meaning is the same.

  10. #16 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/03/2013 - 6:25 pm

    White supremacist is a Code Word for any white person who does not partake in their races own genocide.

  11. #17 by mandela on 11/03/2013 - 7:10 pm

    pdap – I like that, will try it out
    Asgardian – White supremacist is a Code Word for Whites resisting White GeNOcide.

  12. #18 by Sentinel on 11/03/2013 - 9:41 pm

    The only kind of Supremacy I’ve ever heard of is White Supremacy. Why is that, anti-White??

    A White Supremacist is a white person who’s not working hard enough to get rid of white people.

    White Supremacist is a codeword for Hard to Kill.

    Isn’t a White Supremacist someone who insists that only White countries are the Land of Opportunity and therefore all non-Whites must emigrate to them?

    I went fishing the other day… Caught a few and put them on ice, but this one big lunker just wouldn’t take the bait. Must have been a Trout Supremacist.

    A White Supremacist is anyone who’s against White Genocide.

    • #19 by Truck Roy on 11/05/2013 - 9:25 pm

      Great lines! I am going to use a few of those.

      • #20 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/05/2013 - 9:36 pm

        Truck, are you going to be doing more radio shows?

  13. #21 by dubya on 11/04/2013 - 7:42 am

    I’m WW, from Spain.

    You will WANT to read this!

    http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/anti-racist-code-anti-white

  14. #22 by Bob on 11/04/2013 - 8:08 am

    Gar5, speaking of the proper use of language, how can one be a White Supremacist if one’s crime is wanting nothing to do with non-whites? How can one be a white supremacist among nothing BUT whites?

    • #23 by -Gar5- on 11/04/2013 - 1:09 pm

      Exactly Bob.

      They SAY they oppose “White supremacism”, which the real world definition of is: Whites who want to live with just Whites.

    • #24 by Daniel Genseric on 11/04/2013 - 6:14 pm

      White Supremacist is a code word for white survivalist.

    • #25 by SixGun on 11/05/2013 - 8:28 am

      It is the same as the White privilege nonsense.
      How can I have White privilege in my ancestral homeland?
      This is why the notion of White privilege has never gained traction in Europe. It is too easy to smash down, even the brainwashed puppets have trouble swallowing this garbage.

  15. #26 by Simon on 11/04/2013 - 8:39 am

    So your a white supremacist if you want to be left alone, but not if you want non-whites to do the jobs you don’t want to do, like mow your lawn, look after your children, drive you, and serve your food.

  16. #27 by Simon on 11/04/2013 - 8:43 am

    White Supremacist – someone who thinks that whites should do their own dirty jobs.

    Non-White Supremacist – somone who thinks non-whites should do the dirty for jobs for whites.

  17. #28 by Jason on 11/04/2013 - 8:50 am

    We’ve extracted a major confession from Anti-Whites on this one. The move from “racist” to “White Supremacist” means they are being forced to show their hand.

    Before, they could hide behind the fig leaf of “anti-racism” as if they were against racism in general, when in fact they couldn’t care less about Black or Asian racism. It was always an attack against Whites only.

    Now, we are getting closer to the heart of it: we made them publicly admit that it is WHITES they have a problem with, in particular Whites who want to be left alone and be allowed to exist. By destroying their pretense of “anti-racism”, we have gone a layer deeper.

    At least I hope so. We still need to keep hammering anti-racism, this is just a beginning.

    • #29 by SwampRabbit on 11/04/2013 - 10:38 am

      Good points. I see “supremacist” a lot, too. And, I have had similar thoughts to yours and in the original post. I never said anything about being superior to anyone. I just don’t want to be one of [them].
      Another anti-White pejorative that I’ve encountered is “Separatist”, which confirms Mantra points. The same people, who argue in favor of “freedom of association”, HATE people who choose not to associate. But there is no freedom of association without the ability to choose to not associate with someone. Anti-Whites claim that we want to deny the rights of non-Whites, but they fail to recognize the present denial of our rights.
      I see a lot of people argue against collectivism, especially Libertarians, then vilify that which they identify as Separatism. Libertarians claim to oppose use of force, yet support forced associations, under the banner of “freedom of association”. It’s would be ludicrous…except it’s not really funny at all.

