Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

The Magic Clock

Posted by Bob on May 16th, 2014 under Coaching Session

Some time ago a big advertising magazine had a lead article, “Objections to intermarriage in 2014?”

Like any magazine editor, it expressed shock that mere consumers would dare object to a Quaker Oats (?) ad featuring a mulatto child going from his white mother to his black dad.

The first irony here is what ADVERTISING is all about.

Advertising is supposed to be the science of KNOWING public opinion, not of JUDGING it.

Like any other big magazine, this publication hired an editor from the pool of carbon copies produced by the magazine bureaucracy.

But in advertising, astonishment at real public attitudes is not a mistake of the public, but of the advertising industry.

Advertisers are hired to KNOW public opinion, not to be astonished by it.  photo quakeroats.jpg

Let me explain this further: The magazine editor bureaucracy produces editors who tell the public what it SHOULD think.

Advertising is about what the public DOES think.

So the carbon copy editor did not come up through the advertising industry.

In real advertising, the question is “What do people prefer?” not “In the Year 2014 on the Magic Clock, this is what the public SHOULD think.”

No editor, least of all in advertising, would hire ugly models. Models for ads are not representative of the public. No matter how often you repeat, “Real people don’t look like that,” there is no way this side of Hell that advertisers are going to hire fat, ugly models.

To most White people, the kid looks like every other mulatto.

In real world advertising, you don’t tell people that ugly is lovely. That is fine for mainline magazines.

But in the real world real consumers don’t LIKE ugly. Period.

  1. #1 by Jason on 05/17/2014 - 12:57 am

    Leave it to Bob to point out the obvious, that is ONLY obvious once he points it out. I don’t know if it’s a learnable skill or not.

    How are these people, who are supposed to appeal to public opinion, able to get away with this? Well for one thing our “free market” is increasingly concentrated in fewer hands. The lack of competition makes it easier for them to push social messages (who else ya gonna buy from?).

    This matters because the PC crowd will claim they can’t violate free speech, only the government can. But then they destroy the ability of anyone who says something forbidden to keep a job. They can’t put you jail (yet) in the USA for Thought Crimes, but they make it so you can’t work, buy or sell anything.

    (By the way, the interracial child ad was for Cheerios which is owned by General Mills. Not sure Quaker Oats did anything like that)

    • #2 by Mike M on 05/17/2014 - 4:12 am

      “They can’t put you jail (yet) in the USA for Thought Crimes, but they make it so you can’t work, buy or sell anything”

      But you can be put to jail in France, Germany, Italy and I bet some other countries for that. ;). Freedom of speech ? HA !

      • #3 by Daniel Genseric on 05/17/2014 - 9:34 am

        The thing is, in France, Germany, Italy, etc…, at least you know when you’ve been caught being “RACIST!”.

        In America, they can backdoor and blackball you. The way the SPLC and other “anti-Hate” groups work, you might never know you’ve been made.

        Silence can kill too.

        • #4 by Jason on 05/17/2014 - 10:11 am

          Notice the anti-Whites won’t define what they mean by “rayyyccisss”. Any clear definition will trip them up. So in practice, it’s anything that gets in the way of their anti-White agenda.

  2. #5 by Swarmer E Euro on 05/17/2014 - 2:03 am

    “Let me explain this further: The magazine editor bureaucracy produces editors who tell the public what it SHOULD think.”

    Like here in this article of National Geographic. It is hammered into the public`s head that this poor miserable being is `beautiful`.

    • #6 by Yankee Rebel on 05/17/2014 - 6:16 am

      Was that collection of photos from an “Ugly Mug” contest? lol

      • #7 by Swarmer E Euro on 05/18/2014 - 6:26 am

        Yes, these are very ugly. 😀 White Genocide is an ugly thing.

