Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Genseric’s exchange with #AntiWhite Journalist Tom Polansek

Posted by Laura on June 24th, 2015 under General

Here is a fantastic exchange between Genseric and anti-white journalist Mr Tom Polansek. Like Bob’s interview with CNN, Genseric has received nothing but silence to the questions he asked.

Hello Mr. Polansek,

You have my attention.

Daniel Genseric

Hi Daniel, Thanks for contacting me. I am trying to learn more about groups concerned with white genocide. I found your Twitter account and am trying to reach out to some of the other people you tweet with too.
Do you associate with a particular group, or are you a member of any groups? How did you become involved with this movement?
I am normally based in Chicago, but am in South Carolina now. Do you ever communicate with anyone here?
I’m glad to talk on the phone of you’re up for it.
Thanks again, Tom

Hi Tom,

Why don’t you explain to me what story you are writing, the angle, etc… and then we can take it from there with the Q and A.

Daniel Genseric

I am just trying to understand the basics of the movement against white genocide from those involved. I am talking to people in the movement to understand how they became involved with it and whether they work mainly by themselves or join established groups. It is unclear to me how often groups have actual meetings and rallies.

It would be helpful if you could help me understand how you joined the moment. Was there a particular event that inspired you? For Dylann Roof, it appears to have been the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin shooting.

If you are in an organized group, which one? How did you become a part of it? Do you ever attend actual events in person?

How long have you been a part of he white genocide movement?

Some people have said the recent conflicts between blacks and police in Ferguson and Baltimore have strengthened the movement. Do you agree?

Has law enforcement ever contacted you about your posts online?

In his apparent manifesto, Dylann Roof complained that most people in the white nationalist moment only post comments online without taking any action.

How do you feel about that?

Thank you, Tom

Why would law enforcement bother to contact a movement (or its adherents) so firmly opposed to violence, i.e. genocide? Is that in the purview of law enforcement’s responsibilities these days? Can you help me understand that? Or, is it simply that the crime ceases to be genocide when the victims are White children and our heresy becomes dangerous when European Americans build any sort of semblance of community, whether online or offline?

United Nations resolution 260, article II clearly states that ANY program whose intent is to eliminate an ethnic group fits the bill for genocide. Have you bothered to read it yet?

Are you seriously attempting to create a link between Dylann Roof, a violent “White Supremacist”, and the White genocide movement whose very ethos is separatist and non-violent?

I think the concept of white genocide is a rather easy one to understand, don’t you? However, it seems most journalists and citizens elect to remain confused about it and misconstrue the facts on purpose. Perhaps their very livelihood is dependent upon maintaining this thin veneer of perpetual “misunderstanding”. Would anyone be confused about a program whose facilitators forced non-Black immigration and subsequently forced assimilation, i.e. intermarriage and status quo “anti-racist” sex, in Africa and only in Africa? Would anyone be confused about the psychological warfare being waged when they then screamed at anyone who disagreed with the program, “racist, nazi, supremacist!”, etc…? Would it ‘require further research’ were genocidal maniacs forcing non-Chinese into China and subsequently forcing them to “integrate” and “assimilate” until Chinese are a minority in their own country? Or, how about doing the same to Latinos in Latin America?

But, somehow when genocide happens to my people, Europid White people, and I dare oppose it, liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a heretic, a racistwhitesupremacistwhowantstokillblacks. The Holy Anti-White Church of Political Correctness says its bible is anti-racist while they justify our genocide. Their minions say white genocide is “justified” because of this or that past indiscretion. It’s as if we are somehow uniquely evil. And these so-called ‘anti-racists’ sugarcoat this obvious program of genocide against whites with gumdrops and rainbow sprinkles like “Diversity, Multiculturalism, Inclusion, Normalization, etc…” What these mind control gurus really are is anti-White.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


For and on behalf of
European Americans,
Daniel Genseric

Thanks Daniel. I was asking whether law enforcement had ever contacted you out of curiosity. I would not know for sure if I didn’t ask.
Are you part of an established white nationalist group? If, so how did become involved with it? If not, why not?
I’m interested in your response.


