In every area, the United States is moving toward the stagnation of colored countries.
All my earlier life, a certain percentage increase in per capita income was taken as inevitable. This was because technology was steadily moving forward. In fact, any econometrician could probably chart the rate of stagnation by looking at our changing color. The line goes from upward when white, to stagnation and to the steady decline to third world status observed in all brown lands.
Meanwhile, Mommy Professor mentions polls which show the public endorsing the statement ‘The great days of America are past.”
No sh**, Dick Tracy.
These were the exact same Mommy Professors who STILL take Marxism seriously.
They STILL say that if the economy were turned over to “The Intellectuals,” meaning them, Production would rocket upward.
You know, the way it did in the USSR.
To Mommy Professor and the yuppies, Economics is a Voodoo governed by “highly complex factors.” Only Understood by The Intelligentsia.
To me, the economy is the product of those who make up the country:
“Ourselves and OUR posterity.”
Mommy Professor, who made the USSR the stunning success it was, says that the purpose of America is “all men are created equal.” Guess who is to decide what “equal” means?
Mommy Professor insists that all that matters is the WORDS a country uses.
And we can follow Mommy Professor down the same chute the USSR did.
#1 by -Gar5- on 02/10/2015 - 3:33 am
The difference between yoghurt and sour milk is just one strain of bacteria.
The difference between the third world and the first world is genetic.
Anti-White professors only admit genetic differences between individuals because in the end it was so obvious, that they had to in order to keep their “respectability”.
In the end, anti-White professors will have to admit that there are differences between races and even different countries.
#2 by -scythian- on 02/10/2015 - 6:44 pm
My idea of a 10th circle of hell is for anti-whites to get exactly what they want, what they advocate for: to live eternally in a brown world. I don’t mean a 3rd world with hundreds of millions of Whites on the planet, I mean a brown world well after Whites have left the planet. And for each and every one of those anti-whites to constantly have the knowledge that the hell they are eternally stuck in is exactly the “heaven on earth” they wanted.
I haven’t heard about “black history month”, “civil rights” (i.e. FORCED integration), nor that anti-white marxist pig mlk in the past couple months nearly as much as in recent years. But I did hear someone say the “civil rights” movement was about providing “opportunity” for blacks. There’s 40 million blacks in the U.S. speaking the same language and black civil rightists have no confidence that there’s enough blacks to provide enough opportunity for blacks to the point they allied with anti-white white TRAITORS to FORCE White people to give them “opportunity”? You can’t get any more White Supremacist than that!
But here’s the simple math these morons might want to consider: the more brown/ less White the U.S. gets, by THEIR OWN admission – the less “opportunity” blacks and hispanics of 3rd world descent will have. Then you add to that ratio that b/c there’s less Whites, and quite frankly b/c of OUR pro-white propaganda, Whites will just start ignoring FORCED integration laws and NOBODY is going to enforce them. That’s a force-multiplier of less “opportunity”. But that’s what you get you side w/ TRAITORS you stupid morons.
#3 by Daniel Genseric on 02/12/2015 - 1:45 am
Send the 10th circle traitors to me if Detroit or Chicago won’t have them.
I will provide them with a free one way trip to North Minneapolis, where my mother and grandfather and grandma, and great-grandmothers and great-grandfathers and great-great-grandparents ALL built homes. The city they helped build and from where they eventually fled. Now, the “Diversity” is powerful STRONG there.
The White anti-Whites can get section-8 housing right down the street from North High, which shut down because of the Minneapolis Public School System’s “Diversity efforts”. Next to Popeye’s on Broadway, where the #WhiteGenocide (and chicken) is “Looooouisiana Faaassst…” Half the black kids don’t even get pulled up by police for truancy because there is NO school anymore.
The Jews opened up a synagogue on campus replete with security cameras and gunshot audio detection sensors once they gutted it of taxpayers’ children and drove the property value to zero. Now the blacks who invaded MY ancestors neighborhoods have been loaded up and are being force BUS-ED on city transportation to Patrick Henry High, where they can chase down even MORE whites.
NOBODY, especially not even a black from around here, says “When I’m done with school and the government buys me a house, I’m moving to North Mpls.” No effin way. The best part is North Memorial’s highly-specialized gun shot victim unit, the morgue and the cemetery are just a hop and a skip down the street.