  18. #30 by -Blackbyte on 11/04/2013 - 11:08 am

    A White Supremacist is anyone that likes being White.

  19. #31 by -Blackbyte on 11/04/2013 - 11:11 am

    A White Supremacist is anyone with a high regard for European culture and heritage.

    • #32 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/04/2013 - 6:26 pm

      You have a different profile….I like it I just don’t know how you did it.

  20. #33 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/04/2013 - 11:27 am

    “Incidentally, how can one be a white supremacist if his crime is that he wants nothing to do with non-whites?”

    This is EXCELLENT coach…I have used something similar in my talking points (we just want to be left alone) I have used it AFTER I made my points about ariacwfaw and how this is only happening to white countries. They BLOW THEIR LIDS. I had a white anti white go as far as saying that a white country would be attacked with a nuclear weapon.

  21. #34 by pdappui on 11/04/2013 - 11:27 am

    Bob… how about this one?

    A white man who wants to bomb brown people in brown countries is a “respectable conservative”

    A white man who wants to import millions of brown people to white countries so they can do his laundry is a “progressive”

    A white man who wants nothing to do with non-whites is a “supremacist”

  22. #35 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/04/2013 - 11:33 am

    My response to that was…”So whites with a homogeneous country would be attacked for enforcing immigration policies the way African and Asian countries do? How do you feel about african and asian countries being nuked for simply wanting to exsist. Of course you don’t want that you only want white people genocided via forced assimilation or nuclear bombs either way it works for you.

  23. #36 by pdappui on 11/04/2013 - 11:56 am

    (Spoken to anti-white)

    -When you try to kill my children, it’s “social justice.” If I dare to protect them, it’s “hate.”

    -When you accuse me of hate, what you actually mean is that the very existence of my white children is hateful to you.

    –Gated Communities for the Rich, Diversity for the Poor

    —Interesting. So by your definition, a white person who wants to live around other whites is a “supremacist.” In that case, “supremacy” is OK as long as one separates oneself on the basis of being able to afford an expensive house like yours. What you really mean by supremacist, then, in the pejorative sense, are those loser NON-MILLIONAIRE whites who think they deserve to live in safe-neighborhoods too. Gotcha. (almost verbatim from an actual convo I had)

  24. #37 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/04/2013 - 12:01 pm

    Hate is a Code Word for white neighborhoods.

  25. #38 by Hexadecimator777 on 11/04/2013 - 12:55 pm

    Mr. Whitaker asks a very important question:

    “how can one be a white supremacist if his crime is that he wants nothing to do with non-whites?

    How can you be a white supremacist when there is nobody around but white people?”

  26. #39 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/04/2013 - 1:05 pm

    That’s the whole point hex…White people have had their fair share of diversity, they don’t want anymore. Now they call white people who just want to be left alone supremacists. Imo it’s no where near as strong as racism and THEY KNOW IT they are panicking. Any person REGARDLESS of race can see wanting to be left alone does NOT equate supremacy and the anti whites KNOW this.

  27. #40 by -Gar5- on 11/05/2013 - 5:00 am

    I’ve had a bit of a think. The reason why we’re called “supremacist” is just a media “attention grabber”.

    Originally, they used to call us “separatists”, the point being here is that we wanted to be left alone, so Joe Public thought “How does that effect me?”

    With “Supremacist”, it is designed to make Joe Public think “Oh no, they’re after me!”.

    • #41 by Jason on 11/05/2013 - 5:30 am

      You are right, I’ve heard them use White Separatist in the past, but it doesn’t carry a punch that scares anybody.

      They must paint us as ominous, scary, intimidating … a threat. And always without moral standing. As everyone here knows, we aren’t trying to scare non-Whites.

      We really should have a way to respond to the “White Supremacist” label and we certainly shouldn’t just accept it.

  28. #42 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/05/2013 - 7:40 am

    Absolutely jason, anyone hear can read are comments and see that we mean to scare no one.

    If actually read aloud 99.9% of our comments are quite sensible to anyone….they just need to get past the programming first..

