Many, many times I have taken on a whole roomful of people on race. Almost invariably someone came up to me and said they were on my side, often someone who had made themselves appear to be with the crowd.

Many of the pro-whites on Stormfront will be on line but would not take the side of someone who was fighting for us in the Opposing Views section which Lord Nelson tells us I helped depopulate.

The pro-whites who did not back us up usually claimed they don’t want to get into all that, or that the pro-white was doing OK without them or whatever else a shirker always says.

But I’ll tell you one area in which those pro-whites are not shirkers. If you point out where we are making progress, they will fight you every inch of the way, until dawn if necessary.

When it comes to arguing All Is Lost, no one has the kind of energy that defeatists on Stormfront have.

I was just informed that “A BUGster who is always on message” — quite a compliment, especially considering the source — had put the Mantra in his Facebook Profile and said, “The message is spreading and we are winning.”

They came down on him like an avalanche. No, not the anti-whites; the crowd that will fight to the death to say that they love our race but All Is Lost. I honestly believe they would take pills and stay up day and night to fight for All Is Lost until the ambulance came and took them away.

When Napoleon came back from his first exile and took Paris, one old British general went to a map and pointed at Waterloo. He said, “This is where he will be defeated.”

A lot of people thought he was a Prophet. He was probably thinking, “I’ve been in this damned war for over twenty years. But they’re astonished I know how it will go.”

I feel the same way, and a lot of you are beginning to. I didn’t spend all those years developing the Mantra and trying it out and then these years with Whitaker Online because I thought all was lost. I was hitting the flint for a spark that would catch, because I knew this spark could not be quenched once it caught a set of proponents like you.

And every inch of the way I battled those who want us to read their moans and groans in huge books and whose only goal was to have others to moan the Inevitable End with them.

First of all, let me say that I have been in this and related political wars for well over half a century. More important, I have WON some. Like the old British general, I an not a Prophet. I am just a bit surprised when someone doesn’t realize that I might have an idea by now of how these things go.

Not that long ago, I was fighting alone for the Mantra and the big voices on our side consisted almost entirely of Militant Defeatists.

You and I get sick to our stomachs when we see what I call “A Jewish Wet Dream,” a very black male with a very blond girl. Every other white and most blacks do, too. It is not uncommon to hear a black say “He’s too black for HER” when a black is out to get a mulatto.

What they are doing is not only wrong, it is sickening, and they have to have everybody agreeing that it is inevitable and you better take your Tums and like it.

Whites are not trying to sneak into brown countries. A black man who gets a white woman would never marry a person who looked like the daughters they will have. He is destroying what he is after. He is evil.

This is what they cannot allow anyone to SAY. It is a house of cards, and the Mantra hits at its base.

But those who sell tomes desperately do not want anyone to see that this is a house of cards. They want it to be something dramatic, an All Powerful Conspiracy of Geniuses only they truly understand.

Others of them are simply depressives, and this world view appeals to them because it is the ideal world of a depressive.

But the bottom line is that the world view they are fighting for is not TRUE. They will fight harder for defeatism than they ever would for our race. And many of them will hate you far more than they hate any anti-white.

Lord Nelson impressed the hell out of me with his reaction to a criticism I made of him. It has been discussed here a number of times.

Lord Nelson had slipped into the habit of saying that white countries were “being overwhelmed” by immigration. So he was not criticizing our established religion’s Holy of Holies, assimilation.

He didn’t realize this. He just found that for some reason this argument was easier, so he continued it.

“Being overwhelmed” keeps you from criticizing interracial marriage, so it makes things easy.

I pointed out to him why he was having such an easy time of it.

What really impressed me was that the moment I mentioned it, Lord Nelson said he was glad I had.

No ego trip, no “but I was sort of right,” just an immediate change of course and sincere thanks to me for setting him straight. THAT was the lesson of the event.

Lord Nelson just did the same thing for me Here’s his comment:

“I do get it Coach.

We are in effect dealing with a faith based belief system. Which is basically how you define a religion. I also understand your comments about the inbred stupidity of academia. It’s a very important point too!

Just a detail point. We should start to refer to ourselves as ‘Pro-Whites’. Not as WN’s or even BUGSers. It’s an important piece of propaganda. If we call ourselves ‘Pro-Whites’ then anyone who stands against us is by default, an Anti-White.

Just like all the best propaganda, this also happens to be TRUE!

In the particular subject we deal in (White Genocide) there is no middle ground. You are either Pro-White, or Anti-White. We are Pro-Whites. And we really need to start calling ourselves exactly that. We have started to use the correct term of Anti-White to label our enemies. Now to really hammer that label home. We must always refer to ourselves as PRO-WHITES!”

Lord Nelson was very deferential, but the point is I was WRONG.

One of my big crusades on SF was to make our people call our enemies, not “antis,” but anti-WHITES.

But I have not been practicing the consistency I was demanding.

So Lord Nelson pointed it out. And I want to prove that I am as good a pro-white as he is.

He is a man with good upbringing. He shows diffidence to the old man in making this correction.

