A commenter posted a URL for a Michael Savage YT that condemned the media for not reporting the torture-murder of a White couple by four blacks. A Professor of Journalism who justified leaving the story out of ALL the MSM and local newspapers avoided the issue.
The professor’s reply was rather lengthy, but Savage, even as outraged as he was, couldn’t avoid the true justification for leaving this murder out of the news. The Professor didn’t dare mention it and Savage (for all his famous “courage”) didn’t dare ask Mommy Professor about it. 
It is the oldest rule of journalism. It was probably old when Roman government scribes wrote the latest happenings up on a wall in Rome.
That old rule is, “When a dog bites a man it is NOT news. When a man bites a dog it IS news.”
As usual, this rule that everybody knows is not mentioned anywhere but BUGS:
The Professor is dead right. Only his BS explanation is nonsense, and Savage at his most furious is not going to expose it:
If a full news report was required every time a dog bit a man, there wouldn’t be room left for any other news. If a news report was required every time one more black killed one or more Whites, even the twenty-four hour cable news channels would be overloaded.
This is the kind of reality only BUGSERS will even MENTION.
#1 by Laura on 11/24/2014 - 11:58 am
Saying it in plain English makes the anti-Whites go ballistic.
Another Whitakerism: Everyone knows it, but no one puts it in English.
Instead of endless crime statistics, just saying:
“Dog bites man” is not a news story.
“Man bites dog” IS a news story.
“Black kills White” is not a news story.
“White kills black” IS a news story.
#2 by Jason on 11/24/2014 - 1:52 pm
DOJ stats say 100 White women are raped every DAY by Black men. That was in 2005, the last time they gave us stats based on race.
The number of Black women raped that year by White men is zero (although it could have been as high as 10 for the whole year). Versus 35,000 White women being raped by Black men.
So, another White woman getting raped by a Black man gets no coverage. But remember the heat over that fake Duke LaCrosse case.
Using that Man bites dog analogy really makes the point clear.
#3 by -scythian- on 11/26/2014 - 12:26 am
When I was a kid a saw on the show 20/20 the daughter of “idealistic” liberals who went to some God forsaken black African country to help “mankind”. At the first agitation of some outside “oppression”, the villagers ganged up on this White girl who went there to “help” them and beat her with their hands and feat to an unrecognizable bloody pulp.
The story was about her parents traveling to that village after their own child had been stomped to death for being White on a “mission of understanding” taking a smiling photo with the villagers, who stomped their daughter to a bloody pulp.
God forbid her parents offend mommy professor.
#4 by Carloman on 11/24/2014 - 4:29 pm
The difference is that everyone knows that dogs bite people, and that people don’t bite dogs. People knew that even before television and mass media.
In fact, the media often does report Black-on-White crime, but in those cases not only are the races of the perpetrators and victims not reported, but a stock photo of a White criminal often accompanies the article.
So a better analogy would be to say that when a dog bites a man, the newspapers will report that a biting occurred without reporting the species of either the biter or the bitten, and the story will be accompanied by a photo of a man baring his teeth.
#5 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/24/2014 - 4:49 pm
In other words, the story is still unreported.
One of the heartbreaking sights of this struggle has been seeing the stalwart News and Jewsers spending their days researching the perps in the avalanche of redacted crime reports just to find out “for sure” that it was another dog that tore a chunk out of a white man or woman.
#6 by Carloman on 11/24/2014 - 6:29 pm
The difference is one of intention.
If the MSM simply didn’t report Black-on-White crime, then you could say that perhaps the reason is that it’s a dog-bites-man story. But when they report the crime but use a photo of a White person to suggest that the perpetrator is White, that goes beyond non-reporting and becomes misleading reporting. For example:
http://www.vdare.com/posts/crackedcom-dumb-crooks-and-stock-photos
For more examples, see
http://www.vdare.com/?s=stock+photo&submit.x=53&submit.y=12&submit=Search
Although the dog-bites-man phenomenon may be true to a certain extent, to attribute the lack or reporting of Black-on-White crime as simply dog-bites-man almost makes the MSM seem innocent, which they most certainly are not.