You want your “Diversity”, anti-Whites? You can KEEP your “Diversity”. ‘Bang bang’ mofo-ers.
That’s the sound of the door of opportunity closing on your ASS for all of eternity.
#4 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/12/2015 - 2:59 am
If economics is a product of those that make up a country how do you reconcile the fact that Russia was White? Or the wealth of Saudi Arabia or Qutar?
#5 by Secret Squirrel on 02/12/2015 - 3:20 am
All brown countries are poor, unless whites find oil under their feet, provide the technology to extract it and then pay them a fortune for it.
If you mean Communist Russia, Communism is the only system that has been able to make both white and Asian countries stagnate. After starvation was ended in Africa, Communist countries were the only places left, where people still starved. Bob has written about it often, so you should search on it.
Both “diversity” and Communism come from the same wordist Mommy Professors. The Professor Priesthood.
#6 by Secret Squirrel on 02/12/2015 - 3:23 am
If economics worked, all brown countries wouldn’t be poor. So its yet more of Mommy Professor’s nonsense.
#7 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/12/2015 - 11:38 am
Trinidad? Tobago? Aruba?
#8 by Secret Squirrel on 02/12/2015 - 12:45 pm
Aruba is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and has a mixed population. I don’t know about the rest. Perhaps they are mixed as well? The rule goes, the darker the skin the poorer a country generally is.
I remember Arab illegals trying to get into Australia a few years ago. Many were drowning, yet still they came. Wave after wave. Finally, when the ones in detainment were told, they would be sent to a brown country instead of the white country, they rioted and burned their housing to the ground. After that, the boats stopped coming. Fancy that!
Everyone except for Mommy Professor, understands the brown countries rule.
#9 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/13/2015 - 8:39 pm
“To me, the economy is the product of those who make up the country:”
Our exchange puts the lie to this little tidbit. Economy is not a product of who makes up a country, but rather a product of who RUNS a country. Or better still, a product of the makeup of those that run the country.
#10 by Secret Squirrel on 02/14/2015 - 12:41 am
The rule still holds.
In general the people with the highest standard of living in your white ruled brown country, will have the lightest skin. And that white ruled brown country, with trains that run on time, cannot exist without money pouring into it, from rich white countries.
I am wondering if you are thinking, if only we can convince the blacks to agree to be ruled by white supremacists, then they will live in a paradise like Rhodesia, that produces excess food. Well that works out well for the white supremacists, until the black majority comes to resent being ruled by whites and then you get your black ruled Zimbabwe and South Africa.
Another rule that white supremacists, anti-white liberals, respectable conservatives and Mommy Professors are blind to, is the *labor votes* rule. If you import cheap non-white labor into your country, eventually that cheap non-white labor will come to rule your country. Labor votes.
#11 by jo3w on 02/14/2015 - 6:26 pm
Correct me if I’m missing something, but everywhere on earth where brown people enjoy a standard of living that is anything other than poverty, there is significant involvement of White capitalists. You may be able to make the same argument, to a lesser extent, for Asians.
I think the observation Theseekroftruth may be making is that a hypothetical nation made up of White people that is run entirely by brown people would surely be an economic failure. I also think this hypothetical is so ridiculous that it is of no real utility.
#12 by Bob on 02/14/2015 - 1:18 pm
Bless you and thank you, Secret Squirrel!
Bless all BGERS but it is really painful, after yeats and a million words, when one of our own repeats some old claptrap I ae repeatedly already dealt with.
Trinidad, Tobago, Aruba and the Middle East are all oil rich.
It takes no great talent to be on top of oil used by white countries and discovered under your feet by whites.
I just get WEARY when a BUGSER repeats such crap.
I have not seen one single criticism of my articles I haven’t been over before, and I haven’t got the energy to deal with them. I depend on the Secret Squirrels here to do this, and I always deeply appreciate it.
#13 by Secret Squirrel on 02/14/2015 - 10:17 pm
“Trinidad, Tobago, Aruba and the Middle East are all oil rich.”
I didn’t know TTA had oil, as I’m not from that part of the world, but I did smell big money behind it.
I’ve seen how white money and expertise poured into a brown country, can make small parts of it civilized. I also saw how far and quickly that country fell, when the colonial money train ended.
