Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

“Conservatism” is the New Islam

Posted by Bob on March 9th, 2014 under History, How Things Work


We are the missionaries of the pro-white movement.

The real missionary movements that pay off are always scorned by those who are building new cathedrals back at church headquarters in Rome or Constantinople.

Only history tells you who laid the foundations of a church’s absolutely vital expansion into new areas like Central and Northern Europe, which were of little important to the fifth century church.

But then Islam conquered the entire Middle East, and the area where the missionaries worked became the BASE of Christianity.

Fifth century church leaders wanted to spend money showing the Glory of God in giant buildings that would be there long after those pitiful little forays into Northern Europe petered out. photo boniface2.png

Some of those buildings are still there, provided they became useful as mosques.

You are presently experiencing exactly what those who saved Christianity by planting it outside the Roman Empire experience. It never even occurred to them that, when they came back with lessons learned “in the field,” any of the church leaders or Great Intellects would want to LEARN from them.

If they ever got back to Rome or Constantinople, it was to LEARN the deep and true theology TAUGHT there. What really fascinates me is that you are getting first-hand EXPERIENCE of exactly what those missionaries faced.

Vanishingly few Old Hands are interested in Learning from you. James seems hardly to notice anything we actually have to say.

When the missionaries who were out building the basis of a Christianity after the rise of Islam came back, they were there to learn about the martyrs and prophets who had founded the church where its Intellectuals sat in Rome and Constantinople.

It didn’t occur to any of the religious scholars that the lesson of the Fathers and martyrs they taught about was, in fact, missionary work. No, when the real missionaries came back it was to be TAUGHT True Orthodoxy.

I felt the same way on James’s show.

If any of us get on James Edwards’s show again, we need to point out that we have nothing to do with “conservatism.” Like the Middle Eastern heartland of the Old Church, conservatism has been taken over by a new variation on Islam, neoconservatism.

Like the Christian missionaries, we must plant pro-white sentiments in areas where people are not anti-abortion nuts, pro-Israel monomaniacs, and possessed of a desperate desire to get more wars going.

And, above all, ASSIMILATION: Opening the borders and making True Americans of the Immigrants and taking the third world into our Traditional Values families.

We have no more intention of spreading “conservatism” than the real Christian missionaries did of spreading Islam.

Today’s “Conservatism” is now just one more enemy.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Daniel Genseric on 03/09/2014 - 6:49 pm

    They’ll get the next political machinery wrong too. Even with the manual and template laid out for them right here.

    Republican Survivalism is going to be the theme of 2014 – 2018. After more goading, Ann Coulter has keyed-in on this in a piece she did over at VDare. Moderate Conservatives (progressive liberals in sheep’s clothing) such as Rubio and Cruz are working hard and poised to make huge concessions on massive non-white immigration and forced-assimilation in order to Secure The Future of The Republican Race.

    The only thing they’ll succeed in doing is pushing European Americans our way faster than ever.

    • #2 by WmWhite on 03/09/2014 - 8:50 pm

      Good point.
      I have seen the republican party as an ‘anti-white’ abomination for many years and look forward to its demise.

      As for Rubio and Cruz (they are non-white’s),
      so I wouldn’t expect anything less from them BUT being advocates of,
      and taking anti-white, ‘pro massive’ non-white immigration, and forced assimilation positions.

      Ann Coulter might be useful, but her non-white dating history speaks for itself, as to where her loyalties lie.

      =====
      We are most certainly the missionaries of pro-white issues, fighting against white genocide. There will be very little help from established media and professional politicians (IMO). –except indirectly from negative news stories and MAYBE a future documentary about BUGS.
      =====

      Finally, there is nothing wrong with PROFILING … in fact whites who don’t see and are not aware of the differences between (i.e. race or ‘tribe’) are sad gullible folk; who will do as they are told by the powers that be –or be easily taken in by deception and subterfuge.

      • #3 by Jason on 03/10/2014 - 8:27 am

        Notice Ann’s big talking point is that it was the GOP that passed Civil Rights. Suck it, Democrats! We’re more anti-racist than you are!

