Practical Politics Seminar: Non-Voting Politics and 21st Century Verbal Tactics For Anyone White and Normal

Third Weekend of September, Knoxville, TN-Area

We stand at a remarkable time in our history. All White countries, and only White countries, presently endure a demand for displacement of their White populations through massive immigration of non-Whites. White countries around the world suffer under the calumny and hatred of anti-White legislation and institutionalized group vilification of their native population. The path that led our countries to this remarkable point can be traced through the words and tactics used by anti-White agitators. Simply put, verbal tactics and a consistent message overwhelmed the reason and innate sense of self-worth that should have checked these anti-White movements every step of the way. Instead, a few invented terms and a concept of “racism” rooted in opposition to White hegemony in our own countries allowed our leadership and elites to pursue a genocide on their own people without opposition.

These words and tactics resonated in their own time and in their own place. Today we see a new group of people, in the United States and abroad, dedicated to leveraging the hypocrisies of this anti-White myth. The past decades of one-sided venom against White families, and the subsequent recalcitrance from our so-called leaders to oppose it on the grounds of genocide, shows nothing if not that words and a powerful vision can change the world. Today a group of people whom you likely know of (and many whom you may not) pursue a new vision. This new vision compels the propagators of the old one to answer for their crimes and wields a stronger power because it speaks the truth instead of an anti-White fantasy.

To answer the demand for accountability from those who disparage and attack the happiness, lives, and faith of White people wherever we may live, a seminar on verbal tactics will convene in East Tennessee in the third weekend of September. Pro-White presenters from different walks of life will lead workshops on different aspects of their expertise in this struggle to engage and galvanize White morale. The overwhelming theme of this seminar will address the simple verbal tactics that crumble the facade of anti-Whites and give our people the offensive. All attendees will leave with the tools to turn any curse word, such as “racist,” on its head and leave their antagonist retreating.

Workshops will focus on varying situations in which our attendees may utilize these tools. Many different goals can be attained using the same consistent message. Whether you hope to leave confident to rouse your neighbor or social group to a pro-White stand, or wish to run for political office, the presenters will address many possible opportunities and situations to utilize these practical tools.

This seminar will expand upon the power of words and symbols. Symbolic figures wielding powerful, simple phrases and chants have changed history. It will focus attendee’s efforts against anti-White opponents into specific phrases, symbols, and public demonstrations. These tactics are designed to most quickly neutralize the anti-White opposition’s hexes and curses such as “racism” and “White supremacism.” Whether you intend to represent White interests as a public figure or from behind-the-scenes, group discussions and exercises will equip you with vital keys to crumble the enemy’s facade.

The seminar itself will take place over one long day and will provide many opportunities to interact with presenters and attendees alike. Attendees who have already confirmed their registration include pro-White organizers, businesspeople, authors, activists, contributors, and many others who have dedicated themselves effectively to promoting a pro-White agenda. The Knoxville area is beautifully surrounded by the Smoky Mountains and the seminar will offer ample opportunities to enjoy the surrounding country with other attendees.

This seminar will focus on arming attendees with verbal tactics and then practicing them in a comfortable environment with long-time experts. During the breaks, conversation with presenters and attendees alike will give the opportunity to discuss ideas and become involved in a larger network.

Below is a brief list of presenters and workshop leaders:

James Edwards, a pro-White political activist and host of the award winning and long running pro-White AM radio program, the Political Cesspool out of Memphis, TN, and author of Racism Schmacism. He will speak and address throwing anti-Whites on the defensive instead of cowering to name-calling.

———————————————

Bob Whitaker, a former Capital Hill staffer and political lobbyist, currently writes for his blog, Bob’s Undergraduate Seminar, and there organizes his readers to utilize his version of the pro-White consistent message across the internet. He will lead discussions on the consistent message and leveraging hypocrisy by opposing White Genocide.

———————————————

Paul Fromm, a Canadian Free Speech advocate, and director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, has defended numerous people charged over the past several years by the Canadian government of subversive speech on the internet under its so-called “hate speech laws.” He will address pro-White advocacy under the hammer of government censorship.