You are welcome, Tom.

I’m also interested in your response. Why would you be curious about law enforcement contacting me? Why would that thought even occur to you? Also, how did you land in South Carolina when you are based in Illinois? Are you there only to cover the Dylann Roof story? Have you been permanently reassigned? Is it your goal to link the white genocide movement to Dylann Roof?

Will you be following up with the New Black Panther Party and their various members’ recent, credible threats on majority-White nurseries/daycare centers in retaliation for the AME church shooting? Maybe try researching the #WeWillShootBack hash? Whatever happened to the ANTI-WHITE TERRORISTS who burned alive nineteen year-old Jessica Chambers and fifteen year-old Desirae Jones last December? Where is the wall street media coverage of those anti-White atrocities?

On groups:
I exercise MY vanishing free speech rights on behalf of Europid Whites who are too saddled with silence imposed on them by The Holy Anti-White Church of Political Correctness’ priest-class and its Diversity Gospel to speak for themselves.

Diversity is a code word for White genocide

  1. #1 by Rose on 06/24/2015 - 6:22 pm

    Poor guy couldn’t get the Dylan Roof & “White Supremacist group” quotes he was hoping for.

  2. #2 by -cecilhenry- on 06/24/2015 - 6:27 pm

    He was ‘trying to learn more about groups concerned with White Genocide’ .

    But to the point– why are you not interested in learning about White Genocide.

    That is the issue. This is NOT about a ‘group’.

    This is about White Genocide. There is a big difference. Do you understand that Mr. Polansek?

  3. #3 by Bob on 06/24/2015 - 6:51 pm

    Excellent work.
    But something occurred to me that I think Daniel G will agree with:
    No matter how sickening liberal proposals are, respectable conservatives always manage to come up with something even more nauseating.
    Respectables are now saying that they fully approve of racial genocide, so long as it doesn’t become cultural “genocide.”
    Respectable conservatives are as amoral as they are absurd.

    • #4 by Rose on 06/24/2015 - 7:36 pm

      Does this guy on CNN calling removal of the Confederate flag “cultural genocide” against Southern Whites not help spread our message?

      “Cultural Genocide” doesn’t seem as an nefarious counter-meme as “White Suicide.”

    • #5 by Daniel Genseric on 06/24/2015 - 9:29 pm

      Thanks for the feedback and the airtime, Bob. I do agree that the great pretenders, or ratifiers as you call them, are probably worse – working their “magic” almost from within our ranks. The anti-White liberals would not be able to move without the Nikki Haley’s, Mitt Romney’s and William F. Buckley’s of the world.

      Saying ‘cultural genocide’ without mentioning race is as disingenuous as one can get. The ‘cultural genocide’ wannameme is a classic example of piggybacking.

    • #6 by Undercover Lover on 06/24/2015 - 9:46 pm

      I love that line Bob

      Respectable conservatives fully approve of racial genocide, so long as it doesn’t become “cultural genocide.”

  4. #7 by Richard on 06/24/2015 - 8:18 pm I looked at his twitter account and, to me, he did not seem openly Anti-White. It says about him: “Reuters reporter covering agriculture, futures business. Ex-Dow Jones/WSJ. ” Obviously he is not awake to anti-White perfidy. I admit it is strange that he went to South Carolina to seemingly investigate the shooting out of the blue.

  5. #8 by Jason on 06/24/2015 - 9:28 pm

    Now if another BUGSER had done this, Genseric would attack them, call them names, demoralize them, right after they had put in a tremendous amount of work, as he has done for years.

    No one should do that to him.

    • #9 by Daniel Genseric on 06/24/2015 - 9:34 pm

      Unlike some people around here, I actually seek out constructive criticism, of which you apparently have none to offer.

