Gator on the Fourteen Words

Posted by Bob on March 6, 2010 at 6:51 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 9 Comments »

Gator says:

A year or two back I did an experiment on yahoo answers. First I posted:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Jewish children.
It got very positive responses. As it did when I used black children, and Native American children.
It was only when I used white children did I get called a racA year or two back I did an experiment on yahoo answers. First I posted:
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Jewish children.
It got very positive responses. As it did when I used black children, and Native American children.
It was only when I used white children did I get called racist
Try it.

Gator asks me for instructions. He is already following my instructions. He already TRIED it and he is finally telling us so.

I need active brains, not followers.

Sic ‘em, Gator!

BUGS Fills the Gap

Posted by Bob on March 1, 2010 at 10:13 am  
Filed Under Bob, Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 3 Comments »

The first comment on my article “Torture” said no one can stand up under interrogation. I can’t comment on that. I was just called in when I could be use, and I never cracked anybody. In fact, the person I was talking to was never aware he had given me ANY information.

Every American who was in World War II says he really knows what Combat is. So since I did some questioning, people assume that I claim to know a lot about interrogations in general. They are not open to the public, or to me, so you can find out more about them on Google than from me.

But thinking about it, I think my usefulness there relates to what we are doing here. The person I LISTENED to, and that is all I did, was not aware I got information out of him. Ninety percent of the people who are influenced by the Mantra will not remember where or when they saw it and we will not know about them.

In fact, ninety percent of THOSE people will never have heard of the Mantra itself. They will hear from those who do and get the point. We MAY find out about one percent of the people we influence, but I doubt it will be that many.

Everything here relates to everything, and even I am just finding out things like the link between my interrogation methods and the stuff I just mentioned.

Also this all relates to the question one needs always to ask oneself: “Why was this information PRODUCED?” People who run organizations or raise money or want to be Leaders have to limit themselves to results they can SEE. That is the only way to get what they are, in most cases legitimately, really after.

That leaves a huge opening for people like us, who are only interested in results for their own sake. We will always be flying blind to a certain extent, but that is because we are filling a gap only we can fill. Where there are measurable results, there are others who have the incentive to get them.

Just as I have never “cracked” anybody, at least ninety-nine percent of the people we influence will not be aware we influenced them.

And we want it that way. Some day a historian may write a book that includes us, but not for decades yet. In his time, Monet was a very déclassé painter. Nobody who WAS anybody liked him.

No one in BUGS, least of all me, has any interest in making “Whitakerites” out of anybody. If I were trying to be a LEADER or we were raising money, that would change our approach completely. This may answer some of Gator’s questions.

The best definition I ever heard of the difference between Nixon and Reagan was: “Nixon ran for president to BE something. Reagan ran for president to DO something.”

BUGS is here to DO something.

Mommy Sarge to Mommy Professor

Posted by Bob on February 23, 2010 at 6:25 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 10 Comments »

One thing about the Obedient Generation sticks out to me like a sore thumb.

So nobody else notices it.

Fifty percent of that generation took some advantage of the GI Bill for college. They went straight from learning that Sergeant whipping them and being worshiped to Mommy Professor telling them how he and his fellow Idealists and Intellectuals should rule the world. It is hard to imagine a more effective combination to make slaves of Americans.

No wonder they were THEN known as the Silent Generation. They had absolutely no training but how to obey. Stay butt-up to your sergeant and then repeat what Mommy Professors said word for word. They did not become vocal until they were GIVEN PERMISSION to do so from the establishment:

“You are so much better than the guys fighting Progressive Socialism in Vietnam. Yours was the Good War.” The louder they proclaimed this, the more praise they got.

Shari’s right — as usual — the draft was the natural continuation of this process. Look at how we warped our young people: Ideally a young person reaching the age when they used to have to make decisions entered an eight-year Politically Correct incubation period.

Young people who would have been learning a trade or determining their future at age fourteen began high school and did four-years, freshman-sophomore-junior-senior. THEN began ANOTHER four years under Mommy Professor. Then they were supposed to be drafted and go from Mommy Professor to Mommy Sarge.

Those who were drafted first reverse this process after the high school four years. If you ever wonder how Americans became the mindless slaves they are, THINK ABOUT this process.

Analyzing the Mantra

Posted by Bob on February 18, 2010 at 7:29 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 10 Comments »

Backbaygrouch points out the many hits he got on Google for BUGS when He put in “anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.” Most rewrites of the Mantra leave this out.

That is because they are based on theory rather than practice. That is term that gets noticed. That is where you get a chuckle from even the most unwilling people. That is where you get a break from the seriousness.

It also shows why I am so careful about the wording. I developed this by USING this, not by THEORIZING about it. You can get the points in faster, but in the real world, can you GET them in? What, IN PRACTICE, do you need to get them in?

