New Article – Portland City Council Hears Resolution Condemning White Supremacy, Unanimously Passing It As They Were EXPECTED To
Posted by Laura on February 15th, 2019 under General
Bob’s Books
Bob's first book - 1976
A Plague On Both Your HousesBob's second book - 1982
THE NEW RIGHT PAPERSBob's deadliest book - 2004
Why Johnny Can't Think:
America's Professor-PriesthoodWhy Johnny Can't Think ebook zip
pwrd: Phu=9Ad5
#1 by WmWhite on 02/19/2019 - 12:48 pm
A very good article by FWG about (the hypocrisy and blatant white hatred of the low IQ) Nicole Grant, for attacking whites and then saying it’s NOT about whites… what a liar!
But more troubling is the acceptance of this anti-white Resolution by the “lemming” white commissioners, who would rather eat-their-own-children than be perceived as heretics to the religion of Political Correctness.
#2 by Wuntz Moore on 03/03/2019 - 4:58 pm
“White supremacy” is the lie that anti-whites tell while they carry out White Genocide.
#3 by Wuntz Moore on 03/03/2019 - 9:02 pm
It would help to have some feedback, especially any criticisms or objections, on trying out that statement as a response when anti-whites use “White supremacy.” Those of us who like the statement don’t want to start promoting it to pro-whites as “a gift from Whitaker’s BUGSers” unless BUGSers feel it’s useful enough that we can state that about it.
#4 by WmWhite on 03/06/2019 - 1:06 pm
Hello WM
I’ve posted your meme at several sites but have not gotten any response …yet!
I’m not sure the logic of the statement: “White supremacy” is the lie that anti-whites tell while they carry out White Genocide,” works for me but I’ll continue posting it and thinking about it.
#5 by Wuntz Moore on 03/06/2019 - 8:51 pm
Thanks for the feedback and thanks for the experimenting (you’re just posting it when anti-whites use the phrase “white supremacy,” right? I don’t recommend posting it in any other circumstance. I think it might be weird as a stand-alone statement.)
I shared your feeling about the logic, and I think your mentioning it has made me see the problem more clearly:
“White supremacy” seems to refer to 3 different things:
1. The fact that whites were in a superior position up until recent decades.
2. The claim that restoring ourselves to that position is what we’re all about.
3. The claim that we are still in that position.
We certainly wouldn’t want to call the first meaning a lie, but I think it’s honest for us to call #2 or #3 a lie.
The statement probably responds best to claim #3, but the problem is that the term “white supremacy,” whichever of its 3 meanings seems most intended in a particular case, carries the other 2 meanings subliminally, which may always make our experimental statement seem a bit of a stretch because meaning #1 clearly isn’t a lie.
Otoh, the function of the term “white supremacy” today is to hide the fact of White Genocide, so I’m seeing the experimental statement as functioning somewhat like the two memes we have about diversity.
I’ll think about it more too.
#6 by Sunlit I. on 03/05/2019 - 2:31 pm
How about:
Justification of White Genocide begins with talking about “white supremacy” ?