B. U. G. S.

Notice his use of the term “indigenous.”

There are many groups within the UN trying to define the term indigenous. Their goal in defining the word is to define it as everyone except Whites (we would then have some amount of protection). Despite this fact, no one has argued with Griffin on his use of the term in relation to the White population he is defending.

The UN has been working on laws to protect indigenous populations but they will not make it law until they can define indigenous to their satisfaction (non White). The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples does not apply to international law yet.

Using the term will cut them off preemptively.

The current direction of the definition is as follows: non colonizing, distinct from other peoples, self identifying as indigenous, recognizable as different from other peoples, historical connection to the land, or historically dispossessed in some form.
So they have to make sure White people do not identify as indigenous, do not recognize our differences, and do not notice our dispossession so we can be pushed further along the path to genocide.

Article 7 of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples:

Indigenous peoples have the collective and individual right not to be subjected to ethnocide and cultural genocide, including prevention of and redress for:

(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;

(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;

(c) Any form of population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;

(d) Any form of assimilation or integration by other cultures or ways of life imposed on them by legislative, administrative or other measures;

(e) Any form of propaganda directed against them.