The only improvement so far has been Genocide by Assimilation and Shari’s emphasis on

ASIA FOR THE ASIANS! AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS! WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYONE!

If you left out anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, it turns out, you have far less chance of being Googled. That never occurred to me before BBG tried it, but it is the only unique word in the thing.

There is probably no way to get why I wrote the Mantra as I did if you don’t PRACTICE the Mantra. It looks cumbersome, but believe me I have tried to cut out stuff.

On the good side, I made an error I am glad was dumbass. Gator61 put the Mantra in Yahoo Talks a second time. I went there and found that his second reply was the usual, whites are horrible bit. I Immediately wrote he should follow up with “You are advocating genocide.” Turns out he already had, with quotes from the genocide convention.

It occurs to me now that he might not have aimed that at the commenter I was talking about. My point is that “white people are awful” is the regular knee-jerk reaction. If you THINK about hat, they can only be saying that genocide is all right against whites. What other purpose could that statement possibly have?

Hit them on that! They get a busted-nose introduction to our new way of thinking by way of getting hit for knee-jerk reply.

I assumed that Gator61 had not used this because I have a hell of a time getting anybody to use the Mantra, much less the next step.

I will never know. Yahoo pulled the plug on the whole thing at last.

Go on to the next. Protest Yahoo’s cutting us off, but it also means we are definitely taking prisoners.

If you are working in a dictatorship, you have to expect your phone to hang itself up a lot.

Mantra Thinking

Posted by Bob on February 15, 2010 at 8:10 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 6 Comments »

Backbaygrouch sardonically said that one thing I was saying was that politicians are only interested in the next election. That is a smartass remark, meant humorously, but it is also Mantra Thinking.

Unlike any other forum that calls itself intellectual, we encourage simplification. Porch Talk does not use big words.

Yes, that is one thing I said. I repeated a simple reality. But Mantra Thinking sees the simple thought and then THINKS about it, rather than just saying it in a complicated way to be impressive.

It took me many years to realize that most of what I say is simply THINKING about what people already know. Nothing is more commonly known than that the Puritans did not come here for religious tolerance. But once they have made that statement, they give it no more thought. I THOUGHT about it, the way the old man on the porch does.

If you think beyond that simple statement, you get some profound results. Yes, the Puritans came here to impose their own religion. But they FAILED. New England became Unitarian. No one ever THINKS about this.

Newton did not DISCOVER gravity, he THOUGHT about gravity.

I did not DISCOVER Genocide by Assimilation, I THOUGHT about it and produced the Mantra.

I have a lot of information, but I am not happy until I fit those facts into a common sense lesson. I make it obvious.

THAT is Mantra Thinking.

BGLASS PAYS HER TUITION

Posted by Bob on February 15, 2010 at 7:55 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 6 Comments »

BGlass says BUGS is quite a find. She uses it to stimulate her mind, which is the point of a real seminar, something you wont find at universities any more.

And BGlass has paid her tuition with three words:

Annihilation by Assimilation

I would say Genocide by Assimilation, but I wouldnt have thought of it without BGlass.

So now I propose the shortest introduction to us and to the Mantra yet:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS AND WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

GENOCIDE BY ASSIMILATION!

Thats the shortest intro to our thinking yet.

The Mantra is hard work. Most people finances way out that satisfies their own emotions rather than introducing a new world view. Thats why we can win and those who just vent lose.

This short article is more important than most of the longer ones.

“The ORIGINAL Mantra Group”

Posted by Bob on February 14, 2010 at 7:13 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 9 Comments »

I have begun to read General Comments.

Gator61 is actually going for it, using the Mantra. He and at least one other of us is USING THE MANTRA on Yahoo Talks at question about the Mantra.

One of the only two rational replies ended with “You must be from BUGS.”

That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you spread your message. It takes a LONG time to be identified when you produce a samizdat, so other people — I assume that last person was one of us — will see this title and wonder about it.

Now or later people will try to Google BUGS. I tried it and naturally BUGS refers to the little creatures. I only found our BUGS when I put in “BUGS Whitaker.” It was at the end of page one of references. Somewhere in the general BUGS title it may be far back, I didn’t look.

I may try BUGS Mantra.

This is big progress. This is what accumulates.

The knee-jerk replies mean nothing, of course. But what is important is that, unlike anybody on our side, Yahoo Talks did not erase the Mantra and put it in the Memory Hole by the time I got to it. No one now has any excuse not to put the Mantra SOMEWHERE.

Don’t stick to sympathetic fora. I believe Virginia Dare would be first to erase it. If I am wrong, tell me and we have another place to hit.

We are not in a unique position here. All through history the greatest breakthroughs have been made by people who spent time developing their points down to the nub and then somehow getting it past an establishment, and the establishments established “opposition,” which is determined to wipe it out.

In fact, that, more than any Great Battles, is what MAKES real history.