When I was a child I used to watch the CBS evening news with my parents. Every day Walter Cronkite would report the number of American soldiers killed and wounded in Viet Nam, along with the number of South Vietnamese and the number of North Vietnamese. That was clearly dog-bites-man, but the MSM reported it EVERY DAY nonetheless. If the MSM were being honest today, every news report would contain the number of Whites killed and robbed by Blacks, the number of Blacks killed and robbed by Whites, etc. If Walter Cronkite could do it back then, then the MSM can do it today. Of course, we all know why they won’t.
#7 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/24/2014 - 10:55 pm
Instead of creating mountains out of molehills, you could just reflect on the simple fact that anti-white News people have to bend over backwards to keep their programming from being overwhelmed with the racial reality they insist does not exist.
“If the MSM simply didn’t report Black-on-White crime…”
Before the internet that was pretty much the case, and even now it`s page 7 footnote stuff (instead of the Front Page Shouting Coach suggests with “full news report” given to man bites dog)
“when they report the crime but use a photo of a White person to suggest that the perpetrator is White, that goes beyond non-reporting and becomes misleading reporting..”
The whole reality tunnel of the anti-white media is a fabrication
#8 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/24/2014 - 11:18 pm
” If Walter Cronkite could do it back then, then the MSM can do it today Of course, we all know why they won’t.”
They`d rather chew broken glass and they`d run out of airtime as Coach mentioned in the article. Walter Cronkite was drily reporting the days casualty figures merely in numerical terms news once(?) a day.
24-7 media bills itself as a reporting of The Latest News As It Happens.
#9 by WmWhite on 11/24/2014 - 5:15 pm
AP Stylebook updates entry on racial IDs in news stories!!!
“Don’t ask, Don’t tell.”
http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/newsgathering-storytelling/diversity-at-work/166506/ap-stylebook-updates-entry-on-racial-ids-in-news-stories/
=====
I remember an article about 5 or 6-years ago (maybe more) about the LA Times forbidding its reporters and affiliates from mentioning the RACE of any ‘perpetrator’ in its printed or other outlets …with limited exceptions enforced and restricted by its strict StyleBook guidelines.
One of the exceptions, I’m sure, would have been if the accused criminal was White.
#10 by Undercover Lover on 11/24/2014 - 6:04 pm
“When a dog bites a man it is NOT news. When a man bites a dog it IS news.”
Great line. I’ll have to keep that one. Though I feel that this example takes the respectable conservative position of bitching about crime rather than white genocide.
What would be a better use of this line?
White genocide is NOT news. Non-white genocide IS news.
or what about…
Chasing down whites with Diversity is NOT News. Chasing down NON-whites with Diversity IS News!
Random thought: I believe a similar line was used by Stalin:
Kill one non-white and it’s a tragedy. Kill a million whites and it’s a statistic.
#11 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/24/2014 - 11:52 pm
“Though I feel that this example takes the respectable conservative position of bitching about crime rather than white genocide”
If the respectables instead of making the useless point that non-white crime “does`nt get reported enough” , made the point that non-white terror against whites is on such a scale that the News media COULD`NT report it all even if they wanted to, would`nt it help expose the genocidal nature of the anti-white proposition?
#12 by Undercover Lover on 11/25/2014 - 12:31 am
No, I don’t think so. Anyone can be pissed off about crime and media double standards. Only pro-whites can be pissed off about SPLC’s and such chasing down white communities with diversity. Non-white crime is only a symptom of white genocide.
Stormfronters have been using “crime” and “media manipulation” lines for a lot longer than we’ve been using “white genocide” and it hasn’t worked
Kill one non-white, and it’s a tragedy. Kill a million whites, and it’s a statistic.
#13 by Denounce Genocidists on 11/25/2014 - 1:43 am
I like the Stalin quote retool.
#14 by Henry Davenport on 11/25/2014 - 3:12 am
This needs initials to become visible at the White House:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/ferguson-white-genocide-white-house-message-needs-initials/
The Ferguson thread at SF had well over 300 people reading it, of which over 60 were SF members, when I put that petition on the thread.
It got TWO signatures.
They’re all excited that Ferguson may bring new SF members, which to them is what the struggle is all about.
#15 by Jason on 11/25/2014 - 3:37 am
I laughed out loud at this post. Actually, 2 out of 300 is a great response. NOBODY wants to work. NOBODY wants to lay the foundation. Everyone just want to fantasize about the future – although they call it “talking policy”.