———————————————

Horus the Avenger, a student of Bob Whitaker and the host of the popular podcast, Follow the White Rabbit, focuses his efforts on training pro-White advocates in utilizing verbal tactics against anti-Whites and maintaining a consistent message at all times. He will bring his expertise in practical politics to a ready audience. His workshop will be conducted in conjunction with internet radio host and daily correspondent to the AM radio Don and Derek Black Show, Truck Roy. Their past team podcasts on this topic have already caught fire across the internet.

———————————————

The entire staff of the pro-White AM radio program The Don and Derek Black Show will be in attendance and participating in workshops and presentations throughout the day.

Many other prominent attendees and presenters will also be present. There will also be a contingent of attendees focused on business from the “Economic Summits” organized on Stormfront. As well there will be people experienced with homesteading and hobbyfarming and a slough of entrepreneurial skills.

Because of a dedicated and talented group of organizers, the seminar has multiple private locations throughout the area. There is no concern of cancellation, but let it be known that a large open field and a big-top tent remain one possible fallback should it become necessary. This is the spirit in which this vital seminar will be conducted. This event presents a key opportunity to gain connections to the large network of effective pro-White activists across America and the world.

Attendance is limited to a little over 150. In order to guarantee a place, please register early. The cost, $45 per attendee payable through Stormfront, will guarantee a place at the seminar and will include you immediately in further plans as we approach the date. Food will be provided at the location. All attendees may book their own accommodations, and a lodging recommendation in the area will be sent after successful registration. No tickets will be available less than 72 hours before the seminar begins.

Register for the seminar through a donation to Stormfront. Include $45 per ticket and designate the payment as for the seminar. Please be sure to include a reliable means to contact you quickly (preferably a cell phone number or email address) with updates.

We are looking forward to seeing you there!

Wouldn’t it be wonderful for a killer if he could tell the police, “You have asked that question twenty times. You ought to be ashamed of yourself for being so repetitious.”

No doubt it does make them look unsophisticated, but the police are not respectable conservatives. They simply will not stop asking a question until it has been answered. In fact they don’t stop asking it after it has been answered because they want to be sure your answer is consistent.

But everybody seems to be a sucker for this “repetitious” line.

Normally all a liberal has to do is make it clear that that point has been made enough and a conservative backs off, or he will lose his respectable paycheck.

But if it ever happens that some respectable conservative has cajones enough to keep demanding an answer, there is one way to shut him up..

The liberal says, “I already answered that.”

When you have chased an anti-white around over all over with the Mantra, they will refer to the thousands of words they and other have said and claim the question has already been asked over and over and ANSWERED over and over.

Respectable conservatives get paid for falling for that line, but a cop who did would be looking for a new line of work.

That “You already asked that” and the follow up “I already answered that” simply do not work with grownups.

Iceland has a population that is almost exactly 0.1% pf that of the United States. Creator says she (?) has a developing wolf pack there, or BUGS Swarm. If so, that’s very important. One member there can have the effect of a thousand members in the US in terms of breaking Media Silence.

A few months back I got a fund raising letter from the Southern Poverty Law Center, signed by George McGovern, asking for funds to end the shortage of black people in Northern Idaho.

No, I am NOT joking. This sounds like the kind of thing someone making fun of the Mantra would invent as a wild overstatement of how far forcing immigration and assimilation on all white areas and ONLY white areas could go.

But it was no joke. SPLC has tens of millions of dollars, and it does not send out fund raisers unless they raise funds. This was perfectly a serious letter, signed by the SPLC’s biggest name, for which its members sent it many, many dollars: getting blacks into northern Idaho.

The only reason given was the extreme shortage of a black population in Northern Idaho.

This fund raiser took it for granted that any place on Planet Earth where there is a majority white population funds can be raised to get non-whites in there.

Iceland has another example of this that would be funny if WE made it up.

There are plenty of parts of Japan with Iceland’s 300,000 population and no minorities. You are going to play hell finding any place outside of the cities in Red China that have a large number of non-Mongoloid people.

So why Iceland?

We all know why Iceland.