I am beginning to believe that someday you will be able to say, “I was with the ORIGINAL BUGS, the Original Mantra Group.”

Answering BBG’s BASIC Question

Posted by Bob on February 13, 2010 at 7:30 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 4 Comments »

Backbaygrouch asks:

“The question then arises, why was the Greatest Generation such a bunch of self important jerks? Who trained them? As opposed to who trained both sides of the blood letters of the Civil War [War Of Northern Aggression]? May I suggest it was the FDR’s Jewish appointees with a Jewish agenda? Does anyone have any evidence on the issue? I have nothing more than a gut reaction. Agreed, the Greatest Generation was brainwashed, but who did it, and why? Basics.”

The reason the WWII Generation got to be such self important jerks — BBG is always a master of subtlety — actually came from the fact that in 1945 America regretted its wretched treatment of World War I vets — the Bonus March crowd of 1932. The Bonus Army was very recent headlines by 1945.

But, our usual BASIC question: Why was this information, which could be forgotten as yesterday’s news, produced? Because it was food for the biggest lobby America had ever seen: those who found a gold mine in exploiting those who had been in uniform during the War.

Many of the soldiers in WWI were left in Europe for over a year after that War ended. American soldiers wanted to go HOME. So a movement began in America and Britain:

“No boats, no votes.” That was the first cry of the lobby that would dominate America for over a generation. Soon every discharged soldier got a year’s pension after he was discharged. Vet’s benefits became a giant lobby.

The Jews did not plan this, the leftists did not plan this. But once that force was there, they, unlike our side, made USE of it. So naturally the theory arose that they PLANNED it. Successful politics doesn’t MAKE the opportunities, it EXPLOITS them.

But BBG is right about the invention of the self-righteous part.

It is almost impossible to credit, but when I was coming up and the Korean veterans came home, the WWII crowd was known as, of all things, the Quiet Generation. It was noticed that, while Korean War vets talked endlessly about their war adventures, WWII vets didn’t want to talk about it.

When I reached my teens, the WWII vets were doing what earlier generations had done, getting back to real life.

As you know, in 1948 the Red Cross reported on Nazi killings and they were not Six Million. Nazi killings in wartime were vastly inferior to Stalin’s in peacetime. If they had been as vast as it is now illegal to dispute, the Red Cross would have talked about it and Churchill would have mentioned it.

So why was this information that Hitler killed as many Jews as the left wanted him to have, PRODUCED?

You know the answer to THAT. Everything encouraged the production of this information and there was no lobby against it. As the years passed, the left wanted to end the Cold War. Anything that showed that World War II was against Evil, while the Reds were entirely different, was eagerly published.

Yes, Virginia, there was Jewish Lobby. But its basis was disappointingly prosaic. I have no idea how many hundreds of billions Jews got of our reparations from Germany, but it was titanic. Two overwhelming lobbies, WWII vets and the Jewish Lobby, became indistinguishable. It would-be astonishing if the left did not USE this.

It wasn’t until the 1960’s that the Good War against Hitler was invented. In the 1960’s people were shot down daily trying to escape Communist countries, so that was not reported on. This was no plot, it was as natural as gravity. All the news became Eichmann and the Good War. By the time opposition to Vietnam became media policy, this natural development turned into a tidal wave.

In this tidal wave the Quiet Generation turned into self-righteous jerks. All of the media made Vietnam Vets ashamed of fighting the People’s Republics. Suddenly the millions of WWII “vets,” of whom about a third had ever heard a hostile shot fired, became John Waynes. Again if you have the slightest understanding of the human animal, this was as natural as gravity.

Veterans of the Good War were lionized. Veterans against Communism were portrayed as psychotic nut jobs.

For millions of WWII vets the Good War was the last noteworthy thing they had ever done. They began to talk about nothing else. They became self-righteous permanent adolescents, self-righteous jerks. Once they had this tool in their hands the left used it ruthlessly.

The left was simply not as stupid as the right was. As the leftist media found a need for some kind of opposition, they naturally gave those slots to the people who threatened them least and agreed with them on vital matters like the Holocaust.

This is not as exciting as a Jewish Conspiracy. But it IS the way history really works.

An Apology and a Thank God for Brian

Posted by Bob on February 6, 2010 at 1:00 pm  
Filed Under Bob, Comment Responses | No Comments »

When Brian started the new General Comments it was a terrible shock to me. I have not been looking in that section for months! It had petered out, so I didn’t look at it.

I felt I had let you down horribly. But now that I HAVE looked at them, I am much happier about the whole thing. General Comments are excellent and, what came as a relief to me, you didn’t NEED me there!

“Our discussion is going very well, Bob, thank you very much.”

This last is a critically important point. That, in fact, is what gives BUGS a future. I don’t think any Leader in politics, left, right, or pro-white, would be relieved to find that things are going right along without him.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the key to our success.

