Gar5 brought up the standard anti-white reply that pro-whites are “tribalists,” where anti-whites are Universalists.
I have heard this from Communists, socialists, libertarians, Catholics, Bible-thumpers, Hindus, Buddhists, conservatives, liberals … Well, if you truly have nothing else to do, you could spend the rest of your life extending this list of Only True Faiths.
In fact, with the Internet, you will never have to stop because of your own limited memory. You can just list the new ones as they come along, and new ones come along faster than you can look them up and write them down.
H.L. Mencken made a list of several hundred “serious gods.” By “serious” he meant Osiris and Jupiter and Amon, gods to whom whole priesthoods dedicated their lives, gods like Marduk with whose anger ancient librarians would threaten anyone stealing a book.
But the list of Only Universal Truths is infinitely longer. You can’t make up a tribe.
Anti-whites say that the white race is guilty of endless sins, but they also say that race is a social construct. That is why being pro-white is “tribalism.”
But an Only Universal Truth is nothing BUT a social construct, and nobody claims anything else.
#1 by Jason on 11/16/2013 - 8:04 am
I’ve heard the “tribalist” hurled at Whites recently too. They seem to be recycling their oldies, like with “White supremacist”. Maybe it’s a sign that they can’t generate anything new.
Of course, the Japanese, who choose to remain 99% homogeneous, aren’t called tribalists.
We need to be reminded over and over about Wordism. And this is a million dollar line:
But an Only Universal Truth is nothing BUT a social construct, and nobody claims anything else.
They want us to destroy what we know is real in favor of what everyone knows is a social construct (an ideology).
I do wish there were more religious people to have serious conversations with by the way. But usually they have made some text so sacred that any serious questions risks The Grand Hissy Fit. But I yearn for such conversations.
Why can’t serious questioning, skeptical analysis AND respect go together?
#2 by Jason on 11/16/2013 - 8:09 am
By the way, I don’t really want those religious conversations HERE, I just mean in regular life.
#3 by shari on 11/16/2013 - 11:45 am
That’s really ironic that anti-whites claim to be “Universalists.” Their “one true faith” has become senile in about 50yrs. I see such a tiredness of it, even by nice people, who repeat it’s dogma.
#4 by Richard on 11/16/2013 - 12:11 pm
“Free institutions are next to impossible in a country made up of different nationalities. Among a people without fellow-feeling, especially if they read and speak different languages, the united public opinion, necessary to the working of representative government, cannot exist.” –John Stuart Mill. (He has been called “the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century.)
http://aemn.eu/2013/10/29/invalidation-customs-heritage/
#5 by -backbaygrouch- on 11/16/2013 - 1:04 pm
The theory social construct means for anti-Whites a tool to deconstruct any society in which Natural Human Affections and Liberties exist.
#6 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/16/2013 - 1:57 pm
It`s like the “Architect” character said in the Matrix films:
“The first versions of the Matrix were a paradise of peace and non-suffering. It was a disaster. No one would accept the programming. Whole crops were lost”.
So instead of the “We are the children of the rainbow” version of human affairs they`re forced into trying to micromanage the brutal but tried and true “World forever divided” version.
#7 by Undercover Lover on 11/16/2013 - 6:29 pm
Oh come on Bob.
There isn’t that many “universalisms”
I mean at most there is only 7.125 Billion according to the United States Census Bureau
🙂
#8 by jo3w on 11/16/2013 - 11:02 pm
Its still nice to read some dissucion on an old topic. Multiculturalism/PC must be more lucrative than tribalism. I have no proof of that, im just looking at the current state of affairs and making a guess. I dont think people come with conspircies to take advantage, I think the money leads them support those ideas which are harmful for people like us. Money, politics and popular opinion are, most likley, all part of the same stream. No one person can control them all, but by influencing one of the constituants, you can take advantage of the others. (Usually money) We seem to ignore any ideas regarding the accumulation of money. Is that a mistake or a breakthrough? Are there other constituants of this river that we can exploit?
#9 by Laura aka minervia on 11/17/2013 - 8:23 am
Every set of words is a social construct, Our genes are the only Universal Truth.
Putting ANY social construct ahead of your Race/Tribe is treason.
BUGSers putting words before the Mantra is betrayal.
When I’m jabbing my short sword I do not care about the state of my Soul and its Salvation.
Losing formation you’ve weakened us all. That is betrayal.
#10 by The Asgardian known as Michael on 11/17/2013 - 3:03 pm
Anti Whites are “Universalists” in white countries and only white countries, in non white countries they promote tribalism.
White children you…it’s ONLY a skin color.
Non white children…you must maintain your culture to maintain your people.
#11 by The Old Man of the Mountain on 11/17/2013 - 5:02 pm
If Communism is all about universal brotherhood then why do the mass murders begin the moment Communists assume control?
#12 by Cleric_Preston on 11/17/2013 - 5:50 pm
It’s always easier to love ‘humanity’ then to love the guys who lives next door to you.
#13 by -Gar5- on 11/18/2013 - 10:45 am
Bob – http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1006189/
Anti-White Charity organisation in Australia is arguing with us on our terms; that ONLY White countries have opened borders – but they did not mention genocide.
Same anti-White crap I hear all the time
I noticed is they didn’t use “Politically Incorrect”, they used the term “Factually Incorrect”. We have the morale high-ground and they know it.