Getting through the media silence in Iceland could be a major breakthrough.

Creator might want to have a sign that says, “Why US?”

“Because we are a white majority country, of course.”

That could spread to Eastern Europe: “Why are WE supposed to be ‘ready for immigration?’”

“Because we are a white majority country.”

This seems rather obvious, since all the slaves were black.

But slavery remained in Brazil until 1889, and racial intermarriage there was officially encouraged because all that mattered was that a person was Catholic. The official policy throughout the Latin colonies was assimilation or, in Brazil’s case, asimilacion.

But you would still play hell arguing that being pro-slavery did not imply one hell of an attitude toward blacks. You would be LAUGHED at for even hinting that it showed no racial attitude.

Why?

Because all the slaves were black, of course!

Today nobody but BUGS laughs when someone says that the push for immigration and assimilation , even though it is only white majority countries, and ALL white majority countries, that are under international pressure to take in mass third world immigration and assimilate with it.

www.whitenewsnow.com
www.thewhiterace.com

There is reason why the Book of Judges is followed by the Book of Kings.

As the Soviet Union wobbled, its component nations threatened to secede. There was a series of cartoons portraying Estonia as a bunch of Confederates, all drunk and singing Dixie. The columnists made it clear that the Soviets didn’t know about a free country, that you were not free to just pull out.

Lincoln would get you.

That month of hilarity went right down the media Memory Hole.

Estonia DID secede, and almost every republic followed it.

One of the endless things the media did not know was that the Soviet Constitution included the right to secede. The Soviet Constitution, adopted in 1936 under Comrade Stalin, made the US Constitution look oppressive. It gave total freedom of everything, including the right of any component republic to secede.

Nobody in the USSR was fooled by the Soviet Constitution.

At least nobody who survived.

You survived only if you knew that the 1936 document was being interpreted by Comrade Stalin.

A couple of years earlier Hitler became Chancellor of Germany. The Weimar Constitution allowed the Chancellor, with the President, to declare a state of emergency and make himself dictator. During the First and Second World Wars, Britain did the same thing. There were no elections and no Parliaments. A multiparty Cabinet took over dictatorial powers.

So when President Hindenburg died, Hitler held an election, actually a referendum, in making himself also President. He stated flatly that “This will be the last election in Germany for a thousand years.”

In other words, Hitler obeyed the letter of the Weimar Constitution, not the original intent. The original intent was not in line with the New Order. When he held both offices, he simply imposed a perfectly constitutional emergency rule on Germany.

Forever.

The reason no one in the media was truly aware of this right to secede was because it violated the position on which America is supposedly based, the “one nation, indivisible” line.

Not that long ago the President of China visited the White House. He demanded that, since the United States had recognized a One China Policy, they should either allow China to rule Formosa or that the portraits of Lincoln in the White House be taken down.

Nobody shouted Liberty, Equality and Fraternity more loudly than Robespierre.

He interpreted those words and enforced his interpretation.

Which is where the Terror came from.

The Gettysburg Address simply erased the Preamble to the Constitution and substituted the Preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Any history professor who says that is likely to be fired in the name of Academic Freedom.

Once I say that, everybody nods and says we all learned that in school.

So why doesn’t anybody but me SAY that?

“He tells us, pray in the place where is there is no woman.”

– The Gospel of Judas

Our Gospels were not chosen until the fourth century.

That’s over three hundred years during which we have no idea whether any of the celebrated Martyrs were orthodox or heretics.

EACH Gospel, possibly hundreds of them, was THE Gospel to a huge number of Christians.

A hundred Only True Faiths. The Only True Faiths of some huge percentage of Christians for three centuries were burned.

We only hear about Only True Faiths like the Gospel of Judas because they were denounced in demands that the True Gospels be chosen.

Jesus never denounced women. A major part of Paul’s writings denounced human procreation. What the quote from the Gospel named for Judas is that it was written after the influence of rotting-away Zoroastrianism took over “intellectual” thought.

St Paul, when he was absurd, was being was a Mommy Professor!