But the fact is that I was dead wrong. From now on pro-white is what it is and I am sincerely grateful to the Admiral for calling me on it.

In this battle for survival, our egos don’t mean a damned thing.

My commenters are very good to me. If you ever get tired of all that praise of me, think of it this way: Why would anyone take the trouble to participate in BUGS if he didn’t think it was very good. There are, literally, millions of blogs out there.

So when I use a comment as a starting point, I sound like I am criticizing someone who said something good about me. I appreciate the good stuff, I have an ego like anybody else. More important, like every human being, I need encouragement.

Look at what Ben Franklin said about the raw ego it takes to write an autobiography in the Introduction to HIS autobiography.

So one commenter came to my defense in criticizing another for talking about how I should live a long time. I appreciate his coming to my defense, damned few people ever did in my career. But it gives me a chance to talk about his point.

The guy who said I could live long was referring to an article where I mentioned my own death. I do it a lot. So someone who says, “Long may you wave” gets my appreciation, while most people don’t want the subject mentioned.

The writer who waved the caution sign about mentioning my death also went on to make dead accurate observations about me, how I am worried to death about not having people to carry on my THINKING. I keep talking about how Doctor Pierce said on his deathbed that no one alive could take his place in the leadership.

After all, he was talking about courtesy to normal people, and no one here confuses me with normal.

I will be frozen when I pass on. Everybody in my family had to agree not to oppose it, they have since agreed to insist on it, but none of them like it. If you know about the Ted Williams case, you can check the web, one daughter suddenly decided to make the papers by opposing his being frozen, and the legal case made his freezing cost ALCOR a mint.

My family always says I don’t know what will happen when I am frozen. My thinking is that I know EXACTLY what will happen to THEM if they’re NOT frozen.

Actually my being frozen is like BUGS and all the rest of my political life. It’s a lottery ticket. I am a hell of a lot surer about sharing my ideas this way than I am about being frozen. In both cases, I am spending a lot of effort and money on faith.

No one really does anything useful on a sure bet. The only people who do that are politicians looking forward to the next election, which is just MORE of a sure shot.

There are million politicians, but what I do is critical PRECISELY because it is a bet on the future.

How could someone like me, who has had so much power from probabilities, NOT decide on freezing?

““I hope our BUGSTERS understand the stellar quality of this kind of commentary”
I do, and I am NOT an intellectual. When I first read the Mantra, I thought it was too simple and well…too mantra like. Then I realized, that the mindless quoting of mantras is the only weapon the anti-whites have! They quote their mantras on TV, in the movies, on the radio, in the newspapers, all over the internet, etc. In other words, THEY HAVE NO ARGUEMENT! An amazing revelation, the emperor really does have no clothes. We are not battling intellectuals at all, they are just sissies who are deathly afraid of getting punched the mouth and losing their status. Remember Geraldo’s insecure posturing against some so called White Supremacists? Imagine, we the most valuable and creative race on the planet are being driven to and fro by mere words and shadows. Sure, the threat of violence is real, but only because too many people draw their sustenance from fleecing the sheep; it is these people who are the real enemy and they mostly come from our camp. Thus, this is the true beauty of the Mantra…it exposes those who look like us as the traitors they are. All hail General Whitaker for this brilliant strategy!
And on a personal note, thank-you Sir for equipping the average Working Class White with the weapon we need to fight back.”

I very much appreciate the compliment, but you are anything but average.

And Trucker Roy really IS a trucker.

The stated requirement for Bob’s Underground Graduate Seminar, BUGS, is “For those who have outgrown a college education, whether they had one or not.” As with so much we discuss here, this sounds simple but is full of meaning. Most people who are able to “speak for the working people” use that as a sign of their humility.

In my public career I spoke for working people, that is, I wrote press releases and organized marches of grassroots uprisings against busing in Boston and Louisville and against Education Establishment textbooks in the public schools in Kanawha County, West Virginia.

I listened very carefully to what they wanted to say and wrote THAT down in the press releases. I was successful when they said that what I wrote was what they had said. We finally couldn’t take on all the grassroots that wanted us to help them and I had to make a living.

But nobody, anywhere, said I did not speak for the working people. In fact, the Communist Daily World had a major article bitching about how we must have big financing, since THEY couldn’t get into the wildcat strike areas we operated in!

THEY couldn’t get invited to more real workers’ movements than they could handle as we did.

But what is missing in me is the humility this is supposed to show, the kind where a politician puts on overalls and shows how he can get down — though the word “down” is seldom stated — with “regular folks.”

I am much smarter than the average working person. I am also out of the league of those who call themselves “educated.” That’s not very humble.

Talking to somebody who calls himself “educated” is like running the hurdles. You know exactly how their brains have been trained and you jump over their particular superstitions. It’s WORK, and by the time you have talked to the ten thousandth “educated” person who has exactly the same wired-in “educated outlook,” the novelty is worn out like a million-mile tire and you can feel the road right through your butt.

BUGS is dedicated to using facts everybody knows and language everybody can understand to fight a mindset it takes thousand of hours of dog-like training in school to implant in people.