          • #5 by Jason on 03/10/2014 - 7:51 pm

            Ann talks about mass immigration, but she either ignores or endorses the other major component of our genocide: the programs of forced integration/assimilation that Whites are subjected to.

            Before people think I am too harsh, she continues to imply that the “Civil Rights” bill of the 1960s and desegregation were good things. She keeps saying that Reagan never got the votes of any naughty segregationists.

            I understand she wants to stay on TV (and maybe use that platform for some good). But she should stop implying that segregation was bad or that “evil” racists in the South are a group to be shunned (or does she really feel that way?).

            Notice her apparent support for sending military troops to force integrate Arkansas schools in 1957.

            Now, she may say, at some later date, “oh I wasn’t supporting forced integration, I was just pointing out Democrat hypocrisy”, but I think it’s too clever by half.

            I like her sounding the alarm on amnesty and mass immigration (and calling out the traitors in business, the GOP, unions, etc.). And maybe she thinks that is all she can get away with and still have a voice. Fine. But she should stop appearing to support some of the original programs of forced integration and she should stop trying to be more “anti-racist” than the Left. Her words, in my opinion, give legitimacy to the “anti-racist” cause.

            http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2013-02-13.html

            • #6 by WmWhite on 03/11/2014 - 9:50 am

              Well said Jason.
              I think Daniel has forgotten this rather important sentence of the Mantra:

              “Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

              ===
              She (Annie C) may be of help??? but she plays hard to ‘outdo’ the Democrats with her ‘Civil Right’ wardrobe and personal miscegenistic practices.

              Her actions and Daniels acquiescent acceptance of said behavior, follows a white genocidal flow of things that goes something like this: (force assimilation, –to dating non-whites, –to intermarriage, –to non-white children)!!!

              This is one of the major strategies of white genocide … it produces NO white children.

          • #7 by WmWhite on 03/11/2014 - 9:49 am

            @Jason
            I believe you and I are referring to the same Vdare article from (9 March 2014), titled: “CPAC 2014: Conservatism Inc. Tries To Finesse Amnesty/ Immigration Surge—But Ann Coulter Doesn’t Let Them”
            (video of her speech at same site)
            ====
            I now see were Daniel is writing about an older article on Vdare, written (26 Feb 2014) –which doesn’t address Cruz’s or Rubio’s position on immigration so much as it discusses minimum wages and immigration.

            Must be something he ate.

      • #8 by Daniel Genseric on 03/10/2014 - 2:37 pm

        Focusing on Coulter’s dating record, however anti-white and mudsharkalicious it might be, offers our cause about as much value as learning what I ate for dinner last night.

        Ann Coulter remains a missionary for the civilized American republic. That being said, she still hasn’t connected two mission-critical dots. The two dots which highlight how a healthy republic hinges on a healthy and unhampered European American population. Champion and foster the latter and you’ll undoubtedly produce the former. The reality of it is Ann Coulter is moving right because of BUGS’ efforts. And guess who’s going with her? That’s right, all of America.

        Her ability to identify and glom onto what works in enraging both “sides” of the establishment AS A WOMAN should pique your interest. The fact that she is routinely engaging in Mantra Thinking is a net positive for us and disastrous for our enemy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0xfjM_9z2o Secondly, she is helping us shift the Overton Window, which I have written about right here on this very blog. BUGSters are thoroughly engaged in this exercise, whether they realize it or not.

        http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/11/12/student-body-right/

        Stimulating white minds is what will catapult us forward with the velocity of gravity. All the other garbage will fix itself after we fix US.

        So, a good question to ask right now might be, “Can you name someone who could run as Coulter’s right-leaning 2016 Vice Presidential candidate?” or perhaps more importantly, “Who is writing Ann Coulter’s stuff?”

        • #9 by WmWhite on 03/11/2014 - 10:08 am

          I think Daniel has himself a new girlfriend.

          Seriously Daniel, how do you know Coulter is influenced by us?
          Have you corresponded with her or has she mentioned us specifically?
          I don’t know, I’m just curious is all, because if she has than thats something.

