Have you ever had the impression that no matter how THICKLY you lay sarcasm on…

– even if you give SPOILERS that you are being sarcastic –

That people STILL take it the wrong way?…

That’s because the unconscious / subconscious mind doesn’t understand sarcasm in certain contexts.

This is very important to understand, so please read this carefully:

The unconscious mind doesn’t understand sarcasm in many forms.

If someone says something, so that the audience can HEAR and SEE the person, then there are various cues such as tone of voice and body language. The unconscious mind picks up on these cues.

So if something sarcastic is said IN PERSON or as a VIDEO by a SKILLED ACTOR, the mixed messages reach the unconscious and it will create dissonance.

But it is still risky, and for purely written communication it DOESN’T WORK.

That’s because the unconscious mind can’t process the intent from just written text.

It’s similar to the way children don’t understand sarcasm, or how the unconscious mind doesn’t understand negations.

This is well-known in the field of hypnosis and NLP.

That being said, few people really come to grips with this.

The Sarcasm Trap is something all-too-easy to fall into.

Even some White geNOcide messages have been altered over the years because of this. A case in point:

Canada is 63% Racist and 37% Diverse. The U.S. is 61% Racist and 39% Diverse. Australia is 69% Racist and 31% Diverse. Europe is 82% Racist and 18% Diverse.

END RACISM NOW!!! WE NEED MORE DIVERSITY!!!

– Anti-racist logic

“Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.

Note that the line “- Anti-racist logic” was added some time ago, because audiences didn’t “get it”.

And even with THIS line, many people STILL get the wrong idea…

But don’t blame the audience. You have to change the message.

It is NOT the intent of the communicator; it is HOW the message is understood.

So especially in purely written communication, stop the sarcasm!

The unconscious mind doesn’t understand it. It takes it literally!

Bob Raw #007 – Elections are substitutes for something a whole lot nastier – CIVIL WAR

Bob Raw #007 – Elections make the decision that a battlefield may have to make. Once you have to justify your freedoms, you are a slave

Bob Raw #007 – Artifical Intelligence, Automation and Artifical Will

In denying charges of White genocide, anti-Whites are now going beyond all previous limits in denouncing White people.

The SPLC denounces a mythical White race which is pure Evil. Their Evil Whites have no homeland at all.

All these Evil Whites do is take. At least the Learned Elders of Zion were supposed to be greedy JEWS. But the ADL’s whites seem to have done nothing but take away the land of others.

The anti-Semites’ Learned Elders were at least greedy JEWS. The anti-Whites’ version of White people seem to have no origin except in the Medieval Inquisitors’ imaginary homeland of Hell.

In the anti-Whites sick vision the White race comes onto the scene of history doing nothing but TAKING.

They attacks the term “White genocide,” but they do nothing from the word go except JUSTIFYING a program of ridding the world of these purely evil White people they imagine.

Anti-Whites declare that they are offended by being accused of advocating White genocide, but they then go onto describe White people as a pure nightmare of evil.

Can these Whites be the race which rid the world of smallpox and reduced starvation to hunger at most throughout the world? You won’t see the least bit of credit given to White people given by these rabid anti-Whites. According to the anti-Whites, Whites do nothing but take and invade!

Every word anti-Whites say in response to the charge of White genocide is a justification for that exact policy.

From the first moment of the movie, Godzilla is titanic, a force of nature one never even imagines.

And he’s dead meat.

Ferocious Godzilla’s life span as the Monster of the Universe is limited by another factor.

We call it “chatter.”

We call it “just talk.”

His death is not dependent on the action of Great Heroes.

He will live until some guy who can’t fly because he wears glasses gets a report through to HQ. They will then chatter a command to some other guy sitting at a desk. Soon Godzilla, and Godzilla’s big brother, are strictly past tense.

When I worked on Capitol Hill one of  the best stories, which could have been true, was about an office manager who had worked at the Defense Department.

Until she misplaced a regiment. She put an entire combat regiment into the wrong base in the wrong state.

That regiment could have had a nuclear weapon. That regiment would have taken out Godzilla.

She mixed up the communications and misplaced it.

BUGS is group dedicated to bringing chatter to a professional level.

We have made things go viral and we may have discovered a new rule that groups who fund raise under the present system have to cripple themselves in terms of the power that would vaporize Godzilla.

When he died in 2011, Christopher Hitchens was a recovering Marxist

In a society where people don’t like to commit themselves to being “atheists,”Hitchens declared himself an “antitheist.”

Hitchens declared not only that he was an atheist, but that religion itself was a bad thing. He called himself an antitheist. His book on this subject was called, “Religion Spoils Everything.”

After a lifetime of watching people creep around issues, the simple fact that he dropped all the crap and said it bluntly was a relief to a lot of people like me. I did not fall into a goofy love affair with him the way respectable conservatives did, but I was impressed by this.