Our whole society is set up to say that one who has missed college or grad school or a new thirteenth grade can’t go head to head with someone who has. The person who hasn’t and who presumes to debate is seen as trying to justify his inferiority.

And that sense of inferiority is the biggest single weapon of anti-whites. Nobody would take their crap seriously for two minutes if they didn’t have degrees.

This is a theme of history. People refuse to see reality because the guy who talks class is of the Better Class or has on a robe and talks in Latin or speaks in unknown tongues only The Initiated know.

You weren’t allowed to question the predictions of priests who got them out of the stars or fish intestines because YOU couldn’t read the stars or fish intestines. You are completely drawn off the fact that the “education” to read fish intestines is not the POINT.

The POINT is whether those who use those methods come up with anything. But ten thousand years ago people were so feeling inferior about not being able to read fish intestines that they did not point out that those predictions were random.

Astrology, “education,” fish intestines, the Class System, they are all the same thing.

All they do is keep people from putting what the priests say in plain English.

Anti-white: And there are non-whites that do not benefit from any programs or quotas, but just want an end to all kinds of discrimination and racism because it is wrong.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): You Alzheimer anti-whites always pretend you never read this: “Quotes the mantra”

——————

Anti-white: There are more Whites in Africa than there are Blacks in Europe, there are more Whites in Asia than there are Asians in America, There are more Whites in India than there are Indians in Scotland.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): If you select it this way, ther are more Eskimos in America, too. But Europe and America will be a majority non-white by the middle of the century, and that is what you are for. As I said, YOUR intent is genocide, what you call “assimilation:” “Quotes the mantra”
——————

Anti-white: (Six-Man Race Shows the Value of Diversity – Stormfront)

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Let us assume the impossible: That instead of regurgitating the usual Diversity Poster, this guy could THINK.

My point was the six-man, all black race was exactly what we would expect to see in a real championship race. Look at the photos in each case in this standard and packaged Diversity Poster the same way:

Imagine a country made up 90% of the kind of people pictured IN EACH CASE.

In EVERY case, the ones made up of 90% whites would be where the brown ones would be going to get a better life. In the real world, it is the same as the six-man race.

It is easy to realize that the six black man race simply shows what blacks obviously do best.

You and Mommy Professor can talk until you are blue in the face about it is an accident that the six black runners you see are an accident, but no one is going do anything but laugh at you.

Blacks win the race. Mulattoes lose it. Get rid of the whites and the whole world looks like the colored countries where people do NOT want to go.

You do the standard Diversity poster and that is supposed to show that the fact that white countries are ALL where the brown ones want to go is somehow irrelevant because you are so Loving.

This is, speaking charitably, moronic.

If that’s a Brainy Spic, I’d hate to see a DUMB one.
——————

Anti-white: I would love for my son to marry a nice Panamanian girl… but if he wants to marry a Colombian, or American… what can I do about it?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Get real.

The only right being suppressed is the right of white people to have their own lands and you KNOW it: “Quotes the mantra”
——————

Statement: That is the nature of the liberal, the leftist, the anti. Hypocrisy, contradiction, and yes double standard as you said friend.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): The anti-WHITE.

They are comfortable with “anti.”

Anti-WHITE makes a point: “Quotes the mantra”

——————

Anti-white: I’m researching White Nationalism and am interested to find out some answers to my questions.

1.) Do you believe that we did an injustice to the American Indians after we became a country? Why or why not?

2.) Do you believe we have have a financial obligation to American Indians and African Americans that were brought over during the slave trade?

3.) What do you think is the reason White Nationalist groups are developing very quickly in this country?

4.) How do you feel about White people who do not agree with your point of view?

5.) Do you believe it is wrong to hurt someone when they do not agree with you or if they are part of a minority group?

Thank you very much. I look forward to hearing from you.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): If each Indian tribe is paying reparations to the people they replaced whites might pay, too. If Inuits are paying reparations to the Nordics they replaced, it might be Okay. If the blacks are paying reparations to the Hottentots they forced out and slaughtered all over Capoid Africa, maybe so.

Do you know ANY real history at all?
——————

Statement: Russia/Eastern European are unmistakenly part of the European race, but they are not considered Western. Ultimately, what does that mean?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): It is a corollary to what I said:

Those who are obsessed with “culture” are enemies to our RACE.
——————

Anti-white: I’m white. My Dad’s Austrian. My mom’s American and she is of mostly English and French descent.

I was born with blond hair and blue eyes, but as the days went on my hair has turned brown.

That’s 100% the truth.

There’s no way of proving it unless I post a picture of myself, which I won’t. So whatever.

Call me a race traitor if you want. I don’t care.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): You are, in short, a true traitor.

I pointed out that whites had done nothing that non-whites would not have done had they had the power. You said that was not proven.

You are saying that whites are genetically evil and need to be done away with.

That is not an intellectual position. That is a declaration of war and should be treated as such.
——————

Anti-white: you claim that every other race is more violent but white people have done so much violence and killed so many people. It doesn’t make sense.