  29. #43 by Simmons on 11/05/2013 - 10:48 am

    I’m gonna try and word this so Bob and the ranting obsessives do not have fits, don’t have fits.

    The anti-whites use of the phrase “white supremacists” will allow us to interject our memes into all sorts of “respectable conservative” conversations.

    These conversations will not be exact Mantra wordings, so don’t jump down my throat. I’m doing advance work not debating the punctuation of our latest sound bite.

    • #44 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/05/2013 - 11:45 am

      It’s all about the audience 😉

  30. #45 by Dick Whitman on 11/05/2013 - 3:55 pm

    Replies to the “White Supremacist” smear.

    “Anytime a White person opposes the on-going program of White genocide they are called a “White Supremacist.””

    Or

    Are Jews called “supremacists” for wanting Jews to survive?

    Are blacks called “supremacists” for wanting blacks to survive?

    Only Whites are called “supremacists” for wanting our people to survive.

    This IS White genocide.

    Or

    When black people advocate for their people it’s called “civil rights.”

    When Jews advocate for their people it’s called “lobbying.”

    When White people advocate for their people it’s called “White Supremacy.”

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

  31. #46 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/05/2013 - 4:54 pm

    It`s a funny kind of supremacy that asks for an open public discussion of ongoing genocide.

  32. #48 by Daniel Genseric on 11/05/2013 - 7:58 pm

    Only in the anti-whites’ world does survival = supremacy.

    White supremacist is a code word for white survivalist.

    STOP white genocide worldwide

  33. #49 by Henry Davenport on 11/05/2013 - 9:39 pm

    Critique always invited (I’ve posted it here):
    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/attacks-against-the-term-white-supremacism/#post-54525

    (Dec #3 of 3) Stop calling Whites who oppose WHITE GENOCIDE “White Supremacists”

    Suppose Japan were being flooded with millions of non-Japanese, and Japanese were forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

    Would you call any Japanese man who protested that genocide of his race a “Japanese Supremacist”?

    ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with millions of non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

    But if I call for an open discussion of this genocide of my race, the White race, you call me a “White supremacist.”

    You say you’re anti-racist. What you are is anti-WHITE.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    • #50 by Jason on 11/05/2013 - 10:28 pm

      I like it.

      • #51 by Henry Davenport on 11/05/2013 - 11:06 pm

        I think I’ll use Tibet instead of Japan.

      • #52 by Henry Davenport on 11/06/2013 - 12:02 am

        Isn’t this better?

        (Dec. #3 of 3) Are Tibetans who oppose their genocide “Tibetan Supremacists”?

        Tibet is being flooded with millions of Chinese, and Tibetans are forced by law to integrate with the Chinese so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

        Are Tibetans who oppose their genocide, “Tibetan supremacists”?

        ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with millions of third world non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

        But if I call for an open discussion of this genocide of my race, the White race, you call me a “White supremacist.”

        Stop calling Whites who call for public discussion of White Genocide, “White supremacists”!

        You say you’re anti-racist. What you are is anti-WHITE!

        Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

        • #53 by Jason on 11/06/2013 - 12:11 am

          I like that too.

        • #54 by Sentinel on 11/08/2013 - 8:21 pm

          Tibetan Supremacist… Love it!

          That would actually make an awesome animation. The Dalai Lama could be verbally abused by ”anti-racists” and made out to be a Skoal dipping backwoods doofus.

          • #55 by Henry Davenport on 11/08/2013 - 10:29 pm

            That’s a great idea. I’m going to email it to Horus right now.

  34. #56 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 11/05/2013 - 11:10 pm

    That is right Coach, Segregation eliminates White Privilege.

    Any one who is opposed to the natural order of segregation must be in favor of White Privilege.

    Stop the hate– separate!

    • #57 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/05/2013 - 11:46 pm

      Talking about segregation is “policies”, and it could be argued so is:

      “wants nothing to do with non-whites?

      How can you be a white supremacist when there is nobody around but white people?”