#14 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 2:12 am
Trinidad, Tobago and Aruba are not oil rich. Bob quit lying. They are however island vacation destinations that rely entirely on American and European money pouring in through tourism. What I find painful is this echo chamber singing the praises of Bob. He states that “economy is a product of the people that make up a country” while talking about Russia a country that bordered on third world status during Communism. Secret Squirrel dismisses this by saying ,” Communism is the only system of government to make both White and Asian countries stagnate.”
Firstly, Asian countries stagnate because that is what they do.
Secondly, communism making White countries stagnate indicates that policies MATTER.
Thirdly, when did I ever mention White supremacy?
#15 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 2:19 am
Bob, you get weary when a Bugser questions the guru. You ain’t used to it. I don’t care what you’re used to though. The folk from Alabama made it abundantly clear that they did not care what you thought when we were in Tennessee, yet when there was a problem that required physical action it was a man from Alabama that STOPPED the problem cold. When no news outlet had interviewed you in nearly two decades and then would not discuss the Mantra it was a man from Alabama that made that happen. Guess what? I’m from Alabama. So save me your sanctimonious commentary.
#16 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 9:37 am
*spare me
#17 by Bob on 02/15/2015 - 1:43 pm
Aruba is a great example of my point. It has no oil, but it got rich on Venezuelan oil because it was Dutch, ie, white-ruled.
One theygot the oil out of dark-skinned Venezuela, investors wanted the big capital investments to be on white soil.
The last I looked, which was of all things for an NPR editorial in 1981, Puerto Rico had a per capita income half that of the US, wildly high by the standards of Latin America, and US blacks had a standard of living equal to those of Europeans,
On the rare occasions when anti-whites try to answer us, they say that the MIddle East is taking on massive immigration.
Of course the oil countries are not taking in CITIZENS, but labor for the oil they were born on top of.
I was surprised to see that there is also oil in Trinidad and Tobago. Like Aruba, they have a huge white tourist demand.
Mixed-blood brown per capita is high where there are relatively few with resources — oil or beaches — that that whites want.
By contrast Oriental countries can earn their own money, but they depend on white innovation.
#18 by Bob on 02/15/2015 - 1:51 pm
I thought TTA was tourist rich, so the reference to oil I found in Wiki surprised me,
I am still confused, but I use Wiki and am too lazy for more research on it, since tourism would be white-dependent too.
There is a big difference between ignorance and laziness, which I admit to, and lying.
That is a distinction I would expect an Alabaman would take seriously.
#19 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 2:47 pm
Fine then, quit being lazy. I still assert that the make-up of the ruling elite determine the wealth of a country as opposed to the make-up of the country itself. Of course Blacks in America had a equal standard of living to that of Europeans, half of Europe was under the boot of Communism. Once again policy MATTERS. So what if the Arab countries accept workers? The don’t let them vote. Why? That is their POLICY! Their policy also does not allow the foreign worker to integrate into that society. The same for Orientals. What is the major difference in their policy and ours? Simply put, their policymakers are not traitors. ALL of ours are.
#20 by Secret Squirrel on 02/15/2015 - 4:13 pm
“I still assert that the make-up of the ruling elite determine the wealth of a country as opposed to the make-up of the country”
Anti-white detected.
“Once again policy MATTERS.”
You are saying words matter more than people. You talk exactly like any conservative or liberal anti-white, I’ve ever listened to.
“Simply put, their policymakers are not traitors. ALL of ours are.”
Yes, loyalty is what counts, but from what you have said here, you are a traitor.
Prove your belief in interchangeable work units and move to a mixed/brown country. Change their words and take them to Jupiter!
#21 by Secret Squirrel on 02/15/2015 - 7:22 pm
“So what if the Arab countries accept workers? The don’t let them vote. Why? That is their POLICY! Their policy also does not allow the foreign worker to integrate into that society. The same for Orientals. ”
How did importing non-whites and making it POLICY they can’t vote, work out for the USA?
Non-whites can do things in their interest and Whites cannot. That is the whole point of BUGS.
Your belief that policy is made in a vacuum, shows what an autistic blockhead you are.
#22 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 5:02 pm
Firstly, when did I use the the phrase “matters more?”