But the Gospel of Judas was the ONLY Gospel for a lot of Christians, including those cited as martyrs for the Faith.

Show me a history book and I can usually tell what decade it was written in. That fact makes history patently false. Most of it is factual, but it can’t be real history if you can tell when it was written.

That means that the historical context changes regularly.. If we expect anything from history, it is to give us a consistent picture.

You can generally tell what decades a Gospel was written in as the “intellectual” influences come into it. If that is a problem for history, it is an absurdity in theology! Yet every anti-white honestly believes that he has found something that is Universal and, incredibly, UNIQUE.

A Universalist can only have one loyalty if he denounces all others as tribalists, nationalists, racists. The moment a person starts saying he is loyal to all humanity, he is betting everything on a proposition which, if you, for God Sakes, please, at last THINK about it, really is only fit for a lunatic asylum: He has the Universal Truth.

Her needs no natural feelings or loyalties to guide him.

Those are just Prejudices.

And even the very Christian Dante said that the Tenth Circle, the worst punishment in Hell, is freezing cold.

And the Tenth Circle is for traitors.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

The problem is that, when something that has happened before in earlier societies occurs in our present we do not see it as the Same Old Thing. It is Here and Now.

Spengler is known for his theory of the rise and fall of civilizations, but, IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR, you will find the exact same theme in each succeeding country that is now brown and dead.

We al talk about how Political Correctness is becoming more and more like the Inquisition, and its Protestant equivalents.

The problem is that no one who says this thinks about it.

Recently two top experts largely discredited the Global Warming hysteria when their email correspondence revealed they made up their results as they went along.

When blacks working for the Washington Post and the New York Times respectively completely made up their news, it was a small scandal. One was only exposed because her series was up for a Pulitzer!

No problem. They just got caught, but they were doing it for the True Religion.

But no one sees all this the way, as a simple repeat of obvious history. In each society the priesthood eventually crowds a out all logic and all scientific advancement.

But no one in each society sees it simply as a repeat of the old story, because, like Political Correctness, the NEW priesthood is on today’s headlines or is the latest news in Rome, not connected with hoary old history books.

This is a Whitakerism: There is nothing new about our new religion. Unless you an readjust your thinking to realize the simple reality, you will miss the boat as every other country which was once in the forefront of the world and is now just another brown and stagnant backwater did.

The Whitakerism here is: They are not ALIKE, they are the SAME.

That is where “Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion,” comes from.

There is a absolutely no difference between those who expect “scientists” to warp everything to come to the right conclusion and the Curia which condemned Galileo.

Marxism states that truth is a political matter. This is EXACTLY the same as the Old Religion, which said that what Galileo saw and could show the Curia, was false because the Will of God said it could not be true.

Western science finally managed to cast off the abortion that was built up in the name of Christ and today’s science is unprecedented. But this struggle was barely won by science in an all-white society.

We are not doing something “new.” We are establishing a priesthood, becoming a brown people. We are doing EXACTLY what all the others did before.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

#6 by Frank on 4/9/2011 – 11:10 am
Dave, I live in a university town, so have a lot of Mommy Profs here both in the U and throughout the local political establishment. I comment in the local newsblogs, and get a word in wherever I smell anti-white, which is everywhere.

I actually use the phrase “mommy professor” in some posts, and usually with anti-white in the same sentence. The intent is to make the MPs look both silly and evil.

The question I have for you is: do you (or any other bugsters) use “mommy professor” outside of “our Thing” here? Do you recommend it? Do you see a problem with it?

Thanks for all your coach-talks!

#7 by Dave on 4/10/2011 – 2:28 am
Frank,

I use “Mommy Professor” all the time and I use it in any venue I happen to be in without restraint (I regularly use the term in informal conversations with elected officials, in speaking before groups, and also at work) It is perfect because it is an underhanded way of expressing disrespect while having “cover” for being called on it.

You know the organizational game when it comes to behavioral standards: You have to keep your commentary within the bounds of “being directed toward an organizational purpose” or face discipline for having a personal agenda. You can stay within those bounds and successfully use the term “Mommy Professor”. I have never been called on it for violating organizational behavioral norms.