Think about it, white people have caused destruction everywhere. North America, South America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East. is there any place that you haven’t wrecked?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Whites have committed no evils other races would not have done had they had the power.

Slavery was everywhere. What was shameful was that WHITES would sink to it.

ONLY white people ever felt ashamed of slavery or abolished it.

Whites have committed no UNIQUE evils. We have done many, many unique GOOD things. The device you are using now is one of them.

Adelheim’s basic work in finding and sending my arguments against anti-whites on Stormfront is important.

But BUGS will run these with new articles, because the first, of course, got no comments. Brian tells me that Kelso’s whitenewsnow has some discussion of it, which I will look up. But for BUGSers, nothing about this is new.

But if you are being trained in using a weapon, you can learn all about the theory and how to take it apart and put it back together and its effects in action. But you still have to pull the trigger, and your instructor has to watch you do it.

I do not want this to make BUGS boring. So skip it if you like. But I do want Brian to put in the whole Mantra where I do. I want everybody to see that what works is repetition. You pull the trigger over and over and over.

There are only a few of these. Then Adelheim added some of his own replies using this method. To me, this is very important.

If this bores YOU, it is because you know about the Mantra. But if you are bored, the other side is driven up the wall. They can’t deal with it.

We are the ONLY source of the Mantra. NOBODY but BUGS and the shows set up by BUGS members ever mentions the Mantra.

There is a lot of difference between theory and practice. Some people may agree with the theory of hammering in the Mantra, but when they start doing it, they have an urge to expand it to be more interesting or look better.

The Bang! Bang! Bang! I advocate is the one I practiced. It is a tough discipline.

And it is a lot like Classical warfare. The Greeks beat the Persians because the Persians used a mass attack, while the Greeks held together. Rome perfected this technique, locking shields and going in as a solid block. They formed an early tank, the testudo or tortoise, by forming a square and using the central shields as a roof.

This was easy theory and terribly hard practice. In the midst of a battle, it is against every instinct. When the moment comes, some want to run and some want to hold back and some want to go beserker.

On the Field of Mars Romans practiced doing the same thing, together, for thousands of hours.

I would like to hear from BUGSERS who have practice in using the Mantra this way.

I am sure everyone on the Field of Mars would rather have been hearing tales of Great Heroes and practicing far more exciting tactics.

But it is critical for the few of us who have found the fatal dent in the enemy lines to show how we pull the trigger or lock shields.

Anti-white: “No one can “force” you to accept diversity.”

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Then you describe the diversity we are forced to accept.
——-

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): The “DUHH!” approach.

So you’ve never heard anybody talk about a race problem. You’ve never heard the white race condemned.

You’ve never heard anybody insist on open borders.

You’ve never heard anybody say the Final Solution to race is “mixing THE races,” when they mean only mixing races in predominantly white countries.

I am not even sure this comes up to the level of a good solid lie. It is certainly not a reply, and it is less than childish.

Mommy Professor will Let you get away with this crap, but you’re not with Mommy Professor here.

“Quotes the mantra”

————-

Anti-white: Hey now, we prefer to be called pro-humanity.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Stalin called himself a friend of humanity, too. “Quotes the mantra”

————————-

Anti-white: (writes a long rant about something)

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): You haven’t read a word we’ve said, have you? If Mommy Professor didn’t say it you don’t hear it. I used to be a professor myself.

I just pointed out that whites who are anti-white are the most rabid of all. It make you feel virtuous.

Another thing you never noticed is something I repeat and you anti-whites complain I keep repeating it but you never address it: “Quotes the mantra”

————————–

Statement: Of course the anti-whites don’t seem to understand that 60% of Jews make up the student body of Georgetown or Harvard, and are considered to be “Whites.”

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Jews are whatever they choose to all themselves at the moment, minority, white, religion, nation.

Anyone who contradicts them is ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.

“Quotes the mantra”
———————————-

Anti-white: I’m not a racist and I’m not a WN. I don’t hate white people and I’m not against whites preserving their culture and identity. I’m white.

What I’m against is this hatred that many white nationalists have towards people of colour.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): What you are is this: “Quotes the mantra”
——————–

Anti-white: (a long rant I am an Asian and I am shocked – Page 34 – Stormfront )

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): This seems to begin with a complaint that we do not FULLY allow anti-whites to speak out here and ends with a demand that we be suppressed entirely.
——————
Anti-white: …..

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Anti-whites are always spouting about how massive immigration and assimilation demanded of ALL white countries and ONLY white countries is just Freedom.

I am really ticked off at my comrades for NEVER telling the truth about this.

The same anti-white who spouts this libertarian nonsense knows very well that free speech does not apply to US, but I am STILL waiting for us to SAY so every time this crap appears.

They keep saying we can live in our own bunkers if we want to. Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, it is forbidden for us to do so.

But no one points this out.

As O’Reilly said, “There should be no all-white ANYTHING in America.”

At least O’Reilly SAYS it. That’s more than my comrades do here.

For all their “diversity” talk, the fact is that all-white areas are forbidden because people will MOVE there. If we had freedom of choice integration would be doomed in the long term.