Secondly, what in the hell have you ACTUALLY done aside from repeating a man’s own words back at him, in other words being Bob’s cheerleader?
Thirdly, you can sit down and shut up now. Bob is speaking for himself and usually when the players are on the field the cheerleaders must remove themselves from it.
#23 by Secret Squirrel on 02/15/2015 - 7:01 pm
Can’t deal with the point I made eh?
#24 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 10:22 pm
What I’d like is for you to attend one of the many conferences and demonstrations that I attend and call me an anti-White autistic block head to my face. Until then, shhh, child. Adults are talking.
#25 by Secret Squirrel on 02/15/2015 - 11:46 pm
“call me an anti-White autistic block head to my face.”
The truth hurts.
#26 by Secret Squirrel on 02/16/2015 - 12:01 am
We note he dodged both points I made, because he couldn’t deal with them. Instead he called himself “wise” and threatened violence.
#27 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/16/2015 - 5:32 am
I note that you can’t name one thing you’ve actually done other than cheerlead.
#28 by jo3w on 02/15/2015 - 10:28 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita
This one seems pretty cut and dry.
According to this map, policy doesnt seem to matter much, of course there are special circumstances, but generslly, the rule is good. Look at communist china and cuba as compared to the heart of africa.
According to wikipedia, ussr gdp per capita $5800 IN 1982 and $9130 in 1991. Compare thst to Kenya gdp per capita in 2013 $1245. Even at thier poorest, the russians under communism were not as unproductive as africans.
#29 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 10:42 pm
According to that Qatar and Singapore outscore the US.
#30 by Secret Squirrel on 02/15/2015 - 11:51 pm
Your autism is selective, I see.
“Qatar is the largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the world, and the country’s exports of LNG, crude oil, and petroleum products provide a significant portion of government revenues.”
http://www.eia.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=QA
#31 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/16/2015 - 5:27 am
How much oil does Singapore have nutsucker?
#32 by jo3w on 02/16/2015 - 7:24 am
S.Korea 1991 ~$8000
Vietnam 1991 ~$450
Cambodia 199~$250
Japan 1991~$33000
Phillipenes 1991~$450
Thailand 1991~$1600
Taiwan 1991~$9000
Hong Kong 1991~$15000
The generalization as a whole seems to still be standing up pretty well.
Do you expect more or less non-White countries to rank higher than the US as the country becomes less White?
Do you think the non-White world can compete with White peoples natural ability to preform skilled labor and professional occupations? This data suggests that the next best are still a half step behind and the others are non competitors.
#33 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/16/2015 - 7:49 am
I expect homogeneous Asian countries to vastly outstrip the US, the UK and any other White country the more that said White countries become “diverse” especially as that “diversity” trickles up to the elite class. Look at Hong Kong and Japan compared to Eastern Europe and Russia during that time.
Also, those countries employed large amounts of Whites from the US and Western Europe to teach them engineering and other technical trades, the same for the Saudis. We are entering into a phase that White professionals have the opportunity to become a “nomadic elite” amongst rapidly darkening countries and “emerging economies.” That is kind of scary to me as loyalty as a virtue has been destroyed amongst our people.
#34 by -scythian- on 02/17/2015 - 3:21 pm
You sound like an “all is lost” AMPW or an “inevitable brown future” anti-white. My answer to that bulls**t is ‘if there were any White community anywhere, all Whites would go there. Integration must be forced, b/c always no country can be White.’ Which do you think is more likely to happen: 1) The anti-whites are able to hold the damn from breaking until the effects of White genocide become irreversible, or 2) anti-whites find themselves hanging from nearest lamp posts.?
#35 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/17/2015 - 4:45 pm
It’s hard to say what will happen. I doubt that there will be any “day of the rope.” anti-Whites are a slippery bunch and their arguments and tactics change. Nobody notices this because each generation is fed a different line of BS and is not taught the previous lines.
I will say this though, Whites will follow money. If there is an opportunity for a White professional to make money in Asia he will go. He may be racially conscious and even loyal, but what’s to say his grandchildren will look like him if his children’s only option for reproduction is dissimilar to him? That is why the US policy for decades has been to strangle businesses here in order to force them to relocate elsewhere and send that productive managerial class offshore for a time. The White workers have no money to have kids and the productive must drown their children in the nonWhite flood in order to make a living.