After my guilt rush, I am enjoying reading the General Comments.

Skype-writing Brian a few days ago I happened in on a conversation on which Lord Nelson was having with him, which was supposed to include me after I had gone away abruptly as Brian allows me to do. It was GREAT!

Brian and Lord Nelson were discussing your ongoing activities, from White Rabbit to, one by one, most of our regular commenters and other BUGSers besides. You are not only going out and DOING it, you are going out and DOING it in a MENTALLY DISCIPLINED way.

Every reminder I would have put in was emphasized between Brian and Lord Nelson, with some additions that were dead on the money and I would be proud to have made myself. I was glad I missed the discussion because I was afraid I might screw it up.

Even better, the discussion was about how YOU keep forcing each other back on track.

I have a legacy!

Going Over the Mantra

Posted by Bob on February 1, 2010 at 7:14 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 11 Comments »

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

I slip sometimes. I thought of a bumper sticker like “Isn’t there enough room on earth for ONE Denmark?” It was the question why there is no room on earth for a white culture. Shari replied, “A bumper sticker should be “AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!”

After all my preaching about staying with the Mantra, I had wandered myself. But I now have people to correct me.

I think the reason I capitalized those words was because it took me YEARS to add them on. I had been saying AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY! for years, and I had been reciting the mantra for years, but I had not put them together. Now I realize that those words summarize the Mantra. I am angry at myself for taking so long to put the two together.

It took me many years to develop the Mantra, and I am hesitant to discuss other people’s versions. So I will go through it, line by line, and try to explain why each line is there.

This very hard, because the words were developed slowly, in debate after debate. Each sentence is designed to keep the puppy’s nose in the poo.

I have been exposed to an awesome number of attempts by the anti-white puppy to get his nose out of said poo but I can’t remember most or all of them. All I know is that the Mantra would be shorter if I could do without a line of it.

When people tell me something will work and tell me the logic I don’t want to SAY that the words I have provided were not developed in my head, but in many, many hours of successful debate. If you haven’t been through all that, you would assume that sane people would get the point without repeating it.

But that is where you trip yourself up. We are not only not dealing with sane people, we are dealing with the most difficult form of insanity, one to which it cannot even occur that it considers itself to be the epitome of mental health.

That is why it took so long to develop what looks, after one has grasped it, to be an obvious truth. We are back to the Semmelweis Rule: Nothing is harder to get across than a simple reality that is being MILITANTLY overlooked.

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”

WHERE?

Posted by Bob on January 30, 2010 at 6:52 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 3 Comments »

This may be a problem only for me, since I was not raised in the computer age and simply don’t have the energy any more to do real search.

I know our commenters look for our ideas reflected in other locations because you are constantly sending me links. But for Old Bob, these links fall into two categories:

1) Place where the Mantra Thinking has been cut out; and

2) Places where I can’t FIND the section referred to.

The first one demonstrates as nothing else could my point about respectable conservatism. Right-wing blogs which are not specifically pro-white will remove whole pages to get rid of the Mantra and show they are not doing just that. That happens all the time.

But there are pages which are still there and a commenter gives the link only. But no such pages are devoted only and entirely to the one comment referred to. Is it the Mantra which we might look for or is a use of the Mantra? I don’t know about you, but I would have to read fifty entries to find what has been referred to, and even then it could have been removed AND the commenter was not specific about what I am looking for.

Since this is very important to us, commenters will have to be far, far more specific about how to find them than just giving a link.

Brian has trouble with this link-only business. But he has a solution.

It’s called copy and paste.

When Brian gives me a link, he COPIES the specific thing he is referring to. That takes a few seconds. Then he puts in the words he is referring to and THEN puts the link below it. I want the quote itself, and there is no reason in our age for me to have to look it up. But I also want the CONTEXT, what is the nature of the blog or other place where this is quoted?

Giving only a link is OUTDATED, like referring to a tome.

This is easy, and it would put an end to our present endless frustration.

Solid Advice From Simmons

Posted by Bob on January 10, 2010 at 3:19 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 1 Comment »

Simmons’ comment on the debate I asked you to read is solidly professional:

I read the responses. Some were good. Some quibbled the details with a pet monkey.

How about you query the publishers for a rebuttal to this anti-white propaganda they are responsible for putting on the web (there is that word again).

Remember writing basics 101, the intro must actually introduce what you mean to prove. That means within a few sentences the phrase or “anti-racism is nothing but anti-white”, or something real close to that must appear.

BBG’s Point

Posted by Bob on January 10, 2010 at 11:03 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 6 Comments »

Backbaygrouch’s comment on “No Finger Pointing” deserves to be our article for today:

America has a unique legal doctrine, sometimes called purity of the temple. If the police or the prosecutor violate laws in gathering evidence, the criminal walks. Everywhere else the evidence is allowed and the officials are punished for their acts. In America the public is punished by allowing criminals to walk while the officials seldom face any censure.