That is the justification for our entire set of laws, the ones O’Reilly is all for and states so clearly. Why do my comrades let the anti-whites get away with this “Freedom” crap?

——————

Anti-white: I don’t believe this. I’m fine with as many Europeans emigrating outside of Europe and other European-majority regions. I’m part-South Asian in a country that originally had an Australian Aboriginal majority, so it would be hypocritical of me to deny this of other people of European descent (I’m also half-White).

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): All anti-whites claim that. But in the real world: “Quotes the mantra”

Simmons has been hammering on the importance of the term anti-white and it is time for me to chime in. I haven’t been on Stormfront for years, but I fought and I fought to get them to stop using terms like “anti” for the anti-whites.

It would be a shame if people with all our years of experience with the effectiveness of “racist” were to underestimate the importance of a basic attack word. “Racist” has been the greatest single weapon in the enemy’s arsenal. It is their attack word.

The attack word is the one that draws a reaction. For them it is racist. For us the attack word is anti-white. It sums up our reaction to their basic genocidal program. It is TRUE.

“Racism” is also TRUE. When the Founders declared that America was entirely about “We the People” they followed it with a 1793 Act declaring that the “people” they referred to were WHITE.

America was considered simply racial movement of the white race, the same one which, in wave after waved, brought Aryan groups, Iberians, Celts, Germans and Slavs across Europe westward into Europe. It brought the Dorian Greeks then the Ionian Greeks. It brought the Latins to Italy and then the Germanic Lombards.

This was well known, and it was a conundrum when Lincoln declared that America was a Proposition, not a people. The Constitution says it is a people. The legislation passed four years after the Constitution was adopted said it was a people.

A WHITE people.

So those who say “racist” are right. America was founded on racism, as they define it. That is what Lincoln-worshipping conservatives cannot face. That is why the word “racist” makes them change their diapers, because if America is NOT racist, it is just a bunch of words.

Conservatism cannot face true history, because it is as much a bunch of words, words twisting reality, as the left is.

Having explained why “racist” is effective because it is true.

“Anti-white” hits home on both liberals and respectable conservatives because it is true. Liberals are perfectly aware that what they say about whites, if said about any other race or any religion, would be genocidal hatred.

Even the rads regret the statement, “The white race is the cancer of humanity.” It was too blatant, and too true of their mindset.

Which is why anti-white is so effective. That one word changes the whole debate.

That one word sums up the whole debate.

That one word, like no other, gets ATTENTION.

They have no answer for it in their tape recorder minds because Mommy Professor never USES that word.

Good Work, Comrade Simmons.

Anti-white: Every man who says they’ve never thought of having sex with a colored
woman is just a plain old homosexual. You racist-homosexuals disgust me.
The big problem is that you racists are scared, because now, you are the
minority. You can hate religion, that’s your right, but just hating the color
of someone’s skin is so dumb.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Then why do YOU hate the color of OUR skin?

THIS is ENTIRELY a matter of “skin color:”

“Quotes The Mantra”
———-

Anti-white: Main stream ones, yes

i’m an anti-racst and i hate all racists including the KKK, NAACP, jesse jackson and al sharpton

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): But you only seek to DESTROY one race: “Quotes the mantra”
———

Anti-white: I don’t believe this. I’m fine with as many Europeans emigrating outside of Europe and other European-majority regions. I’m part-South Asian in a country that originally had an Australian Aboriginal majority, so it would be hypocritical of me to deny this of other people of European descent (I’m also half-White).

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Meanwhile, back on Earth: “Quotes the mantra”

——-

Anti-white: Race doesn’t exist…

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Allzheimer anti-white,a forensic pathologist must, to keep his job, testify that there is no such thing as race AND be able to tell the rae of a victim from a few scraps or bones.

If race does not exist, then why do you demand: “Quotes the Mantra”

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): In order to graduate a forensic specialist must spout the Politically Correct line that there is no such thing as race. But to keep his job he must be able to tell the race of the most damaged victim of which he has only decayed scraps.

In every country with an established religion like today’s Political Correctness, scienists were
required to repeat the Party Line but ignore it in serious business.

Since anti-whites are tape recorders, they wouldn’t understand that. They just repeat it, they don’t think about it.
————

Anti-white: Are we in 2008 or 1800?

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): The answer to your question is that you are still in 1800, fighting the New England slave trade, while I living in 2009, where the real situation is this: “Quotes the mantra”
————

Anti-white: Where did I say that the immigration into Liberia or Botswana is white? Would you be kind enough to point it out? No? Thought so.

The point is that people move between countries and not all movement is necessarily to white nations.

I am sure that the movement into Singapore, which is into the top positions is not white either, but Asian.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): One more time for the Alzheimer anti-white:

This is about RACE. I repeat, I never said a word about all immigration being to white countries.

I repeat, Singapore could cut off all immigration tomorrow and no one would object. ALL white countries and ONLY white countries are REQUIRED by you self-stytled “antis” to bring in in OTHER races in huge numbers.