          Actions speak louder than words, and her effort to open the dialogue about non-white immigration is a “good” thing, but to what end is she fighting for?

          Is it for white survival or just so she can show her (52-yr old leg) and negatively influence our young white daughters and girls with her anti-white dating practices and her support of FORCED assimilation and integration (aka Civil Rights)?

          …“assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites,” IS white genocide.

  2. #10 by ϟentinel on 03/09/2014 - 7:20 pm

    Conservatism wouldn’t exist without a negative force to oppose, so Conservatives primarily work to conserve their opposition, while reassuring their duped followers that “We’ll get ’em next time.”

    This retarded mess is what happens when people define themselves with words and not real things like genes.

    The only thing that Conservatives conserve is Conservatism.

  3. #11 by Henry Davenport on 03/09/2014 - 8:05 pm

    I don’t have enough brain to do my work and also learn the first thing about what conservatives are about. (I do understand the neocons).

    Fortunately I have a collaborator on the petitions now who understands the conservative scene and has an interesting project underway based on his understanding.

    I hope he won’t discover that conservatives are just another group that offer almost no returns for us no matter what effort we expend.

    But if so, he has another project in the works that I like better: get our stuff into the Ivy League, where every time someone farts it’s reported by media.

    Any of you who are going to be out on March 15 near an ivy league school, if you feel able to do it, right in the quadrangle of the ivy league school is the best place to do it.

  4. #12 by Henry Davenport on 03/09/2014 - 8:39 pm

    If I understand today’s blog, Bob is saying that neoconservatism is as alien to true conservatism as Islam was alien to Christianity when it took over what had been a seat of Christianity. And Conservatism used to be the seat of pro-White activism but is now usurped by neocons who have no connection to us, beyond being our enemies.

    I haven’t listened to the show, but apparently James has been misled by words to think the “neoconservatives” still are part of the conservatism that pro-white feeling and activism used to be rooted in?

    One or two of the porch talks (newbies see tab above) are “interviews” of Bob by James years ago…I use quotation marks, because James scarcely let Bob complete a thought…when finally Bob had been allowed to say enough in one little piece, and then after being interrupted, in another little piece, and so on, until bob’s thought had been completed enough for James to hear it, James was almost overcome with the brilliance of what Bob had been trying to express, and James started saying stuff like, roughly, “wow, I consider myself smart (I recall Bob graciously saying, “you are smart”!), but you…”…I forget James’ exact words of recognition of being in the presence of someone sharper than himself from whom he could learn something (that very last thought on the tail end is my own…I don’t know if it was James’), but it didn’t make James shut up and listen any more than he had been, to the best I recall.

    Well all that’s just human and I wouldn’t have minded if afterward James had had a little talk with himself and said, wow, what an opportunity I missed, I hogged the floor and then got all ego-flustered, but I’m going to invite that fellow back and say hardly a word except to ask him a question occasionally. And especially since just having him at all was one of the more popular shows. [Aren’t I remembering that correctly?]

    We men don’t know ourselves well enough and don’t understand our behaviors well enough. To do so would upset our applecarts! I guess; it’s a mystery to me really.

    • #13 by Jason on 03/10/2014 - 8:41 am

      NeoCon thinking has almost totally replaced real conservatism. During this latest brewhaha in the Ukraine, it was “conservatives” saying it was time to stand up to Putin, who is the new … drum-roll … Hitler! I heard people call into talk shows pushing for war with a nuclear power in the most chest beating tones. FINALLY they had a chance to sound like a real man.

      I heard Geraldo Rivera refer to Bill O’Reilly as the “president of the White guys”. God help us. I had to have a few drinks after that.

  5. #14 by Henry Davenport on 03/09/2014 - 8:59 pm

    (from the blog):
    Like the Christian missionaries, we must plant pro-white sentiments in areas where people are not anti-abortion nuts, pro-Israel monomaniacs, and possessed of a desperate desire to get more wars going.

    (from my first comment above):
    I hope [my collaborator] won’t discover that conservatives are just another group that offer almost no returns for us no matter what effort we expend.

    I’ll ask him to think about all this.

