Search? Click Here
Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!

Lee SURRENDERED. Nations NEVER Surrender

Posted by Laura on July 16th, 2018 under Coaching Session


Originally posted by Bob July 16th, 2008 – http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2008/07/16/lee-surrendered-nations-never-surrender/

Lee was CONVINCED he was defeated, so he surrendered. At Appomattox a brigadier general from South Carolina (where else?) told Lee that, instead of surrendering, what was left of the Confederate Army should drop what few weapons it had left and run for the mountains for a guerrilla war.

He said Lee should advise other Southerners to continue the resistance.

Lee ignored this fanatic.

Under the Union government he accepted by his surrender, Lee had no more freedom of speech than we have today. His citizenship was taken away and he had to be silent about everything he really thought to stay in the US.

But it is clear that he regretted his decision on April 9, 1865 to the end of his days.

Let us go back to the theme I set out in “Defeatism is the ONLY Enemy.” Lee decided he had lost a war, fair and square.

Which means he never saw the South as a NATION.

Nations NEVER surrender.

In the oceans of ink spilled over the Civil War, a major portion is criticism of Jefferson Davis for always appointing Lee as Commander and Chief subject to himself. Only in the final emergency did Davis give Lee full powers as Commander in Chief.

Lee did only one thing with that total command, and he regretted it until his dying day. Lee not only did not allow his forces to head for the hills, but he surrendered ALL Confederate forces everywhere.

Which left the South totally at the mercy and good will of the North.

Fifty years before Lee made his one Great Political Decision, Russia made the opposite one.

Napoleon had conquered Moscow, Russia’s Richmond. Napoleon had defeated every Russian army and Russia was simply prostrate. But Russia was a NATION.

Lee ordered every Southerner to accept that the South was not a nation.

We were a movement that had lost fair and square.

Could the North have done all that to us if we had had a military core as guerrilla force in the mountains? Could the North have done all that to us if each army had to decide for itself what to do next?

The Union Army occupied the South in exactly the same way that Napoleon occupied Russia in 1812 and Britain occupied America in 1780. Napoleon occupied the land his army STOOD on. Britain occupied the part of America it STOOD on. Yankee armies occupied the Southern land they STOOD on.

The one difference was that Lee SURRENDERED.

Nations NEVER surrender

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  1. #1 by Richard on 07/23/2018 - 3:29 pm

    I view Lee as too much a military man and too little a patriot. Why did Lee go to Gettysburg? By going into the North, the Southern army was doing the very thing the Northern army was guilty of: invading another country.

    The South should have simply defended its homelands — always forcing the North to be the aggressor, and always having the advantage of their own fortresses. And telling the world that the war would end the day the North stopped invading another county to force their rule over it.

    As soon as the South started “playing war” as taught to professional solders, and became an aggressor themselves they had no moral advantage. The North being larger and richer was then bound to win.

  2. #2 by Wuntz Moore on 07/28/2018 - 4:25 pm

    The great majority of whites in the U.S. are not yet even aware that a genocidal racial war is being waged against them. And yet, some sizable fraction of awakened whites already cede defeat. They mistake occupation for defeat, and, I believe, harbor the hope that surrender will be the easier path.

  3. #3 by Cat on 07/29/2018 - 11:27 am

    Thank-you for posting this. I have never looked at it like that but then I read Jefferson Davis’ book. Your work in keeping Bob’s work fresh and at the forefront is appreciated.

  4. #4 by WmWhite on 07/31/2018 - 9:37 am

    White Genocide in New Hampshire …unfortunately there is no comment section.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/27/us/new-hampshire-white-diversify.html

    “New Hampshire, 94 Percent White, Asks: How Do You Diversify a Whole State?”

    This article is a perfect example of the well organized assault on White people that Bob often wrote about. The article even gives the example of Portland ME where the successful effort (by anti-whites) was made to import Somali Africans into a majority white area with the intended goal of White Genocide.

    Unlike Lee who FOUGHT and then surrendered, the people I know from Maine stood complacently by and passively capitulated to what they saw as the inevitable demographic change of a once white country. To them there was nothing to fight for or surrender too …it was just “progress.”

    New Hampshirites will probably do the same. White self-hatred and white appeasement to anti-white hatred will leave a very empty and sad legacy for our children …very sad indeed.

    • #5 by Yankee Rebel on 08/07/2018 - 11:21 am

      I can proudly say I am ONE White Mainer that hasn’t stood complacently by while my state gets “forced diversity”. Eventually, more will join me in the resistance to White Genocide. The tide will turn. We will not surrender our nation to anti-Whites.

  5. #6 by Laura on 07/31/2018 - 1:10 pm

    That NY Times article is a blatant example of how White Genocide is taking place. How whites are being chased down with “diversity”.

    It’s another example just like the one Bob used to speak about, how the SPLC sent a fundraising letter to force integrate NORTHERN Idaho with non-whites.

    This is a prime target for us BUGSER to swarm. This is what we do.

    Expose the program of White Genocide.

    We have an article up on FWG with the phone number of the Governors office in New Hampshire – http://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/2018/07/30/white-genocide-will-good-new-hampshire-tells-white-citizens/

    Will Arvelo, the New Hampshire’s director of economic development would be another good anti-white to contact.

    We have been conditioned to white self hatred. Our races mentality has to change. This is our task.

    It needs to be known that it is NOT OK to be anti-white.

    It’s NOT OK to chase white people down with “diversity”.

    That this IS White Genocide. And these anti-whites are complicit in that genocide.

    The tide of history IS turning. Just keep doing what Bob taught us.

Comments are closed.