What’s scary is that this guy REALLY can’t anything he hasn’t had drilled into him. He is really is a Mommy Professor Tape Recorder. So I will play my record back to him: “Quotes the mantra”
————

Anti-white: Race mixing is just a result of conquest.. Look on all the Italians, the Spanish, the Russians..

Example All those Latinos are Part whites.. every last one of ‘em..

You might call me a color race lover.. but we whites brought it onto to ourselves when we conquered these people/places.

Is it bad? I like authenticity, but i would say it is up to a personal choice.

Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): All crime is a matter of personal choice. “Quotes the mantra”
————

BBG says: “Way back there was a set up on TV in which a guy would tell a joke in English to a Frenchman who would tell it in French to an Italian, to a German, to a Spaniard and then back to English. Of course nothing of the joke survived, which was the joke. Comparing the thoughts between thinkers of differing civilizations, races and millennia is compounded interest on the routine. It cannot be done.”

This really hit home. This is EXACTLY what Lawrence Brown was trying to explain in Might of the West. Accepted history tries to show a single continuum of a History of Mankind, and least of its problems is that it is in different languages.

If you go back to what the Renaissance nonsense says was the basis of our science, you find that they were talking about entirely different THINGS. BBG wrote the above in response to my description of what historians like to call the origin of our atomic science in one Greek philosopher.

He was not talking about our atomic science. He was questioning the “substance” idea in form and substance. There is no debate over this subject now. He was discussing this in a different language, a different language no matter how it is translated.

Lawrence Brown points out that few if any societies had what WE would call atheists. The world kept moving, so there must be a Prime Mover pushing it. We would call a Prime Mover a god.

Now we call it inertia. Every other society took it for granted that things could only keep moving if they were constantly pushed. But we take inertia for granted in the same way.

We are not speaking the same language. We are not living in the same world.

No other society ever divided Science and Religion the way we do. Where they were separated, they were different specialties, not different fields, and certainly no more contradictory than obstetrics contradicts ophthalmology.

The Mankind Theory of History ignores all this. It HAS to. Somehow it has to look at a seventeenth century Hottentot swimming in the Zambezi (Yes, Capoids were there then) and somehow show that that is a “stage of development” leading to the Moon Landing.

That takes a LOT of twisting. But we let them get away with it.

If we talk about the Mantra, the anti-white immediately says he is only talking his own country. So he has no idea of the fate of ALL white countries.

No one points out that he is hiding behind provinciality. Anti-whites are always talking about All Mankind and A Global Point of View. Then suddenly they say they are only talking about one country, so it isn‘t genocide.

Looked at one country at a time, immigration and assimilation is a policy. Looked at globally, it is genocide. They hide behind “mixing THE races,” they hide behind, “I am only talking about my own country.”

They are hiding behind provincialism, the same provincialism they so denounce.

Their whole world view is provincial. Mommy Professors of history refuse to talk about ancient thinking as it was. They only talk about how it led of what they call Modern Thinking, the Common Heritage of All Mankind.

The result is the same as BBG’s joke. This translation loses all its relevance, nay, all its SENSE, the same way that the joke loses its humor– it is not only no longer funny, it no longer makes SENSE.

By the time that joke comes from its tenth translation, you could easily teach how it was an entirely different joke originally, about any joke you want to make up. It could just as easily be used to show that it was a Wise Saying instead of a joke, a Wise Saying that just happens to coincide with whatever Mommy Professor is trying to sell right now.

Why is information produced. Let’s say you presented that meaningless mass of words to a journal as originally being the actual joke it was, or as the road traveled by different peoples to come to a Politically Correct conclusion.

Which do you think is more likely to be published?

This is a summary of some of the responses Bob gave to anti-whites on Stormfront.
Anti-white: So if I am against an Asians who say that Negroes are inferior, I’m being anti-white?
Africa for everyone
Asia for everyone
White countries for everyone
Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): It doesn’t matter if you ALSO believe horses are purple. The point is that what you are pushing this: “Quotes the mantra”
—————-
Anti-white: That… that doesn’t make any sense.
I make a statement about my beliefs – saying that as many people of European ethnic backgrounds can immigrate to wherever they want – and you respond with what quotes from someone else? What? How did that contradict anything I said?
Anti-racist is not a codeword for anti-White. I am against racism, in all its forms. I am against, say, a Japanese person or a Zulu or whatever being racist against European peoples.
Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): This is how your “anti-racism” WORKS on Planet Earth: “Quotes the mantra”
—————
Anti-white: I don’t believe so called “anti-racists” are so much anti white……I would more likely refer to them as deceived.
Most of them have been indoctrinated by the mainstream politically correct press and media, and most have probably attended university, which has furthered their brainwashing.
Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): They are anti-white and proud of it. To white anti-whites, hating white people is a form of virtuous self-sacrifice.
Remember that we are part of a tradition, both Puritan and monastic Catholicism, that has often gone overboard in the area of self-hatred. There is a fine line between acknowledging one’s guilt and going into all-out self-hatred, and our established religion, Political Correctness, wipes that line out on racial issues.
The first building stone of our established religion today is total self-hatred. If any European professor said the same things about blacks or Orientals or, above all, Jews, that European professors routinely say about whites, he would be in prison.
Anti-whites are PROUD to be anti-white.
————-
Anti-white: The most anti-racist people I’ve met ARE white. How can they be anti-themselves?? That correlation makes no sense.
Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): It’s called treason, dumb-dumb. It happens all the time.
You’ve never HEARD of self-hatred?
———-
Anti-white: That… that doesn’t make any sense.
I make a statement about my beliefs – saying that as many people of European ethnic backgrounds can immigrate to wherever they want – and you respond with what quotes from someone else? What? How did that contradict anything I said?
Anti-racist is not a codeword for anti-White. I am against racism, in all its forms. I am against, say, a Japanese person or a Zulu or whatever being racist against European peoples.
Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): You are part of a program to end the existence, SPECIFICALLY, of the white race. That is its PRACTICAL, REAL result. To say that is d not anti-white is like saying that those who supported slavery were just objectively pro-property.
“Quotes the mantra”
————
Anti-white: However, one can’t say that if one is anti-racist one is anti-white
Pro-white (from Bob Whitaker): Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth: “Quotes the mantra”