  35. #58 by -4MyNation- on 11/06/2013 - 12:23 am

    Bob, has it been concluded which is the best way to attack “diversity” and “white supremacist”? We don’t need the team out using a bunch of different phrases, right? The power of repeating the exact same phrase is what we need. I think if you decided the best ones and just wrote a blog post and said “use this and this, period” that would get us all on the same page and get the job done. I’ve seen a bunch of different ones, and am not sure which are best. Maybe I’ve missed something through all the threads and posts.
    I for one trust your judgement most since you’re the coach and you got this whole thing off the ground. I know you said “Diversity is a code word for Anti-White” and “How can one be a white supremacist if his crime is that he wants nothing to do with non-whites? How can you be a white supremacist when there is nobody around but white people?” We going with these? Or am I jumping the gun and we need more field testing? I just think we should all be saying the same phrases. Thanks

  36. #59 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/06/2013 - 3:12 am

    Wow…look at all you guys kicking ass. I’m in awe…I really am.

  37. #60 by -algiz- on 11/06/2013 - 7:34 am

    Anti-Whites hate Whites yet condemn hate.

  38. #61 by Hudson Valley Rabbit on 11/06/2013 - 2:02 pm

    “how can one be a White Supremacist if one’s crime is wanting nothing to do with non-whites? How can one be a white supremacist among nothing BUT whites?” <– Bob brings out an excellent point here.

    Being that this Fact has been extracted & sits all by itself under a spotlight to be analyzed. We can make this a real tough sale for anti-Whites if we work more on it.

  39. #62 by The Beef on 11/06/2013 - 4:31 pm

    It is interesting that “Racist” was the Anti-Whites best term, in that before we came along they would use it in such a dynamic way to silence Whites. The reason is that “Racist” in and of itself had a vague definition.

    It could be used to describe anyone White who said we had given unique gifts to the world, OR anyone who even claimed Race existed at all. It used to appear legitimate before we came along and pointed out it was ALWAYS and ONLY a term used to silence Whites.

    Supremacist seems like a feeble attempt to hold onto the message. Oh of course we will bring the hammer down on it, we are here to destroy ALL the Anti-White terminology.

    The thing about Supremacist is that it has so much more of an Obvious definition, in that its accusing ones opponent of claiming superiority.

    It being clearly out of place will seem much more evident much faster to the Audience. They can easily see when its pointed out that we are not claiming superiority. We are not claiming a right to dominate anyone else.

    Rather we are fighting for the right to preserve our people and to even be able to safely have open public discussion on our own ongoing Genocide!

  40. #64 by Sentinel on 11/06/2013 - 6:48 pm

    Supremacy can only exist where Diversity exists.

  41. #65 by Jason on 11/06/2013 - 8:48 pm

    YouTube is starting it’s changes. Suddenly they have a button for sorting comments by most popular vs newest, and most popular is the default.

    I’m sure more changes are coming to filter us out. So, instead of debating minutia and telling me how you “kicked an anti-Whites ass on a blog that 4 people read”, or debating some trivia to death on a side thread, please go actually post something while you still can.

    I mean, if you are actually wanting to do any WORK.

    • #66 by LinuxLewis on 11/06/2013 - 8:59 pm

      I released a private video about 3 weeks ago that covers this – and how to use it in our favor. If you have contact with Genseric/BritishBugster/Nelson or any of the others in private ask them for the link

    • #67 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/06/2013 - 9:01 pm

      Then we have to change its that simple.

      • #68 by Jason on 11/06/2013 - 9:11 pm

        What does that mean? The chance to have a big impact on YouTube is probably coming to an end soon. While we discusses bullsh*t

  42. #69 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 11/06/2013 - 9:04 pm

    The fact that a well known political party not only admitted that the on going world wide genocide of White Children exists, it even publicly took a stand to STOP WHITE GENOCIDE!

    This is HUGE!

    We are moving forward and gaining ground.

    Let the enemy tremble.

  43. #70 by LinuxLewis on 11/06/2013 - 9:07 pm

    Why are my posts being removed?

    • #71 by Sys Op on 11/06/2013 - 9:11 pm

      Please review our long skype. All comments about several in-fighting threads, which are gone under mutual consent, have been removed.

      Tailgating. Please continue that older debate and discussion in a private area.

      It’s not about you. Any of you.