      Thanks anyway. Maybe you can add some value and contribute next time.

      You can do it!

      • #10 by Jason on 06/24/2015 - 9:46 pm

        You blocked me on twitter, denigrated me and other BUGSERS on twitter and here in a way that could hurt our pro-White efforts, called me a traitor and told me to leave BUGS starting 3 years and many times afterward. You never explained yourself.

        You went out of your way to NEVER offer constructive criticism to BUGSERS who were doing difficult work in the field.

        However, this recent video of you surfaced which gives me insight into your behavior. It’s never too late to get off the bottle. We see Daniel sing for his booze:

  6. #11 by Daniel Genseric on 06/25/2015 - 11:17 am

    I might reply the next time a BUGSer enters.

    Haven’t seen anything since my last comment and Bob’s quickie on the next page.

  7. #12 by RobRoy on 06/25/2015 - 6:49 pm

    “I am just trying to understand the basics of the movement against white genocide…”

    When will he contact those who are FOR white genocide?

    Well done, Daniel.

  8. #13 by time for freedom on 06/25/2015 - 8:32 pm

    But Daniel, this would have been a tremendous opportunity to discuss the basics of White Genocide and it’s methodology instead of questioning his sincerity or honesty. It is our job to explain this criminal process to everybody we can using the talking points that we have been given. Agreed?

    I don’t need to know the exact motives driving all of these journalists and reporters. My job is to state mantrafied points over and over, because that’s what works…We’ve proven this over and over on the ‘net, in Paltalk, and other venues.

    But you still got in a couple of good licks to demonstrate the anti-white double standards which prevail in our society.

    Let us know how the rest of the interview goes, if you are lucky enough to go further with this fellow.


    • #14 by Daniel Genseric on 06/26/2015 - 6:59 pm

      Luck had nothing to do with it. I earned every bit of it, and every other exchange I’ve had with professors, media personalities, and reporters.

      They all either paid the price or told the truth, so help them god.

  9. #15 by time for freedom on 06/25/2015 - 9:14 pm

    What do you all think of this answer to the Dyllan Roof nonsense?

    “If a crazed mentally ill psychotic such as Dyllan Roof has been able to discern some of the specifics of White Genocide, that clearly indicates that White Genocide as a policy must be so apparent and extant in our society that even a psychiatrically impaired person can understand it.

    This means that every single White Man, Woman, and Child is on their way to developing an even more in depth understanding of how they have been violated by the system of White Genocide, and will demand by rights its complete abolition.”

    • #16 by RobRoy on 06/25/2015 - 10:34 pm

      I don’t answer inane anti-white questions. Dylann Roof’s alleged crimes do not justify white genocide.

  10. #17 by Dennis K on 06/27/2015 - 8:11 am

    You handled yourself well, Daniel.’
    If I may offer some thoughts, based on my impressions and prior experience.

    Firstly I do not like the terms Europid or Europoid. I understand you may want something more technically accurate, but 99.9% of whites (most likely more) do not use this term to describe themselves. I think most whites would get the initial impression you are talking about some other group, and not themselves.

    Secondly, I think you asked too many questions. So many questions being asked, few are going to follow what was asked. I prefer to ask a very limited number, but DEMAND an answer. I choose my questions carefully, so if demonstrating the inability to answer the question is the only point I make, then it is worth it. I got the sense your questions were never meant to be answered. We can’t let anti-whites get away with not answering questions.

    Shorter responses hit home harder.

    Assuming that you are already speaking on behalf of all European Americans is a great tactic. Love it.

  11. #18 by Lord Nelson on 07/02/2015 - 2:39 pm

    Well done Daniel G. You went on the attack and took control of the exchange with loaded questions. Nice! 😉

    For too long our side has had too much respect for the Anti-Whites. We would try to reason with them and hopefully convince them that we are not wacist etc… Instead of labeling them and treating them with the contempt they deserve.

You must be logged in to post a comment.