It is very difficult to be called on using “Mommy Professor” because you just say that you are reminding everyone, Mommy Professor’s credentials notwithstanding, that you are just dealing with opinion. The question is whether it is “informed opinion” and informed opinion adheres to people regardless of credentials. People are sick and tired of the costume of credentials anyway. Increasingly, reciting one’s credentials just makes people groan. In today’s world credentials are actually a hindrance to your credibility (outside of medicine and other technical areas where formal ratings actually matter), but kids don’t know this.

Everybody knows it is “Mommy Professor’s” tendency to hide behind her status, even though it is not uncommon for her to claim to be a renegade. (This is another thing I think people are increasingly sick of – the standard claim of Establishment people that they are anti-Establishment).

Think of Elizabeth Warren (Harvard Law Professor and Special Counsel to the President) and her pretense that she is a feared enemy of Wall Street and friend of THE CONSUMER.

I wish I had a nickel for every anti-Establishment “rebel” in the Establishment. I would be a rich man indeed. Mommy Professor LOVES to posture. Pretending she is a “rebel” is one of her most standard forms of posturing.

Believe me, Elizabeth Warren would be offended by being called “Mommy Professor” and she would have a terrible time responding. “Mommy Professor” is a great insult. It is durable, memorable, and it works.

This debate has gone on long enough.

The official line of BUGS on birthrates may be found in the archives. Bob Whitaker is not responsible for the opinions the members of the seminar may or may not hold. They are capable people in charge of forming their own opinions.

I have reenabled comment moderation for everyone.

General Comments Archives

General Comments

General Comments II

General Comments III

General Comments IV

General Comments V

General Comments VI

Irony is not allowed in respectable conservatives.

To be respectable conservative your discussion must be long, verbose, preferably with a few big words thrown in and lots of references to some Critociticologenous in the fourteenth century, whose real name was probably Smith.

When you can’t impress people with your thinking, you can cow ‘em with your Greek.

I was looking at the White Genocide project and I noticed one of this type there, declaring that the really important thing was to use a term like Euro instead of white people. He said that anything else would have a “Made in America” look. As a comment, it would been OK, but he went on and on about it, how he knew how to influence European thought and this was the wrong way.

I can’t see any sign of him influencing European thought. I also note that the reason every European country has adopted the term “multicultural” is because it was Made in America.

Every country in Europe thought it had a culture of its own, but the minute New York and San Francisco took over they all, every single one of them, set up whole multicultural programs.

There is a piece somewhere on the net called “debunking Bob Whitaker.” The words flow, but there is no meaning in them.

This is another example of one of my favorite expressions of irony:

“It sounds obscure but it is actually meaningless..”

It’s the old bit that terrifies respectable conservatives when one of the liberals they worship threatens to say it: “You just don’t agree with me because you don’t Understand.”

Buckley was the ideal conservative because he trailed along behind Galbraith who was a REAL WASP professor at Harvard, with no stain of Catholicism or Southernness about him, and he was willing to be seen in public with Bill.

When a lot of people pointed out that Buckley’s New Love, the neoconservatives, were just rats deserting a sinking ship, the replied, “Well, why shouldn’t rats desert a sinking ship?”

It is not surprising that those rats took over National review at the end of Buckley’s career.

One of my best friends at National Review, Bill Rusher, wrote a history of the conservative movement right after Reagan’s election. He showed it was by getting the Wallace vote that the Reagan majority was formed.

But he spent half the book praising and thanking and doing kow-tows to neoconservatives for the Ivy Leaguers and New Yorkers who had left the sinking liberal ship and condescended to switch to be against liberals. He admitted they had nothing to do with the Reagan victory, “But…” he said, and went on and on about how glorious and wonderful they are to speak with such as he the way a peasant would go on if the King visited his village.

People on that level of superficiality would never understand irony.

People on that level of superficiality are AFRAID of irony.

Wandrin asks.

“Could a Mantra-thinker please help with some tips to address the “only White countries” argument when the anti-Whites point out Singapore and UAE etc, as seen in this thread.”

