I wrote this after I had submitted the article below.

Someone suggested that using this point might distract from concentrating on the Mantra.

It was an excellent point, but, for me, it was wonderful to hear it.

Now I have, after almost twenty years of effort, a cadre that can MAKE a criticism like that!

Can you imagine anyone in the maze of argument and “somebody ought tos” I spent all those years in saying “That might distract from THE point!?”

For me, the fact that it is a valid criticism is totally buried in the sheer joy of this little team of professionals it took so long to develop.

In my own case. I have used this truth, you can hardly call it just an argument, when it was a good lead in to the whole subject, as when some idiot at a cocktail party would start blubbering about how we stole the land from the Indians.

I think it is a good point, but BUGSERS have to make sure they don’t waste precious time dragging it in. But at the right time and place, it really puts some crocodile-tearing, loud-mouthed fashionable anti-white in his place.

So here it is:

Whenever White Genocide is discussed, there is the chorus about how whites stole the land.

Grant that. What is the FIRST obligation of any receiver of stolen goods?

Is a person who believes his property has been stolen from others obligated, first and foremost, to denounce the OTHER people who committed the robbery?

No. Any sane person knows that, IF YOU FEEL YOU HAVE STOLEN GOODS, then your first obligation is to RETURN them to whomever you insist is the RIGHTFUL owner.

The first obligation of an Australian who really believes Australia was stolen from the aborigines or any American who honestly believes America was stolen from the Indians is TO GET THE HELL OUT!

Every adult knows that you cannot hold onto stolen property while denouncing the OTHER thieves.

No Indian or Abo would be happier than I would be if these crocodile-tear-shedding, “The White man STOLE America!” types were to hop on a boat and go elsewhere.