  3. #8 by Jason on 05/17/2014 - 3:56 am

    Excuse the interruption, but the scientific establishment is starting to admit RACE is real. Book by New York Time’s writer Nicholas Wade has been published and here is a link to a review from the ever-so-establishment Scientific American giving it a positive review.

    The bottom line: Race is real and it matters.

  4. #9 by Yankee Rebel on 05/17/2014 - 6:26 am

    In the modern world of advertising and media, we are told what to think, how to dress, etc. We are told that ugly is beautiful, race is not real, evil is good, and on and on. Only ignorant “racists” and “Bible Nazis” would dare to question any of this “common” knowledge. lol

  5. #10 by Daniel Genseric on 05/17/2014 - 9:28 am

    Bob is saying, whether he intended to or not, that some of us might actually have a future in advertising.

    By the way, Bob’s right. Chevy and cheerios have both realized the Magic Clock is broken. They edited out the Diversity Sermons from both of their recent videos.

    Yes, I watch TV.

    They make a splash during high tide and then head for calmer waters. So, we can expect the same next time.

  6. #11 by Jason on 05/17/2014 - 10:28 am

    Bob mentioned that families in India would love to create Aryan children for themselves. And now, it looks like women around the world want to build an Aryan super race all on their own, when it comes to choosing sperm from donors:

  7. #12 by -Gar5- on 05/17/2014 - 2:14 pm

    Bob’s post didn’t mention one thing – in a world where it’s survival of the fittest why is it advertisers can push their unpopular agenda and not get fired?

    Because, most of the billionaires are left-wing, and most of the millionaires are right-wing.

    Billionaires can AFFORD to upset people. Millionaires need to make money.

  8. #13 by Simmons on 05/17/2014 - 4:39 pm

    We should always ask, “Why is this information produced?”

    Anyway the comments at the BBC were mostly stupid, so realize this the anti-whites are freaking morons not the 10ft tall monsters the AMPWs make them out to be.

    And the Poles show us a glimpse of our glorious white future, scroll down to the video

  9. #14 by Steadiness on 05/17/2014 - 11:16 pm

    Were they surprised? Or were they hoping to get their name out there in a way no one is allowed to insult them, the way Cheerios did last year with their interracial family ad?

  10. #15 by Denounce Genocidists on 05/18/2014 - 6:47 am

    “The magazine editor bureaucracy”

    There must also be a “store music bureaucracy”, because you only have to look at the wincing of middle-aged onwards whites (with most of the disposable cash) trying to make good purchasing decisions while “urban youth music” assaults their eardrums.

    The companies tell us the “customer shopping experience” is the highest priority. They tell us they do regular customer satisfaction surveys and they study the CCTV footage of customer behaviour while in the stores.

    And the beat goes on.

  11. #16 by Al Parker on 05/18/2014 - 9:43 am

    The idea that the Japanese were, in a civilizational sense, “honorary Aryans” was widespread. American president Theodore Roosevelt said that “Japan is the only nation in Asia that understands the principles and methods of Western civilization”, and approved of the Japan–Korea Treaty of 1905 which ended the latter’s independence.[12]

    The distinction was viewed by the Japanese themselves with pride, and moreover, as corroboration of their own, independent belief that they were superior to other Asians.[13] The approximately 10,000 Japanese nationals who resided in Germany during World War II enjoyed more privileges than any other non-Caucasian ethno-national group under their “honorary Aryan” citizenship.