  6. #15 by Jason on 03/10/2014 - 8:20 am

    Believing The Truth is already known and written down somewhere is so widespread. It’s as if we are a species that evolved to sit passively and listen to Priests.

    The experimental method is used by SOME White Men. Not all. How many of you have pointed to actual facts that disprove some tenet of Political Correctness, only to have a smug face stare back at you and say, “that’s not what the educated people say”. And that’s it.

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen such a person wise up.

  7. #16 by Henry Davenport on 03/10/2014 - 1:24 pm

    Was Bob or anyone else on James’ show recently, or does Bob’s blog refer to Laura’s appearance there several weeks ago?

    In James’ recent show descriptions, I’m not finding anything. I’m assuming now that Bob is speaking of Laura’s past appearance.

    I also want to locate the recent show of Don Black on which I’ve heard there was some discussion of BUGSters coming on too strong on SF.

    I always try to be gentle there:
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1026864-3/#post11943166

    • #17 by Henry Davenport on 03/10/2014 - 1:50 pm

      Re my comment at SF I just linked, this is from Bob’s recent blog Why is this Information Produced?:

      Professional Republicans want things to stay the way they are. How things are today is the way they make their living.

      ….

      The people who explain why the other side’s propaganda gets produced would never ask why their OWN does. But that is also information.

      There is a MARKET for “The Jews Did It.”

      There is a REWARD in being one of the True Intelligentsia in the Occidental. This reward is nowhere near the one TOO’s Mommy Professor’s opponents get paid for producing bullshit. But it is nonetheless a reward.

      All the “White sites” I’ve visited, with a few exceptions, seem to be about folks hunkering down for a satisfying bitch-and-moan without being interrupted by any disturbing calls to do something. What the persons who congregate at those sites seem to be getting “paid” is just a slight increase in comfort in their lives afforded by their “pro-white” online social clubs.

      But SF is so huge that the tiny fraction there who are willing to act have provided the biggest part of the 172 Stalwarts we now have to get the petitions up each month on the FIRST.

      Btw, if you are a Stalwart and think I may not know that you are also a bugster, please let me know. It’s slightly important.

      We can PM each other here now, right? I assume I can figure out how to do it when the necessity arises.

      This comment is under moderation. I hadn’t realized I’d posted so much on this thread. Sorry.

  8. #18 by jo3w on 03/10/2014 - 6:20 pm

    Who are todays Pagans, Celts and Norse?

  9. #19 by Secret Squirrel on 03/11/2014 - 12:08 am

    Conservatives may not be in the spotlight so much pushing our genocide like Jews, but they support it with their votes, money and peer pressure.

    I know Conservatives so well, I don’t want them in any Pro White country. They will only ruin it.

  10. #20 by Simmons on 03/11/2014 - 8:25 am

    Some years ago James’ nice wife posted here a few times, but per usual with most people she knew she was out of place. She had the script of the day that addressed the issues of the day and that was it.

    Think of it this way, Libs and Cons tussling over the same source of authority, like the tree in the picture with this article.

    Think of BUGs people as coming along and taking an axe to everyone’s source of authority.

    IMO only Horus could make James’ show useful, Horus being friendly and engaging enough that James’s would just sit there and giggle while H mantrafied the audience.

  11. #21 by Simmons on 03/11/2014 - 3:32 pm

    FTR Ann Coulter has been rumored to have attended the first AmRen conference (SPLC take note)

    None of you believe me when I say we crossed into the mainstream some time ago, but its true.

    Now if you want to argue about IQ and crime, maybe the establishment doesn’t want to hear that and can shut you out with the word racist, but they have no response to us.

    The Mantra is there just like the words that described the USSR as a shit hole jail were there in the early 80s.

  12. #22 by seapea on 03/12/2014 - 2:17 am

    Henry Davenport :
    I also want to locate the recent show of Don Black on which I’ve heard there was some discussion of BUGSters coming on too strong on SF.

    HD, did you or anybody else locate that Don Black show? I wouldn’t mind hearing it, if it was interesting.

You must be logged in to post a comment.