Of course those in recovery never use the term “recovered” alcoholic.  It’s always “recovering,” and I think we all know why.

Hitchens also said that he understood how becoming atheists can be hard on them psychologically. Rejecting their version of God robs a person of the central theme of his life.

Hitchens explained that he knew this agony because Marxism had been his religion.

The fact that Marxism is a religious faith is something Marxists hate to hear.

Like all religious fanaticism, Marxism declares that it is against all OTHER religions.

But the most basic tenet of the Marxist Faith is that Marxism is NOT a faith.

But Hitchens was a recoverING Marxist. It is possible he would have taken the next step in his recovery had he not died of cancer at 62 years of age.

He had realized that Marxism was silly. But given time, he might have seen the basic fault of Marxism. It might have occurred to him that there is something wrong with countries that have to use walls and machine guns to keep their people inside as all Marxist states must.

When he denounced all the horror of the Stalins and Maos, he still made the fundamental error converts from Marxism make. He admitted that Marxism was not just an intellectual mistake, but was also causing horror after horror in the name of humanitarianism, just as other religious faiths had done throughout history. He never saw the fundamental error Marxism represents.

Like every anti-Communist who wants to be “fair,” he said that anti-Communists were often just as bad as Communists. His favorite examples of an anti-Communist error was apartheid.

In saying apartheid was as bad as Stalin, Hitchens spoke like a good conservative.

And a good conservative always makes the same fundamental error: To be respectable, conservatives are like every other elitist:

They do not understand the difference between freedom and a prison.

For me, and for those who wrote our Constitution, what one wants is not a country that is dedicated to Ideals that the intellectual elite agree on.

The aim of our Founders was to create a country they would want to live in, ideals be damned.

The Founders had had quite enough of Great Ideals, thank you very much. The example of Evil that towered over their tie was the centuries of European Religious Wars that had slaughtered a third of Germany’s entire population in the century before the Constitution was written.

The Founders were all too familiar with how people tortured and slaughtered each other in the name of Love and Brotherhood.   The last thing they were obsessed with was the Ideal of Equality or some other abstract. They only put that crap in the Declaration to appeal to Europeans to take their side in the war against Britain.

Jefferson would have been appalled if someone making POLICY in America actually took this “all men are created equal nonsense” seriously.

That crap was for Europeans, and none-too-intelligent Europeans at that.

So Hitchens’s talk about apartheid showed that he had not yet taken the critical step in recovery from his Marxist faith.

Apartheid was a system that survived the acid test that Marxism always fails.

There was no fence around apartheid South Africa. Illegal IMMIGRATION was their only problem in this respect. A major complaint of actual South African Blacks was that the apartheid government did not enforce IMMIGRATION laws.

With Whites in power, cheap African labor coming into South Africa was encouraged, just as our ruling money men are all for cheap labor coming into America.

The acid test of any society is not whether it fits in with the Ideals laid out by the “Intellectuals” and “Idealists.”

The acid test of a country is whether people want to live there.

Communist countries all had to have walls and millions of men to keep their people IN.

America needs walls to keep people OUT.

Hitchens’  recovery from Marxism never reached the point where he saw this most fundamental reality of all.

A society where the people must be fenced in or where Whites have to be chased down in the name of Diversity is failure, Idealistic nonsense be damned.

Artificial Intelligence repeats the discussion of automation that was all the rage about half a century ago.

The problem as the professors saw it was that the working clahss would have nothing to do and lose all virtue.

Professors looked at the working class in exactly the same way that their New England predecessors did. They felt that automation would make them lazy and degenerate.

Eric Hoffer, being a workingman himself, went back over history and pointed out that the great breakthrough was made during playtime, not during worktime. This was a truy heretical repudiation of the Puritan Ethic, which says that mankind only makes Great Advances when it must do so for survival.

Under this Puritan Ethic, the only people who should get paid just to think were the professors, the heirs of the Puritan preachers.   This Hoffer piece may be hard to find, for the exact same reason that my stuff will be hard to find:

When Mommy Professor gets really put down, the arguments that put him in his place are carefully forgotten.

The only book that Hoffer wrote that is easy to find is The True Believer, which does not criticize Mommy Professor from the point of view of an actual working class spokesman.

It exposes the so-called Working Class Marxism for the silliness it is without even discussing it.

Hoffer said that the general population with more playtime would outthink the Mommy Professors.

That commentary,  like the rest of Hoffer’s real breakthroughs, are now in The Silence.

The True Believer is his only book that gets mentioned.

But unlike automation, AI involves not only artificial, nonhuman work.  it also means Artificial Will.

This is the old Frankenstein Complex that AI will produce genius machines who want what they want rather than what we want.

All the commenters asked for was commentary on the old automation idea that AI would take over the WORK.

If you can find it, Hoffer already covered this.

But artificial will is entirely different.

You will have enough trouble finding Hoffer’s common sense approach to automation.

Lots of luck. The Silence is very effective.