Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!


Posted by -backbaygrouch- on February 28th, 2015 under Coaching Session

This British lad was cycling with some mates on Caledonian Street in Islington, London, on Friday evening – yesterday. He was accosted and an attempt was made to steal his bicycle. He was stabbed but escaped. After a few feet he collapsed, dead from a knife wound. The murderers ran off. There are multiple witnesses.

“Anyone with information is asked to contact police”.

It would seem that the police do not have any description of the criminals to share with the public in order to jar memories. It would seem none of the multiple witnesses even observed the race of the killers. Because the boy’s family has provided a photograph we know he is White.

When a Black is injured and a suspect is White the press finds out fast. It reports it faster, even if a new category has to be invented, as in the “White Hispanic” slot created for George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin show trial by headline.

Amazingly, the Metropolitan Police do not have a sketch artist on call to assist the public in identifying potential persons of interest. “These days of tight budgets, blah, blah blah….”

One does not have to be a tea leaves reader to know that those the police are searching for are not White. But all must pretend.  photo alancartwright.jpg

But this hurts the investigation. Are they Jamaicans, Pakistanis, Bengladeshis? This is vital information. On the other hand, Alan Cartwright was only a White kid. Why bother with petty matters, such as a useful description? Proper police work must be curtailed to hide the race of those with innocent White blood on their hands.

White lives mean nothing to the authorities. This true in London. This is true in Memphis. This is true in your home town, whether you are English, Canadian, American, Australian, et cetera. All White countries and only White countries.

The hostile elite presiding over all White nations is so secure in its position that it can with impunity toss a bogus plea for help in the face of Whites. No one is being fooled.

In the Daily Mail coverage of this senseless killing there are comments asking: Why no description? Approval of these comments is de facto acknowledgement by the public that the killers are non-Whites. Sample numbers – 1365 to 12 and 858 to 5. No one is buying into the official lie. The anti-Whites do not care.

This horrible slaughter of a White lad is just another of the daily reminders that we are being prepped for Genocide unless we wake up. No one in the Halls of Power gives a damn about us.

We need an alarm clock. The Mantra rings loud and clear. Set it off today.

If you are new here and believe there should be No More Alan Cartwrights check out the Mantra and discover our work. You can join. There are no dues.

  1. #1 by Undercover Lover on 03/01/2015 - 3:35 pm

    “Anti-racists” say
    The killing of a non-white is a tragedy
    and the killing of a MILLION whites is a statistic.
    “Anti-racists” don’t care how many whites get mugged, raped or murdered.
    They only care about how many whites are left.
    “Anti-racists” say they must inflict Diversity on us whites to end racism.
    We all know a “Diverse community” is a formerly White community
    Diversity means Chasing Down The Last White Person.
    It’s Genocide.
    “Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.

  2. #2 by jo3w on 03/01/2015 - 6:42 pm

    I think that as White people become a smaller segment of the population our genocide will turn from “conditions imposed”(article 2(c)) to “killing and serious bodily and mental harm” (article 2(a)(b)).
    We don’t really promote this idea with our talking points. It’s on the slippery slope, but I think every White person knows this will be the case as our government becomes more brown. i.e. South Africa.

    • #3 by polydoros on 03/02/2015 - 4:03 am

      Yesterday I was talking to a family-friend who used the old argument about the etymology of “genocide” meaning “to kill”/-cide, as in “patricide”.

      It was a face-to-face encounter and the speed with which he came up with this argument took me a bit aback. I started talking about the 1948 Genocide Convention, but it was long-winded.

      Afterwards I wished I’d not simply said White Genocide is violent too.

      • #4 by polydoros on 03/02/2015 - 4:10 am

        PS: Usually on the Internet I use the following counters (but they’re very aggressive so not necessarily appropriate against “family-friends”):

        So you support forced conditions aimed at bringing about a world without White people YET you say that’s not White Genocide? You Anti-Whites are sick.

        [or:] You are such a stupid anti-white freak. You’re missing the point entirely. Genocide doesn’t have to be carried out by physically forcing the target population to intermarry.

        [or:] So-called “anti-racists” are imposing “diversity” EVERYWHERE white people live in the world and ONLY where white people live.

        Everyone knows this. “Diverse” means formerly white.

  3. #5 by Bob on 03/02/2015 - 9:17 am

    Genocide has nothing to do with violence.
    Genocide is the purposeful destruction of a race or ethnic group.
    The long-windedness I have seen is sure to be quoting the treaty.
    I have forgotten the citation, so please put it here.
    But making it short is my specialty, so our Mantra on this should be:
    “Genocide has nothing to do with violence.”
    “Genocide is PURPOSELY bringing about the end of any race or ethnic group. (Genocide Treaty Citation).”

    • #6 by Jason on 03/02/2015 - 8:31 pm

      And just to drive the point home: mass violence doesn’t make something genocide. Two countries could go to war killing millions on each side without any genocidal intent.

  4. #7 by -backbaygrouch- on 03/02/2015 - 1:50 pm

    The UN Convention on Genocide defines it in Article 2. It is:

    “Article 2 In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

  5. #8 by Bob on 03/02/2015 - 7:38 pm

    Thanks BBG!
    So here’s the drill:

    “Genocide has nothing to do with violence.”
    “Genocide is PURPOSELY bringing about the end of any race or ethnic group. (UN Convention on Genocide, Article 2).”


You must be logged in to post a comment.