      • #72 by LinuxLewis on 11/07/2013 - 12:16 am

        you are misusing the term tailgating since what i said was 100% relevant to the thread….

        but regardless i want to take my toys and go home – are you guys going to let me do that or what?

  44. #73 by Henry Davenport on 11/06/2013 - 9:36 pm

    White supremacism is scoring highest on the test and losing the job to a less-qualified minority member.

  45. #74 by Henry Davenport on 11/06/2013 - 9:44 pm

    White supremacism is having your privacy protected when the national media doesn’t report the kidnap, rape, torture, and murder of your son or daughter by minority members.

    • #75 by Henry Davenport on 11/06/2013 - 9:48 pm

      Oops. These don’t stick to White Genocide.

      • #76 by AnotherOne on 11/06/2013 - 10:02 pm

        HD,
        I’d just include another talking point below it that goes into White Genocide.

    • #77 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/06/2013 - 10:00 pm

      Yes it does HD…Anti White Terror.

  46. #78 by LinuxLewis on 11/06/2013 - 11:52 pm

    @Bob when did you change the TTGH rule? I’m trying to do it and I’m being told that i can’t take my toys…. where is the post that says this rule no longer applies?

  47. #79 by Henry Davenport on 11/07/2013 - 12:21 am

    Don Black mentioned once that there’s an Apple computer store in Britain that’s named “Stormfront.”

    They’re “Apple Supremacists,” Don quipped.

  48. #80 by Henry Davenport on 11/07/2013 - 12:42 am

    White supremacism

    1. Telegraph, telephone, radio, television.

    Better than the tom-tom

    2. Computer.

    Better than the abacus.

    3. Pick-up trucks.

    Better than the travois.

    • #81 by Jason on 11/07/2013 - 1:53 am

      I’d say those are good points for extended casual conservation but not as lines to use with Mantra work. Because it borders on arguing about how good White people are, when we aren’t doing that as BUGS.

      • #82 by Henry Davenport on 11/07/2013 - 2:47 am

        You’re right, they’re PURE TAILGATING!

        And in this case, they’re tailgating that even attacks directly the fact I want to push that “White supremacist” is just a hate word that anti-whites hide behind to carry out White genocide.

        Thanks, Jason!

        I’ll leave them up as perfect examples of what NOT TO DO!

        Thanks, Jason.

        • #83 by Henry Davenport on 11/07/2013 - 3:00 am

          Sys Op is working super super hard on this site (I know for a fact), something we should all know and remember and appreciate when we suddenly need to edit and can’t!

          But how the ego suffers to leave those stupid errors and incomprehensible sentences!

  49. #84 by Jason on 11/07/2013 - 2:03 am

    On White Supremacy, Bob said that the Tea Party was the last gasp of the idea that White Supremacy was in still effect.

    Please read if you haven’t:

    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2010/11/25/the-tea-party-is-the-last-gasp-of-white-supremacy/

    It is amazing how many regular Whites STILL think, on some unconscious level, that they run things and are the vast majority.

    It is a barrier to get them to accept genocide, when they haven’t even accepted that White Supremacy is dead. This is why symbols and slogans that suggest a mean-spirited aggression on the part of Whites keeps falling flat: the intended audience doesn’t even think of themselves as aggrieved.

    I think that stubborn iceberg is starting to melt.

    • #85 by Henry Davenport on 11/07/2013 - 3:09 am

      Studies have shown that humans’ view of the nature of the world forms from the world of their childhood, and that view remains constant even as the world changes.

      I know that’s true of myself. My mind understands the situation we’re in today, but I FEEL that it’s still 1950 and it’s a White country. A white world in fact.

      It unnerves me a bit when I talk to younger bugsters who feel the country as it really is today.

      • #86 by Daniel Genseric on 11/07/2013 - 5:23 am

        The weakest generation and the baby-boomers have a LOT to atone for.

        They were given EVERYTHING and now gen X-ers are left with the bill and tasked with building something with the ruins turned over to them.

        • #87 by -Gar5- on 11/07/2013 - 6:07 am

          I think the reason the kids of today are so hopeless is because they have been betrayed by their grandparent’s generation.