The reasoning given is that the inability of the officials to prosecute will discourage wrongful actions. This reasoning escapes the rest of the world where punishment is seen as a greater prod towards adherence to correct methods than immunity for public payroll malefactors. They see no reason to let a criminal walk whenever evidence, rightfully or wrongfully gathered, proves guilt.

In brief in the United States the court system is operated for the benefit of those who run it rather than the public in a way no other nation tolerates, at least in theory. This is illustrative of Bob’s argument. It is so ingrained that most Americans do not even notice it or ever question the manifest stupidity of the situation.

Tim’s “HEADS UP!”

Posted by Bob on January 8, 2010 at 4:44 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 2 Comments »

PLEASE READ THIS.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/01/05/bob-whitakers-mantra-is-working/#comments

This incidentally includes something I have been describing for years but cannot get any commenter to talk about: An actual exchange using the Mantra!

Turtle Egg

Posted by Bob on December 24, 2009 at 7:40 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 2 Comments »

I had an FBI dossier before I was 15. In 1956, kids at my high school would yell “Federal Troops” when they saw me in the hall. I had said that the Feds would HAVE to use Federal troops to enforce integration (to desegregate means to de-separate and nobody every “deseparated” anything).

As Brian told me, there is one truth to the old statement that people don’t think because they are coddled. Most people DO have it a lot easier than I did and they CHOOSE not to peck at the egg shell that protects them. In our day, there is an eggshell’s worth of difference between saying EXACTLY the right thing and breaking that cocoon completely.

One commenter made a really brilliant statement about the passive-aggressive nature of humor. I get a laugh out of people actually worrying themselves sick about how to use the Only True Term, African-American, to apply to a runner from Kenya.

I remember when one of our unbiased networks in the 1960s did an impartial survey among blacks about what they wanted to be called. That was when liberals were trying to hang on to the term “Negro” so, lo and behold Moses, it turned out that blacks said that was what they wanted to be called. A long-forgotten conclusion was that “Some wanted to be called Afro-American, and the least popular was he schizophrenic term, ‘African-American.’”

So, as I pointed out, most people prefer to stay in the egg or, said Freud, in the womb. The ones who make it to adolescence and stay there think they have really matured.

But if you are out there as I was, and I don’t think it was a choice, your egg cracks early and you grow a new shell, very SLOWLY.

This turtle would have had a MUCH easier life if he stayed in his egg.

Simmons’ Statement and BUGS Entry Requirement

Posted by Bob on December 12, 2009 at 5:31 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 6 Comments »

Simmons says:

Never having gone to college all I can say to Dave is that by not doing so has done me immeasurable good. College produces a script for the average or slightly above average white or Asian, and for the most part little else aside from a little technical training on the side. Once these kids receive these scripts they lose nearly all their curiosity. Because why would they need to ask questions, mommy prof supplied all the answers.

From the word go the BUGS entry has been: “You have to have outgrown a college education, whether you had one or not.” I think I might use that as a leadin to asking people to read BUGS.

On a more general point, in a healthy free society people routinely feel that they have outgrown institutions. Why am I the only former professor who saw the whole thing as the pure fraud it is? National Review went to pieces at my 1976 demand that we stop wasting money on an “education” myth.

But they are still desperate to stay in good with the priesthood of our established religion.

Lately, a third of a century later, NR had a cover article about young people realizing they’ve been cheated. But they keep talking about “reform.” They are “disenchanted” with “education” as provided today. Every other institution has a number of ex-members who say it is all a fraud and a waste and worse. But when it comes to the academic bureaucracy, I seem to be the only person who came out of it and OUTGREW it.

What I said in 1976 is truer today. The last thing we need is some monopoly giving “accreditation” to specific institutions to provide what t hey call “education.” ALL institutions that get that sort of monopoly go berserk, but no one else seems to even notice it IS a monopoly.

Yes, Simmons, It’s Necessary

Posted by Bob on December 8, 2009 at 5:54 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 3 Comments »

To answer Simmons’ question at the end, it happens to be what the blog at its best is all about.

Simmons replies to my last article on him and Horus:

I thought I was clear of what audience I foisted my Mantra heresy upon. Horus calls them people of the consensus trance, Caste Football calls them the “drunk white fans”, and Bob calls them Mommy Prof’s puppets, but one thing they have in common is that they do not think, they are conditioned and trained to hold and speak certain yiews. Debating them is like debating your TV and I mean that literally because the TV tells them what to say and how to act and what to buy and basically how to live their lives.