#36 by -scythian- on 02/17/2015 - 5:31 pm
I asked which is more likely?
As soon as there is one White homeland, many will follow.
#37 by Secret Squirrel on 02/15/2015 - 11:57 pm
“According to this map, policy doesnt seem to matter much, of course there are special circumstances, but generslly, the rule is good. ”
Honest readers understand the brown countries rule. Everyone else in the world understands it as well, since they aren’t risking their lives to get into anything but white countries.
To someone that is dishonest or mentally challenged, exceptions disprove general rules.
#38 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/16/2015 - 5:30 am
How did the Russians stack up against the Asians that weren’t communist. There are a lot of nonWhite folk that are at the same time not Black.
#39 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/15/2015 - 10:37 pm
Bob states that economy is a product of the people who make up a country. Notice that little thing at the end? That’s called a period, it denotes the end of a train of thought. What we are talking about here is WEALTH accumulation. That is the basis of economics. Russia was as White during communism as it was under the Czars yet during both periods it lacked WEALTH and most of the people live in poverty. Apparently policy mattered to them. Ireland has always been poor. Yet until recently it was exclusively White. Apparently policy mattered to them. Venezuela has nearly as much oil as Saudi Arabia yet Venezuela is a crap hole and Saudis live as well as Brits. I guess policy matters there as well. Prince George’s County Maryland got MORE wealthy the BLACKER it got. Maybe policy mattered there. Who knows?
Now a country being poor is no reason to genocide the people and neither is a country being wealthy a reason for genociding their people.
The fact remains that policy amongst the elites determine a lot more when it comes to economics than Ole’ Bob likes to let on. Personally I’d rather my White daughter marry a dirt poor White man than a wealthy Arab, but what do I know? I was just informed that I have autism by a man that named himself after a creature that puts nuts in its mouth.
#40 by Daniel Genseric on 02/16/2015 - 5:38 am
^The above sentence may very well be a Whitakerism.
Everybody knows exactly what is meant by, “This used to be a GOOD neighborhood.”
Everybody knows exactly what is meant by, “This IS a good school” or “That used to be such a good school.”
Everybody knows exactly what is meant by, “Such and such nation is a GOOD place to live.”
Only a dishonest anti-White or a mentally challenged person would argue that simple expression of natural law such as this is quote Racist unquote or that an “exception” somehow JUSTIFIES a new genocide. Only anti-Whites seek out exceptions to rules such as these to serve as a justification for why they FORCE Liberal Diversity & Inclusion on White flight refugee camps.
Common sense dictates that Liberal & Respectable “Diversity” IS chasing down white children because a good ANYTHING can only become “Diverse” once it is formerly WHITE.
Only a BUGSter will notice simple truth and then have the audacity to STATE it.
“Diversity” is a code word for #WhiteGenocide
#41 by TheSeeker OfTruth on 02/17/2015 - 6:16 pm
That is exactly why they can not let there be any White homeland.
But I think the system will crumble before the completion of White genocide. That said, I think the effects, if stopped today, will take centuries to rectify.
#42 by Jason on 02/18/2015 - 1:43 am
Firstly, no one is a traitor for disagreeing with me!
At the big level, RACE matters when it comes to economics.
Whites, Blacks, Browns and Asians are not interchangeable units with different paint jobs.
Whether in a country by themselves, or inside another country which is majority Brown, Whites must be able to form a polity or political group among themselves free of genocidal policies to be effective.
White countries do much better than non-White, especially when it comes to innovation. Brown countries that have had White leadership did better than Brown countries without it.
White groups may vary on how economically successful they are. Gregory Clark, an economist, claims that something happened to Western Europeans over the last 800 years that made them especially good at capitalism – and that be a genetic change. The economically successful outbred everyone else. He claims that may be why the Industrial Revolution happened where it did.
Russians are White and very intelligent. Do they have the traits of high trust that are common among Western European people? No – is that cultural or genetic? Or some combination? I don’t know.
#43 by Secret Squirrel on 02/18/2015 - 3:54 am
If by disagreeing they turn my White country brown, because they’re too lazy to do their own work and too cheap to hire a white man, then they are a traitor. Just as much a traitor as any open borders liberal or respectable conservative.