There’s always detailed arguments you can make
- most of those small Arab states have lots of guest workers because of the oil money but they’re basically paid semi-slaves and aren’t allowed to become citizens
- Israel has an explicitly ethno-centric immigration policy and most of those immigrants are jews
- Hong Kong immigration was mostly other ethnic Chinese from the mainland after British rule ended in 1990-something
- Jordan’s “immigrants” are actually Palestinian refugees
etc

There are a few exceptions like Singapore but once you’ve knocked down most of the list then it becomes obvious they are an exception and exceptions prove the rule.

However if i’m arguing with someone as slippery as the guy in the linked thread i usually just cheat by looking out for any little mistake they make and jumping on it and not letting go until they concede the point.

Psychological attrition.

In the thread you linked i’d have picked on his use of Israel in his list of examples and asked him if he supported their ethno-centric immigration

policy and i’d keep on it until he explicitly stated he didn’t believe Israel had the right to an ethno-centric immigration policy either. This would only work if he was jewish as he’d either wriggle around not wanting to say it or he would say it but be tetchy afterwards and easier to needle into

losing his temper.

Sometimes the truth works:

Nobody cares whether a non-white country opens its gates or blocks immigration. But the world would object if Iceland closed its borders. Every white country is supposed to be “a melting pot,” but nobody outside DEMANDS that of any non-white country, black, brown or yellow.

The “race problem” means a Final Solution to the White Problem.

Also do not spend time on any one determined anti-white unless you have an audience. You are speaking to the audience, not to the nut job who hates his own kind.

To be frank with you, Wandrin, you are still on the Stormfront wave-length. Mixing up our message with Israel shows this.

1) Aim at the AUDIENCE;

2) Stop letting them get off the subject. The point is not what non-whites do, the point is that there is a DEMAND on ALL white countries and ONLY on white countries for immigration and assimilation;

3) Don’t screw up the Mantra with some other agenda.

General Comments Archives

General Comments

General Comments II

General Comments III

General Comments IV

General Comments V

James of The Political Cesspool will be interviewing Bob tonight at 9:00 PM EST.

You can listen live at Liberty News Radio

Looking at a an exchange of comments, I agree with your conclusion that we should not use the word “revolution.”

As usual this conclusion comes from going back to the basics. What we are after seems simple, but it is taking on the entire establishment and about every government on earth: we want the disappearance of our race from the face of the earth to be seen as a legitimate topic of discussion.

Pro-whites should learrn from their mistakes. Stormfront put them out there for all to see.

So far, as we lost ground, we always mixed up our legitimate complaints with a demand for some policy. From swastikas to being unwelcome joiners of the anti-immigration movement, we have hitched out wagon to the star of the moment.

The result is that anti-whites have been able to get us off the subject of our legitimate concern by arguing about immigration or whether Hitler was better than Stalin. The actual point, our concern about he obvious disappearance of our race, is buried in standard arguments.

Take it from me, detaching our right to be concerned has been an uphill struggle. The mass audience wants the latest news about some immigration outrage or a Revisionist View of History.

But we now have BUGS and we MUST maintain the discipline BUGS is based on. No one else has it.

That discipline is demanding to DISCUSS our problem without being bullied or outlawed. Screaming fascist or Communists is what fascists and Communists do.

Now, we all know that all the respectable people insist that the only way to deal with a concern is to TALK about it. The fact is that the Mantra is so water-tight that all they can do is get off the subject by arguing specific policies or by rioting and screaming at us and outlawing us.

You have seen what the Mantra can do. They know very well that if whites look at the situation rationally, as any other race would be expected to do, the anti-whites are lost.

We are NOT advocating a policy yet. You have to be able to talk and think rationally before a policy is worked out. That is what they are openly denying us the right to do. They are doing it the same way all tyrannies do, by screaming that any discussion is subversive and dangerous and screaming labels at us.

Every time they are unfair it gives us another example. You have to get over your anger, which I have never been able to do quickly, and copy and paste it for future use.

You must READ the Mantra over and over to prepare to argue INSIDE its context. If you stick to the subject, it is all there.