Your point is well taken it is about Genocide, but first I do the yeoman’s work of the thin edge of the wedge that breaks down the crazy Aunt Sally level of Political Correctness which is that thin shell which protects the yolk, basically by projecting an image of out of control hysteria. (or the Blazing Saddles version, “stop or I shoot the nigger”)

Break down the fear of the crazy Aunt Sallies then the Mommy Profs are ours, they are like bald baby mice, and the cat has found their nest. First, “Anti-white” then “Genocide”, first we create people who can stand up to the CASs then we feed them the line of genocide then the profs feel the fangs.

Abstract polemical thought is all good and well, but remember the Simmons theorem, “Its all personal.” Abstract hypothesis is just that, abstract.

If needed I will cite personal examples of how this works from my own experiences and from others on our board, but for now modesty bids me to quit.

A Piece of Serious Wisdom From Dave

Posted by Bob on October 27, 2009 at 6:35 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 3 Comments »

You have to remember the principle (that I am guilty of violating all too often) is that the less said the better. A simple declarative sentence is very powerful. Tomes are a dime a dozen.

For Gator

Posted by Bob on October 11, 2009 at 9:55 am  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 2 Comments »

Adam Smith wrote a whole long book on the simple observation of supply and demand.

Alfred Marshall had to write another book a century later covering that simple point even better.

Two or three thousand years, at least, before Smith and Marshall wrote merchants who survived took supply and demand as the basis for all their actions. In no age did anyone think it a smart idea to take coal to Newcastle.

There is only one law simpler and more universal than supply and demand. That is the law of gravity. It took the to work out the implications of THAT one. Every merchant took the laws of supply and demand for granted, but its IMPLICATIONS were not really laid out until 1776.

Every ancient man who carried home a dead animal felt the law of gravity, but no one studied its IMPLICATIONS until Newton.

Real advanced are made by looking at reality and thinking out its IMPLICATIONS. The Church fought Galileo and Newton because of the IMPLICATIONS their clear thinking brought out.

Asking “What are the IMPLICATIONS” the most common way of stopping independent thought. Today established faith, Political Correctness, is no different than earlier established faiths in this respect.

Gator sounds like what I used to hear in graduate economics: which set of WORDS will make us prosper? He wants ANYTHING but Race,

The Genome Project predictably told us that all humans are, variously, 99.999% (Bill Clinton), 99.8%, 97.5 % ore whatever you like, alike. That means that every moron, every congenital criminal, the strongest and the weakest, the healthiest and those who will die at age ten, are 99.99999999999% or whatever figure you care to throw out, alike.

In other words, it means nothing. Let me state the proposition I think needs thorough analysis. It is as obvious as gravity and as heretical as Newton.

The most accurate economic indicator of the wealth of nations is the color of the skin. All ancient civilizations that went down and STAYED are now brown-skinned. You can wake up in a country after a drunk, take a look at the skin color around you, and tell me what the country’s standard of living is.

Whatever the magic words may be, no brown skinned country ever seems to invoke them. As I said, California is turning brown and its economy has begun its steady slide beyond stagnation down to the level of a brown-skinned country.

The environment will be saved ONLY if we colonize space or make other technological breakthroughs. Environmentalists are already screaming about what Brazil is doing to the rain forests. yet they insist that the future ideal is a “new race” like Brazil.

If you think nature has been crushed so far, just wait until a world-wide Mexico, or even a Japan, which is still killing whales, gets hold of it. Have you looked lately at what China and Southeast Asia are doing to the air?

If they are 99.99999% like us, that .000001% must be a humdinger.

I don’t have to prove cause and effect here. This is an OBSERVATION that is as universal as gravity or supply and demand. Once again the only argument against it is its IMPLICATIONS.

In the post-petroleum age, we need INNOVATION. There was a time when Japan was expected to outrun the West. All it did was what any observation of the Orient would have predicted: Japan caught up and stopped.

Sort of like the people who refused to see supply and demand, or, for God’s sake, GRAVITY, sat around making up gigantic theories conjuring with Aristotle and Company which are laughable today.

So now we are talking about the end of oil while we are dedicated to getting rid of the only race which forms FUNDAMENTALLY CREATIVE societies. We can get rid of the race and conjure some words to take care of it all.

In fact, two Japanese heads of state got into trouble attacking the flow of Mexicans into the US. They both complained this inflow was lowering the average IQ here. That is simple arithmetic, but both were condemned as only an established church can condemn simple reality.

Most people could not understand this Nipponese concern. But it was important to Japan that the flow of technological advance they could see continue. A brown America was a threat to THEIR future.

Orientals tend to look at out obsession with their IQ scores as humorous. To them an IQ test if a puzzle. They are good at puzzles and they go to school twelve hours a day from Kindergarten to learn things by rote and to learn to solve puzzles.

This won’t do much good in a post-petroleum world. That requires societies that can CREATE, not just ADAPT.