It has taken twelve years for WOL to evolve into BUGS and for BUGSTERS to become a distinct, self-aware group.

You can tell it is finally going the way I wanted it to when you get responses like that of Beserker88:

When I talk to people outside of the WN movement the MANTRA is golden. They can open their door or go to a mall and SEE it. They can Google white dating and get page after page devoted to interracial dating, Google any other race dating and you will find countless pages for blacks to meet blacks and Jews to meet Jews etc. Everyone sees it but nobody says it. When it is said its as eye opening as a punch in the face. I’ve spoke of the MANTRA to fellow WN, it opens their eyes too, only its a blank stare. Those who should get it usually don’t.

You can tell people are really becoming part of BUGS when they begin to express FRUSTRATION.

When you stop philosophizing on the world and start to USE the Mantra, you run face to face into what I have been dealing with for decades:

1) You find out how well my arguments WORK and then

2) You find it impossible to get anybody else to USE them.

This is a LOT different from hearing all this from Bob. People want to enjoy talking about news and Jews, and when you get to BUGS, you want to have a fun intellectual talk about the Fate of the World.

But I can tell when someone has reached the practical, Mantra-USING stage. I see it in you because I saw it in myself.

You get angry and frustrated. I recognize the symptoms because I’ve BEEN there.

Hell, I’m STILL there.

I am delighted that General Comments 4 has become more and more a how-to on the Mantra. Again and again, General Commenters are tracking the Mantra on the Internet.

I can tell that what they say which does not mention the Mantra comes from their USE of it. A person who saw the importance of the Neanderthal discoveries had obviously been talking RACE when he saw it. When one uses the mantra, one becomes aware of the world view we are actually fighting.

As I said before, things like Beserker88′s frustration and General Comments 4 give me a joy I never expected to have. It is real lift, after all the years, to be no longer completely alone in the REAL battle.

Keep it up, and keep it REAL.

You have to be my age, and have a memory, to realize how totally the gun control argument has changed.

I remember when any discussion of crime on the networks went, without a pause, into how hard it was to get effective gun control laws. That was the ONLY crime control measure liberals approved of so no one expected any other to be mentioned.

The whole change has been the one we have been trying to effect. The Corporate Culture of the NRA was the corporate culture of respectable conservatism. All the NRA talked about was the Right to Hunt.

I am NOT kidding you. That was IT.

FINALLY, some “radical” pro-gun organizations started talking about self-defense. Only when the competition got fierce did any conservatives, least of all the NRA, start to MENTION self-defense.

You see, if they mentioned self-defense, liberals would make fun of them. As soon as they started liberals began saying that the NRA wanted to hand out submachine guns to grammar school kids. This made them LOOK bad to the only people who mattered to them.

Which takes us right to Simmons blasting at AmRen. When the NRA would not mention anything but hunting, they had no effect at all. While AmRen takes up all the publicity space and never mentions assimilation and immigration are only for white countries, they take up space and LOSE.

After a decade or so of being forced to talk about self-defense instead of hunting rights, the first response of a majority of Americans to mass shootings has been to give the heave to anyone who demands more gun laws and to point out that one person with a gun could have stopped the maniac.

But as long as AmRen and the BNP take up all the space for argument and avoid the effective ones, this breakthrough will not take place. At least half of he 22,000 gun laws in the US can be laid directly on the old NRA’s doorstep.

Simmons is right on target. The only way to have a decent society is NOT to have a safe, kept opposition group.

AmRen, respectable conservatives, mealy-mouthed “National” parties. They are more costly than outright enemies.

We have very, very little chance to respond. The last thing we need is for that space to be taken up by wimps.

I find reading recent comments exhilarating.

A verb occurred to me that would only be understandable by a person who has been a regular member, even if is not commenting but auditing the course carefully.

That verb is “porching.”

