The most valuable aspect of the Paltalk sessions with Bob (available on youtube), was not the value of the activism itself. It was the educational value FOR BUGSERS.

For it allowed us to more fully model Bob’s way of thinking and techniques.

A memorable case in point:

In the Paltalk room, an anti-white appeared who had repeatedly flagged Bugser comments while we were SWARMING.

But instead of reacting indignantly to this anti-white, Bob took the high ground:

Bob said condescendingly to the anti-white, that the anti-white was at least trying his hardest.

So placing himself ABOVE the enemy:

A few other examples of taking the high ground:

Anti-white writes:

“You are such a sad, fearful person”

BUGSER replies:

“In place of childish name-calling, answer this: Are you for or against White genocide?”

…

Other examples:

“I am anti-retard”:

Who told you it was ‘intelligent’ to support White GENOCIDE?

Diversity is a codeword for White GENOCIDE

…

“lol”/“No one cares”:

People of conscience care about genocide. Get a moral compass

…

“Why should I care about my race?”:

That is the SOCIOPATH’S QUESTION. Only a sociopath doesn’t care about the future of his people.

…

All these responses take the high ground – especially the MORAL HIGH GROUND. Very important!

For decades, there was a perfectly predictable time table on every Republican campaign, one you could trust like sunrise.

In the spring, for example, at a Republican cocktail party, one by one, several people would call  you over and tell you, as if it were Secret Knowledge, the magic formula, “Republicans are going to get the NEGRO VOTE this year!”

Like I say, every spring this was as predictable as sunrise.

As they whispered the Secret Formula for the Black Vote that was being pushed this election year, they would always, decade after decade, recite exactly the same statistics.

They would, even in the 90s, repeat the results of the 1952 and 1956 elections. In those elections, Eisenhower got well over forty percent of the black vote. They would cite, as if it were the first time anyone had ever been let in on The Secret, that Nelson Rockefeller got over forty percent of the black vote consistently.

In fact, I knew of other cases, like a truly right wing congressman, Livingston in Louisiana, who also broke that golden barrier of 40% of the Black vote every two years.

Then I tried to explain, TO A DUMBASS REPUBLICAN who didn’t know politics from cow manure, why this was true but the Blacks weren’t really VOTING.

If you have the choice of explaining real politics to a Republicans or calculus to a hog, pick the hog every time.

The critical fact is that this Black “vote” means nothing because Blacks would consistently go along when there was a landslide. Eisenhower and Rockefeller won their elections by so many votes that the Blacks who went along meant absolutely nothing. Livingston was the same.

Livingston was the same. He won very election big time.

The List would only be pulled out when the Black vote could MATTER.

Eisenhower and Rockefeller would have won their elections regardless. In the cases where the margin was close, only when it COUNTED, the real elections in real politics, which is an alien world to cocktail party Republicans, did the Black List come out.

This was the list handed out at Blacks churches and so forth which listed exactly who to vote for. Makes the Nazi SS look sloppy.

Please note that I am using the present tense here. Blacks have NEVER varied from rigid adherence to their Black List and they never will.

As I have pointed out, the Black List got screwed up and gave the United States senatorial nomination, not exactly a small and obscure position, to a complete political unknown and he won in a landslide.

It didn’t matter that Black voters had never heard of this guy. He was on the Black List so he got the Black so-called “Vote.”

Election night some reporters showed their surprise that this total unknown had won the Democratic nomination out of nowhere.

And it was not mentioned another time during the whole campaign.  Everybody who knows anything about politics which category excludes Republicans, knew exactly what had happened.

As I keep trying to explain, NOTHING would have gotten this mentioned in the media.   I keep being told by one or two otherwise intelligent BUGSERS saying that if I produced that list at a press conference…..

Even some of our own simply cannot grasp reality.

Yea, right, gang, the media are going to make a major story out of something that has been known by everybody here since World War II.

REPORT the Black List?

The Black List is there for any reporter to get hold of it just by giving some Black guy what in the case of a White man would be called a bribe and is proudly referred to here as “walkin’ ‘rounds Money”.

His story would be shredded and he would get another job anywhere near the media for the rest of his life.

Like White Genocide, the Black List is one more demonstration of something everybody knows: The results of the “Civil Rights Movement”  were exactly what us   “old Southern Bigots” SAID they would be.

The big Blacs magazine in the 1950s was called Jet Magazine.   Almost every single Jet cover looked like MSM looks today: It showed Black man married to White woman.

Black men want White women.

Period.

“Giving Blacks the vote” was ridiculous because they don’t really VOTE.

And if you say this in public and show a Blacks List to the media, you will be a big trouble.

I would be deeply ashamed if our present rulers did not call me a “racist.’”

If the truth is racist, it’s the truth that has got to go.

To be anything but a “racist” in today’s America is treason against the truth.

Anti-Whites are in control of the media. Therefore the Commission that by law operates the joint press conferences or joint interviews, aka debates, only appoints anti-Whites as moderators, aka, third debaters. This means that the microphones are controlled by partisans of chasing down Whites. Even who can be in attendance is decided with a bias.

Another way of putting it is that the dice are loaded against White interests. The dice cast a lot of sevens for Clinton last night. The snake eyes were only for Trump.

The moderators in the past and this year have displayed bias so blatant that even the media has acknowledged it. Yet no one asks the simple question: If it is broke, why not fix it?

Television news readers are not the only pool that can be drawn from to provide intelligent questions of national interest. There are multiple other resources out there. It is foolish to limit the search to the only professionals less trusted by the public than Congress Critters.

Try as one may there is no way to take partisanship out of organizing the “debates”. The towel of mythical fairness ought to be thrown in. Each candidate should be allowed to appoint a co-moderator. A coin flip could decide who gets which half to question and the other can control the timing during that half. Another alternative could be real debates in which only the candidates talk with a silent timekeeper enforcing a set schedule.

The second debate this year followed the usual path of not addressing White interests. Anderson Cooper appeared to make some effort at even handedness while Martha Raddatz desperately interrupted and hectored Donald Trump. She was frantic to have her Candy Crowley moment when she could slay a GOP nominee. The hate in Martha Raddatz’s heart seeped through what seem to be a half dozen face lifts the way an overflowing cesspool oozes out across a lawn. The effect was much the same.

There is no need to catalog further the record of bias on display in past TV extravaganzas posing as “debates”.

Bob has spoken about the freedom that being a candidate has given him. A freedom that in is the Bill of Rights.

The “debates” are regulated by law. The Commission is established by law. Laws can be changed. It behooves Congress to take away the power of censorship that the present system has inflicted upon Whites.

The anti-White media must be stripped of its monopoly of public discourse. A candidate such as Donald Trump ought to have his issues addressed. Those are our issues.

Every American is entitled to free speech in theory. A glitch in the law gave Bob a platform. White issues deserve the same. But so long as the anti-White media has a lock on what Americans can hear discussed in public progress is going to be grimly hard.