Naturally, in just such a time, our established religion is dedicated to doing exactly the wrong thing:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”

When Jenner proved the effectiveness of vaccination every Anglican pulpit in London rang with denunciations of his heretical procedure. When will Established Churches STOP being so predictable?

Dave on PC Hypnosis

Posted by Bob on October 6, 2009 at 9:44 am  
Filed Under Comment Responses | 1 Comment »

I wish there some way I could snap my fingers and magically make other people understand the importance and the implications of what BW is saying in this post.

Even among our BUGSTERS I doubt there are few who really get it.

I was fascinated by hypnosis. I read everything about hypnosis I could get my hands on.

I wanted to know the HYPNOTIST’S SECRET.

But I never really got a handle on it, until the “GREAT KRESKIN” gave away the Hypnotist’s Secret in testimony he gave at a murder trial in Spokane, Washington.
He was an expert witness and his purpose was to try to convince an idiotic judge how completely bogus it is to admit testimony obtained from witnesses under the influence of “hypnosis”. Kreskin explained that there was no way such testimony could be reliable because there was NO SUCH THING AS THE HYPNOTIC STATE. Kreskin explained to the judge that the “Hypnotist’s Secret” was all a con. “You simply have to understand the immense susceptibility most people have to the power of suggestion. People have low capacity for apprehending reality accurately. They can easily be tricked into believing anything.”

There I had it! The SECRET!

Now days I just love watching hypnotist’s stage shows. I never miss an opportunity. These shows are wonderful lessons in real politics.

I have come to realize that most of what people say they know about what is real is just the influence of suggestions they have received and are repeating.

Also, I hardly ever believe people when they relate events from their past. VERY FEW PEOPLE are capable of relating their past accurately. They simply believe they have experienced things that never happened and once more, they really and truly believe it.
There is nothing that can be done about this aspect of human life. But if you are real player, you have to be keenly aware of it. People are a lot less connected to reality than you think.

Society’s perceptions are not to be trusted.

This is a wonderful post by BW. It is truly extraordinary.

I hope our BUGSTERS get its importance. Getting stuff like this is what makes you a PLAYER. It is what puts you in power.

Dave: Without Whites, Non-Whites Stagnate

Posted by Bob on October 5, 2009 at 9:44 am  
Filed Under Comment Responses | No Comments »

Regardless of ambient circumstances of Bob’s plight in having to make bricks, and regardless of Bob’s susceptibility to the influences emanating from those circumstances, there is no way in hell that Bob, a white man, would have remained in that plight.

Furthermore, he required no external SPONSORSHIP to effectuate his removal from that plight.

But, if Bob were a black man, the influences of his circumstances would have prevailed and Bob, the black man, would have perpetually remained in that plight.

The takeaway is to realize that the challenge we face from nonwhites is entirely due to our own SPONSORSHIP. Without our influence as whites, nonwhites have no capacity or capability of mounting a challenge to whites.

That is why it is crazy for white people to oppose the demands of nonwhites to be left to their own devices. White people who oppose Islamic fundamentalism have rocks in their brains. White people who oppose Castro style communism have rocks in their brains. These are wonderful regimes for nonwhites to live under. They are exactly what the doctor ordered: nonwhites living upon their own devices.

The holocaust of nonwhite criminality that has descended upon us is entirely due to the SPONSORSHIP of white people through the misbegotten standards of the criminal justice system, standards promulgated by white people.

The daily drill of racial confrontations faced by our school children and teenagers are entirely due to the SPONSORSHIP of white people through the misbegotten standards of the public school system, standards promulgated by white people.

The neighborhood racial frictions we all face are entirely due to the SPONSORSHIP of white people through the misbegotten standards of national housing and housing welfare policy, standards promulgated by white people.

The tyranny of Political Correctness we all face in the workplace is entirely due to the SPONSORSHIP of white people through the misbegotten standards of the national welfare and income maintenance policies, standards promulgated by white people.

WE are the enablers!

This is the far more important point than the point that whites are creative and nonwhites aren’t.

WE are brought this on ourselves and having brought it on ourselves, WE can turn it around.
All it takes is a capacity for BASIC thinking, the whole point of BUGS.

Alan B

Posted by Bob on October 3, 2009 at 9:23 am  
Filed Under Comment Responses | 1 Comment »

Mommy Professor dreams of a world made of milk and honey, coated in a layer of chocolate. Mommy Professor is a man with a plan, his plan is the road to his predictable future. He is never wrong, all failures are the result of meddling that interferes with the plan, by the book is his motto.

Men of vision, white men, plan for a brighter future. Our nature allows our race to adapt to changes, to invent and seek out ways to better our lives. No amount of wishful thinking, plans or otherwise can change what evolution gave us. Bob once wrote how boring it was to load a kiln full of bricks, one brick, two bricks, hundreds of bricks, every day as predictable and dreadful as the last, with no future. Bob decided on a different career path, Mommy Professor is still counting bricks.