I sit up and take notice when people begin to tie things together. I sit up and notice when people are talking about what they DID, like Truck Roy and White Rabbit, how they HANDLE actual experiences with our way of defining our message, developing out own way of thinking, and at the same time introducing different kinds of people to THINKING.

There are words like intellectualizing and preaching and so forth, but porching, among us, does a lot to explain itself. The family on the porch is listening to old wisdom and children who are not afraid to give their opinions.

Sure, most of what young people have to say will seem obvious to them later on. But even in a normal family each person is not afraid to go ahead and say it. They say it in terms which have been worked out inside the family, inside the SOCIETY.

Porch talk, among other things, is not from Mommy Professor, but from LIVING.

Parkinson, of Parkinson’s Law fame years ago, pointed out that Karl Marx’s basic problem was that he had no one near him to say “Balderdash!” That is, of course, Mommy Professor’s problem too, and that Marx is underneath all Political Correctness, left AND right, is not coincidental.

But none of the words like over intellectualizing and so forth really lead to what we might call porching. If I could give you a clear explanation of what porching is, we would just have another Wordism.

No, I want you think some about that verb. It is the essence of a real society. It is the essence of what the family group can give that the media take away. It is THINKING. It is trying things out. It is saying “Balderdash!”

I have said repeated that what I feel I have to offer is a WAY OF THINKING. That cannot be defined, but you can sure as hell tell what it’s NOT. But really just the word itself is what I have to offer here, since we all have a clear idea what “porching” is, and only we do.

I will give one example of what “porching” is NOT. It is NOT Family Values. That is simply a way to indoctrinate your children against the ruling indoctrination. A healthy family raised on porch talk can have members who end up on the right and the left, and most of them will freely admit they don’t give a damn about a lot of stuff.

I think mantra think on the verb porching is worth one of our thousands of articles here.

After all, the whole point of Mantra thinking is that I give you things to chew on, not that I teach you some rigid doctrine. I am not Mommy Professor. I am not Family Values. As long as you clearly understand what the traps of Wordism are, you will have to proceed to build your own world view.

Here as on the porch, The Old Man’s job is to give some good ideas on how to follow your own path. I can give you invaluable practice is seeing what is just plain silly. Then you can start off clean and fresh and go out like we did from the porch, happily thinking the other is way off tilt on a lot of things.

But we are learning here what is just plain silly. Since porching went out of fashion, no one else seems to have a way of doing that.

I always want to apologize to our radio hosts about my failure to listen to them. I have trouble with understanding these days, which makes it worse, but the fact of the matter is that when I fly a thousand miles to a convention about the only speech I hear is my own.

I spent tens of years listening to speeches, writing speeches, making speeches. Now when I sit down to a speech I feel trapped.

My grandfather was circuit rider, and his motto was, “The brain can only absorb what the seat can bear.” Given the benches in those old churches, that was a limited period. But, believe it or not, the usual complaint was that the sermon was too SHORT! My grandfather could have to do five sermons on one day and ride his horse between them on something less than Interstate Highways and each sermon was the same.

Most of us feel that the shorter the sermon the better. In my tiny Methodist Church in Dentsville the clock was over the entrance, where anyone in the congregation had to turn around completely to see it. It was, however, directly facing the preacher.

Even in those days there were wrist watches, so the parson didn’t NEED to be facing the clock during his talk, but the congregation seemed to think it was good thing to do.

In the Puritan churches sermons would routinely go on for three or four hours and a couple of guys patrolled the aisles with long sticks in their hands to bop anybody who nodded off towards sleep. When I heard about that in school — history never mentioned anything BUT Puritan churches back then — it struck me as perfectly natural.

I thought everybody had always squirmed until the preacher wound down.

I was astonished to learn that in previous generations there was what was called “A Hunger for Sermons.”

LONG sermons. They lasted for hours. People would buggy from twenty miles away to hear a preacher — not a famous preacher — to sample his wares.

In our day, food, housing and clothing are major expenses, but entertainment costs very little compared to these giant budget items. Not so long ago you either did your own singing and dancing or you went a LONG way or paid good deal of money. If a preacher was in town you could listen to him or sit with your family or out on the porch.

It is easy to think of a person with a large beautiful home in England sitting on his porch as a beautiful scene. But we never thin of them as sitting there for DAYS.

I remember in the 50s sitting and watching the test pattern on TV, waiting for the time that seemed like hours before programming would begin. At the same time in Europe you would only have one radio station on your dial.

The picture presented by these old man’s wanderings is, if you SEE it, of critical importance. We look at the causes of yesterday and see that they Carried the Message. If you got out to them, people would come. There was competition, so you had to be sure not to conflict with the only other thing in town that week, but the big thing was Carrying the Message.

How totally different the whole business of Carrying the Message has become! Now Beulah, Mississippi is at least as reachable as Manhattan.

It used to be Take It to the Streets. That was when people would be on the porch FACING the streets.

Porches are empty now, not because of TV, which can be watched on the porch, but because of air conditioning. If you are going to march, you had better choose a cool, dry day to do it if you want it to be noticed. And even then you’ll want it on the TV.

Communication isn’t different now. It is a completely different THING.