          I bet if the weakest generation had the same thing done to them by THEIR grandparent’s generation, they’d be like the kids of today. I don’t think any of them have thought about that, and that’s why they complain about youth behavior.

          When I was in school a few years ago now, I was pro-White but I wasn’t a bugster; I was speaking to a group of boys about race (typical news and IQs stuff) and ALL of them were really interested, one actually told another one to shut up so they could hear me.

          In my experience, my generation out of the others of the 20th century has the healthiest thought-process, yes . . . they do have worst beliefs – that’s easier to change.

          After all, exposure to the real world is the biggest enlightenment.

          • #88 by Daniel Genseric on 11/08/2013 - 7:45 pm

            They’re ready for change. Change we can sink our teeth into.

            It’s coming.

    • #89 by -scythian- on 11/07/2013 - 5:40 pm

      That White people can’t ever see themselves as aggrieved IS White Supremacy. And I doubt non-whites will ever give up this belief.

      Bob has said that Hitler was a Jewish Supremacist – Jews were to blame for all problems, inherently evil, super humans in the bad sense. Jews were the problem, so Jews had to go.

      You heard in Horus’ radio interview the recording of Obama saying: “White folks greed runs a world of need”. Is this not akin to what Hitler said about the Jews?

      I’m going to assume since Abe Lincoln is Obama’s boy that he’s said many times: “All men are created equal” – how can you believe this & blame the world’s problems on a small global minority that is our race? That’s double think, and White Supremacist anti-white hypocrites of the same mindset will call us “White Supremacists” for pointing out the obvious simple realty that the Third World is the fault of Third Worlders.

      What Obama said is White Supremacist, a lie, and an incitement for GENOCIDE.

      If I went around saying: ‘Jew folks greed runs a world of need’, I’d be put in jail in Europe & Canada, financially ruined in the U.S. at the least – the Western versions of the Gulags. What if I convinced everybody that indeed the Jews were the cause of all the world’s problems? The Jews would be finished. White Supremacy says that you can say anything about White people & we can never be harmed; but people must be put in jail for saying “harmful” things about non-whites; and Whites must protect non-whites from other whites – the oft used excuse for whites killing a hundred million whites in the civil war & WW2 +.

      And ‘White Power’ by definition means that anti-white white traitors have the power to subject their own race to an ongoing GENOCIDE.

      The anti-white system is predicated on bullshit/double-think, “anti-racism” propaganda is get white people not to care about race – well if you don’t care about race then you don’t care about white genocide. And the deeper reality is that whites are “racist” if they don’t care about other races and “racist” if they care about their own race.

      So I don’t think White Supremacy is dead, I think we are killing it because not only do we HAVE a grievance, we have the greatest grievance of all time.

      Perhaps HD can write a petition asking Obama to renounce his genocidal statement; point out that Holder saying “white people don’t have civil rights” shows that U.S. “civil rights” laws break the international genocide law of denying group defense.

  50. #90 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/07/2013 - 7:29 am

    I’m 28 years old and I see men that are old enough to be my grandfather and I have no fear or respect for them.

    How could they have let this happen..and better yet? THEY STILL CHEER IT ON.

    To betray a generation of people that haven’t even been born yet is the CRUELEST of betrayls.

    I feel like I’m living in occupied territory and the men that were SUPPOSED to safeguard the door for us to take over are chasing my generation with pitchforks just to get a slice of the pie.

    Heroes my ass…..more like TRAITORS.

  51. #91 by Henry Davenport on 11/07/2013 - 8:28 am

    Variations of this title for petitions:

    Update Ministry of Truth: War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Diversity is Strength, White Genocide is White Supremacism

    • #92 by Daniel Genseric on 11/08/2013 - 7:48 pm

      Almost.

      War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Diversity is Strength, White survivalism is White Supremacism

      Diversity is a code word for White Genocide.

  52. #93 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/07/2013 - 8:41 am

    Yes because through white supremacy our identities are protected when are posterity falls victim to a group that they have been lied to about intentionally lowering their defenses to something they should have been apprehensive about. The media never knows our names because the media doesn’t report anti white terror.

You must be logged in to post a comment.