Dave on Conservation and Stagnation

Posted by Bob on September 5, 2009 at 12:02 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses | 2 Comments »

Yes, ALL these COINCIDENCES.

Casrro’s Cuba is now entering its sixth decade of STRUGGLE.

The nonwhite majority has got its President but that is merely a milepost (according to them) in eighty years of ongoing (and not yet and will never be finished) STRUGGLE.

According to the environmentalists, we face decades of STRUGGLE against carbon emissions and the very sun itself. (How dumb can you get? Struggling against the sun itself?)

When the economic recovery inevitably fails to materialize, the Establishment will certainly tell us years of STRUGGLE are required to correct our debt induced economic malaise

We WN’s own our (very own) endless STRUGGLE.against the nonwhite majority and our anti-white white traitor enemies.

But what WN’s need to understand is the language of STRUGGLE is the semantic domain of stagnation (and when you use the language of STRUGGLE, you are playing into the hands of the enemy).

In his old age Masanobu Fukuoka (one of the founders of the organic farming movement) obtained enlightenment about the hopeless state of his own people. He said, “Japan’s only hope is change from the creative energies of white people (who according to Masanobu are only people capable of real change), for the Japanese are incapable of change themselves.”

He went on to say, “ There is no advantage God delivers into Japan’s lap that the Japanese will not turn into an unnecessary and endless effort of labor, cost, and sacrifice.”

Furthermore, he said, “ Nothing can possibly be easy for Japanese. Everything that is effortless in fact, they transform into pain, cost, and STRUGGLE through philosophy“

He concluded: “They are the opposite of the efficient people they pretend to be. For them there is only one road, the hardest road and the most expensive road. They are incapable of IMAGINING anything effortless and easy.”

Hardly anybody gets what Masanobu understood: IMAGINATION MATTERS.

When you come to understand the importance of imagination, you are delivered into the vertex of power.

The effective use of your voice to enforce your own personal will (mostly through strategic silence) is EASY. Winning arguments is EASY. Spreading influence is EASY.

Defeating the depredations of corrupt laws and courts is EASY.

Dealing with tyrannical police is EASY.

Mitigating the assaults of the political system is EASY.

Almost without exception, the most effective road is the EASIEST ROAD to take.

This is the polar opposite of what the nonwhite majority and their anti-white white traitor allies believe. For them, everything is HARD. Everything is STRUGGLE.

And when you hear STRUGGLE, when you think STRUGGLE, you are experiencing the world of stagnation

Dave on Truth in Stereotyping

Posted by Bob on August 20, 2009 at 11:14 am  
Filed Under Comment Responses | 6 Comments »

The favorite word of the Establishment, brought up on WW II movies, is “sacrifice”.

Thank God we’re not Chinese where “sacrifice” is regularly (and actually) in operation as the main pillar of the culture. Here in America, we just pretend.

During the Chinese war years, the local militia would round up a village to clear land mines by marching them through the mine fields. The commander would exclaim to the villagers, “Good news! Today you get to die for the Motherland. “

Later he would catch some old fellow crawling along on his belly banging the ground ahead of him with a stick. He would pull the geezer up by the scruff of the neck and exclaim, “No cheating! Get out there and die and don’t dally about it!”

This trait of the Chinese is the main reason Respectable Conservatives are so impressed with them and why they think it is awful America isn’t more “China like”.

They are ashamed that America isn’t more patriotic. Secretly, they love the idea of the draft, but know that in today’s America putting a draft into operation, no matter what the circumstances, is impossible.

The young boys all want to get paid great wages, have the latest muscle cars, get to wear Damascus gloves and cool shades, and be fabulous Kelmar Knights, supported by the latest IT enhanced weapons’ exotica.

They are real Americans and like the rest of the real America they are absolutely opposed to dying. And to the dismay of our dumb ass politicians, they (and the rest of the real America) hate “sacrifice”.

Not everything is bad about (the real) America.

Browning Out

Posted by Bob on August 13, 2009 at 2:05 pm  
Filed Under Coaching Session, Comment Responses, History | 1 Comment »

Dave keeps making the point that non-whites enjoy what they could not create.

If you look at every single society that has fallen, you will see that it turned brown. Northern Europe stayed white and continued the process from Roman organization to modern Western society. But the areas of the Roman Empire that turned brown in skin color stayed at the bottom.

I know a lot of geography and most people don’t. Scientific observation consists of looking at a fact which does not fit the pattern, and NOT explaining it away for the sake of your present beliefs.

There is a fact here. Regardless of their totally different histories, brown-skinned people are universally poor and stagnant. Anyone who points this out is a modern Galileo. This CANNOT be true, so it is not true.

But it IS true. Like the child in The Emperor’s Clothes or Galileo, we see reality.

Next Page →

Switch to our mobile site