    They were still subject to Germany’s racial laws, however, which—with the exception of the 1935 Nuremberg Laws, which specifically mentioned Jews—generally applied to all “non-Aryans”. Hitler’s government began enacting the laws after taking power in 1933, and the Japanese government protested several racial incidents involving Japanese or Japanese-Germans that year. Influential Nazi anti-Semite Johann von Leers favored excluding Japanese from the laws due both to the alleged Japanese-Aryan racial link and to improve diplomatic relations with Japan. The Foreign Ministry agreed with von Leers and sought several times between 1934 and 1937 to change the laws, but other government agencies, including the Racial Policy Office, opposed the change.[13]

    An October 1933 statement by Foreign Minister Konstantin von Neurath which falsely claimed in response to the Japanese protests that Japanese were exempt, however, was widely publicized and caused many in Germany, Japan, and elsewhere to believe that such an exemption existed. Instead of a broad exemption, an April 1935 decree stated that racial discrimination cases involving non-Aryans that might jeopardize German diplomatic relations—i.e., Japanese—would be dealt with individually. Decisions on such cases often took years, with those affected unable to obtain jobs or interracially marry, primarily because the German government preferred as much as possible to avoid giving exemptions. The German government often exempted more German-Japanese than it preferred in order to avoid a repeat of the 1933 controversies, and in 1934 it prohibited the German press from discussing the race laws when Japanese were involved.[13]

    • #17 by Secret Squirrel on 05/18/2014 - 9:52 am

      You posting on the right website Al?

      • #18 by Al Parker on 05/18/2014 - 9:57 am

        YES, Secret Squirrel.

        I was going to tie in with the intermarriage topic:

        Apparently the most racist government in world history quietly allowed intermarriage. It goes to show how practical issues overtake principles. It also shows the danger that a great leader can pose when words like “honorary Aryan” might allow white genocide to enter in through the back door even into a racial-nationalist state. (i.e. “Ignore what your eyes are telling you — Yellow is White!).

        • #19 by Secret Squirrel on 05/19/2014 - 10:02 am

          You aren’t talking about Pro Whites. You are talking about Right Wingers. Yes, we still have plenty of those hanging around Pro Whites for some reason.

          Something that occurred to me a couple of days ago, Hitler never had to contend with being called a “racist”.

  12. #20 by Al Parker on 05/18/2014 - 10:08 am

    [QUOTE]it looks like women around the world want to build an Aryan super race all on their own, when it comes to choosing sperm from donors:

    It sounds like the future is fast approaching. The real pro-white movement is out there where we aren’t looking.

    I have begun to wonder WHY who someone falls in love with, or who marries for practical reasons, should have anything to do with which egg or sperm is used to create the next generation. Am I thinking too far “outside of the box”?

    • #21 by Denounce Genocidists on 05/18/2014 - 11:54 am

      It`s a good theory and it might happen sometime in the future, but the practicalities of keeping the non-white temporarily infertile until their ready for the Aryan child plus the concept of having whites being grown inside non-white insides, it`s not exactly appealing is it?

    • #22 by Denounce Genocidists on 05/18/2014 - 12:21 pm

      That reply was garbled.

      What I mean is non-whites deciding not to have any non-white kids or progressively whitening themselves over generations, or having a white “playmate” “trophy”, these things are not without negative consequences for white racial politics, it seems to me.

  13. #23 by Jason on 05/19/2014 - 8:22 am

    Question for anyone who knows about South Africa:

    What is the state of racial solidarity among Whites there today? Are they pro-White? Or even now, are only a minority of Whites openly pro-White?

    • #24 by Secret Squirrel on 05/19/2014 - 10:14 am

      I encountered a White city dwelling South African, that said SA is a great nation and those complaining about farm murders are liars and trouble makers.

      Then he said without a hint of irony, if you visit his great country, do not travel to area X in his city, or you will likely be killed.

      Apparently he thinks this is a normal way for White people to live.

      • #25 by Jason on 05/19/2014 - 9:38 pm

        Thanks … that is what scares me the most: Whites being oblivious to their genocide even when it is in their face.

        In fact, what gives me the most hope is the violent reaction we get from Anti-Whites and their rabid desire to silence us. They must know something I don’t!

  14. #26 by RightWabbitAwake on 05/22/2014 - 10:35 am

    Re; Advertisements.
    They are not using mixed race families to sell products,
    anti-Whites are using the products to sell White Genocide.

You must be logged in to post a comment.